Legal Aid NT board member speaks out about string of resignations following appointment of new director
Attorney-General Marie-Clare Boothby appointed South Australian barrister Catherine Voumard the director of LANT earlier this month, despite an independent selection panel deeming her unsuitable for the job.
The decision prompted three of the LANT board's seven members, and its only non-government members, to resign from the organisation.
The ABC has confirmed those three former members are Ali Nur, Tessa Czislowski and the board's chair Duncan McConnel SC.
Mr Nur served as the board's community interest representative for nine years, but he resigned last week, saying Ms Boothby's decision to override the panel's recommendations was "unfair" and lacked transparency.
He said the LANT director vacancy was first advertised in July last year, when an independent advisory panel headed by Mr McConnel was set up to assess potential candidates.
In October, the panel provided Ms Boothby with a report recommending three suitable applicants.
Ms Boothby selected one of those three, but the chosen applicant subsequently withdrew her application for the role.
The two remaining applicants were rejected by the attorney-general, forcing the panel to reconvene.
Mr Nur said the director position was re-advertised in November, at a time when LANT was under significant financial and resourcing stress.
He said Ms Voumard was one of 18 applicants in the second application round, but she did not progress to the interview stage.
In February, the panel put forward three applicants as suitable for the position, with one selected as a high-calibre candidate.
However, Ms Boothby rejected all three in favour of Ms Voumard.
"The minister didn't give the board any reason why," Mr Nur said.
"We went through a thorough process, impartial process, a fair process … and now the minister says 'it doesn't matter who meets or doesn't meet the criteria, this is my captain's pick'.
"I don't think that's good enough."
Mr Nur said he felt the move indicated Ms Boothby had "lost faith" in the board.
"Sadly, we feel the minister doesn't give a hoot," he said.
In a letter sent to Ms Boothby last week, Mr McConnel said he was "deeply disappointed" by her choice to override the panel's decision.
"Ms Voumard's appointment appears to have been based on reasons other than merit or otherwise marks a serious departure of judgement between the Attorney and the [Legal Aid] Commission," he wrote.
NT Bar Association president Mary Chalmers SC has also called for transparency about the appointment process, saying selections "made contrary to the advice of a panel" could "damage community and organisational confidence".
Faced with questions over her decision in NT parliament on Wednesday, Ms Boothby backed the move and said Ms Voumard would bring "diverse experience" to the role.
"She's worked for Legal Aid before, she's worked for NAAJA [the North Australian Aboriginal Justice Agency] before … and guess what? She also worked for Maleys, which is excellent because they are a good, local, large, experienced law firm in the Northern Territory."
Maleys Barristers & Solicitors is headed by former Country Liberal Party MLA Peter Maley, who is also the brother of current deputy chief minister Gerard Maley.
Mr Nur said LANT was yet to recover from the financial issues it has been facing in recent months.
In October, the organisation indicated it would have to cut critical services due to a lack of funding and skyrocketing demand.
"We're having absolute difficulty recruiting competent lawyers … we can't retain the ones we've got," Mr Nur said.
He said Ms Voumard's appointment risked undermining trust in the organisation at a time when consistent and experienced leadership was essential.
