
The journalism lesson my mom taught me: ‘If your mother says she loves you, check it out'
I first tried journalism at age 6. My family was living in Beijing, and I handwrote a two-page newsletter for U.S. expats.
After I made a mistake, a veteran journalist, the Los Angeles Times' Beijing bureau chief, shared with me an old reporting adage about how reporters must double-check everything — especially things about which you feel certain.
That adage: 'If your mother says she loves you, check it out.'
I've never forgotten that. Not least because the journalist who shared it with me was my very own mother.
My mother taught me a lot about journalism. You wouldn't be reading this column if not for her. But, on Mother's Day, with our profession in crisis, Mom's lessons about love seem urgent.
Her biggest lesson: True love is conveyed not just through hugs and trust. Love requires hard skepticism and relentless questioning — two habits she generously gifted me.
Linda (nee McVeigh) Mathews was born in Redlands (San Bernardino County), where her grandparents migrated during the Dust Bowl. But she grew up in Hawthorne, near Los Angeles International Airport, attending Hawthorne High with Beach Boy Dennis Wilson.
Neither of her parents — an aviation assembly-line worker and a custodian — had gone beyond high school. Mom was always honest about how her father's alcoholism cut short her parents' marriage. But she always encouraged me to talk to my grandfather.
Mom, through intelligence and perseverance, won a scholarship to Harvard and joined the Crimson, the campus newspaper, where she met my father, who later became a journalist.
Mom also learned how to navigate a world full of glass ceilings. Her appointment as the Crimson's managing editor, the first woman to hold the role, made national news when the Yale Daily News managing editor sent her a note that read:
'OK you did it. As a member of the female conspiracy to undermine maleness, you have successfully broken into another heretofore male institution,' he wrote, before challenging her to the 'girl's game' of jacks.
She lost at jacks — and won admission to Harvard Law. But she hated the law — rules reflect the preferences of the powerful — and switched to journalism.
Watching her bump up against career obstacles taught me never to trust newsrooms or their leaders. She got hired by the L.A. Times only after the top editor, who didn't want 'girls' on the desk, went on vacation. When my father got transferred by the Washington Post to Hong Kong, the Times refused to send her to compete against my dad. After a year of her out-scooping him at the Asian Wall Street Journal, the Times hired her back.
When she returned to L.A., she sought to rise in the editing ranks, but always seemed to end up deputy to a less diligent man. She eventually landed important jobs at ABC News, the New York Times and USA Today, but never the top one.
Her colleagues, many of whom became my colleagues, have told me she was a victim of glass ceilings and her own style. Colleagues loved my mom's lack of vanity. When one Times colleague told Mom that breast milk was leaking through her blouse (she had just given birth to my baby sister), Mom said it could wait until after deadline.
But her smoother bosses found her too unsparing of their feelings. She believed strongly that journalists must tell each other the truth if we are going to give readers the truth. But the direct style of the working-class Hawthorne girl cost her.
In personality, I'm my mother's child, and her experiences influenced my choices. Which is why I've always remained a reporter and resisted becoming a boss. If someone as brilliant and principled as my mom was blocked by journalism politics, what chance would I have?
I benefited from following Mom's path in other ways. Just as she did, I went to Harvard, became Crimson managing editor and married one of my fellow editors. I became the sort of journalist she was, skeptical about everything and direct with superiors. And while sometimes failing at opportunities elsewhere, I always returned to California. She loved the place, despite the fires and earthquakes, because you could be yourself.
My mom never left behind her large extended family, still a working-class clan of truck drivers and school bus drivers, along with a few teachers and reporters. And she encouraged me to write about Apple Valley and Modesto and other ignored places where our relatives lived. Until recently, my mom would give me feedback on stories; she was particularly critical of wordiness and sentimentalism. I always worked harder on stories knowing that she would read them.
Now she has Alzheimer's. She copes with the disease in a familiar way, by constantly asking us skeptical questions. With every query, I feel her love.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
What Does It Mean To Be a Modern Dad?
