Bid to relocate iconic US Space Shuttle Discovery faces museum pushback
The plan now faces legal uncertainty, with the Smithsonian Institution arguing Congress had no authority to give away what it considers private property -- even before accounting for the steep logistical and financial challenges.
'The Smithsonian Institution owns the Discovery and holds it in trust for the American public,' the museum network, which receives substantial federal funding yet remains an independent entity, said in a statement to AFP on Friday.
'In 2012, NASA transferred 'all rights, title, interest and ownership' of the shuttle to the Smithsonian,' the statement continued, calling Discovery one of the museum's 'centerpieces' that welcomes millions of visitors a year.
The push to move Discovery from the Air and Space Museum's site in northern Virginia began in April, when Texas Senator John Cornyn, a Republican who faces a tough primary challenge next year by state attorney general Ken Paxton, introduced the 'Bring the Space Shuttle Home Act,' naming Discovery.
The legislation stalled until it was folded into the mammoth 'Big Beautiful Bill,' signed into law on July 4.
Its passage allocated $85 million for the move, though the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service has projected a far higher cost of $325 million, adding that the NASA administrator's power over non-NASA entities is 'unclear.'
To comply with Senate rules, the bill's language was modified such that Discovery is no longer named directly. Instead, the bill refers to a 'space vehicle,' though there is little doubt as to the target.
NASA's administrator -- currently Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, serving in an acting capacity -- was given 30 days to identify which spacecraft is to be relocated, a deadline coming up on Sunday.
End of an era
NASA's Space Shuttle program ended in 2011, after a 30-year run that carried America's post-Apollo space ambitions.
The four surviving orbiters -- Atlantis, Endeavour, prototype Enterprise, and Discovery -- were awarded to Florida, California, New York, and Virginia through a ranked selection process.
Discovery, the most flown, was chosen as a vehicle-of-record in a near-complete state, intended for study by future generations.
'There was not a lot of support within Houston to want a shuttle,' space historian Robert Pearlman told AFP, adding that a proposal to house it at Space Center Houston was relatively weak.
But after the announcement, Texas -- home to the Johnson Space Center, which oversees NASA's human spaceflight -- felt snubbed, and allegations of political interference by then-president Barack Obama swirled.
A NASA inspector general probe found no evidence of foul play.
Enormous challenges
Relocating Discovery now would pose major technical hurdles. NASA had modified two Boeing 747s to ferry retired shuttles -- one is now a museum piece, and the other is out of service.
That leaves land and water transport. 'The nearest water entrance to the Potomac River is about 30 miles away,' Pearlman said -- but it may be too shallow for the orbiter and required barge, requiring a 100-mile journey instead.
A water transport would require a massive enclosed barge, he added.
The US government owns only one such vessel, controlled by the military. Loaning it to a civilian agency would require another act of Congress, and the alternative would involve building one from scratch.
Dennis Jenkins, a former shuttle engineer who oversaw the delivery of retired orbiters to their new homes, told the Collect Space outlet he could see costs reach a billion dollars.
Nicholas O'Donnell, an attorney at Sullivan & Worcester with expertise in art and museum law, told AFP that assuming Smithsonian has valid paperwork, 'I don't think Secretary Duffy or anyone in the federal government has any more authority to order the move of Discovery than you or I do.'
The government could invoke eminent domain -- seizing private property for public use -- but it would have to pay fair market value or try to sue.
The Smithsonian is unlikely to want a court battle, and while it's legally independent, its financial reliance on federal funds leaves it politically vulnerable, said O'Donnell.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leaders
2 hours ago
- Leaders
‘Unreasonable': India Responds to US Tariff Threat over Russian Oil
New Delhi has responded to the US tariff threat, criticizing what it called the 'unjustifiable and unreasonable' targeting of India. The US President, Donald Trump, threatened India with 'substantially' steeper tariffs over its imports of Russian oil, few days after imposing a 25% levy on the country, reported BBC. Rejecting US Tariff Threat In an official statement, the spokesperson of India's Foreign Ministry, Randhir Jaiswal, responded to Trump's tariff threats, accusing the US and the European Union (EU) of targeting India. 'India has been targeted by the United States and the European Union for importing oil from Russia after the commencement of the Ukraine conflict. In fact, India began importing from Russia because traditional supplies were diverted to Europe after the outbreak of the conflict. The United States at that time actively encouraged such imports by India for strengthening global energy markets stability,' the statement said. It added that Russian oil imports are 'a necessity compelled by global market situation' to ensure predictable and affordable energy costs to Indian consumers. Harsh Criticism India sharply criticized the US and EU for attacking New Delhi while doing trade themselves with Russia. 'It is revealing that the very nations criticizing India are themselves indulging in trade with Russia,' the statement said, noting that this trade 'is not a vital national compulsion' for them. The statement went on to highlight the volume of trade between the EU and Russia, which in 2024 reached € 67.5 billion in goods, significantly surpassing India's total trade with Russia in the same year or subsequently. In the meantime, the US has maintained its imports from Russia, including uranium hexafluoride for its nuclear industry, palladium for its EV industry, fertilizers and chemicals, the statement added. Defending India's Interests The Indian Foreign Ministry's statement emphasized that Delhi will take the necessary measure to defend its national interests. 'The targeting of India is unjustified and unreasonable,' it said. 