Breaking Martin Luther King Jr. assassination files released by US Justice Dept
Files were posted on the website of the National Archives, which said more would be released.
Dr King died of an assassin's bullet in Memphis, Tennessee, on 4 April, 1968, as he increasingly extended his attention from a nonviolent campaign for equal rights for African Americans to economic issues and calls for peace.
His death shook the United States in a year that would also bring race riots, anti-Vietnam war demonstrations and the assassination of presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy.
Earlier this year, President Donald Trump's administration released thousands of pages of digital documents related to the assassinations of Robert Kennedy and former President John F.Kennedy, who was killed in 1963.
Mr Trump promised on the campaign trail to provide more transparency about President Kennedy's death.
Upon taking office, he also ordered aides to present a plan for the release of records relating to the assassinations of Robert Kennedy and Dr King.
The FBI kept files on Mr King in the 1950s and 1960s - even wiretapping his phones - because of what the bureau falsely said at the time were his suspected ties to communism during the Cold War between the US and Soviet Union.
In recent years, the FBI has acknowledged that as an example of "abuse and overreach" in its history.
The civil rights leader's family asked those who engage with the files to "do so with empathy, restraint, and respect for our family's continuing grief," and condemned "any attempts to misuse these documents."
"Now more than ever, we must honor his sacrifice by committing ourselves to the realization of his dream – a society rooted in compassion, unity, and equality," they said in a statement.
"During our father's lifetime, he was relentlessly targeted by an invasive, predatory, and deeply disturbing disinformation and surveillance campaign orchestrated by J. Edgar Hoover through the Federal Bureau of Investigation," the family, including his two living children, Martin III, 67, and Bernice, 62, said, referring to the then-FBI director.
James Earl Ray, a segregationist and drifter, confessed to killing Mr King but later recanted.
He died in prison in 1998.
Dr King's family said it had filed a wrongful death civil lawsuit in Tennessee in 1999 that led to a jury unanimously concluding "that our father was the victim of a conspiracy involving Loyd Jowers and unnamed co-conspirators, including government agencies as a part of a wider scheme.
"The verdict also affirmed that someone other than James Earl Ray was the shooter, and that Mr. Ray was set up to take the blame. Our family views that verdict as an affirmation of our long-held beliefs."
Mr Jowers, once a Memphis police officer, told ABC's Prime Time Live in 1993 that he participated in a plot to kill Dr King.
A 2023 Justice Department report called his claims dubious.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
4 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Donald Trump's envoy to meet Vladimir Putin ahead of deadline for Ukraine peace deal
Steve Witkoff will visit Moscow on 'Wednesday or Thursday' to meet the Russian president, Mr Trump said. His task is to 'get a deal where people stop getting killed', according to the US president. Putin has already met Mr Witkoff four times in Moscow in an attempt to broker a peace deal. But this trip to the Russian capital comes ahead of the shortened deadline set by Mr Trump for Putin to reach a ceasefire or face crippling new sanctions. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said yesterday that officials are happy to meet with Mr Trump's envoy. 'We are always glad to see Mr Witkoff in Moscow,' he said. 'We consider (talks with Witkoff) important, substantive and very useful.' The US president has said the new measures could mean 'secondary tariffs' targeting Russia's remaining trade partners, such as China and India. This would further stifle Russia, but would risk significant international disruption. 'There'll be sanctions, but they seem to be pretty good at avoiding sanctions,' Mr Trump told reporters on Sunday. He also confirmed that US nuclear submarines are 'now in the region where they have to be' after he announced on Friday that two underwater vessels would be moved towards Russian waters. 'The answer is, they are in the region, yeah, where they have to be,' he said on Sunday. The decision to move US nuclear submarines came in response to an escalating war of words online between Mr Trump and Russia's former president. Dmitry Medvedev, a key Putin ally now on Russia's security council, had aggressively criticised Mr Trump's sanctions ultimatum and reminded him of the strength of Moscow's nuclear arsenal. Mr Trump said on social media that Mr Medvedev's 'highly provocative statements' led him to dispatch the submarines 'just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that'. It is not clear which nuclear submarines have been moved, but experts said it was likely to be nuclear-armed vessels. It is extremely rare for a US president to signal their movements, which are usually shrouded in secrecy. In response, Mr Medvedev, one of Russia's most outspoken anti-Western hawks who has long been at odds with Mr Trump, has stayed unusually quiet. Noting his silence, Andriy Yermak, Volodymyr Zelensky's chief of staff, said the reaction of the 'Russian drunk who had been threatening nuclear war' made it