Karnataka High Court stays new tender invited for collection of waste in Bengaluru
Observing that 'there is a breach of the undertaking given to the court earlier', the High Court of Karnataka has stayed the new tender invited by the Bengaluru Solid Waste Management Ltd (BSWML) on May 28 for collection and transportation of city's garbage.
The court noted that on April 22, it gave permission to the State government and the BSWML to continue with the tender invited on November 7, 2024, but both the government and the BSWML, instead of continuing that tender, have now come out with a new tender.
Contrary to undertaking
Inviting new tender with new clauses is contrary to the undertaking given to the court by the State Advocate General, who had assured the court that the November 7, 2024, tender would be continued and would be taken to its logical conclusion by allowing participation of those contractors, who were either disqualified or their bids were rejected and have filed petitions before the court, to participate in the tender, the court noted.
Justice M. Nagaprasanna passed the interim order on the petition filed by Bengaluru Mahanagara Swachate Mattu Lorry Malikara Hagoo Guthigedarara Sangha.
It has been pointed out in the petition that the government, in its May 26 approval granted for floating a new tender, , imposed a condition that BSWML has to take permission from the minister in charge of the department instead of continuing the 2024 tender. This condition, the petitioner-sangha has claimed, is a clear violation of the provisions of the Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurement Act.
During the hearing, the court expressed serious displeasure with the A-G on the conduct of the State government in breaching the undertaking given to the court earlier.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
HC sets aside condition to obtain vehicle passes from district police
Madurai: Madras high court on Friday set aside the condition imposed by Madurai city police to obtain vehicle passes for participation in the Lord Murugan devotees conference, saying the right to movement throughout the territory of India is guaranteed to all citizens under Article 19(1)(d) of the Constitution. The court modified the order of a single bench in this regard. The court was hearing an appeal filed by Hindu Munnani functionary M Arasupandi challenging a condition imposed by a single bench. The petitioner had earlier filed another petition challenging certain conditions imposed by the city police while permitting the conference. The single bench had refused to interfere with the condition requiring participants to obtain passes for vehicles from the concerned district police. Aggrieved by the condition, the petitioner moved Supreme Court. The petition was disposed of as withdrawn on the petitioner's request, following which he preferred the present appeal before high court. Senior counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the object of the state appears to be to put spokes in the wheels and discourage participants to the conference. A division bench of Justice G R Swaminathan and Justice K Rajasekar observed that since the authorities themselves chose to grant permission for the conference, no exception can be taken to its conduct. The condition imposed by the assistant commissioner of police, Anna Nagar, Madurai city, states that no vehicle carrying the conference participants without a vehicle pass will be allowed to enter city limits. An assistant commissioner can have jurisdiction and sway only over her territorial limits. The official cannot issue an order preventing the entry of vehicles into Madurai city. It is open to any citizen to enter Madurai city in his/her vehicle, and such a right cannot be interfered with by an assistant commissioner, said the judges. In the case on hand, not more than 10,000 vehicles are expected, and therefore, there is no need to impose such an onerous condition. The appellant undertook that participants who come in their personal vehicles or hired vehicles would deposit the photostat copies of the RC book, insurance certificate, and driving licence at the police booths at various parking places earmarked. "The organisers assure us that pucca arrangements have been made so that there is no stampede, which was witnessed in Bengaluru, Delhi, and other places recently," the judges observed.
The Hindu
6 hours ago
- The Hindu
Karnataka High Court stays new tender invited for collection of waste in Bengaluru
Observing that 'there is a breach of the undertaking given to the court earlier', the High Court of Karnataka has stayed the new tender invited by the Bengaluru Solid Waste Management Ltd (BSWML) on May 28 for collection and transportation of city's garbage. The court noted that on April 22, it gave permission to the State government and the BSWML to continue with the tender invited on November 7, 2024, but both the government and the BSWML, instead of continuing that tender, have now come out with a new tender. Contrary to undertaking Inviting new tender with new clauses is contrary to the undertaking given to the court by the State Advocate General, who had assured the court that the November 7, 2024, tender would be continued and would be taken to its logical conclusion by allowing participation of those contractors, who were either disqualified or their bids were rejected and have filed petitions before the court, to participate in the tender, the court noted. Justice M. Nagaprasanna passed the interim order on the petition filed by Bengaluru Mahanagara Swachate Mattu Lorry Malikara Hagoo Guthigedarara Sangha. It has been pointed out in the petition that the government, in its May 26 approval granted for floating a new tender, , imposed a condition that BSWML has to take permission from the minister in charge of the department instead of continuing the 2024 tender. This condition, the petitioner-sangha has claimed, is a clear violation of the provisions of the Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurement Act. During the hearing, the court expressed serious displeasure with the A-G on the conduct of the State government in breaching the undertaking given to the court earlier.
The Hindu
6 hours ago
- The Hindu
Govt. released additional water to industries from Hidkal dam, say farmers
Activists and farmers leaders have complained that the State government had released more than twice the amount of water than stipulated for industries from the Hidkal dam in Belagavi district. The Department of Irrigation, under requests from the Department of Industries has released over 0.229 tmcft. of Ghataprabha river water for industries, against the allocation of 0.1 tmcft. of water from the Raja Lakhamagouda reservoir. The full reservoir capacity is 51 tmcft. The government's response has become important in the wake of reports that the department of industries has obtained the release of a further 0.5tmcft. of water from the dam to the Dharwad industrial area. A Right To Information application by activist Sujit Mulgund has revealed that from the dam State government had released 'excess water' to industries. 'This is legally and ethically wrong. While the rule says that only 0.1 tmcft. is to be set aside for industries. Secondly, the cities of Belagavi, Bagalkot and en route villages depend on the Hidkal dam for drinking water. In fact, they suffer from water scarcity during summer months as the water levels in the dam are reduced. In such a situation, it is a cruel joke on the people of north Karnataka to divert drinking water for industries,'' he said. 'The State government has also acted in a non-democratic manner, by not taking into confidence, the local irrigation consultative committee of the Hidkal dam, in deciding to release water to industries,' he said. This dam was not built to benefit just a few industries. Its primary task is to support the rural poor, Mr. Mulgund said. 'The State government has violated the National Water Policy of 2011, that gives preference to drinking water and agriculture, over industrial usage,' he added. A delegation of farmers led by former Minister Shashikant Naik has urged the State government not to draw water from Hidkal for Dharwad industrial area. Another team led by water expert B. Anand Kumar, advocate Nitin Tolbandi, Mr. Mulgund and others have suggested that treated sewage water from Belagavi and Dharwad could be utilised for industrial purposes, rather than drinking water from dams. Mr. Naik said they would appeal to the State government again, to stop supply of Ghataprabha waters to industrial areas. 'If the government does not listen to us, we will protest and stop the water supply pipeline works,' he said. Established in 1961, the Hidkal Dam was meant exclusively for irrigation and drinking water. It is named after Raja Lakhamagouda, the erstwhile head of a local princely state, and philanthropist who donated land and resources to several educational institutions in British India.
