Why zero-hours contracts could be here to stay in new blow to workers' rights
Flagship plans by the Government to halt zero-hour contracts in the workplace have been scuppered by peers in the House of Lords.
The House of Lords backed by 264 to 158, majority 106, a move to change the legal requirement for an employer to offer guaranteed hours to an employee's right to request the arrangement.
Peers went on to inflict a further blow on the Labour front bench in supporting by 267 votes to 153, majority 114, a measure to exempt employers from having to make a payment to a worker if a shift was cancelled with at least 48 hours' notice.
The defeats came as the Employment Rights Bill, which has already been through the Commons, continued its passage through the upper chamber.
The changes made by peers to the draft law paves the way for a parliamentary tussle, known as 'ping-pong', where the legislation is batted between the two Houses until agreement is reached.
The proposed workers' rights reforms also introduce new restrictions on 'fire-and-rehire' processes when employees are let go and then re-employed on new contracts with worse pay or conditions.
In addition, the Bill strengthens trade unions and gives workers certain 'day one' rights, such as sick pay, paternity leave and the right to request flexible working.
Proposing his alternative to the proposed zero-hours provision, Liberal Democrat Lord Goddard of Stockport acknowledged the need to tackle the 'exploitative' use of the practice that left workers in 'precarious employment circumstances'.
But he added: 'That said, our amendment reflects that shared objective, while offering a more practical and balanced view.
'The amendment changes legislation from an obligation to offer guaranteed hours to a right to request them.
'Furthermore, it maintains that when a such request is made, the employer must grant it.'
He added: 'Our amendment seeks a fair balance, protecting workers from exploitation while preserving the flexibility which is crucial for many industries to function.'
But opposing the move, Labour peer Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill, a former assistant general secretary of the Trades Union Congress, warned: 'I very much fear that it undermines the purpose of the Bill, which is trying to deal with the problem of zero-hours contracts.'
She said: 'What the amendment doesn't take account of is the imbalance of power in workplaces and the characteristics of employees who are working on zero-hours contracts.'
Arguing those on zero-hours contracts were 'the least empowered workers', Lady Carberry added: 'So the right to request guaranteed hours in those circumstances is not a real right at all.
'And then how many of those workers, vulnerable as they are, might come under pressure not to press for guaranteed hours
'This formulation of the amendment leaves open the path to some of those worst employers to make sure that they don't end up offering guaranteed hours to workers on zero-hours contracts.'
However, Tory shadow business minister Lord Sharpe of Epsom said: 'It makes no sense to require employers to offer guaranteed hours to employees who don't want them.
'The Government appears to misunderstand or simply disregard the autonomy of the individual worker.
'Imposing this administrative burden, especially on small employers, to calculate and offer guaranteed hours where they are neither wanted nor needed, is an unnecessary and unavoidable cost.
'We therefore strongly support the right to request amendment proposed by Lord Goddard which better respects worker choice and employer flexibility.'
Responding, business minister Baroness Jones of Whitchurch said: 'We believe the duty to make a guaranteed offer should lie with the employer.
'This is the best way to ensure that all qualifying workers benefit from the right guaranteed hours when they want them.
'If a worker on an exploitative zero-hours contract had to request the guaranteed outcome, they may feel less able to assert their right to those guaranteed hours, and they would lose out as a result.
'It's quite right to highlight the imbalance of power in the workforce for these individuals, and this is particularly true when workers take up a new job.'
She added: 'A right to request model could create undesirable barriers, making it especially difficult for vulnerable workers on exploitative zero-hours contracts to access their right to those guaranteed hours, especially as many workers are younger and often in their first job.
'As the Bill is currently drafted after receiving an offer from the employer, qualifying workers will be empowered to make a decision based on their individual circumstances.
