Breaking Martin Luther King Jr. assassination files released by US Justice Dept
Files were posted on the website of the National Archives, which said more would be released.
Dr King died of an assassin's bullet in Memphis, Tennessee, on 4 April, 1968, as he increasingly extended his attention from a nonviolent campaign for equal rights for African Americans to economic issues and calls for peace.
His death shook the United States in a year that would also bring race riots, anti-Vietnam war demonstrations and the assassination of presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy.
Earlier this year, President Donald Trump's administration released thousands of pages of digital documents related to the assassinations of Robert Kennedy and former President John F.Kennedy, who was killed in 1963.
Mr Trump promised on the campaign trail to provide more transparency about President Kennedy's death.
Upon taking office, he also ordered aides to present a plan for the release of records relating to the assassinations of Robert Kennedy and Dr King.
The FBI kept files on Mr King in the 1950s and 1960s - even wiretapping his phones - because of what the bureau falsely said at the time were his suspected ties to communism during the Cold War between the US and Soviet Union.
In recent years, the FBI has acknowledged that as an example of "abuse and overreach" in its history.
The civil rights leader's family asked those who engage with the files to "do so with empathy, restraint, and respect for our family's continuing grief," and condemned "any attempts to misuse these documents."
"Now more than ever, we must honor his sacrifice by committing ourselves to the realization of his dream – a society rooted in compassion, unity, and equality," they said in a statement.
"During our father's lifetime, he was relentlessly targeted by an invasive, predatory, and deeply disturbing disinformation and surveillance campaign orchestrated by J. Edgar Hoover through the Federal Bureau of Investigation," the family, including his two living children, Martin III, 67, and Bernice, 62, said, referring to the then-FBI director.
James Earl Ray, a segregationist and drifter, confessed to killing Mr King but later recanted.
He died in prison in 1998.
Dr King's family said it had filed a wrongful death civil lawsuit in Tennessee in 1999 that led to a jury unanimously concluding "that our father was the victim of a conspiracy involving Loyd Jowers and unnamed co-conspirators, including government agencies as a part of a wider scheme.
"The verdict also affirmed that someone other than James Earl Ray was the shooter, and that Mr. Ray was set up to take the blame. Our family views that verdict as an affirmation of our long-held beliefs."
Mr Jowers, once a Memphis police officer, told ABC's Prime Time Live in 1993 that he participated in a plot to kill Dr King.
A 2023 Justice Department report called his claims dubious.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Zelenskiy is facing wartime protests for the first time. Why?
The hundreds of Ukrainians who protested on Tuesday evening against moves to slash the independence of top anti-corruption agencies rallied outside the Ivan Franko theatre in central Kyiv because, activists said, it was the closest they could get to the headquarters of president Volodymyr Zelenskiy 's administration. The theatre sits on a leafy square at the foot of steps leading up to Bankova, which is the name of the guarded street where the presidency is situated and also a synonym in Ukraine for presidential power and related political machinations. Even in wartime – and in startling contrast to their neighbours in Russia – Ukrainians reject any notion that their leaders should exist in some sequestered space where decisions cannot be questioned and authority must not be challenged. It is infuriating to many Ukrainians that Zelenskiy and key aides seem to have forgotten or ignored lessons from the nation's recent history when ramming through a law that effectively makes the country's main anti-graft institutions subordinate to a prosecutor general who is a presidential appointee. READ MORE Both the Orange Revolution in 2004-5 and the Maidan Revolution, or Revolution of Dignity, in 2013-14 were at heart mass protests against corruption and the impunity of a political-economic elite in Ukraine that did not feel bound by the rules that applied to less privileged citizens. The same urge for change prompted Ukrainians to elect Zelenskiy – a comedian and businessman with no political experience – in 2019. A demonstration in Kyiv on Tuesday calls for a veto of a law that reduces the powers of anti-corruption agencies. Photograph: Tetiana Dzhafarova/AFP With its pivot to the West in 2014, Ukraine aimed for European Union membership and committed to rooting out graft at all levels. With EU backing it created a national anti-corruption bureau (Nabu) and specialised anti-corruption prosecutor's office (Sapo). These agencies have had some success despite facing obstruction from vested interests and a sometimes hostile attitude from Bankova. Zelenskiy said on Tuesday night that they would now be more efficient and 'cleansed' of 'Russian influence'. Civil society has long criticised the power held by Zelenskiy's chief of staff, Andriy Yermak, and his