logo
NZ Government Blocks 'Pay Equity' Claims For Hundreds Of Thousands Of Workers

NZ Government Blocks 'Pay Equity' Claims For Hundreds Of Thousands Of Workers

Scoop13-05-2025
Press Release – Socialist Equality Group
The amendment was announced on May 6 by Workplace Relations Minister Brooke Van Velden, from the far-right ACT Party. It was rushed through parliament the next day under anti-democratic urgency provisions to limit public discussion and scrutiny.
New Zealand's right-wing coalition government last week passed the Equal Pay Amendment Act, which is designed to make it much harder—perhaps impossible—for workers in female-dominated professions to claim that they are underpaid because of gender-based inequity.
The amendment was announced on May 6 by Workplace Relations Minister Brooke Van Velden, from the far-right ACT Party. It was rushed through parliament the next day under anti-democratic 'urgency' provisions to limit public discussion and scrutiny.
The legislation is part of the government's austerity regime, which involves brutal cuts to healthcare, education and welfare, a virtual pay freeze across the public sector, and thousands of layoffs. Its aim is to increase the exploitation of the working class, divert more public money to the super-rich, and to fund a vast increase in military spending to prepare for war.
Van Velden told reporters the government was 'not taking money from anybody'—a transparent lie. In the same media conference, she said the new pay equity framework would lead to 'very real and significant cost reductions.'
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon confirmed that money set aside in the budget—to be announced on May 22—to settle pay equity claims can now be reduced. He expected the government to save 'billions of dollars.'
The government has cancelled 33 pay equity claims that were being negotiated under the old system, affecting hundreds of thousands of workers, mainly in the public sector. The unions involved will be forced to reapply under the new thresholds.
The largest outstanding claim covers 94,000 teachers in the primary, secondary and early childhood sectors. It was lodged under the previous Labour Party-led government at the end of 2020 and negotiations have dragged on for years.
The new law changes the definition of work 'predominantly performed by female employees.' It states that 70 percent of the workforce must be women (up from 60 percent under the previous law) and that this must have been the case for at least 10 years. In high schools, 63 percent of teachers are women, meaning that they may be barred from re-submitting a pay equity claim.
The government has also removed the ability for previously settled claims—including for nurses, social workers, librarians and aged and disability carers—to be regularly reviewed and adjusted.
For new claims, there are much stricter criteria for assessing whether 'sex-based undervaluation' of workers exists in a given profession. Claimants' work must be compared with 'work that is the same or substantially similar' to that performed by men or by a majority-male workforce.
Van Velden criticised pay equity claims which compared librarians with mechanical engineers, and social workers with air traffic controllers. She said this was 'muddying the waters' between sex-based discrimination and pay gaps that were caused by other things such as 'market forces.'
The law change has triggered widespread anger, with thousands of people joining protests across the country last week outside the offices of government MPs. A petition by the unions calling for the amendment to be reversed gained more than 65,000 signatures by Sunday night.
The opposition Labour Party, the Greens and the union bureaucracy, however, are working to prevent an organised movement by the working class against austerity. They are telling workers to wait for the next election in 18 months.
Labour's workplace relations spokesperson Jan Tinetti told the BHN podcast that people should 'get behind' Labour, the unions and their allies. 'Together we can fight this and we can make a difference, and we can be so much stronger in 2026 to win that election and put this right again,' she said.
Former Labour Prime Minister Helen Clark (1999-2008) shared a post on X stating: 'When the parents, partners and children of women in the workforce vote in 2026 we will remember this moment.'
Jacinda Ardern's 2017-2023 Labour Party-led government heavily promoted pay equity deals, mainly as a means to subordinate workers to the union apparatus and suppress a broader movement against low wages and austerity.
Thirteen pay equity deals were reached, the most significant covering about 30,000 nurses in public hospitals. The nurses received pay rises of between 18 and 20 percent in 2023. While not insignificant, this followed decades of near-frozen wages under successive Labour and National-led governments, enforced by the union apparatus.
That settlement, touted by Labour and the unions as a 'historic' achievement, is already being undermined through a new round of wage cuts. Nurses have been offered a pay rise of just 1.5 percent over a two-year period, which is well below the increase in the cost of living. Nurses held two part-day strikes in December 2024, but since then the New Zealand Nurses Organisation has organised no action and remained silent on the negotiations.
Notwithstanding the pay equity settlements, the Ardern government presided over a worsening social crisis, including increased homelessness and child poverty. The Labour Party lost the 2023 election in a landslide as living costs soared and it campaigned on cutting jobs in the public sector, to make workers pay for the developing economic crisis.
Labour also agrees with the government's decision to raise spending on the military from 1 to 2 percent of gross domestic product. This will divert an extra $12 billion to the armed forces over the next four years, which will be paid for by further eviscerating public services. By comparison, the cost of the pay equity settlements reached thus far is just $1.78 billion a year.
Fleur Fitzsimons, national secretary of the Public Service Association, wrote in the Post: 'The PSA will not be taking this outrageous attack on the rights of women workers lying down. We will be fighting this in the streets and in the courts.'
The PSA, however, has not announced any strike action. It has done nothing to oppose the thousands of job cuts across multiple government agencies over the past year-and-a-half. The union vocally supports the vast military spending increase, which is at the direct expense of workers.
The statements by the union bureaucracy blaming low wages for teachers, healthcare workers, caregivers and others entirely on gender discrimination serves to disorient and divide the working class.
There is a gender pay gap: Women's median hourly earnings are 8.2 percent less than men's. But the fundamental division in society is the gulf between the working class and the financial and business elite, whose wealth is based on the exploitation of workers of every nationality, gender and ethnicity.
Feminist identity politics, which blames low pay on 'sexism' and 'patriarchy,' obscures the reality that male-dominated sections of the workforce have experienced major attacks on wages and conditions in recent decades. Hundreds of thousands of jobs in meat processing, agriculture, construction, transport, forestry and other sectors of the economy have become casualised and insecure, with low wages and often dangerous working conditions.
The richest 5 percent of the population owns 45.5 percent of the country's wealth, while the poorest half of the population owns just 2 percent. According to figures released in 2023, New Zealand's richest 311 families collectively owned $85 billion in assets. All the capitalist parties, including Labour and its allies, are dedicated to the enrichment of this parasitic layer.
A real fight against austerity must be directed against the actual source of inequality, which is not men, but the capitalist system. To carry out such a struggle, workers have to build new organisations: rank-and-file committees, independent of the pro-capitalist union bureaucracy. They must reject the divisive nationalism and identity politics promoted by the unions, Labour and various pseudo-left organisations.
Workers need to adopt a socialist strategy, aimed at expropriating the wealth hoarded by the billionaires and dismantling the armed forces of the state, in order to raise living standards for all workers and to fund a vast expansion of public healthcare, education and other services.
12 May 2025
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Andrew Little's Housing Policy Will Further Destroy Wellington
Andrew Little's Housing Policy Will Further Destroy Wellington