'If a worker wants to retain their zero-hours contract, as many will, they can do so by rejecting the offer.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
16 minutes ago
- BBC News
Concerns Peterborough will lose identity if councils merge
Options for a new-look council system have been discussed as part of local government re-organisation seven authorities in Cambridgeshire and Peterborough have been working together to identify viable options, which could see Peterborough merge with neighbouring councillors are arguing for a "Greater Peterborough" option, which would see Peterborough merge with part of northern Huntingdonshire only, to help it preserve the city's discussions follow a national government requirement to replace district, county and city councils with a simpler unitary, single-council system. Original plans put forward by the county's councils suggested there should be two new unitary authorities covering the whole county, with different options being North West Cambridgeshire MP Sam Carling and Peterborough MP Andrew Pakes - both Labour - expressed concerns that including Peterborough as part of a "mega council" would make it harder for local areas to focus on their own needs and proposed there should be three councils across Cambridgeshire, with one based on Greater Cambridge, one based on Greater Peterborough and one focusing on rural Mid Cambridgeshire, the Local Democracy Reporting Service would see Peterborough merge with part of northern Huntingdonshire. At a full council meeting on Wednesday, the options were discussed and while a number of members supported the Greater Peterborough option, Conservative group leader Wayne Fitzgerald labelled it "opportunistic" and "last-minute".He said: "In Fenland, they'll have a completely different view to us. In Huntingdon, they don't want anything to do with us whatsoever, the liberals would rather go south. So, I suspect what will happen is this will be imposed upon us."A final proposal is set to be submitted at the end of November and the government will then decide how the councils should be councils are expected to be in place from April 2028. Follow Peterborough news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Metro
17 minutes ago
- Metro
Starmer should give Trump a warm welcome - then a £14m bill
Donald Trump jets into Scotland today on a visit which is 'private', according to White House officials. Yet despite that label, he nonetheless intends to make you – the British taxpayer – foot an expected £14million bill. So here's my suggestion: Starmer should shake the man's hand and then pass on the invoice. It's simple. If the President of the United States wants to make a personal pilgrimage to his luxury golf resorts in Scotland, he's free to do so. But if he wishes to take advantage of our stretched to the limit public services so he can fund his circus during an onslaught of budget cuts, crumbling infrastructure, and exhausted police officers, then he can forget it. The bloke's a billionaire! He can afford it. He should pay his way just like any other showman on a world tour. Craig Munro breaks down Westminster chaos into easy to follow insight, walking you through what the latest policies mean to you. Sent every Wednesday. Sign up here. Trump's relationship with Scotland has always been strained, at best. Long before he was President, long before the MAGA hats, indictments, and the endless motorcades, he was already deeply unpopular here. His expansion of Menie Golf Course was met with fervent opposition from residents. Local farmers were threatened with forced purchase orders. And there's that glorious moment comedian Janey Godley welcomed then-candidate Trump to Scotland in 2016 by holding up a banner that read: 'Trump is a c**t'? This time around, we're being told his visit is unofficial, yet our leaders are queuing up to meet him. Starmer is to be flown up to Aberdeen to reportedly 'refine' a recent US-UK trade deal. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video First Minister John Swinney says he is meeting the President to 'protect and promote the interests of Scotland'. I think the interests of Scotland are protected by billing Trump for police overtime, airspace shut downs, motorway closures, and operational disruption the visit will entail. After all, we're continually being reminded there is 'no magic money tree'. Chancellor Rachel Reeves is already warning she will have to make tough decisions (aka tax rises) in the next Budget again. And yet there's nothing tough about the decision of politicians to block their diaries and drain the public purse to accommodate a man who is extravagantly wealthy and extravagantly divisive. Trump does not need to be welcomed with sycophantic deference. Trump needs to be welcomed with boundaries. Because the minute you give him an inch, he'll take the whole fairway. Just ask Cole Palmer, after he intruded on Chelsea's Club World Cup trophy lift by seemingly refusing to move away from the spotlight. This OAP day out is a horrific incentive for a man whose name is much on everybody's lips when it comes to mayhem, corruption, and conspiracy. Epstein anybody? For a man under investigation for mishandling confidential documents and whose election has been based on authoritarian campaign rhetoric. When you think about it, Trump will probably respect being charged. He's in the WWE Hall of Fame for a reason – he loves conflict. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video So what better way to earn his grudging admiration than to stand up for ourselves, rather than grovelling? Our squeamish politicians need to stop bootlicking. Presidential away days never come without that hefty price tag, even when it's not a proper state visit like this one. Trump's last trip to the UK in 2018 cost the taxpayer £14.8 million, which was partly used for his jaunt around Turnberry. His four day visit saw thousands of police deployed, mass protests in Glasgow and Edinburgh, and a security operation of such size as to be comparable with that of a conventional state visit. This time also shall not be any different – perhaps worse, considering he has become even less stable. Scotland Police has already confirmed that this is a 'complex' operation, with extra resources being pulled from across the UK. That, alone, is dozens of precious hours our brilliant officers can't spend solving real crimes. A place where his name is emblazoned in gold letters on our landscape, despite sensational disapproval and ongoing concerns about how much these properties