Campaign and consultation launched by Livingston MP to improve bus services
A campaign has been launched in a bid to improve the provision of bus services in West Lothian.
The public transport campaign and a local consultation, focusing on bus services, has been set up by Gregor Poynton MP.
The Livingston MP's constituency is served primarily by Lothian Country Buses, and he is calling on residents to get in touch, speak up, and share their experiences of local bus services or the lack of them in certain areas.
The campaign aims to highlight where services are working and where urgent improvements are still needed.
Lothian Country Buses took over a number of routes across West Lothian in 2023 following the withdrawal of McGill's, in a move that restored vital services to many communities that had previously lost regular bus access.
However, while reliability has generally improved since the takeover, several areas remain underserved or excluded altogether from current routes.
Communities such as Livingston Village, Addiewell, Longridge, Stoneyburn, Adambrae, and parts of Broxburn are all experiencing either reduced or non-existent bus services. In some areas, residents are left with only one bus per hour, or none at all, leading to residents feeling isolated and with growing concerns about access to essential services.
The MP has already raised these issues directly with Lothian Country Buses and the Scottish Government.
Launching the campaign and his new public transport survey on Facebook, he has committed to doing everything he can to support local residents and advocate for better transport provision across the constituency.
The survey is designed to capture views from across the Livingston Constituency and provide evidence to support future discussions with local transport providers and government bodies.
As part of the campaign, Gregor Poynton recently met with the Livingston Village Bus Campaign Group to listen to their concerns and sign their petition. He heard more about the frustration and sense of isolation felt by many residents, especially those without alternative means of transport.
Gregor Poynton said: 'We know that public transport in many parts of the Livingston constituency is letting local people down.
'Bus routes that work for local people and which are reliable are critical to many people and it's an issue I hear time and time again on the doorstep. Local bus service should allow people to visit their GP, attend hospital appointments, see friends and family, or even just get to the shops, but in many places provision falls short of what's needed.
'When local services are cut or disappear entirely, people are left facing high taxi fares, increased isolation, or the growing cost of running a car, which simply isn't an option for everyone.
'I'm determined to ensure that everyone in the Livingston constituency has fair and equal access to reliable public transport. We must end the postcode lottery that currently exists, where some areas have a regular service and others are left behind.
'That's why it's so important that I hear directly from constituents. Your experiences will help shape the case I make to Lothian Buses and the Scottish Government.
'Please take a moment to complete my survey and share it with your family, friends and neighbours so that we can work to improve bus services across the Livingston constituency and West Lothian as a priority.'
Constituents can take part in the survey on Facebook or contact the Livingston MP directly via email at gregor.poynton.mp@parliament.uk, or through his social media channels.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
29 minutes ago
- Times
Whining about Scottish ‘austerity' is baseless, absurd and idiotic
Like Christmas and birthdays, the annual GERS festival seems to arrive sooner than you think. Has a year really passed since the last edition of the Government Expenditure and Revenue Scotland figures was published? Why, yes it has. This year's numbers are remarkable, best accompanied by an indecently large dram of cask-strength liquor. For public spending in and for Scotland amounted to 52 per cent of Scottish GDP last year. That is lower than in France, Finland, Belgium and Austria but higher than in every other European country. Public spending in Sweden and Denmark, for instance, equals 48 per cent of GDP. In Norway, the figure is 46 per cent. Further afield, other countries with which the Scottish government sometimes likes to compare Scotland contrive to thrive with a much smaller public sector. Public spending in New Zealand is 42 per cent of GDP. This is the context in which to understand the claims made by Scottish government ministers that Scotland is once again enduring some form of 'austerity'. And the thing to understand about this whining is that it is baseless, absurd and idiotic. This is a country of Big Government. If government departments and other agencies struggle to meet their obligations despite this obvious largesse it is because they are inefficiently or incompetently run and because ministers lack the courage to say 'No' to demands for more and more spending. Mercifully, Scottish taxpayers are not required to pay for all of this. In 2024-25, £91.4 billion was raised in taxes in Scotland but government spending amounted to £117.6 billion. This is a notional deficit — notional because Scotland is part of the United Kingdom — of some £26.5 billion. That is equivalent to 11.7 per cent of GDP. John Swinney should pray to the ghost of the late Joel Barnett every night for it is his eponymous formula that grants Scotland its privileged place within the United Kingdom: a relatively wealthy part of the realm funded as though it were a poor one. By way of illustrating the scale of Scotland's deficit, it may be worthing noting that last year Zimbabwe ran a deficit equal to 10.4 per cent of GDP. Indeed, according to data compiled by the International Monetary Fund, the only independent countries running real deficits greater than Scotland's notional one are East Timor, Kiribati, the Maldives and Ukraine. At this point nationalists will customarily enter the chat to say that, look, GERS only tells us about Scotland's current fiscal position and of course an independent Scotland would do things differently. This is true. GERS offers a snapshot of the position from which an independent Scotland would begin life and GERS also makes it very clear that many things would have to be done very differently in an independent Scotland. To start with you would begin with something like £10 billion in tax increases and around another £10 billion in spending cuts. That would still leave Scotland running a deficit like most countries but it would be