The imminence of nation building
India, the cradle of an ancient Hindu geographic civilization, stands at a pivotal juncture in its storied history. For nearly 3,825 years, from the Persian invasion around 1850 BCE to the British colonial exit in 1947, our land endured relentless foreign oppression. These invasions spanning empires, cultures, and ideologies left deep scars on our physical, mental, cultural, and spiritual fabric. Seventy- seven years after achieving independence, India celebrates the triumph of swaraj, or self-governance, but the shackles of centuries-long conditioning persist.
Nation Building
The absence of a structured Nation Building initiative since 1947 has left our society fragmented, our values eroded, and our national identity adrift. The time for Nation Building is not merely imminent, it is an urgent moral and civilizational imperative.
The independence of 1947 was a hard-won victory, ending 200 years of British domination and marking the realization of self-rule. Yet, the national leaders of that time, consumed with crafting a democratic constitution, overlooked a critical need: the healing of a nation traumatized by millennia of subjugation. No formal assessment evaluated the psychological, social, or cultural toll of 3,825 years of foreign rule. No structured plan sought to restore the Dharmic, Vedic, and spiritual wisdom that sustained our civilization through centuries of adversity.
Instead, the nation moved forward as if the wounds of history required no closure, leaving generations to grapple with a legacy of division, self-doubt, and cultural disconnection.
Today, 77 years later, we must confront the consequences of this oversight. What values guide our society? Are we united across the divides of caste, religion, region, or language? Has materialism eclipsed our spiritual heritage? Are our institutions honest, our politics ethical, our workplaces professional? The answers are sobering. Social disharmony festers, corruption permeates public and private spheres, and greed overshadows contentment. Lies and deceit have been normalized in political and social discourse.
Our youth lack role models rooted in our civilizational ethos, and our indigenous culture, once the bedrock of our identity, fades under the weight of globalised consumerism. Families weaken, communities fracture, and national pride wanes. This is not the 'Great Indian Dream' our freedom fighters envisioned. It is the direct result of neglecting Nation Building, a deliberate, value-driven effort to forge a cohesive, resilient, and inspired society.
The Constituent Assembly of 1947 gave us a constitution to govern our republic, but it failed to chart a course for social transformation or cultural revival. It set no national goals, defined no shared values, and offered no guiding light for a people emerging from centuries of oppression. Most critically, it did not formally adopt the Dharmic, Vedic, and spiritual knowledge that enabled our civilization to survive and thrive despite inhuman subjugation. The failure to weave this cultural and spiritual equity into the fabric of our new republic was not just an oversight; it was a generational neglect that continues to haunt us.
Nation Building is not a vague ideal, it is the deliberate crafting of a society grounded in shared principles that inspire unity, purpose, and progress. Economic growth, while essential, is hollow without social transformation. A nation cannot thrive on material wealth alone if its people are divided, its institutions corrupt, and its culture eroded. India's treasure trove of Vedic wisdom offers a blueprint for such a transformation, yet our leaders from the past have failed to harness it. The absence of a National Value Framework has left us rudderless, chasing fleeting prosperity while neglecting the deeper work of building a harmonious and self-reliant society.
The Nation Building Foundation (NBF) proposes a bold and visionary solution: the creation of an Indian National Value Framework, forged through collaboration with scholars, spiritual leaders, social thinkers, and citizens. This framework will draw from India's civilizational heritage to promote values that resonate with both our past and our future. Dharma will inspire ethical conduct and accountability. Satyam will foster transparency and truth in governance and social interactions. Ahimsa will guide us toward peace and tolerance, bridging divides of caste, religion, and region. Swadeshi will revive self-reliance in economics, culture, and intellect, while Santosha will counter materialism with contentment and balance. Vidya (knowledge) will reform education to integrate Vedic wisdom with modern skills, ensuring equitable access to learning. Samyak Drishti (holistic vision) will unite diverse communities under a shared national purpose, fostering pride and progress.
The NBF's mission is threefold. First, it will work with great minds to draft this framework, ensuring it is inclusive, adaptable, and rooted in India's ethos.