deputies, who oversee the running of state structures ranging from law enforcement to arms production. The influence of unelected officials around Zelenskiy has only grown during Russia's devastating full-scale invasion of Ukraine, which has brought a surge of western funding and weapons and also a suspension of elections and many of the checks and balances on presidential power that function in peacetime. Volodymyr Zelenskiy: anti-corruption agencies would now be more efficient and 'cleansed' of 'Russian influence'. Photograph: Vadym Sarakhan/AP Elections would be impossible under daily Russian missile and drone strikes, but Ukraine's civil society and free media continue to hold Zelenskiy and his allies to account. As shown by Tuesday's protests in Kyiv and other cities – the biggest in nearly three-and-a-half years of all-out war – Ukrainians who detest the dictator in the Kremlin will not tolerate any whiff of autocracy from Bankova.
Irish Independent
15 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Trump pulls US out of ‘woke' and ‘divisive' UNESCO for second time
The withdrawal from the Paris-based agency, which was founded after World War Two to promote peace through international cooperation in education, science, and culture, will take effect at the end of next year. The move is in line with the Trump administration's broader "America-first" foreign policy, which includes a deep scepticism of multilateral groups, including the United Nations, the World Trade Organisation, and the NATO alliance. White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly said UNESCO "supports woke, divisive cultural and social causes that are totally out-of-step with the commonsense policies that Americans voted for." The US state department accused UNESCO of supporting "a globalist, ideological agenda for international development at odds with our America First foreign policy". It said its decision to admit the Palestinians as a member state was "highly problematic, contrary to US policy, and contributed to the proliferation of anti-Israel rhetoric." UNESCO chief Audrey Azoulay said she deeply regretted Trump's decision, but it was "expected, and UNESCO has prepared for it." Posting on X, French president Emmanuel Macron professed "unwavering support" for the "universal protector" of world heritage and said the US move would not weaken France's commitment to UNESCO. UNESCO officials said the US withdrawal would have some limited impact on US--financed programmes. Azoulay said UNESCO had diversified funding sources, receiving only about 8pc of its budget from Washington. UNESCO was one of several international bodies Trump withdrew from during his first term, along with the World Health Organisation, the Paris Agreement climate change accord, and the UN Human Rights Council. During his second term, he has largely reinstated those steps. Trump's pick to be his UN envoy, Mike Waltz, said this month the United Nations needs reform while expressing confidence that "we can make the UN great again." Israel praises US moral support and leadership Israel welcomed the US decision with its UN ambassador, Danny Danon, accusing UNESCO of "consistent misguided anti-Israel bias'. In a post on X, Israel's foreign minister Gideon Sa'ar, thanked Washington for its "moral support and leadership" and said that "Singling out Israel and politicization by member states must end, in this and all professional UN agencies." US senator Jeanne Shaheen, the senior Democrat on the Republican-controlled Senate Foreign Relations Committee, called Trump's decision "short-sighted and a win for China," which she said became the largest financial contributor to UNESCO after Trump last withdrew from the agency. UNESCO officials said all relevant agency statements had been agreed with both Israel and the Palestinians over the past eight years. Azoulay said the US had given the same reasons for its pullout as it had seven years ago "even though the situation has changed profoundly, political tensions have receded, and UNESCO today constitutes a rare forum for consensus on concrete and action-oriented multilateralism'. "These claims also contradict the reality of UNESCO's efforts, particularly in the field of Holocaust education and the fight against antisemitism," she added. The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization is best known for designating World Heritage Sites, including the US Grand Canyon and Egypt's pyramids. It lists 26 sites in the United States, including the Statue of Liberty, on its World Heritage List which highlights 1,248 global locations of "outstanding universal value." Washington has had a troubled relationship with UNESCO over the years. It was a founding member in 1945 but first withdrew in 1984 to protest alleged financial mismanagement and perceived anti-US bias during the Cold War. It returned in 2003 under US president George W. Bush, who said UNESCO had undertaken needed reforms, but in 2011 the Obama administration announced it was stopping funding for the agency following its vote to grant the Palestinians full membership. Trump's first administration announced in 2017 it was quitting after accusing UNESCO of anti-Israeli bias, with Washington owing $542 million in dues, before former US president Biden reversed the decision in 2023.