Scoop

time2 days ago

  • Scoop

Andrew Little's Housing Policy Will Further Destroy Wellington

Wellington mayoral candidate Andrew Little has unveiled a Labour Party housing plan that will further destroy Wellington and make the city even more unaffordable for residents. The Labour Party's proposals for housing will not stimulate the local economy, and will see a continuation of high rates that hurt those on fixed incomes, students, pensioners and first home buyers most, and drive residents and businesses to leave. 'In his council housing policy, Andrew Little says Wellington 'simply isn't an affordable place to live' yet he is proposing policies that will only make the problem worse,' Wellington City Councillor and mayoral contender Ray Chung says. 'The most damning aspects of Labour's plan for Wellington are two fold: continuation of the charade that it's ratepayers' responsibility to subsidise new housing and that the city council needs to expand social housing. Both of these are the responsibility of central government and are already paid for by our taxes. Wellington ratepayers should not be paying twice for these.' 'The Labour Party candidates know their policies will cause hardship because they're busy promoting schemes like cheap loans and reverse mortgages to help homeowners pay their rates. That's how bad it's got. The ratepayer assistance scheme is another way to steal your wealth. The council should not be looking at extra ways for ratepayers pay their rates, the council should be lowering the rates take.' Social housing is set to cost Wellington ratepayers $1 billion over the next decade, which is an absolute travesty. People can barely afford to live in the city as it is. If elected mayor, I will get social housing off the council's balance sheet and back to central government, Ray says. Eastern ward candidate for council, Michelle McGuire says, 'the local economy will be stimulated by cutting the financial rates and compliance demands of council, lowering the commercial differential, and streamlining the regulatory process for building (which most councillors agree with but haven't done anything substantive about it since being elected). Wellington's population has stagnated. Until we make Wellington more affordable for residents and businesses, no one will be rushing to move here.' Michelle McGuire is one of the Independent Together candidates along with Paula Muollo (Southern ward), Ken Ah Kuoi (Eastern), Stuart Wong (Lambton) and Guy Nunns and Ray Chung (Western Onslow). These candidates have agreed on a set of pillar policies that include getting a zero rates increase for ratepayers, bringing the council back to core priorities and services, and ensuring that party politics is kept out of council decision making. 'The Independent Together candidates are the only team with policies that will ease the financial burden of ratepayers. Andrew Little's housing policies are more tax and spend. His policies will add to the cost-of-living crisis for Wellingtonians and lead to further population degrowth,' Michelle says. 'It's time to elect people who will put Wellingtonians first, not their political party. It's time to end party politics around the council table.'