clear that 'Russia only understands one thing: strength'. The shift in Washington's nuclear posture towards Russia reflects its growing frustration with Moscow over its intensifying bombardment of Ukraine. Mr Trump, whose patience with Putin has worn thin, said he was 'disgusted' on Thursday by Russia's deadly drone and missile attacks on Ukrainian cities. Russia fired a record number of drones in July, killing hundreds of civilians, while its forces grind forward in the country's east and have accelerated their gains for the fourth consecutive month, according to analysis. Putin, who has consistently rejected calls for a ceasefire, said on Friday that he wants peace but that his demands for ending his nearly three-and-a-half year invasion were 'unchanged'. He has demanded that Ukraine cedes complete control of four regions that Moscow has invaded and claimed to have annexed − a demand that Kyiv says is tantamount to surrender. It comes as Ukrainian drone attacks on Sunday sparked a massive fire at an oil depot in the Russian Black Sea resort of Sochi. It marked a rare strike on the city, which is some 400 miles from the front line in Ukraine, and was part of a series of wider weekend attacks on oil refineries across Russia. Ukraine said yesterday it had charged six people including a lawmaker and a government official for embezzling funds in the purchase of drones and jamming equipment for the military. Kyiv relies on a steady supply of drones and electronic warfare systems to fight Moscow's invasion, and is also waging a crackdown on graft critical to its future in the European Union. Anti-corruption authorities said on Saturday they had uncovered a scheme offering kickbacks for purchases at inflated prices. It involved the legislator, one current and one now sacked official, a National Guard commander and two businessmen. 'In 2024-2025, an organised criminal group systematically misappropriated funds allocated by local authorities for defence needs,' the National Anti-Corruption Bureau said in a statement, adding the bribes totalled around 30pc of the contracts' value. The drone contract was worth $240,000 (€207,000) with an inflation of about $80,000, the bureau said. President Zelensky, who sparked a public furore last month for briefly scrapping the independence of two anti-corruption agencies, praised the move on Saturday after meeting the agency heads. None of the suspects has been identified. The equipment was locally manufactured.
Irish Independent
4 hours ago
- Irish Independent
The Irish Independent's View: Nuclear threats show leaders are playing a dangerous game
Washington had set a deadline of Friday for Russia to agree to end the Ukraine war or face new sanctions. Asked what Vladimir Putin could do to avoid the sanctions, Mr Trump answered: 'Yeah, get a deal where people stop getting killed.' Mr Trump's previously conciliatory posture towards the Kremlin has taken on a menacing tone Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov played down the significance of Mr Trump's announcement about moving the submarines, saying: 'We do not believe that we are talking about any escalation now.' He noted that 'everyone should be careful about nuclear rhetoric', adding: 'There can be no winner in a nuclear war.' The US president's frustration at being strung along for months by Putin is clearly at breaking point. There is no sign of an end to fighting in Ukraine. Yet upping the ante in the nuclear stakes is hardly the answer. Since the Cold War, the two powers have walked a tightrope, knowing one stumble could mean Armageddon. A consensus held that as such a war could never be won, it could never be countenanced. But the balance of such reasoning seems threatened by a new recklessness in word, if – so far – not in deed. Mr Trump's previously conciliatory posture towards the Kremlin has taken on a menacing tone in response to Moscow's continuing stonewalling and defiance. But it should be remembered that so much has changed since the Cold War, with a third nuclear superpower, China, to be considered. The more players there are, the higher the chances of someone tripping over somebody else's feet. The idea of everyone keeping everybody else in check has been further complicated by a number of other countries also holding arsenals for deterrence. But it has been three-and-a-half years since Moscow's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Despite the sanctions, Putin saw his economy grow by more than 4pc last year. The thinking now in Washington is to use secondary sanctions – hitting countries such as India and China, which are buying their energy from Moscow. These, after all, are the revenues funding the war in Ukraine. Another deadline this week could end with either a breakthrough or another missed opportunity So far, Mr Trump's see-sawing between promises and threats has come to nothing. Another deadline looming this week could end with either a breakthrough or another missed opportunity. In Kyiv, president Volodymyr Zelensky has appealed to the US and the EU to impose secondary sanctions on Moscow's energy, trade and banking sectors. So far, Mr Trump has shown no real commitment to forcing Putin's hand. Mr Witkoff's visits to Moscow have also yielded precious little. Putin has leveraged his nuclear arsenal to project invincibility. But what happens when the roulette stops being rhetorical? There is far too much at stake for this to become a contest over who blinks first.