Irish Times
18 hours ago
- Irish Times
Volodymyr Zelenskiy orders officials to prepare for new peace talks with Russia
Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskiy has ordered officials to prepare for a new round of peace talks with Russia that could start on Wednesday, as critics accused him of trying to assert de facto control over his country's top anti-corruption agencies. Mr Zelenskiy on Tuesday appointed Rustem Umerov, the secretary of Ukraine's national security and defence council, to lead a delegation that he said would also include officials from the foreign ministry, intelligence services and his own office. Kyiv officials have said their first peace talks with Russia since early June are scheduled to start in Istanbul on Wednesday. The Kremlin has said it hopes talks could resume this week, without confirming a date or location. 'Let's be honest: the issue of a Ukrainian settlement is so complicated that even reaching agreements on prisoner exchanges or the return of bodies is already a success,' Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Tuesday. 'So ... we have no reason to expect any magical breakthroughs – such outcomes are hardly likely in the current situation.' READ MORE Talks in Istanbul on May 16th and June 2nd resulted in the exchange of thousands of prisoners and the remains of dead soldiers, but made no headway on US-led calls for a full ceasefire – which Ukraine supports – and top-level talks on a possible peace deal. The US has expressed growing impatience with Moscow and last week agreed to send more arms to Ukraine via Nato and threatened to impose 'severe' tariffs on Russian trade if the Kremlin failed to seek peace within 50 days. Russia responded by saying it rejected ultimatums and by reiterating that peace was possible only if Ukraine accepted the permanent occupation of five of its regions and formally agreed never to join Nato – terms that Kyiv says amount to capitulation. 'Ukraine is ready to work as productively as possible for the release of our people from captivity and the return of abducted children, as well as to stop the killings and prepare for a meeting of leaders to achieve the real end of this war,' Mr Zelenskiy said. 'Our position is as transparent as possible. Ukraine never wanted this war, and it is Russia that must end the war that it started.' As he focused publicly on potential peace talks, critics accused Mr Zelenskiy of aiming to crush the independence of the national anti-corruption bureau (Nabu) and specialised anti-corruption prosecutor's office (Sapo), which are central to western-backed efforts to root out the high-level graft that has plagued Ukraine for decades. Deputies rushed through a Bill on Tuesday that would dramatically restrict the two agencies' freedom of operation and effectively subordinate them to Ukraine's prosecutor general, who is appointed directly by the country's president. Opponents of the move urged Mr Zelenskiy not to sign the Bill into law, amid widespread anger among civil society activists over a spate of raids and arrests that they regard as attempts to intimidate and sideline anti-corruption investigators and campaigners. Nabu director Semen Kryvonos urged Mr Zelenskiy to veto a Bill that he said had been supported by deputies who face anti-corruption investigations, and which 'threatened' Ukraine's bid to join the European Union and Nato. 'The European Union is concerned about Ukraine's recent actions with regard to ... Nabu and Sapo. These institutions are crucial to Ukraine's reform agenda and must operate independently to fight corruption and maintain public trust,' said European Commission spokesman Guillaume Mercier. 'The EU provides significant financial assistance to Ukraine, conditional on progress in transparency, judicial reform, and democratic governance. Ukraine's EU accession will require a strong capacity to combat corruption and to ensure institutional resilience.'
