
Forget Indus waters, Pakistan Army and govt have huge canal crisis at home
"A historic mobilisation is taking place in Sindh against the six-canal project. People from all walks of life are participating in a strike to save the river Indus. Policy of 'hard state' is leading to more resentment across the country. Time to submit to the will of the people," historian-politician Ammar Ali Jan posted on X.advertisementIndia put on hold the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) after the dastardly Pahalgam terror attacks that killed 26 people, including 25 tourists. India has blamed Pakistan and its supported terrorists for the massacre in which victims were singled out on the basis of their faith.PEOPLE OF SINDH PROTEST AGAINST INDUS CANALS IN PAKISTANFor the last two weeks, Pakistan's southern province of Sindh has been gripped by widespread protests by some parties, lawyers and civil society groups against the army-backed proposal of five new canals on the Indus, and one on Sutlej.It was claimed that the project, part of the $3.3-billion Green Pakistan Initiative (GPI), would irrigate 4.8 million acres of barren land across Punjab, Sindh, and Balochistan. That's roughly eight times the size of Goa.In 2023, Pakistan PM Shehbaz Sharif and army chief General Asim Munir launched the six-canals project under the Green Pakistan Initiative (GPI).Said to be managed by an army-owned private firm, the GPI was touted as a project that would breathe new life into Pakistan's faltering agriculture by bringing in advanced technologies and developing irrigation networks.Yes, the Pakistan Army, like running the country, is also involved in real estate, hospitality, manufacturing, airlines, food and consumer goods, logistics, banking and insurance.advertisementHowever, the project resulted in a massive outrage in Sindh, a lower riparian province heavily dependent on the Indus River. Fears of water diversion to southern Punjab's Cholistan region (part of the greater Thar) ignited mass protests. Sindh, which already receives 20% less water than its allocated share, experts say would face environmental risks. Reduced fresh water flow could cripple Sindh's agriculture by increasing soil salinity, and hasten seawater intrusion into the Indus Delta.Protests erupted across the province after the project was inaugurated in February 2025 by the Chief Minister of Pakistan's Punjab, Maryam Nawaz, and General Munir.AGE-OLD PUNJAB-SINDH RIVALRY FUELLING PROTESTS TOOThen there was the age-old Punjab-Sindh rivalry at play too.The Sindh-based Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP), part of Sharif's ruling coalition Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari earlier this month, threatened to withdraw support from the government."The people of Sindh have rejected the canal projects, yet those in Islamabad remain blind and deaf to our voices," PPP chief Bilawal Bhutto Zardari was quoted as saying by the Karachi-based The Express Tribune on April 18.The Sindh Assembly unanimously passed a resolution demanding a halt to the canal plans. Sit-in protests and rallies spread from Karachi to Sukkur (in northern Sindh).advertisementINDUS CANALS PROTESTS BRING PAKISTAN TO GRINDING HALTFollowing the massive pushback, the $3.3-billion project, touted by the army as a solution to Pakistan's food security crisis, was suspended last week.On April 24, a day after India suspended the Indus Waters Treaty, and PM Sharif announced a halt to the canal construction until a consensus could be reached at the Council of Common Interests meeting set for May 2.Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari played the India card, saying, "India's announcement on the Indus Waters Treaty was not illegal, but against humanity... As long as the PPP exists, not a single drop of Sindh's water will be given away".Bilawal was trying to use the India card and the move to the IWT to sell the six-canal project.However, the ploy of "consensus" and the India card failed to work for Islamabad's army-backed regime. But the protests across Sindh grew more intense and widespread. Protesters refused to relent, citing a lack of trust in verbal assurances. They demanded a formal notification of the cancellation.The protesters remained seated on major highways across Sindh on Sunday. It stranded thousands of trucks and brought the country's supply chain to a grinding halt. Efforts to disperse the protesters proved ineffective, reported Dawn.advertisementManufacturers in Pakistan have been forced to halt production due to a shortage of raw materials; officials at Karachi Port warned of severe congestion. Export cargo could not arrive at the port, and imported goods have been piling up, as they couldn't be transported out of the port, added the report.Nisar Jafry of the All Pakistan Goods Transporters Association told Dawn, that the movement of around 30,000 trucks and oil tankers had been impeded and around 90,000 to 100,000 drivers and their helpers were stranded for over 10 days, facing severe shortages of food and water.Transporters, according to the report, also alleged that over 100 sacrificial animals, part of their cargo, had already died.By Sunday, sit-ins across Sindh had entered their 10th day, halting all vehicular movement between Punjab and Sindh, reported Geo News.The highway blockade is costing traders $2 million in daily delay charges, President of the Federation of Pakistan Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FPCCI), Atif Ikram Sheikh, was quoted as saying by the Riyadh-based Arab News.For now, the government and protesters remain at an impasse.Despite incurring massive losses and prolonged protests, why are the demonstrators not relenting?advertisementWHY SINDH HAS RISEN UP IN PROTEST AGAINST SHARIF GOVT, PAK ARMYThe answer lies in Shahbaz Sharif's verbal assurance, Sindh's deep mistrust of the Punjabi-dominated leadership of Islamabad and Rawalpindi, and the most pressing water crisis that the province has been facing.Most of Sindh is arid as it lies in the rain shadow of the Western Himalayas and receives less than 200 mm of annual rainfall, which makes it one of the driest regions in South Asia. Sindh Province, which contributes 