Every spring, when Mother's Day and Father's Day roll around, many of us ponder what an ideal holiday honoring our leadership within the family might look like. Coffee in bed? An uninterrupted afternoon nap? Maybe just a day of serenity with no scuffles between young siblings? These all sound great to me… but this year, I find myself contemplating something larger: What does it really mean to be a 'father' in 2025, anyway? I suppose in order to really unpack that question, we need to consider how the paternal role has evolved so dramatically over the last century. First things first: I don't identify closely with the term 'father.' According to my kids' birth certificates, I am indeed a father of two, but I consider myself a dad. And having interviewed well over a hundred other dads on my podcast, Modern Dadhood, it's clear that I'm not alone. In discussing the evolution of the 1940s and '50s father to the father of the 1980s, when co-host Marc Checket and I were growing up, to the modern dad of 2025, several recurring ideas have surfaced, which I'd argue are central to the way we understand the modern dad. Modern dads instinctually strive to be engaged, empathetic, and mindful parents. Comedian Pete Holmes seeks to explain why, suggesting that for most of us, modern life is much more 'comfortable' than it was for our predecessors of decades past, which creates more space for that present, mindful parenting:'You can't really spend too much time wondering about your child's needs if you're worried about food or shelter or whatever it might be. And I just think modern life having gotten more comfortable, just literally like pizza being delivered… in the '80s, that was a newer thing. They'll drive it to your house! And the Internet. […] And every time I'm sitting at a dinner table, let's say, and I realize in a panic that I didn't reply to a very important email, and I just do it. I just take out my phone, I search for it, find it, yes, let's do this. Send. And I'm back at dinner. I have more time to get down on one knee and mirror my daughter's reality to her.' More than ever in history, men are embracing the importance of their mental health and choosing to make it a priority in their lives. I believe that the act of self reflection and a desire for self-improvement and open, honest communication lead to a vulnerability which men have resisted in the past. I believe that embracing vulnerability can lead to a closer relationship with our partners and our children. Men's coach Sean Hotchkiss suggests that therapy is beneficial for men at any age, even those with grown children: 'Just because of the way that things are and how mainstream therapy has become, how destigmatized some of these things have become, I feel like it's starting younger. […] I have seen just beautiful things with men with grown kids, the work that they've done on themselves, rewiring those relationships, kind of putting an end to the old relationship and having this whole rebirth and new connection with their kids, initiated by either them or the kids as they begin to change and shift how they show up with their kids.' Every family is different, but more so than ever in recent history, today's dads are naturally and instinctually embracing parenting responsibilities. This is still very much a 'work in progress,' though; according to a 2019 Gallup poll, 78% of mothers say they do more than their partner in managing their children's schedules and activities, and 57% of mothers with children under 5 say they do more to meet their children's basic needs, such as feeding, bathing, or changing diapers. (Men tend to report these responsibilities to be more equally distributed.) Margaret Ables, co-host of the podcast What Fresh Hell: Laughing in the Face of Motherhood, shares her take on gender roles and parenting equity: 'The balance can look like anything in any given relationship versus, 'Dads do these things, and moms do these things.' […] Because of who we are and our age and whatever else, we still came in with fairly strong gender roles in our division. And I do think I see this in the next generation with my nieces and nephews, that they're coming in much more with a blank slate on those issues. So it doesn't always have to be like, 'Well, of course you'll work, and of course I'll stay home, and of course I'll make the meals, and of course you'll do the grilling on Sundays.' They're coming in with less weighted versions of gender roles.' And with that, I move to officially change Father's Day to Dads' Day. (I briefly contemplated Modern Dad's Day, but it just felt too self-serving.) As for Mothers' Day? That one's up to the moms. These guest quotes were sourced from episodes of the parenting podcast Modern Dadhood, which are linked below if you care to dig deeper: ⇢ What Will Our Kids Be Saying About Us? | Comedian Pete Holmes ⇢ U Mad Bro? | Men's Coach Sean Hotchkiss ⇢ Parenting Podcast Collab | What Fresh Hell | Margaret Ables Adam Flaherty is the creator and co-host of Modern Dadhood, a fatherhood and parenting podcast available on all podcast platforms including Apple Podcasts and Spotify. The post What Does It Mean To Be a Modern Dad? appeared first on Katie Couric Media.


