logo
UK To Roll Out Red Carpet For Second Trump State Visit

UK To Roll Out Red Carpet For Second Trump State Visit

Britain will welcome Donald Trump for an unprecedented second state visit in September, Buckingham Palace confirmed Monday, saying he would stay as the guest of King Charles III at Windsor Castle.
The US president "accompanied by the First Lady Mrs. Melania Trump, has accepted an invitation from His Majesty The King to pay a state visit to the United Kingdom from 17 September to 19 September 2025," said a palace statement.
The visit will come only two months after Charles, and his wife Queen Camilla, welcomed French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife Brigitte to Windsor.
Trump was invited by a personal letter from Charles, which Prime Minister Keir Starmer handed to him in February during a visit to Washington.
Starmer has sought to woo Trump with a charm offensive to boost ties and gain better leverage for the UK in tough trade talks with Washington.
A delighted Trump, who has long been a big fan of the British royal family, has called the invitation a "very great honour", and opened the letter from the king in the glare of the world's cameras.
"This is really special, this has never happened before, this is unprecedented," Starmer said in the Oval Office as he handed Trump a hand-signed letter from the monarch.
"This is truly historic."
Britain rolled out the red carpet for Trump in 2019 when he met the late Queen Elizabeth II, King Charles's mother. No foreign leader has ever had a second state visit.
The Times daily said the king had however sought to put off the new visit until later in Trump's second term, but "Starmer has gone against the wishes of the king" in bringing the visit forward.
"The prime minister has expedited a full 'bells and whistles' visit in an attempt to capitalise on the president's fascination with the royal family," The Times said.
Starmer will also meet with Trump this month when the Republican leader is expected to visit Scotland, where he has two golf resorts.
The visit has not been publicly confirmed by the White House, but Downing Street said Monday that Trump would be "visiting in a private capacity" and "the prime minister is pleased to take up the president's invite to meet during his stay".
Trump's threats against Canada have put Charles, who is the country's head of state, in a delicate position.
Trump has threatened to slap a 35 percent tariff on imports from Canada starting August 1 and has regularly mused that Canada should become the 51st US state.
Reading the letter aloud in the Oval Office in February, Trump said he had been invited to the historic Windsor Castle, near London, one of the royal family's ancient homes.
After reading the letter, Trump said of Charles: "He's a beautiful man, a wonderful man -- I've gotten to know him very well, actually. First term and now second term."
He added: "On behalf of our wonderful First Lady Melania and myself, the answer is yes and we look forward to being there and honouring the King and honouring really your country."
Unlike Macron, who addressed the British parliament during his state visit last week, Trump is not currently scheduled to address the House of Commons which will be then on a break.
During the French leader's visit last week, Britain laid on a pomp-filled welcome, including a horse-drawn procession and a lavish banquet in the castle where the leaders hailed a new era in UK-France relations. Head of State King Charles III delivers the speech from the throne next to Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney during the opening of the Canadian parliament in May AFP
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Thai-Cambodia Evacuees Hail Truce News With Mixed Emotions
Thai-Cambodia Evacuees Hail Truce News With Mixed Emotions

