A DOGE shoutout and a Democratic walkout: Takeaways from Lee's State of the State
Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee touted his administration's innovative policy approaches as he presented his state spending plan and legislative priorities during his annual State of the State address on Monday evening.
In response, spectators yelled out their dissent, nearly a dozen Democrats walked out, and the Republican majority legislature thunderously applauded.
Here are takeaways from Lee's speech:
Innovation was a central theme as Lee presented his vision for the year, but while the governor touted policy changes his administration has championed, he outlined few details for major innovative changes for the future.
Throughout the 38-minute speech, Lee touted his policy innovations, citing work to secure Tennessee's unique state Medicaid block grant, funding grant programs to incentivize nuclear energy development, and rethinking the state's funding approach for K-12 education by establishing a statewide private school choice program.
'Tennessee has led the nation as a beacon of opportunity, security and freedom,' he said. 'Why can't we be the nation's capital of innovation, too?'
He proposed a few new changes. For example, in an effort to address the state's teacher shortage, Lee is proposing to establish a 'limited occupational teaching license' to allow 'experienced tradesmen and women to teach their craft without having to jump through all the hoops of extra coursework.'
'Sometimes the most innovative solution is the obvious one,' he said. 'For example, why not allow an expert welder to teach a welding class?'
He's also proposing $72.6 million toward nuclear energy initiatives and called on the complete of the Tennessee Valley Authority's Clinch River side for a new small modular nuclear reactor.
Lee outlined a plan to create 'tens of thousands of new day care spots across rural and urban Tennessee' to create 'one of the most family friendly workforces in the nation."
But his proposals do little for parents of infants and toddlers that exceed the state income limits of $76,600 per year for a family of four.
'Today, infant care in Tennessee carries virtually the same price tag as in-state tuition at a four-year public college,' Lee said. 'That is an insurmountable cost for the vast majority of moms and dads who want to be in the workforce.'
Lee's solution is an $11 million state grant for Boys and Girls Clubs – a child care provider that serves children ages 5-18 in before and after school care settings.
He's also proposing to 'ease the benefits cliff' of the state's Smart Steps Child Care Program, which provides low-income families with assistance for child care payments, and boosting child care worker pay through the state's existing WAGES program, which offers supplemental pay for DHS-licensed childcare workers.
Lee hinted at an effort 'to streamline child care facility licensing and permitting' but offered no details at what regulations may be changed.
Hecklers shouted objections early in Lee's speech, as Lee touted his recent efforts to establish a state immigration enforcement division. In response, spectators in the West Gallery shouted, 'Immigrants are welcome here! Immigrants are welcome here!'
On the floor, around a dozen Democrats stood up and walked out. The Democrats later said it was in particular protest of Lee's special session legislation that included a private school voucher program and an immigration enforcement plan that Democrats have criticized as anti-democratic.
Rep. Vincent Dixie, D-Nashville, criticized Republicans for starting every House session off with a prayer before doing "some of the most unChristian-like things in that chamber."
"Jesus would do none of the things that they're doing. We're here to protect the least among us, the unhouses, the people who are the most vulnerable," Dixie said.
Democratic leadership did not join the walk-out during Lee's speech, though they said they were still united as a caucus.
"Our Democratic caucus is united in opposition to this governor and his misplaced priorities," House Democratic Caucus Chair John Ray Clemmons said.
Since taking office, Lee has cut just over 1% of cabinet agency employees, repeating the refrain that "government is not the answer" to the state's challenges.
Entering his seventh year in office, Lee is proposing to cut 324 vacant positions at state agencies, continuing his administration's quest to shrink the size of state government.
'Limited government is knowing how to do more with less," Lee said. "More bureaucracy does not mean better service. Businesses already know this – government should do the same.'
Lee specifically acknowledged the new federal Department of Government Efficiency, created by the new Trump administration and led by SpaceX CEO Elon Musk.
"With the new federal Department of Government Efficiency, Washington is finally seeing a revival of our nation's founding principles, aligning with Tennessee's commitment to limited government, fiscal responsibility, and individual liberty," Lee said.
