
Growing backlash to merging bank regulators
Editor's note: Morning Money is a free version of POLITICO Pro Financial Services morning newsletter, which is delivered to our subscribers each morning at 5:15 a.m. The POLITICO Pro platform combines the news you need with tools you can use to take action on the day's biggest stories. Act on the news with POLITICO Pro.
QUICK FIX
Community bankers and state banking supervisors are pushing back on the idea of consolidating or merging the federal agencies that regulate banks.
The Trump administration has already moved to dismantle the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which has long been a target of Republicans and the banking industry. And the White House has sought to exert greater control over all independent regulatory agencies. But it remains unclear how seriously the administration might entertain a more drastic overhaul of other regulators, such as the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. or Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
Still, some powerful critics of the approach are starting to publicly voice their concerns. Rebeca Romero Rainey, who leads the Independent Community Bankers of America, said the group opposed consolidating federal banking agencies.
'Federal banking regulators should be objective, nonpartisan, and protected from political influence, which is essential to promoting a safe and sound banking system, consumer confidence, and a strong national economy,' she said in a statement last week. 'Wall Street calls for consolidating the agencies undermine consumer confidence in the financial system.'
Brandon Milhorn, who leads the Conference of State Bank Supervisors, is also pushing back on the idea of a consolidated federal regulator that oversees 4,500 institutions ranging in size from a few million to $4 trillion. He said he's worried that a single agency would lead to greater politicization of federal regulation and lead to even more drastic swings in policy between administrations.
'One-size-fits-all federal regulation and 'supervisory creep' are problems under the existing system,' he said in a speech at the Atlanta Fed. 'Does anyone seriously believe that these problems would be better under one massive federal regulator?'
Wall Street CEOs are warmer to the idea of merging regulators. Bank of America's Brian Moynihan, said last week that he was 'all ears' to efforts to merge regulations, adding that his bank must answer to '100-plus regulators in our building every day.' And JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon last month pitched Republican senators on a broad overhaul of the financial regulatory system, carrying into his meetings a chart that outlined the complexities of how the nation's largest bank is regulated.
Any major overhaul of the agencies — such as bringing the FDIC into the Treasury Department — would likely require Congress to act.
Rep. Andy Barr, a senior Republican on the House Financial Services Committee, told our Jasper Goodman on Monday that he's open to the idea of consolidating federal regulators. 'It's something that I've been interested in for a long time,' Barr said, adding that 'it's something DOGE needs to look at.'
Sen. Mike Rounds, a senior member of the Senate Banking Committee, said he prefers having multiple regulators but understands the appeal of consolidation, such as having a more consistent approach and said he's 'open for discussion.'
'We'll listen to all the sides on it first,' Rounds told Jasper. 'Right now, I like the idea of large banks having one supervisor and the medium and smaller banks having another. But we'll allow them to play that out.'
Asked if the administration could spearhead a consolidation effort on its own, Rounds said, 'this is something for Congress to be involved in.'
IT'S TUESDAY — Drop me a line at mstratford@politico.com. And for econ policy thoughts, Wall Street tips, personnel moves or general thoughts, email Sam at ssutton@politico.com.
Driving the day
The House Financial Services monetary policy task force holds its first hearing at 10 a.m. … The House Financial Services Housing and Insurance Subcommittee holds a hearing on housing supply at 2 p.m. … Rep. David Schweikert speaks at NABE at 4 p.m. …
Trump tariffs kick in: The sweeping 25-percent tariffs on imports from Mexico and Canada are a bitter blow to industry operating outside of the United States — which had hoped that weeks of mixed signals from senior officials and the president himself would mean new tariffs on U.S. allies would be delayed or removed entirely. The massive tariffs were a staple of Trump's reelection pitch last year. Still, the White House defied a flurry of last-minute pleas to change course from officials and industry groups in sectors from automotives to technology to agriculture.
That includes the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which said new tariffs would result in price hikes or even force some small businesses to shut down entirely. 'We urge reconsideration of this policy and a swift end to these tariffs,' said Neil Bradley, U.S. Chamber's chief policy officer.
