UK To Roll Out Red Carpet For Second Trump State Visit
The US president "accompanied by the First Lady Mrs. Melania Trump, has accepted an invitation from His Majesty The King to pay a state visit to the United Kingdom from 17 September to 19 September 2025," said a palace statement.
The visit will come only two months after Charles, and his wife Queen Camilla, welcomed French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife Brigitte to Windsor.
Trump was invited by a personal letter from Charles, which Prime Minister Keir Starmer handed to him in February during a visit to Washington.
Starmer has sought to woo Trump with a charm offensive to boost ties and gain better leverage for the UK in tough trade talks with Washington.
A delighted Trump, who has long been a big fan of the British royal family, has called the invitation a "very great honour", and opened the letter from the king in the glare of the world's cameras.
"This is really special, this has never happened before, this is unprecedented," Starmer said in the Oval Office as he handed Trump a hand-signed letter from the monarch.
"This is truly historic."
Britain rolled out the red carpet for Trump in 2019 when he met the late Queen Elizabeth II, King Charles's mother. No foreign leader has ever had a second state visit.
The Times daily said the king had however sought to put off the new visit until later in Trump's second term, but "Starmer has gone against the wishes of the king" in bringing the visit forward.
"The prime minister has expedited a full 'bells and whistles' visit in an attempt to capitalise on the president's fascination with the royal family," The Times said.
Starmer will also meet with Trump this month when the Republican leader is expected to visit Scotland, where he has two golf resorts.
The visit has not been publicly confirmed by the White House, but Downing Street said Monday that Trump would be "visiting in a private capacity" and "the prime minister is pleased to take up the president's invite to meet during his stay".
Trump's threats against Canada have put Charles, who is the country's head of state, in a delicate position.
Trump has threatened to slap a 35 percent tariff on imports from Canada starting August 1 and has regularly mused that Canada should become the 51st US state.
Reading the letter aloud in the Oval Office in February, Trump said he had been invited to the historic Windsor Castle, near London, one of the royal family's ancient homes.
After reading the letter, Trump said of Charles: "He's a beautiful man, a wonderful man -- I've gotten to know him very well, actually. First term and now second term."
He added: "On behalf of our wonderful First Lady Melania and myself, the answer is yes and we look forward to being there and honouring the King and honouring really your country."
Unlike Macron, who addressed the British parliament during his state visit last week, Trump is not currently scheduled to address the House of Commons which will be then on a break.
During the French leader's visit last week, Britain laid on a pomp-filled welcome, including a horse-drawn procession and a lavish banquet in the castle where the leaders hailed a new era in UK-France relations. Head of State King Charles III delivers the speech from the throne next to Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney during the opening of the Canadian parliament in May AFP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
26 minutes ago
- Int'l Business Times
India's Modi And UK PM Starmer Ink Trade Deal
Prime Minister Keir Starmer praised Britain's "unique bonds" with India as he and his Indian counterpart Narendra Modi formally signed a recently announced UK-India trade deal during talks on Thursday. Starmer hailed the agreement as a "landmark moment" for both countries as he hosted India's leader at his Chequers country estate, northwest of London. "This is not the extent or the limit of our collaboration with India," added the British premier, whose year-old government is struggling to fire up an economy weakened by years of stagnant growth and high inflation. "We have unique bonds of history, of family and of culture and we want to strengthen our relationship further, so that it is even more ambitious, modern and focused on the long term," he said. Starmer and Modi announced in May they had struck a free trade agreement that the British government says will eventually add GBP4.8 billion ($6.5 billion) a year to the UK economy. The UK and India hope the accord will boost trade between the two countries by GBP25.5 billion, as well as bolstering the British economy and wages. Modi, standing alongside Starmer during a media appearance, described the deal as a "blueprint for our shared prosperity". Britain and India are the sixth and fifth largest global economies respectively, with a trade relationship worth around GBP41 billion and investment supporting more than 600,000 jobs across both countries. The accord slashes tariffs on imports of UK goods into India, including whisky, cosmetics and medical devices. In return, the United Kingdom will cut tariffs on clothes, footwear and food products including frozen prawns from India. Starmer and Modi were also likely to discuss last month's Air India disaster in which 241 people died when a London-bound flight crashed after taking off from Ahmedabad in western India. Some 169 Indian passengers and 52 British nationals were killed in the June 12 crash, one of the deadliest plane disasters in terms of the number of British fatalities. A lawyer for 20 British