Second, it will advocate its adoption through family, educational institutions, social, and spiritual organizations, embedding it into the national consciousness. Third, it will sustain Nation Building through ongoing initiatives, workshops, campaigns, and curricula that guide generations toward a harmonious, value-driven society. This is not a short-term project but a generational commitment to heal the wounds of the past and shape a future worthy of our ancestors' sacrifices.
The Imminence
The urgency of this mission cannot be overstated. Without a National Value Framework, India risks further division, cultural erosion, and moral decline. Economic progress alone cannot mend our social fabric or restore our civilizational glory. The cracks in our society, evident in rising intolerance, institutional decay, and cultural amnesia, demand immediate action. By embracing Nation Building, we can reverse the conditioning of centuries, rebuild our ethical foundations, and unite our diverse populace under a shared vision.
This framework will empower our youth, strengthen our communities, and elevate our global standing as a beacon of wisdom and harmony.
The path forward requires collective resolve. The NBF calls on every Indian citizen, leader, and organization to join this transformative journey. We must reclaim our Dharmic heritage, not as a relic of the past but as a living guide for the future. We must prioritize social transformation over fleeting gains, values over wealth, and unity over division. The creation of an Indian National Value Framework is not just a policy proposal, it is a civilizational reawakening, a chance to redefine what it means to be Indian in a free republic.
India's history is a testament to resilience, but our future depends on vision. Let us heal the scars of 3,825 years, restore the pride of 77 years, and build a nation that inspires the world for centuries to come. The time for Nation Building is now. Let us rise, be united, to craft a 'Great Indian Dream' that honors our past and illuminates our future.
(The writer is the Chairman of the Nation Building Foundation, an organizational strategist and a leadership coach)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Ludhiana West bypoll: Arora faces criticism for forgetting name of freedom fighter
As campaigning continues for the Ludhiana West byelection that to be held on June 19, Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) candidate and Rajya Sabha member Sanjeev Arora is facing strong criticism from opposition parties for not remembering the full name of freedom fighter Kartar Singh Sarabha during a public speech. The incident happened on Saturday during an AAP public meeting held in Sarabha Nagar, a prominent area in Ludhiana named after Ghadar movement hero Kartar Singh Sarabha. Shopkeepers in the area have long demanded that the local market should be renamed in his honour. During an event, in which chief minister Bhagwant Mann was also present, MP Arora in his speech referred to the revolutionary as 'Shaheed Sarabha Singh', forgetting his full name — Shaheed Kartar Singh Sarabha — who was executed by the British at just 19 and admired by Bhagat Singh. A video of the speech has gone viral, showing MP Arora struggling to recall the name and being corrected by others on stage. MP Arora then said, 'I am sure CM saab will announce it soon and Sarabha's statue has already been ordered. It will be installed soon.' Following the video, opposition leaders sharply attacked the AAP. Congress MLA Sukhpal Singh Khaira posted on X (formerly Twitter), 'This proves AAP is full of fake revolutionaries. Their candidate doesn't even know who Shaheed Kartar Singh Sarabha is. Leaders like Kejriwal and Bhagwant Mann are using our martyrs' names for politics.' The Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) also expressed outrage. Harjinder Singh Bobby Garcha, president of the Shaheed Kartar Singh Sarabha Foundation and SAD spokesperson, called it 'extremely shameful'. He said, 'How can someone who doesn't even know our martyrs protect their legacy or serve Punjab and Punjabi culture?' Garcha further warned that if MP Arora does not apologise publicly, the foundation will protest his campaign. He also claimed AAP is bringing outsiders into Punjab who have no knowledge or respect for the state's culture and history. 'This shows the real face of AAP. They are insulting Punjab's martyrs and traditions,' Garcha added.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
SC dropped probe on Allahabad HC judge Shekhar Kumar Yadav after Rajya Sabha alert