The retaliation: Canada is poised to hit the U.S. with 25 percent tariffs on C$30 billion of U.S. goods, and the threat of C$125 billion more after a 21-day consultation period. 'Our tariffs will remain in place until the U.S. trade action is withdrawn, and should U.S. tariffs not cease, we are in active and ongoing discussions with provinces and territories to pursue several non-tariff measures,' Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said in a statement.
Mexico President Claudia Sheinbaum said the next steps for her government 'depends on the United States' and Trump. 'Whatever his decision is, we will make our decisions. And there is a plan, there is unity in Mexico,' she said during a daily press conference Monday.
Political fallout? Trump's new tariffs could hit hard in some GOP states and congressional districts, Doug Palmer reports, underscoring the political peril that tariffs represent for Republicans who have nonetheless maintained broad support for the president's trade agenda.
— Ari Hawkins
At the regulators
New FDIC makes moves: The FDIC on Monday moved to rescind a Biden-era policy that imposed greater scrutiny on proposed bank mergers, the first major regulatory rollback under the agency's new Republican control.
The FDIC said it would temporarily reinstate its prior bank merger guidelines while it embarks on a broader effort to 'comprehensively' overhaul its approach to bank mergers.
Making it official: The FDIC also formally withdrew pending Biden-era regulatory proposals on brokered deposits, corporate governance and asset managers' ownership of banks.
The changes were expected, since the Biden policies have drawn sharp criticism from Republicans and industry groups. Acting FDIC Chair Travis Hill earlier this year said he would prioritize a reversal of the bank merger guidance, among a slew of other policies from the previous administration.
DOGE WATCH
CFPB legal saga continues: A federal judge on Monday said she'll keep in place for now her order blocking the Trump administration from moving ahead with mass firings at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Katy O'Donnell reports.
Judge Amy Berman Jackson scheduled a new evidentiary hearing for next Monday morning. It's the second time a judge has ordered agency officials to sit for sworn testimony in the blizzard of emergency litigation over the Trump administration's efforts to slash the federal bureaucracy.
Jackson called on CFPB Chief Operating Officer Adam Martinez to testify. Martinez in a filing on Sunday conceded that the claims of two employees — that he had referred to the 'closure of the agency' and said it was in 'wind down mode' — 'are not inaccurate,' but said the administration was now seeking to 'right-size' the agency rather than close it.
DOGE eyes IRS procurement system: The Trump administration said in a court filing Monday night that the Treasury Department's DOGE team is seeking access to an IRS system that tracks and approves and funds vendor contracts.
A Justice Department attorney asked a federal judge to confirm that DOGE's access to the IRS data would not violate her existing order that generally blocks the Musk-affiliated operation from tapping into Treasury payment systems.
The government said Treasury's DOGE team needed access to the IRS procurement data 'to analyze vendor contracts and assess them for utility and wastefulness.' The Democratic attorneys general who brought the lawsuit opposed the request, according to the letter.
On The Hill
Shutdown watch: 'Top Republican appropriators both said Monday they are pursuing a 'two-track strategy' for avoiding a shutdown in less than two weeks — a sign that the lead negotiators in government funding talks aren't ready to give up on getting a yearlong deal even as President Donald Trump has called for a stopgap measure,' POLITICO's Ben Leonard, Jennifer Scholtes, Mia McCarthy and Nicholas Wu report.
'The announcements from Rep. Tom Cole and Sen. Susan Collins — the chairs of the House and Senate Appropriations Committee, respectively — come as GOP leaders have already said they plan to move a short-term funding bill in the coming days after rejecting Democrats' demands for new language to stop Trump and Elon Musk from withholding congressionally approved spending.'
Congress eyes regulatory rollbacks: The Senate is expected to vote this week on a pair of Republican resolutions repealing Biden-era rules on cryptocurrency tax reporting and the CFPB's oversight of digital payment companies,Jasper Goodman reports.
