Trump this time is trying to help GOP avoid messy primary fights
Trump recently waded into both Michigan's Senate race and the New York gubernatorial contest in an effort to convince notable candidates — Rep. Bill Huizenga (R) and Rep. Mike Lawler (R), respectively — to opt out of the contests. In both cases, the candidates bowed to pressure.
The president's moves underscore how Republicans are already seeking to coalesce around candidates in some of next year's most high-profile races, as they look to buck historical trends that suggest the president's party will lose congressional seats and other contests.
'He's clearly far more involved in this round than he was in 2017 and 2018 but at the same time it's a totally different situation,' one national Republican operative said of Trump.
The different situation is the narrow House GOP majority. It leaves Trump and Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) dealing with very tight margins on crucial votes.
The president's political operation is effectively being led by Chris LaCivita, a Republican operative who served as co-campaign manager on Trump's 2024 presidential bid.
One source close to the White House said Trump and his team would like to avoid messy, drawn-out GOP primaries in state-wide races that could damage candidates for the general election or divide the resources and attention of Republicans.
The source pointed to the contentious Pennsylvania Senate primary in 2022 between now-Sen. Dave McCormick and Mehmet Oz, who prevailed in the primary but lost in the general election.
Trump spoke directly with Huizenga earlier this month and urged him not to launch a Senate bid, a source familiar with the meeting confirmed to The Hill. NOTUS first reported that Trump had directly asked Huizenga to stay out of the race, effectively clearing the field for former Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.), whom Trump endorsed Thursday.
In North Carolina, Trump is backing Michael Whatley, who is expected in the coming days to announce his campaign to replace retiring Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.). The source said Whatley would not have entered the race without Trump's blessing to leave his position at the Republican National Committee.
'They're also at the same time trying to do a balancing act where they want to be supportive of people who have been loyal to the president and drive who and what they think is in their best interest,' the national Republican strategist said.
The strategist said those two criteria are 'not a perfect match,' pointing to Trump's backing of Whatley. The strategist argued that a candidate like Whatley is a riskier bet in the swing state.
'He essentially sacrificed Tillis who was a much safer bet than Lara Trump would have been or Whatley today,' the strategist said. 'If I were drawing a map, I would shade North Carolina in light blue.'
Other Republicans push back on the notion, pointing to Whatley's deep ties to the state's grassroots from his history as chair of the North Carolina GOP.
'No polling has indicated that Thom Tillis was going to be a better candidate than a pro-Trump Republican,' said a second national Republican operative, noting that Trump has won North Carolina three times in the past.
Republicans are also seeking to put a bow on Georgia's GOP Senate primary as the party looks to oust Sen. Jon Ossoff, arguably the most vulnerable Democratic incumbent up for reelection in the upper chamber.
One other race to watch for Trump's influence is the Kentucky Senate campaign to replace outgoing Sen. Mitch McConnell (R). Trump has so far not weighed in as multiple Republicans have announced their candidacies.
In Georgia, Fox News reported Friday that Trump's political operation and Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp's (R) had butted heads over their preferred candidates, with Kemp pushing former University of Tennessee football coach Derek Dooley.
Businessman Nate Morris has been building his pro-Trump resume. He announced his candidacy on Donald Trump Jr.'s podcast and has already scored endorsements from Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk and Sen. Jim Banks (R-Ind.), both staunch Trump allies. Morris is also close with Vice President Vance.
Trump also has not waded into the Texas Republican Senate primary, where state Attorney General Ken Paxton is taking on incumbent Sen. John Cornyn. Both Republicans are considered Trump allies, with Paxton being popular with the president's base and Cornyn a key GOP voice in the Senate. Most polls show Paxton with a considerable lead over Cornyn, but hypothetical general election polling shows Cornyn performing better than Paxton against Democratic candidates.
Last week Cornyn said Trump has relayed to him that he is not ready to endorse in the race.
Democrats argue that their chances at flipping Texas at the Senate level are boosted with a Paxton nomination.
'Paxton can't win a general but Cornyn probably can't win a primary,' the GOP strategist said. 'There's very complicating factors, but I think they're trying to balance their MAGA loyalties with the practicalities of making sure they keep the Senate comfortably and try to find a map that gives them a House majority that includes redistricting.'
Redistricting has become a major topic of conversation in national political circles as Texas Republicans pursue redistricting ahead of the midterms.
Trump spoke earlier this month with Texas Republicans, where he urged leaders in the state to redraw congressional maps to boost the GOP. The president has also made clear he would support other red states doing the same.