Lee in recent weeks has been effusive in his public praise of Trump, perhaps seeking to smooth over any ruffled feathers that led Trump to publicly refer to the governor as "RINO" after the two endorsed competing candidates in a heated state Senate primary race this summer.
In 2022, lawmakers approved establishment of the Institute of American Civics at the University of Tennessee, to strengthen civics education while underscoring civility and respect in public exchange.
'One way we strengthen tradition is by teaching civics and American exceptionalism,' Lee said.
This year, Lee is proposing funding to expand the institute's reach to 'make sure Tennessee children – from Kindergarten to 12th grade – learn about the founding principles that make America the greatest country on earth.'
Less than three weeks after a school shooting at Antioch High School, gun safety initiatives that Lee has championed in the past did not get a mention in his speech.
In the wake of the Covenant School shooting in 2023, Lee called a special legislative session backing legislation seeking to keep guns out of the hands of dangerous people.
Rep. Jason Powell, D-Nashville, said Monday the governor's office didn't even respond to his request in January to expand the scope of the special session to include gun initiatives. While his budget includes some new funding for school resource officers, Lee made no mention of any other gun safety initiatives on Monday.
Senate Minority Leader Raumesh Akbari, D-Memphis, said the issue of gun safety was 'glaringly omitted.'
'We just had a shooting in Antioch not that long ago. We all remember what happened at Covenant. I represent Memphis, and we have several instances of gun violence there,' Akbari said. 'Several years ago, one of our members pointed out how easy it is to purchase a weapon second-hand in Tennessee. We have to make sure that people feel safe. It's really simple.'
This article originally appeared on Nashville Tennessean: Bill Lee State of the State address: DOGE shoutout and a Dem walkout
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Miami Herald
25 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Is Elon Musk right to oppose the budget bill? What Americans said in a new poll
During his public falling out with President Donald Trump, Elon Musk slammed the president's proposed spending bill — dubbed the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' — claiming it will balloon the deficit. It turns out, most Americans agree with his critique, new polling reveals. In the latest Economist/YouGov poll, half of respondents were asked to react to a statement from Musk on the GOP-backed spending bill, which passed in the House without a single Democratic vote. The legislation, Musk wrote on X on June 3, 'will massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion and burden (American) citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt.' A majority of respondents, 56%, said they agreed with this statement, while just 17% said they disagreed. More than one-quarter, 27%, said they were unsure. The answers were largely linked to partisan affiliation, with Democrats largely siding with Musk for a change. Seventy-two percent of Democrats said they concurred with the billionaire's statement about the spending bill, as did 55% of independents. Among Republicans, a plurality, 44%, said they agreed. The poll — which sampled 1,533 U.S. adults June 6-9 — posed the same statement before the other half of respondents, but this time, it did not attribute it to Musk. Without reference to Musk, a slightly smaller share, 49%, said they agreed with the statement, while 23% said they disagreed. Smaller shares of Republicans, independents and Democrats agreed, though Democrats saw the largest decrease in support — from 72% to 60%. The poll has a margin of error of 3.5 percentage points. More on the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' The spending bill, which provides funding for fiscal year 2025, passed in the House in a 215-214 vote in late May and is now under consideration in the Senate. It contains many pieces of Trump's agenda, including a road map to extend the 2017 tax cuts, as well as an increase in funding for the Pentagon and border security, according to previous reporting from McClatchy News. At the same time, it slashes funding for social programs like Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Further — to Musk's point — it would increase the federal deficit by $3.8 trillion over the next 10 years, according to an analysis from the Congressional Budget Office, a nonpartisan agency. In addition to Musk, the bill has received criticism from several other prominent conservatives in Congress. One of the most vocal opponents has been Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, who wrote on X that 'the spending proposed in this bill is unsustainable, we cannot continue spending at these levels if we want to truly tackle our debt.' Other Republican lawmakers have come out in defense of the bill, including House Speaker Mike Johnson, who has said the legislation will deliver 'historic tax relief, ensure our border stays secure, strengthen our military, and produce historic savings.' Meanwhile, Democrats have been united in their opposition. In a statement, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries labeled the bill 'the GOP Tax Scam' and said it would rip 'healthcare and food assistance away from millions of people in order to provide tax cuts to the wealthy, the well-off and the well-connected.'

