logo
Coalition politics and budget cuts: What to expect from Godongwana's upcoming speech

Coalition politics and budget cuts: What to expect from Godongwana's upcoming speech

IOL News04-05-2025

Minister of Finance, Enoch Godongwana briefing media on the 2025 Budget Process.
Image: Supplied / GCIS
While there have been calls for Enoch Godongwana to resign, South Africa's Finance Minister announced this past week that a third Budget Speech will be taking place later this month, on 21 May.
The announcement came after the 0.5% Value Added Tax (VAT) reversal, which was proposed in the March 2025 Budget, with the matter being taken to court by the Democratic Alliance (DA) and Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF).
Earlier this year in February, the minister's first budget attempt was thwarted by political parties in Parliament, as the minister proposed a larger VAT increase of 2%.
Godongwana said that the Budget of 12 March 2025 and the proposed VAT increase sparked rigorous debate.
'This is welcomed in a healthy democracy. Today there is clarity that VAT will remain at 15%. This decision was shaped not only by political debate but by the voices of the South African people. When people speak we must listen. I'm encouraged by the passion shown, and it reflects the seriousness with which we approach the hard choices needed to place our finances on a sustainable path.'
Godongwana added that we are all new in South Africa to what is called coalition politics.
'There are lessons to be learnt by cabinet, legislature and ourselves. I'm pleased that we have agreed that we will balance the budget without raising VAT while protecting vital sectors such as education, health, and social grants,' he said.
Frank Blackmore, lead economist at KPMG shared his thoughts with Business Report on what he thinks Godongwana's re-tabling of the 2025 Budget Review for the economy.
Blackmore said, "The comprehensive review will include the Fiscal Framework, Appropriations Bill, Division of Revenue Bill, as well as the already tabled Rates and Monetary Amounts and Amendment of Revenue Laws Bills. Given the long delay since the original budget was tabled in February, until the new budget is passed, government services will continue to be funded under Section 29 of the Public Finance Management Act."
He added that this provision also applies, in part, to the funding of provinces and municipalities, it is therefore not the case that these levels of government will be cut off from funding.
"Public services should continue to be rolled out. The Minister also informed us that the National Treasury has begun developing the new fiscal framework to maintain the trajectory towards debt stabilisation, an essential element in strengthening public finances. A key point here is that the Treasury will need to revisit the economic assumptions, using the most recent data available,"Blackmore said.
"I imagine their GDP forecast will be revised down from the 1.9% we saw in the previously tabled budget. This process involves generating updated fiscal projections, recalculating revenue estimates, determining appropriate borrowing strategies, and consolidating these elements into a coherent fiscal framework. It seems that much remains open at this stage, and we will only see the full details on 21 May, by which time, one hopes, agreement will have been reached with all parties that form part of the Government of National Unity (GNU)."
Waldo Krugell, an economics professor at the North-West University, said,
"The work will be done by the Treasury's Budget Office. Economists are keen to see the impact of updated economic growth forecasts and what they mean for tax income and major ratios like debt-to-GDP."
Krugell added that Godongwana has also indicated that borrowing more will not be an option, so there will have to be some spending cuts to the proposals made in Budget 2.0.
Siyabonga Ntombela, University of KwaZulu-Natal academic and political analyst, warned that the government will attempt to recoup the lost revenue through alternative measures, such as increasing the fuel levy, which will in turn impact food prices.
"Certain goods will all of a sudden cost more. South Africa's borrowing ratings are below investment grade. The government will have to put some austerity measures to keep the country afloat," Ntombela said.
BUSINESS REPORT

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What Trump vs Musk makes us appreciate about South Africa
What Trump vs Musk makes us appreciate about South Africa

The Citizen

time2 hours ago

  • The Citizen

What Trump vs Musk makes us appreciate about South Africa

You just can't imagine that kind of behaviour among real South African leaders. This combination of pictures created on 12 August 2024 shows, Tesla CEO Elon Musk, left, and former US president and 2024 Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump. Picture: Frederic J Brown and Brendan Smialowski/ AFP Can you imagine Johan Rupert, Oppenheimer or Motsepe publicly feuding with the president of the nation? Could you imagine them going at it and stopping just short of calling the president a sex predator? Probably not. That's because it's pretty unbecoming for business people to try to sway public opinion against a sitting president. Then again, it's pretty unbecoming of a president to do the same to some important economic drivers. You just can't imagine that kind of behaviour among real South African leaders. Sure, you'd expect it to come from the 'small boys', but those really driving the national agenda, for all their flaws, actually behave respectably. Just try to imagine the anger between the parties during the now-forgotten spat over the budget. Fixing our problems For all of that anger, all we got were a few matter-of-fact statements from various sides, but nothing along the lines of name-calling and bashing, at least nothing to the American extent. We might not have the economy and infrastructure, but we can still look one another in the eye when having a disagreement. It seems our leadership, with all its flaws, is still capable of picking up a phone and sorting issues out rather than committing the public to our battles. We vote for politicians so they can do that battling of our interests for us, not to abuse us as their useful idiots to drive their own agendas. And we've been pretty solid of late on holding them to account on that. They may not be incredibly good at hearing us holding them to account, but we'll take it in baby steps. For now, we can be grateful that poor form can swing more than 10% of an electorate. That would never happen in the USA because no matter how bad things get, they still have their guy. Their democracy has a personality cult bent to it. ALSO READ: Trump and Musk alliance melts down in blazing public row Petty politics While we do love a bit of our Fikiles, Jacbobs and Cyrils, the faith is personality is not that strong. Ask your boys Ace and Carl, but you won't because they're no longer your boys. It's that level of decorum that may seem mundane and a non-issue but is really driving some of what is right in South Africa. Obviously, you'd want political leaders who are firm and robust in stature, and that does involve a significant amount of disagreement. Goodness gracious, though. The world's most powerful man taking on the world's richest man to gain the popular support of the rest of the country's men does seem so…petty. Fighting for a debate Americans should ask themselves why these two dudes are so invested in making this spat public. Surely, if they disagree, they could pick up the phone and discuss it. One has a whole satellite constellation, and the other has a whole military. You can't tell me that they don't have the equipment to have a call. It's because the point isn't to win the debate. It's for the debate, if you can call it that, to go on. That way, they get a platform to continue building their cults, which will eventually battle it out. It's already so powerful that it inspired an insurrection years ago. What would this, much bigger, fight yield? There's so much we can be upset about in our country. There's a lot going wrong, but a fundamental to fixing the issues is that we're still able to talk directly without turning the public into ammunition for personal interests. You can be upset with Cyril's lack of action, silly actions when he takes them, and insistence on pursuing inept policy. You can even be upset with him for the poor economy. You cannot be upset with him for rude, dictatorial and abrasive behaviour because, unlike his US counterpart, he still has the fundamentals of democratic leadership in place. Anyway, sterke daar Suid-Afrikaanse refugees. NOW READ: Elon Musk unceremoniously steps down from Trump administration

