SNP Government threatened with legal action over failing to provide single-sex spaces
Gender critical charity Sex Matters has sent Scottish Government ministers a formal 'letter before action' after the Supreme Court ruling.
The SNP Government has been threatened with legal action over not providing single-sex spaces.
Gender critical charity Sex Matters has sent Scottish Government ministers a formal 'letter before action' and said they are failing to stop men from entering women's spaces.
In April, the Supreme Court said the words 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex – a ruling which had implications for access to single-sex spaces.
First Minister John Swinney said his government accepts the judgment but is waiting for further guidance from the Equalities and Human Rights Commission before taking the next steps.
The letter says the government must implement the ruling 'without delay'.
It also says the government's guidance in a document called 'Supporting transgender pupils in schools' is 'wrong and must be withdrawn with immediate effect'.
The charity's chief executive Maya Forstater told the BBC's Good Morning Scotland radio programme on Wednesday: ' The Supreme Court has made the law absolutely clear: men are male and women are female and both have a right to dignity and privacy in things like toilets and changing rooms as well as specialist services like women's refuges.
'The Scottish Government is dragging its feet, it hasn't changed its policies.'
Forstater said the government had not implemented the ruling in schools or in its own facilities.
She said the government has 14 days to reply to the letter, adding: 'All we're asking them to do is put a simple statement on their website which says that their facilities are separated by sex and they also provide unisex facilities so everyone's included.'
In response to Sex Matters' concerns, a spokesman for the government told The Times: 'The Scottish Government has been clear that we accept the Supreme Court judgment.
'We are reviewing policies, guidance and legislation potentially impacted by the judgment.
'This will prepare us to take all necessary steps when the regulator of the Equality Act 2010, the Equality and Human Rights Commission, publishes its revised statutory code of practice and associated guidance for services, public functions and associations. The EHRC is currently consulting on this revised code of practice.
'We will respond to any letter received in due course.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
26 minutes ago
- The National
The problem is clear – but so is the route to achieving independence
The halfway he has come is his acknowledgement of what is a blindingly obvious political fact, namely that London will not consent to another Holyrood indyref. Perhaps that acknowledgement has been pressed on him by the definitive judgment of the Supreme Court that Holyrood's founding act (the Scotland Act 1998) – in reserving to Westminster all power to legislate on matters 'relating' to the Union – does indeed prohibit the Scottish Parliament from legislating to set up an indyref without special permission from London. READ MORE: John Swinney launches report showing Scotland 'must be in charge of destiny' It can be no surprise to any thinking person that London has no intention whatsoever of granting permission, and barring a near miracle, will keep to that intention, whatever party is in power at Westminster. Mr Walker now seems to accept the position: 'Successive Westminster governments have been steadfast in their refusal to countenance a second independence referendum. There is no hope of that changing.' The half not yet traversed by Mr Walker covers what to do about it. He seems to regard it as a bottomless chasm with no way across: 'We have exhausted every avenue available to us to find a way of allowing our democratic will to be expressed.' But, he wonders, could there be a small gleam of hope in the recent plan of James Dornan MSP, who suggests in his article of June 10 (Tell voters we will hold new indyref no matter what Westminster says) that the Scottish Government should run an indyref even without London's permission. Dismissing the complete legal impossibility of that plan, and its incompatibility with his already stated position, Mr Walker falls for it: 'Dornan's plan may not be perfect but it's the best I've heard yet.' Are we then just to step out onto Mr Dornan's imaginary bridge? Not an inspiring prospect. Here's what the real bridge is: 1. Run the next Westminster General Election on a simple manifesto making it a true popular plebiscite on independence. The country will treat it as their real and effective vote on the issue and, as with the 2014 indyref, turnout will rocket. The current steady support is an excellent starting point. Any national majority for Yes will fill all, or almost all, of the Scottish seats with indy MPs. Scotland has no higher representatives in constitutional or legislative matters than these. READ MORE: Independence campaigners react to John Swinney speech on independence 2. Thus elected, those supreme representatives of Scotland will have a fully democratic mandate to take Scotland out of the Union. Such a step is consistent with UK law and constitution, which hold no prohibition on it. 3. If London still declines to cooperate (though at that juncture it almost certainly will come to the table), the body of Scottish MPs, by their own majority (in the circumstance, virtually unanimously) carry out the step for which they were elected, declaring Scotland to be a sovereign and independent country. (The Holyrood election might be used, but only as a dry run, since we currently have a mere nine indy MPs in place thanks to the SNP completely mishandling last year's election.) And that, in a nutshell, is it. Fully legal, constitutional, democratic, peaceful and proper. Indyref last-gaspers inside and outside the SNP might be dumbstruck, but no-one else will. And Scotland rejoins the world. Alan Crocket Motherwell
Scotsman
28 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Gregor Poynton MP meets UK Veterans Minister to raise plight of Linburn Veterans and Scotland's Military Museum
Gregor Poynton, MP for the Livingston constituency, has today met with the UK Labour Government's Veterans Minister, Al Carns, to highlight the urgent situation facing residents at the Linburn Park in West Lothian. Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... At the meeting in Westminster, Mr Poynton outlined the distress caused by Sight Scotland Veterans' plans to sell parts of the Linburn Estate and pressed the Minister to explore what support the UK Government can provide to protect veterans and their families affected by the decision. The Linburn Estate has long been home to veterans, including many elderly and disabled former service personnel, who now face uncertainty about their future housing after the charity's decision to sell the site. The estate is also home to Scotland's Military Museum, and its future is similarly at risk unless a new location can be secured. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Mr Poynton emphasised the importance of finding a solution that keeps residents in secure, appropriate housing and preserves Scotland's military heritage. The UK Labour Government recently announce a new consumer charter for families in Miliary Homes and additional funding to support veterans. Me Poynton said: 'I am working closely with the UK Government to find a solution that delivers for Linburn's residents. It is vital that we see real pace, urgency and joint working between governments to support veterans and their families. Sight Scotland Veterans Charity and I are still waiting for a response from the Scottish Government's Veterans Minister on what action he will take, and time is of the essence. "I am also seeking to visit the estate soon to meet on site with Sight Scotland Veterans, to learn more about the vital services that will continue, to speak directly with affected residents, and to explore options for the future of Scotland's Military Museum. I'm committed to working with all partners to help secure a future for the museum in West Lothian and ensure we continue our proud military links. "Our veterans and their families deserve nothing less than decisive action and long-term support. Labour in government is determined to deliver for those who have served our country.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad
Telegraph
40 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Feminists threaten to sue SNP for ‘ignoring' Supreme Court trans ruling
SNP ministers have been threatened with legal action for failing to comply with the Supreme Court ruling that banned biological men from women's toilets and changing rooms. Human rights charity Sex Matters has given the Scottish Government two weeks to introduce new policies and guidance or face further court action. In a formal 'letter before action' sent to ministers, the charity demanded that they issue a statement that policies allowing trans people to access women-only spaces be 'suspended with immediate effect'. 'Updated and lawful guidance' should be issued 'at the earliest opportunity', the letter said, with public bodies ordered 'to take immediate action to provide single-sex facilities on the basis of biological sex '. Ruling is 'the law now' First Minister John Swinney has said Scotland's public sector should await guidance on implementing the ruling from the Equalities and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) before acting. But Sex Matters said April's Supreme Court ruling was 'the law now' and it had not been 'suspended in any way' pending the EHRC guidance, which is expected to be published later this summer. The EHRC has previously told the Scottish Government it did not need to delay, noting that the law was already set out in the Supreme Court's 'very readable' ruling and this was 'effective immediately'. Interim guidance has also been issued by the equalities watchdog stating that access to single-sex facilities in workplaces and public services should be based on biological sex. The Tories said Sex Matters had been left with 'no choice' but to threaten legal action to force SNP ministers to comply, 'leaving taxpayers on the hook for costly payouts'. Sturgeon's self-ID When Nicola Sturgeon was in government she proposed allowing trans people to self-identify – meaning they could change gender by signing a declaration without a medical diagnosis. However, after it was passed by MSPs, the controversial Gender Recognition Reform Bill was vetoed by the UK Government over concerns it undermined safety in single-sex spaces. But swathes of Scotland's public sector adopted self-ID, allowing trans people access to female toilets and changing rooms. On April 16, feminist campaign group For Women Scotland won against the Scottish Government in the Supreme Court, which ruled that the definition of woman was based on biological sex. Maya Forstater, chief executive of Sex Matters, said the ruling 'made the law absolutely clear' about who could access women's toilets, changing rooms and refuges but 'the Scottish Government is dragging its feet'. She told BBC Radio's Good Morning Scotland programme: 'It hasn't changed its policies. It still has a policy in schools of saying that schools should allow a child who identifies as transgender to use opposite sex toilets and changing rooms and for its employees in government buildings. 'That exposes women and girls, in particular, to harassment because of their sex. Allowing a man or a boy into a women's toilet creates a hostile environment for women and girls, and that's unlawful.' Ms Forstater said the charity had held a meeting two weeks ago with Scottish Government officials but argued that they were 'passing the buck' by claiming they had to wait for the EHRC guidance. Although she acknowledged that small businesses without access to legal advice may rely on the EHRC, she said this did not apply to SNP ministers. She added: 'They do understand the law, they have legal advisers on tap and they should act now.' She said there was 'no reason to wait' and noted that any woman forced to share a female-only safe space with a biological man could take legal action against the Scottish Government. Asked about the charity's next move, she said: 'They have 14 days to reply. What we've asked them to do is something quite simple. They have the facilities already. 'They have male toilets, female toilets and unisex and all we're asking them to do is put a simple statement on their website that says that their facilities are separated by sex and that they also provide unisex facilities, so that everyone's included.' The letter, which was signed by Ms Forstater, also told SNP ministers that their guidance in a document called 'Supporting transgender pupils in schools' is 'wrong and must be withdrawn with immediate effect'. If the Scottish Government fails to comply within 14 days, she warned 'we may commence proceedings without further warning'. Ms Forstater added: 'For the avoidance of any doubt, we have already consulted with solicitors and counsel in relation to the matters set out in this letter and are prepared to litigate in relation to them.' 'Reckless pandering' Tess White, the Scottish Tories' equalities minister, said: 'The Supreme Court's judgment was crystal clear, but John Swinney still refuses to follow it. 'Sex Matters shouldn't have to threaten legal action, but the SNP government is leaving them no choice by clinging to unlawful guidance on single-sex spaces. 'This reckless pandering to gender ideologues is putting women and girls at risk – and leaving taxpayers on the hook for costly payouts.' Shirley-Anne Somerville, the SNP's Social Justice Secretary, said the Scottish Government accepted the court's decision and was 'moving forward right across government with work on this issue'. She said: 'That's exactly why we have the short-life working group that brings together the civil servants from right across government to ensure that we're delivering at pace and we're delivering consistently.' A Scottish Government spokesman said: ''We are reviewing policies, guidance and legislation potentially impacted by the judgment. 'This will prepare us to take all necessary steps when the regulator of the Equality Act 2010, the Equality and Human Rights Commission, publishes its revised statutory code of practice and associated guidance for services, public functions and associations. 'The EHRC is currently consulting on this revised code of practice. We will respond to any letter received in due course.'