Washington Post
26 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Democrats ignored border politics. Now the consequences are here.
Democrats have gotten the border issue so wrong, for so long, that it amounts to political malpractice. The latest chapter — in which violent protesters could be helping President Donald Trump create a military confrontation he's almost begging for as a distraction from his other problems — may prove the most dangerous yet. When I see activists carrying Mexican flags as they challenge ICE raids in Los Angeles this week, I think of two possibilities: These 'protesters' are deliberately working to create visuals that will help Trump, or they are well-meaning but unwise dissenters who are inadvertently accomplishing the same goal. Democrats' mistake, over more than a decade, has been to behave as though border enforcement doesn't matter. Pressured by immigrant rights activists, party leaders too often acted as if maintaining a well-controlled border was somehow morally wrong. Again and again, the short-term political interests of Democratic leaders in responding to a strong faction within the party won out over having a policy that could appeal to the country as a whole. When red-state voters and elected officials complained that their states were being overwhelmed by uncontrolled immigration over the past decade, Democrats found those protests easy to ignore. They were happening somewhere else. But when red states' governors pushed migrants toward blue-state cities over the past several years, protests from mayors and governors finally began to register. But still not enough to create coherent Democratic policies, alas. It's open season on former president Joe Biden these days, and he doesn't deserve all the retrospective criticism he's getting. But on immigration, he was anything but a profile in courage. Security advisers including Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas wanted tougher border policies starting in 2021. But political advisers such as chief of staff Ron Klain, who sought amity with immigration rights progressives in Congress and the party's base, resisted strong measures. Though Biden was elected as a centrist, he leaned left — and waited until the last months of his presidency to take the strong enforcement measures recommended earlier. Throughout the 2024 campaign, Trump played shamelessly on public anxieties about the border. Some of his arguments, like claims that hungry migrants were eating pets, were grotesque. They were simply provocations. But Biden and Kamala Harris didn't have good answers, other than indignation. They had straddled the issue through Biden's term, talking about border security but failing to enact it, and the public knew it. Democrats finally came up with a bipartisan border bill in 2024 that would have given the president more authority to expel migrants and deny asylum claims, and more money to secure the border. Republicans, led by Trump, were shameless opportunists in opposing the bill. They didn't want Biden to have a win. In the end, Democrats didn't have the votes — or, frankly, the credibility on the issue. Biden took executive action in June 2024, limiting entry into the United States. But it was too late. He could have taken that action in 2021. Since Trump took office in January, he has been building toward this week's confrontation in the streets. ICE raids have steadily increased in cities with large migrant populations, as have nationwide quotas for arrests and deportations. Trump declared a national emergency on Inauguration Day that gave him authority to send troops to the border to 'assist' in controlling immigration. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi L. Noem seized every photo opportunity to convey a militarized approach to the coming clash. Over these months, the immigration issue has been a car crash skidding toward us in slow motion. Since his first term, Trump has clearly wanted a military confrontation with the left over immigration or racial issues. Gen. Mark A. Milley, then chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, helped talk Trump out of invoking the Insurrection Act in 2020 to contain the unrest that followed the death of George Floyd. But this time, Trump faces no opposition. He is surrounded by yes-men and -women. The saddest part is that Democrats still have no clear policy. Some blue-state mayors and governors have pledged to provide 'sanctuary' for migrants, but they don't have good arguments to rebut Trump's claim they're interfering with the enforcement of federal law. In some cases, sanctuary has meant refusing to hand over undocumented migrants convicted of violent crimes, former DHS officials tell me. That's wrong. The courts have limited Trump's most arbitrary policies and his defiance of due process, but not his authority to enforce immigration laws. California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) this week chose sensible ground to fight, by filing a lawsuit challenging Trump's authority to override gubernatorial power by federalizing National Guard troops when there isn't a 'rebellion' or 'invasion.' There is no evidence of such extreme danger — or that local law enforcement in Los Angeles can't handle the problems. But Newsom's smart pushback doesn't get Democrats out of addressing an issue they've been ducking for more than a decade: Do they have the courage to enforce the border themselves? Over the long run, taking border issues seriously means more immigration courts, and more border-control people and facilities — and a fair, legal way of deciding who stays and who goes. But right now, it means Democratic mayors and governors using state and local police to contain protests, so that troops aren't necessary — and preventing extremists among the activists from fomenting the cataclysm in the streets that some of them seem to want as much as Trump. Yes, of course, we need new bipartisan legislation to resolve the gut issue of how to protect the 'dreamers' and other longtime residents who show every day that they want only to be good citizens. But on the way to that day of sweet reason, Democrats need to oppose violence, by anyone — and to help enforce immigration policies that begin with a recognition that it isn't immoral to have a border.


