Why there's no shame in corporate America boycotting LGBT Pride Month
But now the tables have turned, and LGBTQ activists have found themselves in a state between panicked and sulky as their fair-weather friends in corporate America are pulling sponsorships of Pride celebrations this month.
As a result, Pride events across the nation are facing budget shortfalls, and activists are blaming everyone but themselves.
Advertisement
8 LGBT Pride events across America have seen millions of dollars in sponsorship deals dry up since President Trump returned to the White House, according to reports.
lazyllama – stock.adobe.com
At least 14 companies — including Pepsi, Citi, MasterCard, Nissan, Garnier, and US defense contractor Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. — have dropped or greatly scaled back their financial contributions to annual Pride events nationwide.
Anheuser-Busch, makers of Bud Light, has also backtracked on Pride sponsorship — and for good reason. The company lost an estimated $395 million after its botched partnership with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney led to a nationwide boycott in 2023.
Advertisement
Ever since, Bud Light has struggled to reposition itself as the good ol' boys, God 'n' guns beverage, to lukewarm reception.
The numbers are grim: Heritage of Pride, organizers of New York City's festivities, by far the largest in the nation, faces a $750,000 shortfall this year after nearly a quarter of corporate donations dried up. This follows years of operating at a loss: In 2022, the group was $2.7 million in the hole, and another $1.2 million the following year.
8 At least 14 companies, including MasterCard, have scaled back on their financial contributions to annual Pride events nationwide.
8 Pepsi has also decreased its financial contributions to Pride events around the country.
Advertisement
8 Nissan is also including in the group of companies that have either scaled back or dropped their contributions for national Pride events.
Christopher Sadowski
In California, longtime corporate donors ran for the hills when San Francisco Pride executive director Suzanne Ford reached out begging for money. Twin Cities Pride has seen longtime corporate sponsors in Minnesota shift into retreat mode, and now the group is scrambling to meet a $200,000 goal. Organizers in Washington, DC, Milwaukee, and St. Louis all have reported being ghosted by big companies they once relied upon.
All of this is occurring at a time when a dozen companies have withdrawn participation from the Human Rights Campaign's Corporate Equality Index, a shakedown scheme used by the LGBT nonprofit behemoth to enforce woke capitalism.
For LGBTQAI2S+ activists, the reason for all this is simple: It's Trump's fault.
Advertisement
8 Trans-influencer Dylan Mulvaney set off a billion-dollar backlash against her 2023 sponsorship program with Bud Light
Xavier Collin/Image Press Agency/MEGA
8 'There's a lot of fear of repercussions for aligning with our festival,' Wes Shaver, president of Milwaukee Pride, said.
Wes Shaver
'There's a lot of fear of repercussions for aligning with our festival,' Wes Shaver, president of Milwaukee Pride, told The New York Times, joining others who believe companies fear they may be penalized by the White House if they donate to Pride events, citing the administration's effort to curtail DEI initiatives.
(When asked about this, the White House didn't respond to multiple requests for comment from The Post.)
What's equally likely is that everyone just has gay fatigue — a collective eye roll at the oversaturation of LGBT themes in culture, combined with all the negative connotations now associated with Pride. Once a niche event of subculture fun and revelry, it's devolved into a mainstream, month-long orgy of far-leftism that looks more like a tent revival beckoning an impending open-borders transgender race war.
Rage-hungry conservative influencers have latched on to videos of public nudity and shameless parents forcing Pride spectacles onto their children. Transgender insanity has swallowed the entire movement and, in doing so, repelled middle-of-the-road Americans.
Simply put, it's exhausting.
Advertisement
And what company, in its right mind, wants to be tied to all that? While activists say companies are afraid of Trump, the same could have been true about Biden. Businesses certainly felt the Democrat gun in their back to start coughing up their woke bona fides during his term.
Overall, the corporate retreat from Pride is a good thing for everyone, and it ought to continue. The grotesque parade of political and corporate pandering that's defined Pride over the last two decades is embarrassing, as any honest gay person will admit.
8 Trump has set his sights on banning identity-based initiatives and organizations, according to reports.
AP
After all, who wants their sex life validated by junk food companies and bomb-makers?
Advertisement
It's also alienated plenty of old-timers.
'The cold corporations are more important to the rotating Heritage of Pride than the actual surviving Stonewall veterans. Plenty are still alive and kicking,' former New York City Pride Grand Marshall Williamson Henderson, of the Stonewall Veterans Association, and who participated in the original Stonewall rebellion in June 1969 (the reason Pride Month exists), told The Post.
8 NYC Pride alone has seen nearly a million dollars in funding losses. Some community observers, however, suggest the Pride event has become over-commercialized.
Getty Images
Corporate America is a shallow and skittish place, and only the most destructive HR managers want their businesses butting in on the culture wars.