Atlantic
a day ago
- Atlantic
A Computer Wrote My Mother's Obituary
The funeral director said 'AI' as if it were a normal element of memorial services, like caskets or flowers. Of all places, I had not expected artificial intelligence to follow me into the small, windowless room of the mortuary. But here it was, ready to assist me in the task of making sense of death. It was already Wednesday, and I'd just learned that I had to write an obituary for my mother by Thursday afternoon if I wanted it to run in Sunday's paper. AI could help me do this. The software would compose the notice for me. As a professional writer, my first thought was that this would be unnecessary, at best. At worst, it would be an outrage. The philosopher Martin Heidegger held that someone's death is a thing that is truly their own. Now I should ask a computer to announce my mother's, by way of a statistical model? 'Did you say AI?' I asked the funeral director, thinking I must have been dissociating. But yes, she did. As we talked some more, my skepticism faded. The obituary is a specialized form. When a person of note dies, many newspapers will run a piece that was commissioned and produced years in advance: a profile of the deceased. But when a normal person dies—and this applies to most of us—the obituary is something else: not a standard piece of journalistic writing, but a formal notice, composed in brief, that also serves to celebrate the person's life. I had no experience in producing anything like the latter. The option to use AI was welcome news. After all, there were lots of other things to do. The obituary was one of dozens of details I would have to address on short notice. A family in grief must choose a disposition method for their loved one, and perhaps arrange a viewing. They must plan for services, choose floral arrangements or other accessories, select proper clothing for the deceased, and process a large amount of paperwork. Amid these and other tasks, I found that I was grateful for the possibility of any help at all, even from a computer that cannot know a mother's love or mourn her passing. The funeral director told me I would be given access to this AI tool in the funeral-planning online account that she had already created for me. I still had a few misgivings. Would I be sullying Mom's memory by doing this? I glanced over at an advertisement for another high-tech service—one that could make lab-grown diamonds from my mother's ashes or her hair. Having an AI write her obituary seemed pretty tame in comparison. 'Show me how to do it,' I said. Actually getting a computer to do the work proved unexpectedly difficult. Over the next 24 hours, the funeral director and I exchanged the kind of emails you might swap with office tech support while trying to connect to the shared printer. I was able to log in to the funeral portal (the funeral portal!) and click into the obituary section, but no AI option appeared. The funeral director sent over a screenshot of her display. 'It may look slightly different on your end,' she wrote. I sent a screenshot back: 'That interface is not visible to me.' Web-browser compatibility was discussed, then dismissed. The back-and-forth made me realize that Mom's memorial would be no more sullied by AI than it was by the very fact of using this software—a kind of Workday app for death and burial. In the end, the software failed us. My funeral director couldn't figure out how to give me access to the AI obituary writer, so I had to write one myself, using my brain and fingertips. I did what AI is best at: copying a formula. I opened up my dad's obituary, which Mom had written a couple of years earlier, and mirrored its format and structure. Dates and locations of birth and death, surviving family, professional life, interests. I was the computer now, entering data into a pre-provided template. When I finally did get the chance to try the AI obituary writer a few weeks later—after reaching out to Passare, the company behind it—I found its output more creative than mine, and somehow more personal. Like everything else, the funeral-services industry is now operated by cloud-based software-as-a-service companies. Passare is among them, and offers back-office software for funeral-home management along with family-facing funeral-planning tools. Josh McQueen, the company's vice president of marketing and product, explained why my earlier attempt to use the obituary-writing tool had failed: The funeral home must have had that feature set for staff-only access, which some businesses prefer. Then he gave me access to a mock funeral for the fictional departed John Smith so I could finally give it a go. I couldn't change John Smith's name, but I pretended I was writing the obituary for my mother instead. Using simple web forms, I put in her education and employment information, some life events that corresponded to her 'passions' and 'achievements,' and a few facts about relevant family members who had survived her or preceded her in death. These had to be entered one by one, choosing the type of relation from a drop-down and then checking a box to indicate whether the person in question was deceased. I felt like I was cataloging livestock. From there, Passare's software, which is built on top of ChatGPT technology, generated an obituary. And you know what—it was pretty good. Most of all, it was done, and with minimal effort from me. Here's an excerpt, with John Smith's name and pronouns swapped out for my mother's, and a couple of other very small alterations to smooth out the language: Sheila earned her bachelor's degree and dedicated her career to managing her late husband David's psychology private practice for decades. She was not only devoted to his work but also a dedicated caregiver for Dave in his later years. Throughout her life, Sheila nurtured his passions, which included playing music—especially the piano—and a deep appreciation for Native American art. She found joy in teaching skiing to children and sharing the vibrant personalities of her many pet birds. The AI obituary can also be tuned by length and tone—formal, casual, poetic, celebratory. (The poetic version added flourishes such as 'she found joy in the gentle keys of her piano, filling her home with music that echoed her spirit.') Because an obituary is already a schematic form of writing, the AI's results were not just satisfactory but excellent, even. And, of course, once the draft was done, I could adjust it as I wished. 