23% to Pakistan's agricultural GDP, relies on the Indus River and its canal network for over 77% of its irrigation needs, according to the World Bank Group document from 2022.However, Sindh receives 20% less water than its allocated share under the 1991 Indus Water Accord, noted a research paper by the International Union for Conservation of Nature. Now with the Rabi season nearing its end, Sindh's water shortage for winter crops had already deepened to 45%. Sindh reported an overall 50% water shortfall, with Guddu Barrage facing a 10.3% deficit and Sukkur Barrage experiencing a steep 66.3% shortage, according to a Dawn report from March.The 1991 Indus Water Accord was a pact between the provinces of Pakistan for the equitable distribution of the Indus River System's water.Now already parched, Sindh fears that diverting water from the Indus and its tributaries through the proposed canals could further aggravate its water crisis.Sindh's deep-seated mistrust of the Punjabi-dominated leadership in Islamabad and Rawalpindi is now unfolding through the controversy over the six-canal projects.The Punjab vs Sindh equation is also at play here in the controversy over the six Indus canal projects."Journalists and columnists in Pakistan who promote the state's narrative on the Indus Water Treaty [1991 Accord] question Sindh's resistance to the construction of six canals. But it was Punjab that sold three rivers without consulting Sindh and since then, Punjab has been stealing Sindh's share of water," Karachi-based journalist Veengas posted on X.Critics of the proposed canals warn that diverting water from the Indus would carry devastating environmental and human costs, endangering local ecosystems, wildlife, and local communities."This is not a people-centred initiative. It's a for-profit scheme for cash crop irrigation...," environmental activist Zulfikar Ali Bhutto Jr told Dawn, adding that less water in the Indus River would stop fresh water from reaching the Arabian Sea, and break the hydrological cycle.Experts fear that the disruption would lead to increased seawater intrusion into the Indus Delta, turning fertile land saline and unfit for agriculture. It would also threaten aquatic life and collapse the livelihoods of fishing and farming communities in lower Sindh.Now, despite suspending the $3.3-billion canal project and calling for "consensus", the Pakistani government may have delayed the incoming challenge for a bit. But by overlooking the concerns of Sindh it has definitely fanned the fire of distrust.For now, as Pakistan is engaged in the Indus water tussle with India, it seems to be drowning in its own canal chaos. All eyes are on the May 2 Council of Common Interests meeting now.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
From Nehru's kinship to Modi's firepower: India shifts tone on Pak
NEW DELHI: "Our neighbour is Pakistan, which is a part of us, part of our hearts and arms. How do we even think of fighting them? This is like harming ourselves. And, if they are aggressive, they will harm themselves. This is a strange relationship between India and Pakistan. Strange relationship where there is sorrow and anger but ultimately that relationship is so close and for thousands of years that laws can't eradicate it. And, if something harms India, it will definitely harm Pakistan as well," Jawaharlal Nehru told the nation from the Red Fort in 1957 on Independence Day. Nearly seven decades later, Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Friday struck a markedly different note. Signalling no rethink on the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) under present circumstances, he declared that India will not distinguish between terrorists and their sponsors, pointing directly at Pakistan's leadership. Prime Minister Modi underlined that the country would not succumb to "any sort of nuclear blackmail." "The Indus Waters Treaty was an injustice to the people of India. The rivers of India were irrigating the enemy country while our own farmers were deprived of water. Now, the right over India's share of water belongs only to India and its farmers. A compromise on farmers' interests and national interests is not acceptable to us. Not anymore," he said. Modi added, "India will no longer tolerate nuclear blackmail. If the enemy dares to commit any more misadventure, the armed forces will give them a befitting reply. India has decided that blood and water will not flow together." Recalling last month's strikes, Modi said, "Operation Sindoor was the expression of that outrage... Penetrating hundreds of kilometres into enemy territory, they reduced terrorist headquarters to dust... Pakistan is still sleepless." This stark contrast captures the transformation in India's attitude towards Pakistan. PM Modi's language of deterrence and retaliation has replaced the earlier vocabulary of kinship and restraint. From invoking Balochistan, Gilgit and PoK in his 2016 speech to citing deep-penetration strikes in 2025, his addresses reflect a conscious break from decades of what he has called misplaced sentimentality. By comparison, the Nehruvian era was shaped by reconciliation despite provocations. Nehru's framing of Pakistan as inseparable from India's "heart and arms" translated into policies like the IWT and territorial concessions under the Noon-Nehru Pact. Even in the face of aggression, he sought to preserve ties. Indira Gandhi's decisive 1971 victory did not fundamentally alter that mindset. Returning 90,000 Pakistani prisoners of war, according to experts, without securing a settlement on Kashmir reflected a continued view of Pakistan as a "brother". Rajiv Gandhi's Independence Day speeches largely bypassed Pakistan, centring instead on domestic modernisation. Even after terror struck deep, restraint prevailed. In 2009, less than a year after the 26/11 attacks, Manmohan Singh's address spoke only of honouring "special assurances and concessions provided to J&K" - a line that avoided naming Pakistan directly. From Nehru's fraternity to Modi's firepower, the arc of Independence Day speeches reveals how India's strategic outlook on Pakistan - and China - has hardened from conciliatory sentiment to hard-nosed realism.