Innovation helps youth-owned brand RE-L8 thrive in competitive fashion world
Innovation helps youth-owned brand RE-L8 thrive in competitive fashion world

Eyewitness News

time6 hours ago

  • Eyewitness News

Innovation helps youth-owned brand RE-L8 thrive in competitive fashion world

Rustenburg-based youth-owned clothing brand RE-L8 (pronounced RELATE) has gone from strength to strength since its launch in 2016. The proudly South African label was founded by Kau twins, Bonang and Duduetsan, when they were still students. Starting with just 6 printed caps initially made for a group of friends, they managed to scale the business into a mini factory as demand grew for their growing product range. Gugs Mhlungu asks co-founder Bonang Kau about the inspiration for their distinctive multi-functional clothing items.

Trump threatens Musk with 'serious consequences' in spending bill row
Trump threatens Musk with 'serious consequences' in spending bill row

eNCA

time11 hours ago

  • eNCA

Trump threatens Musk with 'serious consequences' in spending bill row

WASHINGTON - US President Donald Trump threatened his former advisor Elon Musk with "serious consequences" Saturday if the tech billionaire seeks to punish Republicans who vote for a controversial spending bill. The comments by Trump to NBC News come after the relationship between the world's most powerful person and the world's richest imploded in bitter and spectacular fashion this week. The blistering break-up -- largely carried out on social media before a riveted public on Thursday -- was ignited by Musk's harsh criticism of Trump's so-called "big, beautiful" spending bill, which is currently before Congress. Some lawmakers who were against the bill had called on Musk -- one of the Republican Party's biggest financial backers in last year's presidential election -- to fund primary challenges against Republicans who voted for the legislation. "He'll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that," Trump, who also branded Musk "disrespectful," told NBC News on Saturday, without specifying what those consequences would be. He also said he had "no" desire to repair his relationship with the South African-born Tesla and SpaceX chief, and that he has "no intention of speaking to him." Just last week, Trump gave Musk a glowing send-off as he left his cost-cutting role at the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). But their relationship cracked within days as Musk described as an "abomination" the spending bill that, if passed by Congress, could define Trump's second term in office. Trump hit back in an Oval Office diatribe and from, there the row detonated, leaving Washington stunned. With real political and economic risks to their falling out, both had appeared to inch back from the brink on Friday, with Trump telling reporters "I just wish him well," and Musk responding on X: "Likewise." - 'Old news' - Trump spoke to NBC Saturday after Musk deleted one of the explosive allegations he had made during their fallout, linking the president with disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. Musk had alleged that the Republican leader is featured in unreleased government files on former associates of Epstein, who died by suicide in 2019 while he faced sex trafficking charges. The Trump administration has acknowledged it is reviewing tens of thousands of documents, videos and investigative material that his "MAGA" movement says will unmask public figures complicit in Epstein's crimes. Trump was named in a trove of deposition and statements linked to Epstein that were unsealed by a New York judge in early 2024. The president has not been accused of any wrongdoing in the case. "Time to drop the really big bomb: (Trump) is in the Epstein files," Musk posted on his social media platform, X. "That is the real reason they have not been made public." Musk did not reveal which files he was talking about and offered no evidence for his claim. He initially doubled down on the claim, writing in a follow-up message: "Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out." However, he appeared to have deleted both tweets by Saturday morning. Trump dismissed the claim as "old news" in his comments to NBC on Saturday, adding: "Even Epstein's lawyer said I had nothing to do with it." Supporters on the conspiratorial end of Trump's "Make America Great Again" base allege that Epstein's associates had their roles in his crimes covered up by government officials and others. They point the finger at Democrats and Hollywood celebrities, although not at Trump himself. No official source has ever confirmed that the president appears in any of the as yet unreleased material. Trump knew and socialized with Epstein but has denied spending time on Little Saint James, the private redoubt in the US Virgin Islands where prosecutors alleged Epstein trafficked underage girls for sex. "Terrific guy," Trump, who was Epstein's neighbor in both Florida and New York, said in an early 2000s profile of the financier. "He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store