Chris Hipkins to speak on decision to skip Covid-19 Royal Commission inquiry public hearings
Chris Hipkins to speak on decision to skip Covid-19 Royal Commission inquiry public hearings

NZ Herald

time3 days ago

  • NZ Herald

Chris Hipkins to speak on decision to skip Covid-19 Royal Commission inquiry public hearings

Labour leader and former Covid-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins is to discuss his decision not to attend the second set of public hearings for the Covid-19 Royal Commission. He is set to speak to Mike Hosking on Newstalk ZB at 7.07am. You can listen live below. The hearings have been called off after key witnesses, including former Prime Minister Dame Jacinda Ardern, refused to appear. Those witnesses, including Hipkins and former ministers Grant Robertson and Ayesha Verrall, are still co-operating with the inquiry. In June last year, a 'phase two' of the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Covid-19 Lessons was established by the National-led coalition Government. It was scheduled to take place after the completion of the original inquiry set up under the previous Labour Government, which ministers have already appeared before in private. Chairman Grant Illingworth has the power to summon people to appear before the inquiry, but said he would not use it on Ardern and the other ministers as there weren't any grounds for it. 'On balance, we are of the view that a summons is undesirable, given that the former ministers continue to co-operate with the evidence-gathering of the inquiry. 'It is our opinion that the use of summonses to achieve their participation at a public hearing would be legalistic and adversarial, which our terms of reference prohibit,' Illingworth said. He said he still believed public hearings would enhance public confidence in the inquiry's processes by enabling the public to see former ministers, who have critical insights into the pandemic response, questioned in public. Hipkins, appearing on Herald NOW last month, said he had issues with the way the second phase of the Royal Commission had been set up, particularly the decision to exclude from consideration the years that NZ First was governing with Labour. 'The fact that the [Royal Commission] terms of reference specifically exclude decisions made when NZ First were part of the [Labour-led coalition] Government … I think the terms of reference have been deliberately constructed to achieve a particular outcome, particularly around providing a platform for those who have conspiracy theorist views. 'That seems to have been specifically written into the terms of reference that they get maximum airtime.' Objections of Ardern and the other ministers, published in a minute of the inquiry, included the convention that ministers and former ministers are interviewed by inquiries in private, and departing from that convention would undermine confidence. They were also concerned that the livestreaming and publication of recordings of the hearing creates a risk of those recordings being 'tampered with, manipulated or otherwise misused', a risk the inquiry 'ought to have foreseen and planned for'. Other witnesses raised concerns that providing evidence at public hearings might bring risks of abuse being directed at them and their families. Hipkins is standing firm on the witnesses' decision. 'We have shown up to the inquiry, I have shown up to the inquiry. I have been interviewed by them twice,' he told reporters yesterday. 'I have provided written evidence to the inquiry, I answered every question they had and I attended the interview they scheduled for me. 'They asked for two hours, but they ran out of questions after an hour.' Hipkins said he did not co-ordinate his approach with Ardern and would not speak on behalf of her. 'She is still a very close friend of mine. We have people representing us in common, but any suggestion we colluded with this is wrong.' 'Deserve the basic respect of accountability' National MP Chris Bishop accused Hipkins of running from his record. 'Fresh from fobbing off Treasury's report into Labour's spending, [he] is avoiding accountability by refusing to front up to the Royal Commission,' he said. 'By first dismissing Treasury's report and now refusing to front, Chris Hipkins is telling New Zealanders he does not care about the effects his decisions have had on Kiwis.' Deputy Prime Minister David Seymour said Ardern, Verrall and Hipkins' refusal to publicly appear before the commission was a change from 'invading our living rooms daily'. 'Hipkins and co loved the limelight at 1pm every day. They wielded extraordinary powers over citizens' lives, dismissing those who questioned them as uncaring. Now they're refusing to even show up, what a contrast,' he said. 'Tens of thousands of New Zealanders have already engaged with the inquiry, sharing experiences of how their lives were upended. 'They deserve the basic respect of accountability,' Seymour said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store