are contributing to the economy. We shouldn't dismiss the views of you and me, too. Everybody gets what he represents: division, authoritarianism, and a transactional politics in which loyalty is bought through economic self harm and truth can be junked. So why are we, as a country, so keen to appease him? We can respect his office, without the costly symbolism. More Trending If the PM wants to demonstrate strength on the world stage, it will not be from photoshoots alongside Trump on an exclusive golf course. It will be from treating him as what he is – an elderly grandpa on a private getaway. We need to be serious about financial prudence, we need to be serious about valuing our public services, and then we start by asking the most glaring question of all: why on earth are we spending millions to go and fetch the world's most powerful tourist? So go ahead and shake the man's hand if you must, Prime Minister. But then, after he hops back onto Air Force One, send over the invoice. Make it clear: the UK won't pick up the bill for foreign billionaires. Do you have a story you'd like to share? Get in touch by emailing Share your views in the comments below. MORE: My lover praised my oral skills – but I wasn't happy MORE: Trump 'called Epstein 'the greatest' in note inside book he gave to him' MORE: Search for 'migrant hotels near me' has rocketed – it's chilling
The Independent
17 minutes ago
- The Independent
How to manage your finances if you're going to university this year
Embarking on university life is a thrilling prospect, often synonymous with a newfound sense of independence, particularly concerning personal finances. For many, this marks their initial venture into managing money, a task that can feel daunting amidst a constant stream of student bank account advertisements and extensive checklists for university essentials. While cultivating budgeting skills and financial responsibility is an invaluable life lesson, navigating this terrain alone can prove challenging. To assist students preparing for their higher education adventure, The Independent consulted Tom Allingham from the student money website Save the Student, who has shared his top financial tips. Pick the right student account ' One of the biggest mistakes new students make is not picking the right student bank account,' says Allingham. 'I think it's really tempting to go for one that has the most appealing freebie attached to it or stick with the bank you are already with, but actually the most important thing for most students will be the size of the interest-free overdraft attached to it.' While most student bank accounts offer an interest-free overdraft, the amount and terms can vary between banks. 'Some of them can offer as much as £1,000 or £2,000 more than a competitor,' highlights Allingham. 'The maintenance loan often falls short of living costs, so there's a good chance that students will need to dip into that interest-free overdraft at some point. Not necessarily to rely upon it, but to have it there as a safety net.' Don't blow your money during freshers' week 'When that first maintenance loan payment arrives, lots of students get over-excited and think 'o h my God, I have £3,000 sitting in my bank account – this is loads of money', then go wild during freshers' week and buy lots of thing s,' recognises Allingham. However, learning to budget will help it last the full term. 'Remember that it's meant to last you until the beginning of January,' says Allingham. 'That's four months of rent, four months of food and four months of bills.' All universities offer a range of scholarships and bursaries, but many of these go unclaimed. 'I would definitely advise all students to spend an hour or two online, searching for different funds that they might be eligible for,' recommends Allingham. 'If at the end of that hour or two, you come out of it with an extra £1,000 or £2,000 of non-repayable funding, that's probably going be the best-paid hour or two you'll ever have in your entire life. So, it's definitely worth looking at.' Have two bank accounts Setting up a second bank account could help with weekly budgeting. 'Get your student loan paid into your student bank account, which has the overdraft and certain perks attached to it, and then transfer over a set amount of money into a second bank account for weekly/monthly spending,' advises Allingham. 'I tend to advise students to go for an online bank provider such as Monzo or Revolut for this. 'Having a weekly or monthly spending pot will help you become much more conscious of your spending and tends to make people much more driven to stick to a budget.' Pack on the lighter side Don't rush to buy all the tech, textbooks and kitchenware straight away as you might not need it. 'With certain things, such as a laptop or books, if you don't think you'll need it absolutely straight away it might be worth waiting until you've enrolled, because then you can use your student discount,' says Allingham. 'With a lot of stuff, I would say potentially even consider not buying them at all and instead look at other options. For example, a lot of course textbooks will be available in the library for free.' A lot of department stores come out with checklists of university 'essentials' at this time of year, but they often encompass far more than you actually need. 'If you are in a shared house that has little storage space, you don't need six plates, six sets of knives and forks and three pans,' says Allingham. 'Pack a little bit on the lighter side and then it's easier to buy one or two bits that you might need later on.' Cook and buy food in bulk 'Cook six portions of lasagne, rather than one, and then chuck the rest in the freezer,' recommends Allingham. 'Then you will have meals there for whenever you want them and doing this will reduce the likelihood of you getting an expensive takeaway or a ready meal. It also prompts you to use all your ingredients instead of throwing them away.' Buying dried food in larger qualities also tends to be more cost-effective. 'One kilo of pasta is typically cheaper than buying two 500g bags. If you have the storage space, always try and buy bigger quantities of things.' 'Be open to suggesting cheaper activities,' recommends Allingham. 'Everyone's going to be tight on money, so if you do want to do something with people who've just met, why not suggest watching a film or something on Netflix. 'Don't feel like every night has to be a massive one where you have go out to an expensive bar, pay for entry and buy loads of drinks.'