a manageable one of around 3 per cent of GDP. That, you will also recall, is the price of admission to the European Union. Every existing tax would doubtless be increased and new taxes created (on this front, if few others, Scotland's political class is endlessly resourceful). But to give an indication of the scale of tax hikes required, £10 billion is about half of total income tax receipts in Scotland last year. Swingeing tax increases of this sort would almost certainly encourage capital flight of a sort this country can ill afford. Just 5 per cent of Britain's top-rate tax-payers live in Scotland which is one reason why although Scotland has 8 per cent of the UK population it contributes just 6.8 per cent of income tax revenue. Tax increases of this sort, however, would only get the job half done. You would still need to cut £10 billion of public spending. That is roughly equivalent to 50 per cent of the NHS budget. Good luck winning an independence referendum on that manifesto. • The facts of life are demanding chiels. It is too often and too easily forgotten that in the years after the 2008 financial crisis Scotland's notional deficit was broadly the same as the UK's real one and, in some years and thanks to buoyant oil revenues, Scotland's relative fiscal position was marginally healthier than the UK's. This was unusual and atypical but it allowed Alex Salmond and Nicola Sturgeon to sell independence as a financial opportunity, not, as it obviously is now, a giant leap into an enormous fiscal black hole. Even then, all lilies had to be gilded. As Sturgeon relates in her new memoir, oil prices were then high but Salmond 'spent a lot of time persuading the government economists to push their projections higher, raking them to the outer edges of credibility'. In other words, the Yes campaign suborned officials to present a fantastical vision of the riches an independent Scotland would enjoy. This is something worth remembering. The SNP are doubtless happy to win without lying but why take that risk when untruths may buttress the liberation cause? Economic self-interest does not always prevail and voters may cheerfully vote for their own impoverishment but, even so, this year's GERS festival is a reminder that the appeal of independence is for the time being strictly notional and hypothetical. That imaginary Scotland is a comfortable place to dwell but the nature of today's fiscal realities is such that even SNP politicians might be wary of asking the national question again. This is why, in the end, they are comfortable not asking it, for no amount of creative accountancy can make these sums add up.
Scotsman
37 minutes ago
- Scotsman
‘Next Stop: Livingston Village!' – MP Gregor Poynton's bus campaign hits the road
Gregor Poynton, Member of Parliament for the Livingston Constituency, has launched a major public transport campaign and local consultation, focusing on bus services and the gaps that still exist within local provision. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Mr Poynton, whose constituency is served primarily by Lothian Country Buses, is calling on residents to get in touch, speak up, and share their experiences of local bus services or the lack of them in certain areas. His campaign aims to highlight where services are working and where urgent improvements are still needed. Lothian Country Buses took over a number of routes across West Lothian in 2023 following the withdrawal of McGill's. This move restored vital services to many communities that had previously lost regular bus access. However, while reliability has generally improved since the takeover, several areas remain underserved or excluded altogether from current routes. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Communities such as Livingston Village, Addiewell, Longridge, Stoneyburn, Adambrae, and parts of Broxburn are all experiencing either reduced or non-existent bus services. In some areas, residents are left with only one bus per hour, or none at all, leading to residents feeling isolated and with growing concerns about access to essential services. Gregor Poynton MP infront of X28 Lothian Country Bus. Mr Poynton has already raised these issues directly with Lothian Country Buses and the Scottish Government. Launching his new public transport survey today on Facebook, he has committed to doing everything he can to support local residents and advocate for better transport provision across the constituency. As part of the campaign, Mr Poynton recently met with the Livingston Village Bus Campaign Group to listen to their concerns and sign their petition. He heard more about the frustration and sense of isolation felt by many residents, especially those without alternative means of transport. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Today marks the formal launch of a wide-reaching public transport campaign, which includes the rollout of a new Public Transport Survey. The survey is designed to capture views from across the Livingston Constituency and provide evidence to support future discussions with local transport providers and government bodies. Gregor Poynton MP waiting to get on the 72 Bus. Speaking about the campaign, Mr Poynton said: 'We know that public transport in many parts of the Livingston constituency is letting local people down. "Bus routes that work for local people and which are reliable are critical to many people and it's an issue I hear time and time again on the doorstep. Local bus service should allow people to visit their GP, attend hospital appointments, see friends and family, or even just get to the shops, but in many places provision falls short of what's needed. 'When local services are cut or disappear entirely, people are left facing high taxi fares, increased isolation, or the growing cost of running a car, which simply isn't an option for everyone. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'I'm determined to ensure that everyone in the Livingston constituency has fair and equal access to reliable public transport. We must end the postcode lottery that currently exists, where some areas have a regular service and others are left behind. 'That's why it's so important that I hear directly from constituents. Your experiences will help shape the case I make to Lothian Buses and the Scottish Government. 'Please take a moment to complete my survey and share it with your family, friends and neighbours so that we can work to improve bus services across the Livingston constituency and West Lothian as a priority." Constituents can take part in the survey on Facebook or contact Mr Poynton directly via email at or through his social media channels, where the survey will also be promoted.