Hindustan Times
5 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Asim Munir's 'rare earth' plan to bring Pakistan out of debt, economic crisis
Pakistan Army chief of staff Asim Munir has revealed a plan to pull Islamabad out of its economic crisis and debt. In a conversation with Pakistani writer Suhail Warraich, the Field Marshal hinted at a "rare earths treasure", shortly after US expressed its interests in Pakistan's mineral reserves. Warraich claimed Munir revealed his ambition for the rare earths plan during a meeting in Brussels, Belgium.(AP) In a column published Saturday in Pakistan's Geo Group, Warraich claimed Munir revealed his ambition for the rare earths plan during a meeting in Brussels, Belgium. Also Read | 'God made me protector': Pak Army chief Asim Munir denies political ambitions, says report "Regarding the solution to the economic crisis, he had a complete roadmap, which planned to put Pakistan in the ranks of the developed countries of the world within five to ten years. He calculated and said that from next year, there will be a net profit of two billion dollars every year from Reko Diq, which will increase every year," wrote Warraich. "He [Munir] said that Pakistan has a rare earth treasure, with this treasure, Pakistan's debt will also be reduced and Pakistan will soon be counted among the most prosperous societies," he added further. Munir's remarks come as the US and Pakistan continue to strengthen their ties under US President Donald Trump. The US' new-found interest in Pakistan also comes after a military stand-off with India earlier this year in May. Also Read | Donald Trump repeats role in India-Pakistan truce; Armenia and Azerbaijan say he deserves Nobel Prize Earlier this month, the Washington Post issued an article exploring Trump's push towards Pakistan. In a post on Truth Social, the US president announced - "Pakistan and the United States will work together on developing their massive Oil Reserves.' POTUS further added that while the process to choose the Oil Company that will lead the partnership is in in the works, "Who knows, maybe they'll be selling Oil to India some day!" About the Reko Diq mine Munir's rare earth push focuses on the Reko Diq mine in Balochistan. The mine is home to one of the world's s largest untapped copper and gold deposits, with 12.3 million tonnes of copper and over 20 million ounces of gold. However, despite Pakistan's hopeful approach, the mine continues to be locked in a geopolitical conflict. China, which is also a close ally for Pakistan, is also reportedly eyeing the mine through its China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). Another obstacle on Pakistan's radar is the conflict with Balochistan, where Baloch nationals have already accused Islamabad of draining the region's national resources.


Economic Times
5 hours ago
- Economic Times
Pakistan minister repeats claim without evidence on downing Indian jets
A Pakistani minister reiterated Islamabad's claim of shooting down six Indian jets during a May conflict, despite India's denial. The minister stated that Pakistan withheld the announcement pending "concrete evidence," including video footage. He also asserted Pakistan's awareness of India's strategies and the safety of its critical assets during the conflict. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads A Pakistani minister on Sunday repeated Islamabad's earlier claim without providing details of downing six Indian jets during the four-day military conflict between the two sides in Chief of Defence Staff Gen Anil Chauhan, speaking in Singapore on May 31, had flatly rejected as "absolutely incorrect" Pakistan's claim of bringing down six Indian his remarks at a seminar, Pakistani Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi said Islamabad chose not to make any formal announcement on it until "concrete evidence" is his comments, Gen Chauhan had said that India suffered losses of aircraft but did not specify the Chief of Air Staff Air Chief Marshal AP Singh earlier this month said that India shot down five Pakistani fighter jets and a large aircraft."Although the radar data had confirmed the downing of the Indian aircraft, Pakistan chose not to make any announcement until concrete evidence is in hand. We have video footage of all six Indian planes which were shot down," Naqvi he did not clarify when Pakistan plans to bring forth the evidence minister further said during this conflict Pakistan had full knowledge of the enemy's planning like what aircraft they would use. "Whatever strategy India devised, we learned about it in time," he also claimed that none of Pakistan's critical assets were damaged during India's missile attack on its seven airbases.