The Supreme Court was preparing to initiate an in-house inquiry into Allahabad high court judge Shekhar Kumar Yadav's controversial speech at a VHP event last year, but dropped the plan after receiving a categorical letter from the Rajya Sabha secretariat that asserted exclusive jurisdiction over the matter, people aware of the matter said. The people cited above confirmed that then Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna had set the process in motion to assess whether the judge's conduct warranted scrutiny in the wake of an adverse report from the Allahabad High Court chief justice. However, the move was halted after the Rajya Sabha secretariat's letter in March underlined that the constitutional mandate for any such proceeding lies solely with the chairman of the Rajya Sabha, and ultimately with Parliament and the President. This letter effectively stalled the judiciary's plan to initiate an in-house inquiry – an internal mechanism laid down through judicial precedents to examine complaints of misconduct against sitting judges of the superior judiciary, against Justice Yadav, whose comments at the VHP's December 8, 2024, event in Prayagraj drew widespread condemnation for violating the principles of secularism and judicial impartiality. HT reached out to the Rajya secretariat for a response on the next course of action but did not get one immediately. In February, Rajya Sabha chairman and vice president Jagdeep Dhankhar said that only Parliament and President have the jurisdiction over the matter 'The jurisdiction for the stated subject matter constitutionally lies in exclusivity with the chairman Rajya Sabha and in an eventuality with the Parliament and honourable President. Taking note of public domain information and inputs available, it is expedient that the Secretary General, Rajya Sabha shares this information with the Secretary General, Supreme Court of India,' he said in Parliament on February 13. Justice Yadav, addressing a gathering organised by the legal cell of the VHP within the Allahabad High Court Bar Association premises, made a series of incendiary statements that targeted the Muslim community and invoked majoritarian themes. In his speech, he reportedly asserted that 'India should function according to the wishes of the majority,' claimed 'only a Hindu can make this country a 'Vishwa Guru',' and linked practices such as triple talaq and halala to societal backwardness, calling for their abolition under the proposed Uniform Civil Code (UCC). Video clips of the speech, which went viral on social media, show him allegedly using derogatory communal remarks framed the UCC as a Hindu-Muslim binary, stating that while Hindu customs had evolved to address historical wrongs, Muslims had resisted reform. The speech triggered outrage among political leaders, jurists and civil society, with senior advocate Kapil Sibal leading a group of 55 opposition MPs in filing a notice in the Rajya Sabha seeking Justice Yadav's impeachment for 'grave violation of judicial ethics.' The Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Reforms (CJAR) also demanded an in-house inquiry and his immediate suspension, citing a clear breach of the Restatement of Values of Judicial Life adopted by the Supreme Court in 1997. Amid mounting criticism, the Supreme Court swiftly sought a report from the Allahabad High Court chief justice on December 10, 2024. A week later, on December 17, the apex court collegium, comprising CJI Khanna and Justices Bhushan R Gavai, Surya Kant, Hrishikesh Roy and Abhay S Oka, summoned Justice Yadav for a 30-minute closed-door meeting to ascertain whether his public comments violated the Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct or judicial ethics outlined in internal codes. While Justice Yadav reportedly assured the collegium judges he would apologise publicly, he failed to do so in the weeks that followed. Instead, in a January 2025 letter to the chief justice of the Allahabad High Court, the judge doubled down on his remarks, claiming they had been misrepresented by vested interests and asserting that his speech reflected societal concerns 'consistent with constitutional values.' Appointed in 2019, Justice Yadav is set to retire on April 15, 2026. People cited above said that CJI Khanna subsequently sought a fresh report from the Allahabad High Court chief justice, referring to additional complaints against Justice Yadav from a law student and a retired IPS officer. But by then, an unexpected development complicated matters. In March 2025, the Supreme Court administration received a formal communication from the Rajya Sabha secretariat, informing it that the matter of Justice Yadav's conduct, arising out of the December 13 impeachment motion signed by 55 MPs, was already under active consideration. 'The court's secretary general brought the letter to the notice of the then CJI, who was clear that an in-house inquiry, being a non-statutory and internal mechanism, should not run parallel to a statutory process under the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968,' a person familiar with the matter told HT. 