What the new CDC director has said about vaccines, fluoride and more
President Trump nominated her for the role in March, praising her as "an incredible mother and dedicated public servant" who "understands the importance of protecting our children, our communities, and our future."
Monarez has been serving as the acting head of the CDC since January, and previously worked as the head of the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health. She was viewed as somewhat surprising pick for the CDC role because unlike most recent CDC directors, she holds a Ph.D. but is not a medical doctor.
The CDC said Monarez "brings decades of distinguished experience in health innovation, disaster preparedness, global health, and biosecurity" to the agency, and will help advance the "mission to Make America Healthy Again."
At her confirmation hearing before the Senate's Health, Education, Labor and Pension (HELP) committee on July 9, Monarez garnered praise from the Republican chairman, Sen. Bill Cassidy, who is a physician, for her commitment to rebuilding public trust in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. Democrats on the committee grilled her about the impact of cuts in federal funding for health programs and medical research, and expressed concern about the CDC's role under Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Monarez was questioned by committee members about a range of health topics. Here are some of those highlights.
Monarez on vaccines
Monarez faced a number of questions about vaccine recommendations. Kennedy has been a longtime vaccine critic who has pushed a discredited theory linking routine childhood shots to autism, but during her hearing, Monarez refuted that view and stated that she has "not seen a causal link between vaccines and autism."
Amid a growing measles outbreak this year, Kennedy has acknowledged the vaccine's efficacy against the disease while still saying he supports individual choice. In a March interview with CBS News, Kennedy publicly encouraged people to get the measles vaccine.
"If I'm confirmed as CDC director, I look forward to supporting the secretary with science and evidence, and making sure that I am giving him the best information possible," Monarez said at her confirmation hearing. "Measles is an important health threat and we have to make sure we are doing everything that we can to prevent and mitigate it."
Monarez was also asked about the continued availability and affordability of vaccines if the CDC's vaccine advisory panel, made up of new RFK Jr. appointees, makes changes to recommendations.
"Vaccines absolutely save lives, and if I'm confirmed as CDC director, I commit to making sure we continue to prioritize vaccine availability," she said.
Monarez on fluoride
Fluoride, another topic Kennedy has spotlighted, was also a subject of discussion during Monarez's hearing. This year, two states, Utah and Florida, became the first to ban the use of fluoride in drinking water, where it's been added for decades to help prevent tooth decay.
"Fluoride is an important component to oral health, and there are various aspects of using fluoride to improve oral health — a direct application can be very valuable," Monarez said.
Democratic Sen. Angela Alsobrooks of Maryland specifically asked Monarez whether the water in Potomac, Maryland, which has fluoridation, is safe for families.
Monarez replied: "I believe the water in Potomac, Maryland is safe."
Monarez on RFK Jr. and the measles outbreak
Measles came up repeatedly as senators questioned Monarez about how she would interact with Kennedy in her role at the CDC.
"The CDC director can't perform this critical role unless they are politically independent. Which means that you must be willing to disagree with political leaders based on scientific evidence," Democratic Sen. Maggie Hassan of New Hampshire said. "So, is there anything that you disagree with Secretary Kennedy about?"
"If I'm confirmed as CDC director, I look forward to having technical discussions with the secretary. He has said he values and prioritizes independent thinking and using science to drive decision making," Monarez replied. "I am an independent thinker, and I am a scientist, and I will welcome the opportunity to share my opinions based on science and evidence with him as he makes some of these very difficult decisions."
After Monarez sidestepped a question from Hassan about whether she disagrees with anything Kennedy has done, the senator got more specific, asking about Kennedy's claim that it's "very difficult for measles to kill a healthy person." This year's measles outbreak, centered in West Texas, killed two children who doctors said did not have previous health conditions.
Monarez replied that measles is an "important public health threat" that can be lethal.
Forensics expert analysis of Jeffrey Epstein jail video contradicts government's claims
Russia reacts to Trump's new deadline on Ukraine ceasefire
Immigration agent told 18-year-old U.S. citizen "you got no rights here" during arrest
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Buzz Feed
12 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
Marjorie Taylor Greene Just Dropped A Truth Bomb About The Republican Party
Marjorie Taylor Greene is NOT happy with the Republican Party. She was pissed about the attack on Iran. She broke ranks with Republicans and called the crisis in Gaza a "genocide." And she won't stop talking about how Republicans won't deal with the national debt. Now, she's talking about breaking up with the Republican Party. In an interview with the Daily Mail, the Congress member said: "I don't know if the Republican Party is leaving me, or if I'm kind of not relating to Republican Party as much anymore. I don't know which one it is." She also said: "I think the Republican Party has turned its back on America First and the workers and just regular Americans." And finally, she criticized the way Republicans treat women: "I think there's other women in our party that are really sick and tired of the way men treat Republican women." Those anti-GOP quotes are going viral in a tweet by Brian Tyler Cohen: People in the replies are, like, duh: "What if she switches parties and becomes a normie dem," one person asked. "I really never thought i'd see that day she was saying shit like this and uttering the word 'genocide'…" another person said in disbelief. And then the Lincoln Project invited her to the party: "Welcome to the resistance, Marge." As this person said, "Trumps presidency is so goddamn bad that it wokeified marjorie taylor green."