North Wales Chronicle
an hour ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Scotland's deficit grows by £5.1bn, Gers figures show
The latest Government Expenditure and Revenue Scotland (Gers) figures reported 'overall public finances in Scotland weakening, as expenditure grew faster than revenue'. For 2024-25, Scotland has a net fiscal deficit of minus £26.5 billion – an increase of £5.1 billion from the previous year – with this the representing minus 11.7% of the country's GDP. The UK deficit for 2024-25 was minus 5.1% of GDP, less than half the rate of Scotland. The Scottish Government report said the 'deterioration' between this year and last was in part linked to a fall in North Sea revenue, but it added: 'The difference is primarily explained by movements in non-North Sea revenue and spending, with Scottish revenue growing more slowly and Scottish expenditure growing more quickly than the UK.' Revenue in Scotland grew by 1.5% in 2024-25 to £91.4 billion. Spending increased to £117.6 billion in 2024-25, up from £111.4 billion in 2023-24. 'As a share of GDP, public spending remained at historically high levels in 2024,' the report noted. Scottish Secretary Ian Murray said the figures show Scots benefit from higher public spending than the UK average – with this £2,669 more per person north of the border. He said this 'means more money for schools, hospitals and policing, if the Scottish Parliament chooses to invest in those areas' – although he also claimed 'people in Scotland will rightly expect to see better outcomes' for these higher spending levels. Mr Murray said: 'These figures underline the collective economic strength of the United Kingdom and how Scotland benefits from the redistribution of wealth inside the UK. 'By sharing resources with each other across the UK, Scots benefit by £2,669 more per head in public spending than the UK average. 'It also means that devolved governments have the financial heft of the wider UK behind them when taking decisions.' Scottish Finance Secretary Shona Robison said decisions taken by ministers at Holyrood 'are helping support sustainable public finances'. She said: 'For the fourth year in a row, devolved revenues have grown faster than devolved expenditure. 'Scotland's public finances are better than many other parts of the UK, with the third highest revenue per person in the UK, behind only London and the South East.' She also stressed the Gers statistics reflect the current constitutional arrangements, with Scotland part of the UK and 'not an independent Scotland with its own policy, decisions on defence spending and the economy'. Arguing the figures highlight the 'limit' of devolved powers, Ms Robison said while the Scottish Government is responsible for more than 60% of public expenditure north of the border, it only controls 'around 30% of revenue'. The Finance Secretary told journalists: 'As an independent Scotland we would have the powers to make different choices, different budgetary results, to build a stronger economy and enable Scotland to be a fairer, wealthier and greener country.' She pointed to Ireland, saying GDP there had grown 12.5% over the last year, with a budget surplus of 24 billion euros (£20.7 billion) in 2024. Ms Robison hailed that as an example of 'what a small independent country, one of our nearest neighbours, is able to do with the full powers of independence'. She said: 'What we want, through the powers of independence, is to be able to make our own decisions. 'If you look at Ireland and what they have been able to do with the powers they have, it's like night and day compared to the economic conditions of the UK economy or the Scottish economy. 'Independence is the direction we want to take because we believe it will unleash the potential, from day one, to be able to emulate some of the economic performance of many of our neighbours, whether it is Ireland, or some of our Scandinavian neighbours.'