Advertisement
Rather than blaming Republicans for a long-deserved pushback against Rainbow Totalitarianism, LGBT activists ought to do a better job policing themselves, embark on a little soul searching as to how they became so toxic, and maybe even re-examine their unbridled love of money.
That last one might be a tough sell. Free Love? Not anymore. It's just about free stuff.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
3 minutes ago
- The Hill
All eyes on the Trump-Putin Alaska summit
The two world leaders met for about three hours alongside senior Russian and U.S. officials, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and special envoy Steve Witkoff, and two Russian aides – shifting from a previously planned one-on-one summit between Trump and Putin. Afterward, they took to podiums in front of a blue backdrop that read 'Pursuing Peace,' speaking to reporters in a highly anticipated joint appearance. Putin began speaking first, in Russian, telling the audience that negotiations were held in a ' respectful, constructive and mutually respectful atmosphere,' and that he agrees that the security of Ukraine should be ensured. ' I agree with Trump that the security of Ukraine must be secured, and of course, we are ready to work on that,' he said, adding that he hopes that the agreement reached between Washington and Moscow 'will help us bring closer that goal and will pave the path towards peace in Ukraine.' Putin also proposed Moscow as the next location for any future meeting with Trump. 'That's an interesting one, I'll get a little heat on that one,' Trump replied. 'But I could see it possibly happening.' When it was his turn to speak, Trump spent a portion of his time lamenting that he has 'always had a fantastic relationship' with Putin, but that it was impeded by investigations during his first term into Russia's interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. 'We had many, many tough meetings, good meetings. We were interfered with by the Russia, Russia, Russia hoax. I've made it a little bit tougher to deal with, but he understood it,' Trump said. He also offered little as to whether anything was agreed to or not in the talks, noting that ' there's no deal until there's a deal.' 'I will say that I believe we had a very productive meeting. There were many, many points that we agreed on, most of them, I would say, a couple of big ones that we haven't quite gotten there. We've made some headway. So, there's no deal until there's a deal,' the president said. Ahead of the meeting, Trump said that he has a 'good idea' of what Ukraine would like to see from the summit. ' It's not for me to negotiate for Ukraine, but I think I have a pretty good idea what they'd like to see, and what's good and what's not good,' the president said during his interview with Fox News' 'Special Report' with host Bret Baier. But Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who was excluded from the talks, said Russia has no intention to end the war soon. 'The war continues, and it is precisely because there is neither an order nor even a signal that Moscow is preparing to end this war. On the day of negotiations, they are killing as well. That speaks volumes,' he said in a video posted to X.
Axios
3 minutes ago
- Axios
"Next time in Moscow": Putin extends Trump invitation as summit ends
At the conclusion of Friday's "productive" but inconclusive summit on Friday, Russian President Vladimir Putin quipped to President Trump: "Next time in Moscow." The intrigue: Putin made the remark in English, a language he rarely speaks in public. The suggestion drew a surprised chuckle from Trump, who didn't rule it out but said he'd "get a little heat for that one." The big picture: If Trump were to travel to Russia, it would be the first time in over a decade that an American president set foot on Russian soil. Putin is angling for a more friendly relationship with the U.S. after being isolated on the world stage, and would likely consider such a visit a major coup. But there's no sign as of now that it's likely to happen. What they're saying: Putin's "next time in Moscow" quip came just at the end of Trump's televised remarks. "Oh, that's an interesting one," Trump replied. "I'll get a little heat on that one, but I could see it possibly happening." The White House did not immediately respond to Axios' request for comment on the president's willingness to travel to the Russian capital. Catch up quick: In a joint press briefing, President Trump called the highly-anticipated peace talks "productive" but said that the two leaders "didn't get there" on a ceasefire or on ending the war in Ukraine. Trump said the two agreed on many issues but could not come to an agreement on "the biggest one." Putin said that it was very important for the two countries "to go back to cooperation," and that it was time for the superpowers to shift from "confrontation to dialogue." Neither Putin nor Trump offered any details of a potential agreement. Flashback: Barack Obama was the last U.S. president to visit Russia over a decade ago, according to the State Department.
American Press
3 minutes ago
- American Press
BREAKING: Trump says no deal to end the Russia-Ukraine war was made with Putin after high-stakes Alaska talks
U.S. President Donald Trump said he and Russian President Vladimir Putin did not reach a deal to end Russia's war in Ukraine after talks in Alaska on Friday, as the two leaders offered scant details on what was discussed but heaped praise on one another. Putin said he and Trump had reached an 'understanding' on Ukraine and warned Europe not to 'torpedo the nascent progress.' But Trump said, 'There's no deal until there's a deal' and said he plans to speak with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders soon. The high-profile summit ended without an agreement to end, or even pause, the brutal conflict — the largest land war in Europe since 1945 — which has raged for more than three years.