Int'l Business Times

time26 minutes ago

  • Int'l Business Times

Thai-Cambodia Evacuees Hail Truce News With Mixed Emotions

Counting down the minutes to midnight when a truce with Cambodia is due, Thai evacuee Jeanjana Phaphan is full of a fragile hopes and doubts that peace will prevail. "I'd be so happy if the ceasefire really happens," said 48-year-old farmer Jeanjana, who fled her frontier home in Phanom Dong Rak district with her three-year-old son a few days ago. "If it's truly ending, I'm overjoyed --- the happiest I've felt in a long time," she told AFP at a shelter in Surin city, 50 kilometres (30 miles) from the border. Thailand and Cambodia's leaders have agreed an "unconditional" ceasefire will begin at midnight on Monday, following five days of combat along their jungle-clad frontier that has killed at least 38 people. Nearly 300,000 people have fled as the two sides fired artillery, rockets and guns in a battle over long-disputed areas home to a smattering of ancient temples. News of the ceasefire sent a ripple of relief, measured with a degree of scepticism, through those who fled since the fighting erupted last Thursday. "If our two countries keep fighting, the hardship and loss will only grow," Jeanjana said. "When I hear neighbours say their roof was pierced by bullets, it makes me heavy-hearted. The sound of people crying from loss is truly heartbreaking," she added with a trembling voice and tear-brimmed eyes. "People on that side are civilians too, just like us. On our side we're just farmers -- and I believe they are farmers like us too. Ordinary people working to survive." The peace deal was agreed in Malaysia, under the mediation of its Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim following interventions by US President Donald Trump and Chinese negotiators. But sitting on a straw mat next to his wife, 68-year-old farmer Tee Samanjai is thinking not about those high-table talks, but his normal life back on his farm. "The first thing I'll do when I get home is check on the chickens, fertilise the rice, and take care of the fields," he said. But his anticipation to return is also clouded with doubt. The past week's clashes have been the deadliest since 2008-2011 over the territory, claimed by both sides because of a vague demarcation made by Cambodia's French colonial administrators in 1907. "I still have doubts that Cambodia will follow through with what they agreed to," Tee said. "We may go home, but with unease. There's no peace of mind. I want to go back, but I don't trust Cambodia at all. No one in our village does." Just over the border in Cambodia, camped out at a temple evacuation site in Phumi Bak Thkav, farmer Say Yoeun has much in common with his Thai counterpart. "I am not happy to stay somewhere like this," said the 55-year-old. "I miss my home and livestock -- and I cannot take care of my paddy field." Cambodian and Thai commanders are due to meet early Tuesday morning if the truce holds, before villagers can return to their homes and start counting the cost of the conflict. For Thai Kavindhra Tiamsai, who evacuated her mother from the conflict zone, the fighting has revealed how locals on the fringes of both countries are marginalised by their governments. "A ceasefire is a good option but also the minimum," the 33-year-old said. "What we need is a comprehensive, grounded plan that speaks to the realities of rural life." "One that doesn't assume evacuation is easy -- or even possible -- when most families have no transport, no money to buffer, and no safety net to lean on." An evacuee looks at footage on a smartphone of Thailand and Cambodia's leaders shaking hands in Malaysia AFP People who fled their homes near the border between Cambodia and Thailand rest in a makeshift shelter AFP Nearly 300,000 people have fled as the two sides battled over long-disputed areas AFP

EU Defends Trump Trade Deal Facing Backlash
EU Defends Trump Trade Deal Facing Backlash