Newsweek
27 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Four Senior Biden Officials to Testify in Probe on His Health: Report
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Four senior officials in former President Joe Biden's administration are set to testify in a House probe into Biden's health while in office. Newsweek reached out to Jill and Joe Biden's office via online form Tuesday for comment. Why It Matters Biden dropped out of the 2024 presidential race in late July following a disastrous debate performance against then-Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump. Biden repeatedly stared at Trump and made halting statements where he appeared to lose his train of thought. Biden later said he had "a bad, bad night." Questions swirled about his mental acuity and possible decline as the White House and then Vice President Kamala Harris fielded questions about his cognitive ability in the final months of his presidency. Biden also faced harsh feedback as excerpts from CNN's Jake Tapper and Axios' Alex Thompson's book Original Sin: President Biden's Decline, Its Cover-Up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again were published. What To Know According to Politico, citing a House Oversight Committee aid, former deputy chief of staff Annie Tomasini, former deputy director of Oval Office operations Ashley Williams, former director of the Domestic Policy Council Neera Tanden, and Anthony Bernal, former senior adviser to the then first lady, are all set to testify in either June or July. Committee Chair James Comer requested their cooperation with the probe in May and also sent Biden's physician, Kevin O'Connor, a subpoena last week, Politico reports. In a post on X, formerly Twitter, Comer said that he requested O'Connor appear for a deposition on June 27, 2025. Trump has pushed White House lawyers to look into whether Biden's aides covered up his alleged health decline, Reuters reports. Biden also revealed last month that he had been diagnosed with an "aggressive" form of prostate cancer that had metastasized to the bone. Former President Joe Biden can be seen posing at the opening night of "Othello" on Broadway at The Barrymore Theatre on March 23, 2025, in New York City. (Photo by Bruce Glikas/WireImage) Former President Joe Biden can be seen posing at the opening night of "Othello" on Broadway at The Barrymore Theatre on March 23, 2025, in New York City. (Photo by Bruce Glikas/WireImage) What People Are Saying House Oversight Committee on X over the weekend: "Even Obama's doctor admits the truth. This is precisely why Chairman @RepJamesComer subpoenaed Dr. Kevin O'Connor, Biden's physician. This is a scandal of historical proportions, and we will investigate it thoroughly!" Trump on Truth Social in May after Biden's diagnosis: "Melania and I are saddened to hear about Joe Biden's recent medical diagnosis. We extend our warmest and best wishes to Jill and the family, and we wish Joe a fast and successful recovery." Biden in a statement last week: "Let me be clear: I made the decisions during my presidency. I made the decisions about the pardons, executive orders, legislation, and proclamations. Any suggestion that I didn't is ridiculous and false," Biden said. "This is nothing more than a distraction by Donald Trump and Congressional Republicans who are working to push disastrous legislation that would cut essential programs like Medicaid and raise costs on American families, all to pay for tax breaks for the ultra-wealthy and big corporations."