families said this week the repatriation of victims had been marred by errors with one relative finding that a returned coffin contained "co-mingled" remains. A different family was told a coffin contained the body of someone else entirely, not their loved one, he said, according to UK media. India's foreign ministry has said all remains "were handled with utmost professionalism" and that it is "continuing to work with the UK authorities on addressing any concerns related to this issue". Another tricky topic of discussion could be that of Scottish sikh blogger Jagtar Singh Johal, imprisoned in India since 2017 on accusations of being part of a terror plot against right-wing Hindu leaders. He has not been convicted of a crime and in March was cleared of one of the nine charges against him. His brother Gurpreet Singh Johal said in a statement the case "should be high on the agenda" during the two leaders' meeting. Starmer and Modi have met twice recently, at the G7 summit in Canada last month and at the G20 meeting in Brazil last year. Modi was also due to see King Charles III during his brief stay in Britain, his fourth visit since becoming India's leader in 2014. The accord slashes tariffs on imports of UK goods into India, including whisky, cosmetics and medical devices AFP
DW
an hour ago
- DW
Fact check: Why does Donald Trump keep sharing AI fakes? – DW – 07/24/2025
US President Donald Trump this week posted an AI-generated video depicting the arrest of his predecessor Barack Obama. It was clearly fake — and not the first time he's shared such content. What's he trying to achieve? The debate over the use of AI-generated content by US President Donald Trump and his administration was reignited this week when Trump posted a video depicting the arrest of former President Barack Obama. The 1-minute-26-second video, postedon Trump's own Truth Social platform on Monday, opens with authentic clips of Obama and other senior Democrat politicians, past and present, declaring that "no one is above the law." It then cuts to footage appearing to show Obama being arrested by FBI agents in the Oval Office, handcuffed in the presence of Trump, and later shown behind bars in an orange jumpsuit. Of course, Obama has not been arrested. The latter part of the video is clearly generated using artificial intelligence. It even bears a watermark revealing that it has been created by a TikTok account with only around 8,000 followers that regularly posts sensationalist, pro-Trump content, some of which is AI-generated. Yet Trump still posted it to his 10.5 million followers, just as he did with a clearly fake image depicting him as the pope on May 3 and an AI-generated video of a "Gaza Riviera" on February 26. The latter example sparked particular outrage, as it presents a vision for the Gaza Strip under the controversial proposal Trump put forward in February 2025. The US president suggested a full US "takeover" and redevelopment of the territory, aiming to transform Gaza into what he described as the "Riviera of the Middle East" and resettling the Palestinian population in the process. Numerous human rights organizations and international actors have sharply condemnedTrump's plan, calling it a violation of international law and an attempt at ethnic cleansing. Last year, AI-generated content also played a role in Trump's reelection campaign, from a video showing him dancing alongside tech billionaire Elon Musk, to images portraying Democratic candidate Kamala Harris as a Soviet-style "communist." He also shared demonstrably fake images of Taylor Swift fans wearing "Swifties for Trump" T-shirts, despite the pop star's public endorsement of Harris. DW Fact check has previously investigated the impact of disinformation on the US election, including cases involving AI-generated fakes. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The fact that the content is not only fake but often patently absurd doesn't seem to bother Trump or his supporters and allies, who continue to regularly post similar motifs. So, why do they do it? "The reason Trump shares a lot of AI-generated content is the same reason that a lot of right-wing trolls share AI-generated content: to contribute to the 'meme-ification' of politics," explained Alex Mahadevan, director of MediaWise, a digital media literacy program at the Poynter Institute in Florida. "The White House itself has made AI-generated images on social media a core element of its audience engagement strategy. It's for the shock factor, the engagement factor. They're just trying to stay relevant. And unfortunately, if you look at the engagement, it works really well." Ahead of the 2024 presidential election, many observers feared that AI content would muddy the waters so that voters simply wouldn't know what to believe. Ultimately, however, according to Mahadevan, that's not quite what happened. "What AI actually ended up doing was just creating a propaganda machine on steroids," he told DW. "You can tell right away that it's AI-generated. But it's not designed to deceive the viewer; it's designed to push a political message." Such obviously fake content as the Obama video shared this week may not be designed to deceive or convince anybody, but it is intended to provoke: enraging the opposition while strengthening Trump's base. "It's rage bait," said Mahadevan. "A way to 'own the libs' [liberals], to 'own' the other side of the political aisle. When they see the other side sharing a meme or content and getting upset about it, they like that! They're doing a touchdown