"For a healthy, sound justice system, we need a stable, qualified workforce," he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
4 hours ago
- ABC News
Bigger properties occupied by smaller households in major housing mismatch, Cotality finds
In a reminder of how broken housing affordability and access is, new analysis highlights a major mismatch between the size of Australian homes and the number of people living in them. While the vast bulk of Australian housing is built for larger families, property research firm Cotality has found more than 60 per cent of households are made up of just one or two people. It reveals a misalignment between "who lives in our homes and the kinds of homes we're building", Cotality's head of head of Australian research Eliza Owen said in the report. "Of the lone-person households in Australia, the data suggests around 40 per cent are aged 65 and over," Ms Owen said. "The highest share of households is two people, but the highest share of housing has three bedrooms. "While there's nothing wrong with more bedrooms than people in a dwelling, there could be some inefficiencies in the way housing is being allocated," Ms Owen said. "After all, a 'traditional' family of four may have more need for a three-bedroom dwelling than a household of two people." The report cited data from the 2021 Census, which showed there were more two-person family households in three-bedroom dwellings (about 1.3 million), than three or four-person family households (about 1.1 million). Ms Owen has suggested a way to fix the "efficiency question", which she knows is not politically appealing — send a price signal. "Governments could make it more expensive to have more housing than you need, and cheaper to live in smaller housing," she wrote in her research note. She said that logic often leads to calls for tax reform including abolishing stamp duty to cheaper to move between housing, replacing it with a broad-based land tax (which raises costs the more land you own). "These options are both politically difficult as it would involve moving from a tax that applies to a small amount of voters each year who purchase property to one that will tax two thirds of voters (property owners)," she noted. Independent housing researcher Cameron Kusher, speaking to The Business in July, argued high transaction costs, namely stamp duty, discourage moving to a "better sized property" and can lead to people purchasing larger homes than they need to begin with. "People just feel like if I can get a better and bigger home sooner, that's a better outcome," he said. "If we look at what is being built, it's usually very large houses, four or five bedrooms, taking up most of the land on these new housing sites," Mr Kusher said. "A lot of it comes down to how much a piece of a property, [and] how much the land and the house, costs. "I think a lot of people are building bigger homes, thinking 'I'll spend a little bit more up-front and my family will grow into this home'. "It might just be a couple grandkids, or they're planning to have a couple of kids." He noted the effects of rapidly increasing property prices, which can leave people priced out of re-entering the market, and the fact that larger properties can be more likely to appreciate in value at a faster pace. Cotality's Ms Owen said other policy options to encourage people to move into appropriately sized homes could include reforming pension asset tests to include the value of the family home. "Strides are already being taken on the supply side to establish well-located apartments in our larger cities, that can accommodate smaller households. "But shifting demand through tax reform could help the take-up of these new homes." The government has accepted it is not on track to meet the target to build 1.2 million homes in five years, but Treasurer Jim Chalmers has stood by the ambition, despite Treasury advice it would not be met. In another recent note, Ms Owen questioned the focus of state and federal governments on speeding up building approvals to boost housing supply, warning that the construction industry simply cannot keep pace. "With completion times already above average and construction costs elevated, it seems an odd time to be incentivising more dwelling approvals and commencements," she said. Cameron Kusher argued past experience could be a guide on how to approach today's housing problems and ease the construction crunch. "Maybe we need to go back to how things were 30 or 40 years ago, where you have smaller homes and you make them easy to renovate," he told The Business. "Over time, people can actually add bedrooms, bathrooms, car parks, verandahs and all these sorts of things to add value to the home.

ABC News
5 hours ago
- ABC News
John Menadue critiques Australia's media and our relationship with the United States
John Menadue has been at the heart of Australian public life for over fifty years, working for the Whitlam, Fraser and Hawke governments. He oversaw the effective end to Australia's White Australia Policy, was CEO of Qantas and set up the Centre for Policy Development. In the media he ran The Australian for Rupert Murdoch, launched the online weekly New Matilda and founded the influential public policy platform, Pearls and Irritations. Now aged ninety, John reflects on Australia's media, in particular its coverage of the war in Gaza, our attitudes to race relations, AUKUS, our relationship with the United States and how Australia is navigating its place in the world during a global power shift. Guest: John Menadue, Founder and Editor in Chief of Pearls and Irritations John Menadue, Founder and Editor in Chief of Pearls and Irritations Producer: Catherine Zengerer


SBS Australia
6 hours ago
- SBS Australia
Australian government pushes back against Netanyahu's attack on PM
Australian government pushes back against Netanyahu's attack on PM Published 20 August 2025, 9:02 am The Israeli Prime Minister has launched an explosive verbal spray on the Australian Government, directly accusing Anthony Albanese of betraying Israel. It's an online attack that has dominated Australian politics and led some key supporters of distance themselves from Benjamin Netanyahu.