USA Today
12 minutes ago
- USA Today
Texas Hold 'em: Gov. Abbott threatens legal action for absent Dems
After more than 50 Democrats fled the state amid a redistricting battle, Greg Abbott gave them an ultimatum and deadline to return to Austin. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott threatened more than 50 Democrats with legal action and removal from the state legislature after the lawmakers fled the Lone Star State en masse Aug. 3 amid a heated redistricting battle. At President Donald Trump's urging, Texas Republicans have proposed a revised congressional map that could give the party a leg up in next year's midterm elections and the ability to flip as many as five U.S. House seats. Democrats in the state, limited by their minority position, employed one of their few viable methods of protest by leaving Texas to break necessary quorum. Many traveled to Illinois, greeted by Democratic Gov. J.B. Pritzker, while other, smaller groups landed in Boston, Massachusetts and Albany, New York. In a memo late Sunday evening, Abbott said he would expel any Democrat who was not back in Austin by the time the legislature reconvened Aug. 4 at 3 p.m. CT. "Democrats hatched a deliberate plan not to show up for work, for the specific purpose of abdicating the duties of their office and thwarting the chamber's business," the governor wrote. "That amounts to an abandonment or forfeiture of an elected state office." Abbott based his ultimatum on a 2021 nonbinding opinion from Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton. In it, Paxton asserts that district courts could rule to remove a lawmaker who has left in order to break quorum, leaving a vacancy that Abbott would then be able to fill. The absent Democrats are already facing consequences in the form of a $500 per day fine for being out of state. The penalty was put in place after state Democrats in 2021 fled in order to protest new voting restrictions and halted operations for 38 days. Deep-pocketed donors and officials on the left − including Pritzker, a billionaire, and Rep. Jasmine Crockett, a congressional Texan and star fundraiser − have offered to assist Texas Democrats. Abbott, in his note, accused the state lawmakers of violating bribery laws by accepting the support. "In addition to abandoning their offices, these legislators may also have committed felonies," Abbott wrote. "I will use my full extradition authority to demand the return to Texas of any potential out-of-state felons." Texas Democrats say they are not deterred by the governor's warnings. At a press conference with New York Gov. Kathy Hochul, state Rep. Jolanda Jones, a Democrat from Houston and an attorney, said Abbott was "making up" a threat he could not follow through on. "He's going to come get us how?" Jones added. "Let me be clear − he's putting up smoke and mirrors."
Newsweek
13 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Bipartisanship Is Alive, and We Governors Are Proving It
Advocates for ideas and draws conclusions based on the interpretation of facts and data. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. In a political era often defined by division, many Americans have stopped expecting their leaders to work together. But across the country, in statehouses and communities far from Washington, cooperation isn't a relic of the past; it's how governors get things done. As the new chair and vice chair of the National Governors Association (NGA), we come from different parties, different regions, and different ideologies. But we stand united in one belief: governing isn't about scoring points, but solving problems. Governors Kevin Stitt and Wes Moore are pictured at the recent National Governors Association (NGA) summer meeting. Governors Kevin Stitt and Wes Moore are pictured at the recent National Governors Association (NGA) summer meeting. Photo Courtesy of the National Governors Association Founded more than a century ago, the NGA remains the only organization representing governors from all 55 states and territories—including Democrats, Republicans, and independents. It doesn't write talking points or campaign ads. It doesn't chase headlines or feed outrage. Its mission is not partisanship, but results. That distinction matters more now than ever. Governors are closest to the people. We're responsible for budgets, schools, roads, disaster response, and public safety. We don't have the luxury of ideological gridlock. We have to deliver every day. The NGA exists to help us do that by bringing leaders together around what unites us: responsibility, pragmatism, and shared purpose. In that spirit, NGA convenes about 100 times a year not only with governors and staff but also with members of Congress, Cabinet members, and other administration officials to engage on the most pressing issues confronting Americans. We know that unity takes work. We also know it works. During the COVID-19 pandemic, governors collaborated through NGA to coordinate health responses and federal support. In recent years, NGA has helped states prepare for infrastructure investments, address the opioid crisis and expand broadband access. This doesn't happen through political speeches, but through quiet coordination and real action. Most recently, NGA has facilitated some of the most effective conversations about permitting reform in our nation. Governors from both sides of the aisle recognize how necessary it is to have a streamlined, effective permitting process to ensure the U.S. continues to lead on the global stage. That's why the NGA operates by consensus. Some criticize that model. We call it a critical mission. It means that when we speak publicly, we speak as one. And when we disagree, we talk to each other. This year, we're launching a joint initiative focused on workforce transformation—building more pathways to careers in cutting-edge fields like energy, AI, and cybersecurity. These are good-paying jobs that are critical for our future. But we hear from too many workers who can't find jobs, and too many employers who can't fill promising positions. It's a matter of training, not talent. And college isn't the only path. To build bridges between Americans seeking good jobs and employers eager to hire them, we've established Good Jobs Funds in our states. And we're inviting other governors to do the same. Leveraging support from state, philanthropic, and federal programs, the Good Jobs initiative is designed to expand proven programs, strengthen employer partnerships, scale what works, and modernize our talent systems. We want to give everyone in our states an on-ramp to live their American Dream—however they define it. This work isn't red or blue; it's critical for our future competitiveness and security. We're also committed to helping all governors, regardless of party, access the tools and resources they need to serve their constituents effectively. We don't pretend to agree on everything. But the NGA proves that disagreement doesn't have to mean dysfunction. That bipartisanship isn't naïve, but necessary. And that cooperation, when done right, is a sign of strength, not weakness. At a time when many Americans feel disillusioned by national politics, we offer this reminder: Governors still lead. Governors still listen. And governors still deliver results. Governor Kevin Stitt is the Republican governor of Oklahoma and the 2025–2026 chair of the National Governors Association. Governor Wes Moore is the Democratic governor of Maryland and the vice chair of the National Governors Association. The views expressed in this article are the writers' own.