'The Rajya Sabha's categorical assertion that it was seized of the matter prompted the judiciary to defer to the parliamentary process,' this person added. The Judges (Inquiry) Act mandates that a motion seeking removal of a High Court or Supreme Court judge for 'proved misbehaviour or incapacity' must be admitted by the presiding officer of the House concerned. To be sure, the Vice President and Rajya Sabha chairman, Jagdeep Dhankhar, has yet to decide on the admissibility of the motion and whether to constitute a formal inquiry committee. 'The idea was not to create constitutional friction or undermine parliamentary privilege…That's the sole reason why no in-house probe was set up despite the initial steps,' the person cited above added. Another person aware of the deliberations within the collegium said that all members were informed of the decision to halt the in-house inquiry after the receipt of the Rajya Sabha's letter. 'There was a kind of consensus that the matter, being under legislative scrutiny, should not be clouded by a simultaneous judicial process,' the person said. Opposition lawmakers, meanwhile, continue to push for clarity on the status of the impeachment motion. Speaking to HT on condition of anonymity, a senior MP said last month that his party planned to raise the matter during the monsoon session. 'During the budget session, the chairman had said that he was assessing the veracity of the signatures on the notice. We would like to know the status of that notice notices have been given in both the Houses and it is imperative it should be taken up,' the lawmaker said. In his formal reply to the complaints, Justice Yadav reportedly maintained in January that he has done no wrong. He described his speech as an articulation of issues affecting society and claimed that his references were misconstrued. On the criticism of his previous judicial orders related to cow protection, he is said to have responded that these reflected India's cultural ethos and legal recognition of cow protection, not any form of judicial bias. Notably, Justice Yadav did not tender an apology in his correspondence, reinforcing his stance that his speech was neither communal nor violative of judicial conduct. He rather asserted that judges, who often face unfair attacks, deserve protection and support from senior members of the judiciary.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
16 arrested in Assam over alleged illegal cattle slaughter during Eid
Guwahati: A total of 16 people were arrested for "illegally" slaughtering cattle during Eid a day ago, said chief minister Himanta Biswa Sarma on Sunday. He said cattle parts were recovered from multiple locations across Assam, including near Cotton University in Guwahati Five illegal slaughter sites were found in two districts of Barak Valley — Gumrah, Silchar, and Lakhipur in Cachar district, and Badarpur and Banga in Karimganj district. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The CM, in a post on his X handle, wrote: "While our Constitution guarantees the right to religious freedom, it equally upholds the rule of law and public order. This Eid-ul-Zuha, disturbing incidents of illegal cattle slaughter and recovery of cattle parts were reported from multiple locations across Assam." Sarma said nine arrests were made in Cachar and seven in Sribhumi district, with additional reports of cattle parts being found in Dhubri, Hojai, and Sribhumi, as well as near Cotton University in Guwahati. The CM said the state govt is committed to "preserving communal harmony, but not at the cost of lawlessness or cruelty". "Please be clear that strict action will be taken against all violators — irrespective of faith or background," he added Meanwhile, people from the Hindu community blocked roads in Hojai on Sunday, alleging that pieces of meat were deliberately thrown by miscreants in certain areas on Saturday night, a police officer said. While beef consumption is not illegal in the state, the Assam Cattle Preservation Act, 2021, prohibits cattle slaughter and beef sales in majority-Hindu, Jain, or Sikh localities, as well as within a five-km radius of a temple or satra (Vaishnavite monastery). On Sunday, a large number of people from the Hindu and Muslim communities came out in Hojai to hold protests separately. They blocked roads and clashed with the police, the officer said. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now "While the Hindus blocked roads in the Barpukhuri area, where suspected cattle meat pieces were found at three places on Saturday, Muslims also came out and blocked a road at Bhuyanpatty as a countermeasure," he said. A section of the mob at Bhuyanpatty clashed with the police, prompting officers to use "mild lathi-charge" to disperse the protesters. However, the situation was brought under control with additional security forces deployed in the area. In Guwahati, police said some pieces of meat wrapped in a polythene packet were found near the Cotton University. The sample has been sent for forensic testing. "No comment can be made until reports are available," the police said.