Int'l Business Times

timean hour ago

  • Int'l Business Times

EU Defends Trump Trade Deal Facing Backlash

The European Union on Monday vehemently defended its trade deal with President Donald Trump, with EU capitals and businesses sharply divided on an outcome some branded a "capitulation". "I'm 100 percent sure that this deal is better than a trade war with the United States," top EU trade negotiator Maros Sefcovic told journalists. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen clinched the framework accord with Trump Sunday after dashing to Scotland as the August 1 deadline loomed for steep levies that threatened to cripple Europe's economy. EU exports are now set to face across-the-board tariffs of 15 percent -- higher than customs duties before Trump returned to the White House, but much lower than his threatened 30 percent. The 27-nation bloc also promised its companies would purchase energy worth $750 billion from the United States and make $600 billion in additional investments -- although it was not clear how binding those pledges would be. "This is clearly the best deal we could get under very difficult circumstances," Sefcovic said. Full details of the agreement -- and crucially which sectors could escape the 15-percent levy -- will be known in coming days, although the EU says it has avoided steeper tariffs on key exports including cars and medicines. But the reaction from European capitals -- which gave von der Leyen the mandate to negotiate -- ranged from muted to outright hostile. French Prime Minister Francois Bayrou said it was a "dark day" for Europe and said the accord was tantamount to "submission". Speaking for Europe's biggest economy, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz gave a warmer welcome to a deal he said had avoided "needless escalation". Industry groups in both countries made plain their disappointment however, with Germany's main auto sector body saying the 15-percent levy "burdens" carmakers while its VCI chemical trade association said the rates were "too high". Hungary's Prime Minister Viktor Orban attacked the deal in blunt terms, saying "Trump ate Ursula von der Leyen for breakfast". "It looks a bit like a capitulation," said Alberto Rizzi of the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR). "The EU accepted a fairly unbalanced deal," he added, saying it delivered a "political victory for Trump". Von der Leyen had faced intense pressure from EU states to strike a deal quickly with the bloc's biggest partner and protect a $1.9-trillion trading relationship. Defending Brussels' approach, Sefcovic warned that a no-deal scenario -- meaning a 30-percent tariff and the prospect of further escalation -- would have risked up to five million jobs in Europe. Throughout the months-long talks, Brussels prioritised stability and maintaining good relations with Washington, over escalation. That line of thinking has support: Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, a Trump ally, said the deal had avoided "potentially devastating" consequences. Markets in Asia and Europe welcomed the certainty and rose following the announcement -- reflecting the 4.4 billion euros ($5.1 billion) worth of daily transatlantic goods and services trade that were at stake. Hanging over the negotiations was the risk to other areas of cooperation -- like Ukraine -- if the EU descended into a trade war with its closest security partner. "It's not only about the trade -- it's about security, it's about Ukraine," Sefcovic told reporters Monday. Jacob Funk Kirkegaard of the Peterson Institute for International Economics acknowledged it was "clearly an imbalanced deal" if judged purely on trade terms. "But if you're trying to avoid worse national security outcomes, well then maybe the deal is not so bad," he said. The EU had sought to ramp up the pressure in the final stretch of talks, fearing a bad deal and higher levies, with countries approving a $109-billion package of counter-tariffs at the last minute. And states led by France were pushing for a more robust response including the option to deploy the trade "bazooka" known as the anti-coercion instrument. But the threat of retaliation was consistently framed by Brussels as a last resort should talks fail, and experts suggested the hardening stance may have come too late to make a real difference. "If the EU had played hardball at the very beginning, it probably could have got a better deal," ECFR's Rizzi told AFP.

Will EU lose out as SE Asia strikes trade deals with US? – DW – 07/28/2025
Will EU lose out as SE Asia strikes trade deals with US? – DW – 07/28/2025