'When we first started testing this, ChatGPT would just make up stories,' McQueen told me. It might assert that someone named Billy was often called Skippy, for example, and then concoct an anecdote to explain the fake nickname. This tendency of large language models, sometimes called hallucination, is caused by the technology's complex statistical underpinnings. But Passare found this problem relatively easy to tame by adjusting the prompts it fed to ChatGPT behind the scenes. He said he hasn't heard complaints about the service from any families who have used it. Obituaries do seem well suited for an AI's help. They're short and easy to review for accuracy. They're supposed to convey real human emotion and character, but in a format that is buttoned-up and professional, for a public audience rather than a private one. Like cover letters or wedding toasts, they represent an important and uncommon form of writing that in many cases must be done by someone who isn't used to writing, yet who will care enough to polish up the finished product. An AI tool can make that effort easier and better. And for me, at least, the tool's inhumanity was also, in its way, a boon. My experience with the elder-care and death industries—assisted living, hospice, funeral homes—had already done a fair amount to alienate me from the token empathy of human beings. As Mom declined and I navigated her care and then her death, industry professionals were always offering me emotional support. They shared kind words in quiet rooms that sometimes had flowers on a table and refreshments. They truly wanted to help, but they were strangers, and I didn't need their intimacy. I was only seeking guidance on logistics: How does all this work? What am I supposed to do? What choices must I make? A person should not pretend to be a friend, and a computer should not pretend to be a person. In the narrow context of my mom's obituary, the AI provided me with middle ground. It neither feigned connection nor replaced my human agency. It only helped—and it did so at a time when a little help was all I really wanted.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Fishing for Favors: How You Get Hooked Into Helping
I was rushing to get to my daughters' orchestra concert when I got two calls from a friend back to back. I answered the second attempt to be sure there wasn't an emergency. My friend seemed caught off guard, almost like she hadn't expected me to answer, and started to make small talk. I said I was hurrying off to a concert and would call her over the weekend. 'OK.' She sounded dejected with a long pause. 'Is everything OK?' I asked. 'Never mind. I know you're busy.' Long pause. 'What's going on?' I asked. 'It's a long story…' she said, followed by another long pause. After several minutes of this, I was starting to get frustrated. I needed to go, and I wanted to be a good friend. I regretted answering the phone. 'Is there anything I can do for you right now?' I asked. 'No. Go. You have more important things to do.' As her words trailed off, I told her I'd call back later, hung up the phone, and left for the concert, feeling bad about the interaction. I didn't know it then, but I'd experienced a very subtle yet common form of dry begging. My friend used a series of short, lingering, and desperate statements, awaiting my response to coerce or manipulate my time and attention indirectly. Having already expressed that I didn't have those to give, I was left feeling guilty in the end. If you've ever accused someone (or been accused of) fishing for a compliment, you're familiar with dry begging, which can also come in the form of fishing for an invitation or help. It entails asking for favors, compliments, resources, gifts, or assistance indirectly, rather than explicitly. Don't dismiss it as a sweet or simply pitiful gesture, though — it's a subtle form of manipulation or coercion used to get something without risking direct rejection. Think of dry begging as dropping hints, tugging at someone's heartstrings, or revealing one's own vulnerability to create a sense of obligation — all in the hopes of getting what you want without asking and while leading the other person to believe volunteering assistance, gifts, or compliments was their idea. The person using dry begging as a tactic gets what they want while retaining plausible deniability, as they never explicitly asked for anything. And when they don't get what they want, they have set the stage to play the role of the victim by acting like they did explicitly ask, and you refused. It's incredibly common and can happen in any type of relationship. Imagine your partner is stressed and frustrated. She's complaining that she doesn't know how she's going to pay her car insurance tomorrow, since she doesn't get paid until next week. She bemoans having spent money on your birthday dinner last week. Now she doesn't have the money she needs. You offer to cover the car insurance. Or imagine your husband says, 'I just don't know when I'll find time to get my mom something for Mother's Day. I'm so busy between work and time with the kids.' You offer to pick up something, and he