The Senate is expected to vote today on legislation by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) that would overturn IRS regulations affecting crypto brokers. And on Wednesday, the chamber will take up a resolution by Sen. Pete Ricketts (R-Neb.) that would scrap the CFPB's expanded oversight of Big Tech firms that offer digital wallet services.
GOP pushes Trump to pick a new Fed bank cop: Jasper also reports that the Republican chairs of Congress' banking committees—Rep. French Hill and Sen. Tim Scott—want the Trump administration to move quickly to name a new top regulatory official at the Federal Reserve, saying the position needs to be filled to roll back Biden-era regulations.
In a letter to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent signed by more than two dozen members of the House Financial Services and Senate Banking panels, the lawmakers called on the administration to name 'a strong leader as soon as possible' to become the Fed's next vice chair for supervision. The role was previously held by Michael Barr, who resigned his role as the top regulatory official last month.
Dems press HUD on cuts: Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) on Monday planned to hand-deliver a letter to Housing and Urban Development Secretary Scott Turner, grilling him on recent cuts at the agency, Katy reports.
Waters, the top Democrat on the House Financial Services Committee, said in the letter that actions by HUD and the Elon Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency have given her 'deep concern about the future of fair and affordable housing.' The letter, shared with POLITICO, was signed by more than 100 of Waters' Democratic colleagues.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
7 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Is Trump's troop deployment in LA a prelude to martial law?
Neither did Hegseth announced that National Guard members and the Marines will stay in Los Angeles for Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up At a Advertisement This is a Trump made-for-TV spectacle of authoritarianism disguised as law and order. It's likely a prelude to martial law. Rob Bonta, California's attorney general, is Advertisement Protests were sparked last week after Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials conducted several workplace raids in Los Angeles, including a But what began as boisterous but peaceful protests against Trump's anti-immigrant scheme which now demands 'If I didn't ''SEND IN THE TROOPS,'" Trump said Tuesday on social media, Los Angeles 'would be burning to the ground right now,' before he disparaged Bass and Newsom. Yes, there has been looting, and some cars have been burned and vandalized. But Trump is lying about the extent of lawlessness. Trump is following his bad policies with even worse provocations that could portend a modern-day Kent State tragedy with soldiers firing live bullets at protesters. But for Trump, the more chaos, the better. As a White House official said, 'We're happy to have this fight.' To some extent this fight to suppress dissent has been boiling in Trump for five years. During nationwide demonstrations after the police murder of George Floyd in 2020, Trump, then in his first term, asked members of his Cabinet whether protesters could be shot. 'He thought that the protests made the country look weak, made us look weak, and 'us' meant him,' Mark Esper, Trump's former defense secretary, Advertisement Esper recalled Trump saying to now-retired General Mark Milley, then chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, ''Can't you just shoot them, just shoot them in the legs or something?' … It was a suggestion and a formal question. And we were just all taken aback at that moment as this issue just hung very heavily in the air.' Ultimately, Trump was talked out of it. That won't happen this time, with an administration packed with people whose only loyalty is to him, not to the Constitution or rule of law. After Tom Homan, Trump's bloviating border czar, If not for the ICE arrest of But not now. Everything in Trump's second administration is designed to codify his authoritarianism. If Trump can convince enough people, especially among his white base, that he alone represents the thin orange line between civilization — as Advertisement Right now, the administration claims the military is in Los Angeles to protect federal buildings and assets — theoretically. Trump has not invoked the Insurrection Act, but neither has he ruled out unleashing US troops on protesters. With his draconian policies, Trump has lit the fuse for what could be a long and difficult summer of protests. With an occupying military force in this nation's second largest city, he has declared war against America itself. Renée Graham is a Globe columnist. She can be reached at


New York Post
8 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump promised not to send in military to tamp down on NYC protests — if NYPD keeps demonstrators in line
