Nvidia Stock Falls. What's Dragging It Down.
The AI chip maker's stock was under pressure as trade uncertainty overshadowed CEO Jensen Huang's European tour.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Verge
35 minutes ago
- The Verge
PCIe 7.0 is coming, but not soon, and not for you
The PCIe 7.0 specification has now been released, while many of us are still waiting for PCIe 6.0 to materialize in consumer products. The PCI Special Interest Group (PCI-SIG) announced on Wednesday that PCIe 7.0 is now available to members of its organization, delivering a theoretical maximum bandwidth speed of 512GB per second in both directions, across a x16 connection. 'PCIe technology has served as the high-bandwidth, low-latency IO interconnect of choice for over two decades and we are pleased to announce the release of the PCIe 7.0 specification, which continues our long-standing tradition of doubling the IO bandwidth every three years,' PCI-SIG President Al Yanes said in the announcement. 'As artificial intelligence applications continue to scale rapidly, the next generation of PCIe technology meets the bandwidth demands of data-intensive markets deploying AI, including hyperscale data centers, high performance computing (HPC), automotive, and military/aerospace.' You may have noticed that consumer computing devices weren't included in that statement — the specification is targeting data-driven applications like cloud and quantum computing datacenters for now, and will take some time to even appear in those markets. PCI-SIG says that PCIe 7.0 will be backward compatible with previous PCI Express versions, but there's no mention of plans to bring it to everyday desktop SSDs or GPUs any time soon. That shouldn't be surprising, given the PCIe 5.0 spec that launched in 2019 only started trickling into consumer hardware two years ago, and is still fairly uncommon. Image: PCI-SIG
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Cynthia Lummis Proposes Artificial Intelligence Bill, Requiring AI Firms to Disclose Technicals
Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-WY) has introduced the Responsible Innovation and Safe Expertise (RISE) Act of 2025, a legislative proposal designed to clarify liability frameworks for artificial intelligence (AI) used by professionals. The bill could bring transparency from AI developers – stoping short of requiring models to be open source. In a press release, Lummis said the RISE Act would mean that professionals, such as physicians, attorneys, engineers, and financial advisors, remain legally responsible for the advice they provide, even when it is informed by AI systems. At the time, AI developers who create the systems can only shield themselves from civil liability when things go awry if they publicly release model cards. The proposed bill defines model cards as detailed technical documents that disclose an AI system's training data sources, intended use cases, performance metrics, known limitations, and potential failure modes. All this is intended to help help professionals assess whether the tool is appropriate for their work. "Wyoming values both innovation and accountability; the RISE Act creates predictable standards that encourage safer AI development while preserving professional autonomy,' Lummis said in a press release. 'This legislation doesn't create blanket immunity for AI," Lummis continued. However, the immunity granted under this Act has clear boundaries. The legislation excludes protection for developers in instances of recklessness, willful misconduct, fraud, knowing misrepresentation, or when actions fall outside the defined scope of professional usage. Additionally, developers face a duty of ongoing accountability under the RISE Act. AI documentation and specifications must be updated within 30 days of deploying new versions or discovering significant failure modes, reinforcing continuous transparency obligations. The RISE Act, as it's written now, stops short of mandating that AI models become fully open source. Developers can withhold proprietary information, but only if the redacted material isn't related to safety, and each omission is accompanied by a written justification explaining the trade secret exemption. In a prior interview with CoinDesk, Simon Kim, the CEO of Hashed, one of Korea's leading VC funds, spoke about the danger of centralized, closed-source AI that's effectively a black box. "OpenAI is not open, and it is controlled by very few people, so it's quite dangerous. Making this type of [closed source] foundational model is similar to making a 'god', but we don't know how it works," Kim said at the time.
Forbes
41 minutes ago
- Forbes
AI Is Giving You Back Half A Day Every Week. How To Use It Wisely.
AI Is Giving You Back Half a Day Every Week If you're using AI at work, even occasionally, you may already be gaining back a valuable resource: time. Microsoft's Copilot study found that users spent 30 minutes less on email each week and completed documents 12 percent faster. Adecco reports time savings of around five hours a week for knowledge workers. Thomson Reuters says four. These small efficiencies often amount to a hidden dividend of roughly half a working day every single week. That figure is supported directionally, if more cautiously, by the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. Their analysis estimates that AI saves an average of 5.4% of their weekly work hours, which is about 2.2 hours every week. Even taking the lowest estimate, the result is still meaningful: reclaimed time, quietly reshaping the workweek. I describe the rising AI flood in earlier Forbes pieces and my book, The Human Edge. Some jobs are being submerged. But within the remaining roles, AI is leaving behind micro-efficiencies: small bursts of reclaimed time that quickly add up. This is not speculative. It's already happening. That landmark Federal Reserve survey of nearly 10,000 people found that: Even the recent ChatGPT outage caused over 500,000 Google searches in hours. That wasn't hype. This tells us something important: AI has already woven itself into the fabric of modern work. Over two decades of leadership development, I've worked with CEOs, scientists, creatives, and entrepreneurs. Different sectors, different goals, but the same underlying refrain: "I'd love to reflect, learn, or think more strategically…but I don't have time." Fair enough. Work is relentless. But AI is shifting the equation. The real question is this: Here are five high-leverage moves to make the most of your AI-liberated time. Here's my prediction. The AI age doesn't just reward those who move fast. It rewards those who use time differently.