Irish Examiner
9 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
China-EU relations are now 50 years old
Fifty years ago, in the midst of the Cold War, visionary leaders from China and Europe showed remarkable political courage and strategic foresight by breaking through the rigid bloc confrontations of the time. In 1975, they established diplomatic relations between China and the European Economic Community — a historic step that opened the door to a relationship grounded in dialogue, co-operation, and mutual benefit. Over the past five decades, the results of this partnership have been truly remarkable. The 'win-win' nature of China–EU relations is clearly evident. The European Community, originally composed of just nine member states, has grown into the 27-member EU — a deeply integrated and influential global actor. Meanwhile, China has emerged as the world's second-largest economy. Bilateral trade has surged from $2.4bn in 1975 to an impressive $785.8bn today, while mutual investment has expanded from virtually nothing to nearly $260bn. Chinese investment has created more than 270,000 jobs in the EU. Co-operation now extends across a wide array of fields, including economy and trade, science, education, and culture. China has unilaterally granted visa-free access to citizens of 24 EU member states, and nearly 600 flights connect China and Europe each week. In 2024 alone, more than 9.7m people travelled between the two regions. Looking back, the development of China–EU relations has not been without its challenges. As the Chinese saying goes, 'A friend in need is a friend indeed'. Despite the EU's internal ups and downs or shifts in the global landscape, China's approach to its relationship with the EU has remained consistent and steady. China has always supported European integration and respects the EU's pursuit of strategic autonomy — welcoming a strong, prosperous, and stable Europe. During the European debt and financial crises, China extended its support by expressing firm confidence — famously declaring that 'confidence is more precious than gold' — and by purchasing large amounts of eurozone bonds. China's capital inflows and booming trade with Europe played a constructive role in the region's economic rebound. Following the UK's decision to leave the EU, China maintained its confidence in European unity. It dismissed the noise of Euroscepticism and Brexit-related anxieties, trusting in a smooth transition between the EU and the UK, while continuing to advocate for the stable and healthy development of China–EU ties. During the covid-19 pandemic, China stood in solidarity with Europe. Despite facing domestic shortages and pressure, China overcame logistical and supply challenges to donate and export large volumes of medical supplies to the EU and its member states, including Ireland. Between March 29 and April 26, 2020, Aer Lingus operated 259 cargo flights between Dublin and Beijing, transporting over 4,000 tons of medical supplies from China — the largest freight operation in the airline's history. These five decades have shown that China and the EU have the capacity to support and elevate each other — and even offer hope to the wider world. China's development has never been intended to challenge or even 'screw' the EU. On the contrary, it has always sought to respect and address EU concerns. On the Ukraine crisis, China has clearly stated its opposition to the use of nuclear weapons and attacks on civilian nuclear facilities. It has called for preventing escalation and spillover of the conflict and emphasised Europe's rightful role in resolving the crisis. Like EU, China is committed to a political settlement and supports Europe to build a balanced, effective, and sustainable European security architecture — one that can ensure lasting peace and prevent a repeat of war. On matters of trade and economic co-operation, China has taken tangible steps to address EU concerns. The number of sectors restricted to foreign investment has been significantly reduced — from 190 to just 29 — while efforts to ensure national treatment for foreign investors are steadily advancing. These measures have provided European businesses with broader access to a more open and rules-based Chinese market. In response to supply-chain concerns, such as those involving rare earth elements, China has introduced a 'fast track' mechanism for European companies. To address worries about trade diversion, China has agreed to a monitoring mechanism and introduced consumer goods upgrade and equipment renewal policies aimed at expanding domestic demand — concrete signs of China's goodwill and commitment. Over the past five decades, China and Europe have built experience and goodwill that will help us counter uncertainty and future challenges. Denying past achievements clouds our vision for the future. Disregarding the efforts of past generations is tantamount to denying our own progress. As two major forces promoting multipolarity, two massive markets supporting globalisation, and two great civilisations championing diversity, China and Europe have every reason to choose openness and co-operation. If we do, the global tide toward economic integration will remain unbroken. Looking ahead, China hopes to work with EU to uphold the post-war international order and multilateral trading system, providing much-needed global stability and certainty. Together, we can shape an even more promising next 50 years for China–EU relations. Zhao Xiyuan is the Ambassador of China to Ireland.