President Trump promised NYPD brass over the weekend that he will not send in the military or National Guard to tamp down on anti-ICE protests in New York City — as long as cops keep the demonstrators in line, The Post has learned. Trump's pledge was made to Deputy Mayor of Public Safety Kaz Daughtry and NYPD Chief of Department John Chell as the pair palled around with the president at his New Jersey golf club. Sources with knowledge of the meeting said Trump had voiced concerns over the destructive mass protests engulfing Los Angeles and them being replicated in the Big Apple. Advertisement But Chell reassured the president that any demonstrations in the city would not get out of hand, the sources said. Kaz Daughtry and John Chell though didn't tee it up with the commander in chief. Linkedin/john-chell The two Big Apple police officials met with Trump on Sunday. Linkedin/john-chell Advertisement Trump then told the two he didn't believe the National Guard would be necessary in New York City. It came after he ordered an initial 2,000 National Guard troops to LA Saturday amid the raging protests over federal immigration enforcement raids. Since then, the Trump administration has in total dispatched roughly 4,000 National Guard members and 700 Marines to the city– sparking an emergency request by California Gov. Gavin Newsom Tuesday for a federal court to block the deployment. On Monday, Mayor Eric Adams and his police commissioner, Jessica Tisch, decried the anti-ICE riots in Los Angeles and issued a stern warning to New Yorkers to not follow suit. 'The escalation of protests in Los Angeles over the last couple of days is unacceptable and would not be tolerated if attempted in our city,' Adams said. Advertisement Tisch added that 'any attacks against law enforcement will be met with a swift and decisive response from the NYPD.' Earlier Monday, dozens of protestors calling for an end to the ICE raids were arrested at Trump Tower after refusing to leave the Manhattan high-rise. The meeting between Trump and Adams' allies raised eyebrows in New York City political circles — after Daughtry and Chell posted photos on social media from the Bedminster club. 'Great day on the links today with POTUS, #45-#47 – Donald J. Trump. Good conversation with a few laughs and a great lunch. Deputy Mayor of Public Safety Kaz Daughtry and I were grateful for the invite,' Chell wrote. Advertisement Sources said the two Big Apple officials didn't actually tee it up with the prez, despite the photos showing them chatting with him on the links. Still, Adams defended the outing on Tuesday, telling reporters, 'A lot of great deals have been made on the golf course.' 'I thank the two of them for doing it,' he said. 'Many of you who play golf know that great decisions are made on the golf course.' Both Chell and Daughtry also joined the mayor at Trump's inauguration earlier this year.
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
IQVIA Holdings (NYSE:IQV) Sees 11% Share Price Rise Over Last Week
IQVIA Holdings experienced a 10% rise in share price over the last week, correlating with its recent developments, notably the dosing of the first patient in the RENEW Phase 2 trial and its strategic alliance with Sarah Cannon Research Institute to optimize oncology trials. These initiatives likely provided a positive sentiment boost, aligning well with the broader market momentum, as indices such as the S&P 500 also reached new highs. The market's anticipation over US-China trade talks and overall strong corporate earnings have supported the upward trend, further enhancing IQV's market performance. We've identified 1 warning sign for IQVIA Holdings that you should be aware of. Uncover 18 companies that survived and thrived after COVID and have the right ingredients to survive Trump's tariffs. The recent 10% rise in IQVIA Holdings' share price has been influenced by important developments like the dosing in the RENEW Phase 2 trial and a key alliance with Sarah Cannon Research Institute. These initiatives are expected to potentially drive revenue growth, particularly as the strategic alliance optimizes oncology trials. The company's past performance, with total returns of 10.45% over five years, suggests modest growth in investor value. However, compared to the US Life Sciences industry's one-year return of 27% decline, IQVIA's recent rise highlights positive market sentiment. These initiatives, combined with FDA reforms and NVIDIA collaboration, may lower operational costs and have a favorable impact on earnings forecasts. Analysts predict revenue to grow by 5.2% annually over the next three years, which is somewhat cautious compared to the general expectations for the life sciences sector. The recent share price movement to US$146.2 remains below the consensus price target of US$216.31, indicating potential for future appreciation if the projected growth in revenue and earnings materializes. Click here to discover the nuances of IQVIA Holdings with our detailed analytical financial health report. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include NYSE:IQV. This article was originally published by Simply Wall St. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data