'Just a very simple redrawing, we pick up five seats,' Trump said of Texas. 'But we have a couple of other states where we'll pick up seats also.'
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) floated 'middecade' redistricting to reporters Thursday, noting that he has spoken to Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick about the matter.
'They said they were going to redo the count in time for 2026,' the governor said, referring to the census. 'They would have to do that relatively soon because you need time to draw maps and you need time to get that done.'
Population shifts in states like Florida could benefit House Republicans, particularly in south Florida, where Democratic Reps. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Jared Moskowitz and Lois Frankel could be negatively impacted.
'Any advantage you can get the better,' the GOP strategist noted. 'That gives you a lot of breathing room even if you lose some tough races.'
Trump's poll numbers have wavered in recent surveys, a result largely attributable to independents souring on his handling of key issues like the economy and immigration. But Trump allies argued the president's endorsement is still a make-or-break factor in primaries because of his enduring popularity within the party.
'His numbers are stronger than ever before with the Republican base,' one Trump ally said. 'Republican voters are happier with him now than ever before.'
The second national Republican operative called Trump's popularity 'a huge asset' in the midterms.
'If you are trying to run a campaign that wants to win you need to replicate the pro Trump coalition,' the operative said, referring to the president's general election win last year.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Paul Krugman on what some Republicans get wrong about the Fed
President Trump has made no secret of his desire for the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates. But as Paul Krugman, a Nobel Laureate in Economics and author of the substack "Paul Krugman," explains, some in the Republican party may have lost sight of what the Fed actually does. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Catalysts. Related videos Europe's most expensive city revealed, as living costs near £3,500 per month Britain's gas imports surge as Miliband abandons North Sea How much do you need in an ISA to target a £5,000 monthly passive income? How will the Lloyds share price be affected by today's Supreme Court ruling? Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Trade War Is Stealing Your Lunch Money — Here's Why (Explained Like We're 12)
The term 'trade war' seems more pervasive these days — on everything from TV pundits to TikTok experts. Oh, and that one uncle who always has an opinion? He's chiming in with his take, too. Yet for all the 'shots fired in the trade war' headlines you've seen, you might still not know what a trade war really is — or if your wallet could end up as collateral. Read More: Find Out: If you want a simple explanation, you could always turn to ChatGPT. That's exactly what I did on your behalf–only I wanted an easy-to-understand, jargon-free approach. So I asked ChatGPT to explain trade wars and their impact on my wallet, like I was 12 years old. As always, you'll want to fact-check — since ChatGPT is far from perfect — but it gave me a solid baseline of information to guide my own research. A Definition Even a Kid Could Understand When asked what constitutes a trade war, ChatGPT gave me a succinct answer. In essence, a trade war involves countries fighting by charging each other extra money — in this case, tariffs — for the goods they buy and sell to one another. To double-check this response, I hopped on ye olde internet and visited the website for international publication Deutsche Welle, where I found an article about a potential trade war between the U.S. and China. In that article, writer Arthur Sullivan described a trade war simply: 'A trade war is an economic conflict in which countries implement and increase tariffs and other nontariff barriers against each other,' he wrote. 'It typically arises from extreme economic protectionism and usually features so-called tit-for-tat measures, where each side increases tariffs in response to each other.' So far, so good in terms of accuracy. Discover Next: How the Trade War Stole My Lunch Money Sullivan's article broke down the trade beef between the U.S. and China, but I wanted a much simpler example. Treating me like a 12-year-old, ChatGPT brought me back to the schoolyard. It asked me to imagine myself and another student trading lunch items. I gave him $2 to buy his cookie (I'm a sucker for a good peanut butter cookie, it's true), and he gave me $3 for my juice box. Initially, we're both happy. We feel the arrangement is fair. But one day, I realized his cookies were a little stale. I decided he'd have to pay an extra dollar for my juice box. That, ChatGPT explained, is like a tariff — because I asked for extra money just to make the trade. Infuriated, my classmate told me I'd now have to pay an extra $1.50 for his cookie. 'Now you're both just charging each other more for the same stuff,' ChatGPT said. 