dance when they see that." It may seem infantile but, according to Mahadevan, it's an established form of communication. "The new right, the digital right, the trolling right have become a pretty big portion of Trump's base and this is how they talk to each other," he says. "Cool, AI-generated images. They are speaking to their base." Nevertheless, whether Trump himself explicitly means it or not, his use of fake content does contribute to a socio-political phenomenon known as the "liar's dividend" — the idea that the prevalence of manipulated media fosters general skepticism, making it easier to dismiss real content as fake. Trump capitalized on this during the election campaign, falsely claiming that a verified image of a large crowd greeting Kamala Harris off the vice-presidential plane ahead of a rally in Detroit had been altered using AI. "[We are] entering the 'nothing is true and everything is possible' phase," commented Renée DiResta, a disinformation expert and former researcher at the Stanford Internet Observatory, on Threads at the time. "The ability to plausibly cast doubt on the real is the unintended consequence of being able to generate unreality." There is, however, one final possible explanation for why Trump and his supporters continue to post content that is demonstrably fake: it reflects a vision of the world they ultimately hope could be real one day. "These pieces of content amount to more than AI slop; they help to create a digital mirror world that reflects the future that Trump imagines, however preposterous it may seem," wrote in March. "In the real world, Trump's vision of Gaza as an ethnically cleansed luxury resort may seem like political fantasy. But, on the internet, Trump Gaza already exists as a virtual beachside destination to like and to share." Mahadevan concurs, explaining: "Trump is affected by AI in the same way that regular people are. You can use AI to manifest a future or a version of yourself that you would dream of. So, I don't think it's too much of a leap to say that Trump and his acolytes are using AI to manifest how they feel the world should be." Following his reposting of the fake "Swifties for Trump" T-shirts in 2024, Trump told : "I didn't generate them. These were all made up by other people. AI is always very dangerous in that way. It's a little bit dangerous out there." But that hasn't stopped him from continuing to post such content.
DW
3 hours ago
- DW
Macron and wife Brigitte sue US YouTuber Candace Owens – DW – 07/24/2025
French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife Brigitte have filed a defamation lawsuit against US right-wing media personality Candace Owens. They accuse her of spreading "verifiably false and devastating lies." Emmanuel Macron and his wife, Brigitte, filed a lawsuit on Wednesday in Delaware Superior Court, targeting statements by social media influencer Candace Owens. The Macrons said they filed the 218-page complaint after Owens repeatedly ignored requests to retract false and defamatory statements. In an eight-part YouTube and podcast series called "Becoming Brigitte," Owens alleged that Brigitte Macron was born male and that the Macrons are blood relatives. It also claims that Macron was selected to be France's president as part of a CIA-operated mind control program. The complaint against Owens, who has millions of followers on X and YouTube, seeks a jury trial and unspecified punitive damages. In a joint statement through their attorney, the Macrons said Owens used the popularity of her podcast to spread "verifiably false and devastating lies." "If ever there were a clear-cut case of defamation, this is it." "Owens's defamation campaign was clearly designed to harass us, cause pain to our family, and generate attention and notoriety for herself," they wrote. The complaint says that baseless speculation about Brigitte Macron's gender began surfacing in 2021, with the topic being discussed on popular conservative podcasts hosted by Tucker Carlson and Joe Rogan. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video "Owens has dissected their appearance, their marriage, their friends, their family, and their personal history — twisting it all into a grotesque narrative designed to inflame and degrade," the complaint said. "The result," the complaint added, "is relentless bullying on a worldwide scale." The Macrons accuse Owens of building her brand on provocation rather than truth. "Owens labels herself as an independent 'investigative journalist' while routinely peddling misinformation under the guise of legitimate reporting," the complaint says. A spokesperson for Owens said the lawsuit was an effort to bully her. "Candace Owens is not shutting up," the spokesperson said. "This is a foreign government attacking the First Amendment rights of an American independent journalist." The statement said Owens had asked Brigitte Macron for an interview. "Instead of offering a comment, Brigitte is resorting to trying to bully a reporter into submission. In France, politicians can bully journalists, but this is not France. It's America." Brigitte Macron has also pursued legal action in France over similar allegations regarding her gender identity. Last year, two women — including a self-described medium — were convicted for spreading false claims online that she had been born a man named Jean-Michel Trogneux — in reality, her brother. The ruling was later overturned by a Paris appeals court, prompting Brigitte Macron to appeal to France's highest court, the Court of Cassation, earlier this month.