'Like any major economy, India will take all necessary measures to safeguard its national interests and economic security,' the statement stressed. Trump Tariffs On Monday, Trump threatened New Delhi with much higher tariffs over its purchase of Russian oil, thus supporting Moscow's war effort in Ukraine. 'India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian Oil, they are then, for much of the Oil purchased, selling it on the Open Market for big profits,' he posted on Truth Social. 'They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine. Because of this, I will be substantially raising the Tariff paid by India to the USA,' Trump stated, without specifying the level of tariffs. Trump's new threat came days after he imposed a 25% tariff on imports from India, taking effect on August 1, 2025, in addition to unspecified 'penalty.' India-Russia Energy Ties India is one of the largest buyers of Russian oil and has emerged as one of the most significant markets for Russian exports after many European countries severed trade ties with Moscow following its war on Ukraine in 2022. According to a report released by the US Energy Information Administration earlier this year, New Delhi increased its imports of Russian oil from just under 100,000 barrels per day before the war to over 1.8 million barrels per day in 2023, accounting for 39% of overall imports. Furthermore, India imported 70% of Russian crude in 2024, according to the International Energy Agency. India has repeatedly defended its oil purchases from Russia. In an interview with CNBC last month, Delhi's Energy Minister, Hardeep Singh Puri, reiterated the idea that his country's oil imports from Russia helped in stabilizing global energy prices and was encouraged by the US. 'If people or countries had stopped buying at that stage, the price of oil would have gone up to 130 dollars a barrel. That was a situation in which we were advised, including by our friends in the United States, to please buy Russian oil, but within the price cap,' he said. Short link : Post Views: 6
Asharq Al-Awsat
4 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
US Could Require Up to $15,000 Bonds for Some Tourist Visas under Pilot Program
The US could require bonds of up to $15,000 for some tourist and business visas under a pilot program launching in two weeks, a government notice said on Monday, an effort that aims to crack down on visitors who overstay their visas. The program gives US consular officers the discretion to impose bonds on visitors from countries with high rates of visa overstays, according to a Federal Register notice. Bonds could also be applied to people coming from countries where screening and vetting information is deemed insufficient, the notice said. President Donald Trump has made cracking down on illegal immigration a focus of his presidency, boosting resources to secure the border and arresting people in the US illegally. He issued a travel ban in June that fully or partially blocks citizens of 19 nations from entering the US on national security grounds. Trump's immigration policies have led some visitors to skip travel to the United States. Transatlantic airfares dropped to rates last seen before the COVID-19 pandemic in May and travel from Canada and Mexico to the US fell by 20% year-over-year. Effective August 20, the new visa program will last for approximately a year, the government notice said. Consular officers will have three options for visa applicants subjected to the bonds: $5,000, $10,000 or $15,000, but will generally be expected to require at least $10,000, it said. The funds will be returned to travelers if they depart in accordance with the terms of their visas, the notice said. A similar pilot program was launched in November 2020 during the last months of Trump's first term in office, but it was not fully implemented due to the drop in global travel associated with the pandemic, the notice said. A State Department spokesperson listed the criteria that will be used to identify the countries that will be affected, adding that the country list may be updated. "Countries will be identified based on high overstay rates, screening and vetting deficiencies, concerns regarding acquisition of citizenship by investment without a residency requirement, and foreign policy considerations," the spokesperson said. The State Department was unable to estimate the number of visa applicants who could be affected by the change. Many of the countries targeted by Trump's travel ban also have high rates of visa overstays, including Chad, Eritrea, Haiti, Myanmar and Yemen. US Travel Association, which represents major tourism-related companies, estimated the "scope of the visa bond pilot program appears to be limited, with an estimated 2,000 applicants affected, most likely from only a few countries with relatively low travel volume to the United States." Numerous countries in Africa, including Burundi, Djibouti and Togo also had high overstay rates, according to US Customs and Border Protection data from fiscal year 2023. A provision in a sweeping spending package passed in the Republican-controlled US Congress in July also created a $250 "visa integrity fee" for anyone approved for a non-immigrant visa that could potentially be reimbursable for those who comply with visa rules. The $250 fee goes into effect on October 1. US Travel said that fee could hinder travel and said "if implemented, the US will have one of, if not the highest, visitor visa fees in the world."
Al Arabiya
4 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Earth is spinning faster: Aug. 5 set to be one of the shortest days on record
The Earth's solar day on Tuesday is set to be one of the shortest days on record, lasting a few milliseconds short of the typical 24 hours, according to reports. While the slight difference of 1.25 milliseconds may not be naturally discernible, it is enough to get scientists studying shifting trends in the Earth's rotation. A usual 24-hour solar day is measured from noon to noon, which adds up to 86,400 seconds. However, scientists have predicted three dates in 2025 which will be shorter than 24 hours. These include July 9, July 22, and August 5. The shortest day ever was July 5 last year, falling 1.66 milliseconds below the 24-hour mark. According to a 2024 article published in Nature by Duncan Carr Agnew, global warming may be a contributing factor in this shift. However, postulates that the accelerated rotation of the Earth is more likely due to slower rotation of the Earth's liquid core, making the rest of the planet spin faster.