'That's a trade war.' How It Hits My Wallet ChatGPT explained that the impact of this lunchbox battle will show up in my piggy bank at home. I'm basically paying more for the same cookie — or, if my allowance doesn't cover it, I can't afford the cookie at all. But my money woes don't stop there. According to ChatGPT, my lunch could get smaller because I'm spending more on fewer things, and I'm saving less overall — which might mean no more candy after school. On top of that, my classmate and I are annoyed with each other, and we might stop trading altogether. ChatGPT knows I'm curious about the real-world implications of an actual trade war, and it offers this summary: 'Countries are like you and the other kid. When they get in a trade war, you (and your parents) end up paying more for stuff like food, clothes, phones — even toys.' Bottom Line: Trade Wars Are Far From Child's Play As ChatGPT puts it: 'A trade war is when countries fight over money and trading, and it makes your lunch cost more … even if you didn't start the fight.' More From GOBankingRates Warren Buffett: 10 Things Poor People Waste Money On This article originally appeared on The Trade War Is Stealing Your Lunch Money — Here's Why (Explained Like We're 12) Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's latest trade salvo revealed a new approach to setting his tariffs: tiers
President Trump is moving forward on a new suite of tariff rates with an approach increasingly focused on grouping countries into tiers, as opposed to a previous approach of simply looking at the trade balance. The new approach remains heavily influenced by either a trade surplus or a deficit but has grown more complex — some might say more subjective — leading to some consolidation in rate levels and the lowering of rates for many countries to a key new standard of 15%. The new landscape was reflected in Thursday night's executive action announcing rates, which centered around the 15% rate set to be in place next week in about 40 countries. Countries facing that rate include major trading partners that recently struck deals, such as Europe and Japan, as well as smaller nations, from Afghanistan to Zimbabwe. More than 100 countries were excluded altogether from this week's announcement, meaning their rate will stay at 10%. Meanwhile, a third group of about 30 countries will see higher rates ranging from 18% to 50%. Trump and his team are taking an approach that could simplify future negotiations and be more in line with global trade dynamics. Recent months have seen America's trading partners focused on their potential rate and how they stack up with direct competitors in nearly equal measure. A White House official confirmed the tiered approach to Yahoo Finance on Friday, suggesting that the 10% rate is largely but not exclusively reserved for countries with a trade surplus, the 15% rate is for those with a deal or a "small deficit," and that higher "bespoke" rates are further up the chain. Read more: What Trump's tariffs mean for the economy and your wallet Those 'bespoke' rates Those countries facing rates above 15% offer a wider array, but even some clear tiers are there. Ten nations with a 19%-20% rate all have one thing in common: a location in South or Southeast Asia. These are trading partners often in focus for their role in China's orbit and the target of Trump's keen focus on issues like transshipping. Prior deals with Indonesia, Vietnam, and the Philippines put those nations in that rate range, with other nations, from Thailand to Taiwan, now set to join them. India is now an outlier in the region, facing a 25% rate as trade talks there have grown contentious but continue. Thursday's order focused on the transshipping issues. Trump threatened an extra 40% tariff on any product deemed "to have been transshipped to evade applicable duties," without providing a further definition on what would meet that standard. In addition to India, five countries, including Mexico, face 25% tariff rates at least for the next 90 days. Even more punitive tariffs include 30% rates on nations like South Africa, 35% on Canada, 39% on Switzerland, and 50% on Brazil to top it off. A more complex formula this time around The White House official said the rates were determined using an array of factors, such as the trade deficit, existing non-tariff barriers, and how talks are going. They noted, for example, that Switzerland is a wealthy country more able to absorb tariffs. That contributed to the 39% rate applied by Trump, which shocked officials there and led to a scramble Friday. That account of how things were decided tracks with how the president himself described his approach in recent weeks. He told reporters he was considering a range of factors when setting rates, from hard numbers like the trade deficit to his own instincts. The contrast is notable when compared with early April, when Trump's team came up with his "reciprocal" tariff formula much more simply. Trump's trade representative at the time acknowledged that those rates were set using a calculation that, once parts that cancel each other out were removed, determined a rate based only on any given country's trade surplus with the US. Meanwhile, other details of this week's rollout — most notably a seven-day delay on tariffs going into effect — mean things could continue to change in the days and weeks ahead. As Capital Economics put it in a note Friday, "this is unlikely to be the final word," noting the chances for new deals and the legal challenges — with some importers looking to strike down these tariffs — could continue to change rates. For his part, Trump told NBC News on Thursday evening that he views his tariff rollout as going "very smooth," adding that it's "too late" for other countries to avoid the rates now set to take effect in seven days but that he's always willing to negotiate. "It doesn't mean that somebody doesn't come along in four weeks and say we can make some kind of a deal," he said. Ben Werschkul is a Washington correspondent for Yahoo Finance. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