acts surprised, 'Really? That would be amazing!' Your wife says, 'I've gotten so fat. You can't possibly find me attractive anymore.' You might be thinking, This sounds like typical insecurity, yet this is a subtle version of manipulation and coercion. What are you going to do? Not respond? Suggest she go to the gym? No, you are left with one option: to reassure your wife profusely that you find her attractive. You call a friend to see if she'd like to meet you for lunch. She says she'd love to, but just can't afford it. You offer to buy her lunch. You're picking your son up from school, and you run into your friend. She's frazzled and says, 'I just don't know how I'm going to get James to soccer on Friday. I'm scheduled back-to-back all day. I know he'll be so disappointed if he misses his game.' After each sentence is a pause, an invitation for you to offer to take him. When that offer isn't extended, another hint is dropped, yet at no time does she ask, 'Hey, would you mind picking James up and taking him to his soccer game Friday?' Your sister says, 'Oh my gosh, I found my dream wedding dress. It's EXACTLY what I wanted. If only I had an extra $200 to cover it. Gosh, I hope someone doesn't buy it before I can save up. It's my size.' They drip each sentence out slowly, waiting for the offer of $200. Or think of a conversation with your elderly parents. You mention that you're taking a trip to Sedona. Your mom says, 'Oh, I just LOVE Sedona. It's always been one of my favorite places. I wonder if I'll ever get back there. It's so hard for me to travel on my own at this point.' While this may be an entirely emotionally healthy response in some cases, in others, the words linger in the air just long enough for you to feel the manipulation, the fishing for an invitation. You're buried in work, juggling what feels like 100 projects, when your coworker says, 'I'm just not going to be able to get this project done by Friday. I've run out of time. If I deliver late again, I just know I'm going to be fired. I don't know how I'll feed my kids without this job.' You unwillingly say, 'I'll help you out,' knowing you'll be finishing your own work over the weekend. You were coerced. Dry begging is a tactic that is so subtle, it can easily be misinterpreted or considered normal. This creates a sense of power and control for the person who uses it. They get what they want without having to ask, while making it seem like your idea. Dry begging allows the narcissist to avoid accountability for their own predicaments and instead forces or coerces others to enable their behavior. When they use the tactic in front of others, it's not only more coercive, but it also plays to the false narrative the narcissist has created about themselves and others. For example, after you politely decline your mother's request to move in with you at a family function, she has an emotional outburst, crying out, 'You don't love me!' You feel the manipulation in her words, and yet all eyes are on you, awaiting your response. What are you going to do? Walk away, say 'I guess you're right,' tell her to knock it off, or implore her to believe that you love her? Narcissists love this tactic because it also earns them compliments, favors, resources, or gifts without the need to express gratitude, appreciation, or reciprocate. If you mention your efforts later, they'll remind you that they never asked for your help. You might be thinking, everyone does this! I've done this! And you're right — but what you're thinking of might be a little different. Those prone to people-pleasing or prioritizing others' needs before their own might make statements similar to dry begging as a way to avoid directly asking for what they need. This situation is a little different. Their intent is not to manipulate others' actions, but to manipulate the situation to avoid feeling rejected, unworthy, or undeserving. This is one you have to recognize by feel. While your friends, family, or colleagues may complain or vent about situations as a normal part of your relationship, your expected response in those cases is to listen and provide support. Dry begging is different. The pauses and follow-up comments make you feel obligated to volunteer words, gifts, or actions that you wouldn't have otherwise. It feels like you have only one option, or your hand is being forced. You sense that you're being manipulated. Now that you've recognized dry begging, what can you do about it? Of course, you can passive-aggressively provide whatever the dry beggar is indirectly requesting; however, that reinforces an unhealthy people-pleasing pattern and can set a precedent for your relationship with that person. Here's what to do instead. First, resolve any emotional triggers you're feeling. You want to respond from a clean, clear space. Next, put the spotlight back on them by asking, 'What are you hoping to gain by telling me that?' or 'Are you asking me to pick your child up after school?' This acts as both a pattern interruption and an invitation to step out of the shadows and clarify the intent of their communication. Only after they've clarified the intent of their statement, choose how to respond. At this point, it's clear they've asked for something, and it's entirely your choice whether you provide it or not. Dr Melissa Kalt, MD, is a narcissistic abuse survivor turned recovery expert who helps Soul-driven leaders transcend their past experience of narcissistic abuse to create massive leaps in their health, wealth, relationships, and impact. For her engaging, entertaining approach to navigating the subtle toxicity common in relationships, check out her free Am I the Problem? Substack newsletter, or learn more on her website. The post Fishing for Favors: How You Get Hooked Into Helping appeared first on Katie Couric Media.