DW

time2 hours ago

  • DW

Will EU lose out as SE Asia strikes trade deals with US? – DW – 07/28/2025

New trade deals between the US and key Southeast Asian economies are reshaping global commerce. While the EU could lose market share, it's also possible that these agreements end up bolstering Brussels' negotiating hand. Vietnam, Indonesia, and the Philippines have struck separate deals with the White House in recent weeks to significantly reduce the tariffs the US will levy on their exports, as the August 1 deadline looms. To access the market of the world's largest economy, all three Southeast Asian states have pledged to reduce their tariffs on US goods to nearly zero and increase their purchases of American products. In some cases, this may negatively affect European exports to Southeast Asia. However, most analysts believe that zero tariffs for the US could work in Europe's favor by pressuring Southeast Asian states to also lower their tariffs on European goods. On Sunday, Washington and Brussels reached their trade deal framework, with a US tariff on EU exports set at 15%, marking the end of a monthslong standoff between two of the world's largest economies. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video On July 22, US President Donald Trump announced that a 19% tariff would be applied to goods from the Philippines, up from the 17% rate set in April, while Manila agreed to eliminate levies on US exports. Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. said that his country would import more soy, wheat, pharmaceutical products, and cars from the US. Days earlier, the US and Indonesia, Southeast Asia's biggest economy, struck a deal in which the US lowers the duties on Indonesian exports to 19%, down from a threatened 32%. Jakarta also agreed to eliminate tariffs on almost all US goods and scrap all non-tariff barriers facing American firms, including recently introduced pre-shipment inspections on imported goods and local content requirements, which had prevented Indonesia-based companies from using certain imported products in their manufacturing processes. According to Trump, Jakarta will also buy $15 billion (€12.9 billion) in US energy, $4.5 billion in American agricultural products, and 50 Boeing jets. Furthermore, Indonesia will remove restrictions on exporting industrial commodities, including critical minerals, to the US. Such restrictions have been in place for years, enabling Indonesian firms to process raw minerals locally and produce higher-value-added products. Earlier in July, Vietnam secured a deal that will see the US imposing a 20% tariff on Vietnamese goods, a sharp drop from the 46% announced in April, as well as zero tariffs on products the US exports to Vietnam. "Vietnam will do something that they have never done before, give the United States of America total access to their markets for trade," Trump said on July 2 in a social media post after agreeing to the deal with Hanoi. It remains to be seen whether other Southeast Asian countries currently negotiating with the US will follow a similar approach. Thailand has stated its intention to maintain tariffs on agricultural imports, and Malaysia is reportedly pushing back on some of Washington's demands. US exports to Singapore are already tariff-free. Initially, the "reciprocal tariffs" were scheduled to take effect on July 8, but the White House delayed the deadline until August 1. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Even though the US looks set to considerably lower the tariffs on Southeast Asian exports from the initially threatened rates, settling around the 20% mark, they are likely to disrupt some regional trade links with the US, the largest export market for most Southeast Asian goods. This could be a boon for Southeast Asian exports into Europe, where import tariffs will be lower. However, it's unclear whether European exporters would benefit, too. According to a report last week by , around 12% of the EU's exports to Indonesia and Vietnam are at risk following the US's signing of bilateral agreements with both countries. In Vietnam, this could affect $1.5 billion worth of European exports. "If products bought from the US replace products purchased from the EU, that will negatively impact European exports to the region," Daniel Balazs, research fellow in the China Programme of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies at Singapore's Nanyang Technological University, told DW. "However, the negative impact is likely to be limited, because Southeast Asian nations' interest is to maintain diversity in their trade relationships to avoid overreliance on a single actor," he added. Alfred Gerstl, an expert on Indo-Pacific international relations at the University of Vienna, noted that in only a few sectors — particularly mechanical engineering and the chemical industry — there is direct competition between US and European companies. But he told DW that some EU companies may reconsider their plans to relocate their production base to Southeast Asia due to the now higher US tariffs on goods coming from these countries. In 2024, EU-Vietnam trade was worth €67 billion, of which €12.3 billion was in European exports to Vietnam, according to data from the European Commission. Indonesia imported €9.7 billion worth of goods last year, while the Philippines imported €7.7 billion. Overall, the EU exported approximately €94 billion worth of goods to the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) region in 2022. Most European exports to Vietnam already benefit from zero tariffs, thanks to the EU-Vietnam free trade deal, which came into effect in 2020, so the zero-tariff policy on US exports will have limited impact, Khac Giang Nguyen, a visiting fellow at the ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute in Singapore, told DW. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Competition may intensify, especially in sectors such as agriculture, where American goods may gain new ground, Nguyen added, although Brussels might also use the US tariff deals as leverage to encourage Hanoi to accelerate tariff cuts under the EU-Vietnam trade deal. Chris Humphrey, executive director of the EU-ASEAN Business Council, said that there will now be pressure on Southeast Asian states to make similar tariff offers to other trading partners, including the EU. "It will certainly strengthen the EU's position in ongoing FTA negotiations with ASEAN countries," he told DW. A deal with Thailand is expected to be finalized this year, while talks with Malaysia recommenced in January and with the Philippines in March 2024. Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen met in July to express their hope of signing the economic agreement in September, following nearly a decade of negotiations. "Indications are that in the case of Indonesia, the EU will get zero tariffs on at least 98% of tariff lines," Humphrey noted. The Southeast Asian countries with which the EU isn't negotiating trade deals — Brunei, Cambodia, Laos, and Myanmar — currently import relatively little from European markets.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store