Solar park boom threatens Spain's centuries-old olive
At his farm in southern Spain, Francisco Campos looked worriedly at a green sea of centuries-old olive trees that he fears will face the axe to make way for a proposed solar park.
'Cutting down olive trees to install solar panels is a crime,' the 64-year-old farmer told AFP in Lopera, a town of whitewashed buildings with 3,600 residents in the sunny southern region of Andalusia, Spain's olive-growing heartland.
Spain is the world's top producer of olive oil, but the fertile agricultural land long used by olive producers is now in high demand from power firms looking to install solar farms.
And with nearly 3,000 hours of sunshine per year, Andalusia is one of the Spanish regions with the highest number of solar panels as a renewables boom makes the country a European leader in green energy.
Renewable energy firms such as Greenalia and FRV Arroyadas have requested permission to build multiple solar farms near Lopera, which farmers say will affect up to 1,000 hectares (2,500 acres) of property.
The businesses negotiated agreements to lease the bulk of the land required for their projects but encountered significant opposition from hundreds of small landowners.
This prompted the regional government of Andalusia to announce it will expropriate some land needed for the plants, declaring them to be in 'the public interest'.
'Is it in the public interest for them to take my land and give it to a company so that the company can profit? This has no benefit for us,' said Campos. 'Our way of life is going to be destroyed,' he added.
'From our ancestors'
Campaigners pre - dict that the eight solar projects planned for the area will require the removal of nearly 100,000 olive trees.
The regional govern - ment puts the figure significantly lower, at 13,000.
Local residents anticipated power companies would seek to install solar panels in the area, but they never imagined 'they would come and take away your property,' said Rafael Alcala, a spokesman for a platform that represents the solar plants' opponents.In support of landowners impacted by the latest round of expropriations, dozens of farmers on tractors -- some holding signs that read 'We don't want solar plants' -- gathered on a recent morning outside Lopera.
'These lands come from our ancestors. What am I going to leave to my children now?' Maria Josefa Palomo, a 67-year-old pensioner, said at the protest.
Losing 500 hectares of olive groves would wipe out more than two million euros ($2.3 million) in annual revenues, according to local olive oil cooperative La Loperana.
Campaigners say 5,000 olive trees have already been uprooted from land belonging to a farmer in Lopera who signed an agreement with one of the firms behind a solar park. More could follow. In an effort to stop the projects, opponents have filed lawsuits against the regional government and the companies involved.
'Until the end'
Spain generated a record 56.8 percent of its electricity last year from renewable sources such as wind and solar, according to grid operator Red Electrica.
Leveraging on its sunny plains, windy hillsides and fast-flowing rivers, Spain intends to raise the share of renewable-generated electricity to 81 percent of the total by 2030 as part of efforts to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions.
The regional government has defended the renewables projects, saying less than one percent of the land they use in the region had to be expropriated from reluctant landowners.
Spanish solar industry group UNEF, which represents more than 800 companies, says the projects boost tax revenues in rural communities.
They generate 'significant amounts' that can be used to improve public services, said UNEF head Jose Donoso.
Solar park opponents in Lopera disagree and vow to continue their fight.
'Until the end. Nobody is going to take what is ours away from us,' said Juan Cantera, a 28-year-old farmer.
'Olive oil is everything in Lopera'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Tribune
16 hours ago
- Daily Tribune
NATO chief urges 400% rise in alliance's air defence
NATO head Mark Rutte yesterday urged a 'quantum leap' in defence capabilities including a '400-percent increase' in air and missile defence to shield the alliance against Russia. His comments came as he pushes for NATO members to commit to ramping up defence spending at a key summit of the western military alliance later this month. 'We see in Ukraine how Russia delivers terror from above, so we will strengthen the shield that protects our skies,' the NATO secretary general said in a speech to the Chatham House think-tank in London. To maintain credible deterrence and defence, NATO needs 'a 400-percent increase in air and missile defence', the former Dutch prime minister added. 'The fact is, we need a quantum leap in our collective defence,' he said. Rutte is urging NATO members to commit to 3.5 percent of GDP on direct military spending by 2032, and an additional 1.5 percent on broader security-related expenditure. The proposal is a compromise deal designed to satisfy US President Donald Trump, who has demanded that allies each spend five percent of economic output on defence, up from a current commitment of two percent. Rutte said he 'expects' leaders to agree to the proposal at the summit of the 32-country alliance on June 24-25 in The Hague. 'It will be a NATO-wide commitment and a defining moment for the alliance,' he said in his speech. Russia condemned Rutte's comments before he took to the stage, denouncing NATO as 'an instrument of aggression'. NATO 'is demonstrating itself as an instrument of aggression and confrontation', Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters in Moscow. Rutte's speech came after he met UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer on Monday, their second Downing Street talks since the Labour leader came into power in July 2024. Starmer's government this year pledged to increase defence spending to 2.5 percent of GDP by 2027, but has not yet set a firm timeline for further hikes. On Monday, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney announced Canada would hit two percent this year. US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth said last week the allies were close to an agreement on the split five-percent target. 'That combination constitutes a real commitment, and we think every country can step up,' he said on Thursday. 'Fairer, more lethal alliance' NATO members have been scrambling to bolster their defence capabilities since Russia launched its invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Trump's return to the White House in January, and question marks over his commitment to European security, has added urgency. 'Danger will not disappear even when the war in Ukraine ends,' Rutte said at Chatham House. 'We must have more forces and capabilities to implement our defence plans in full.' He added that Russia currently produces the same amount of ammunition in three months as 'the whole of NATO produces in a year'. 'Our militaries also need thousands more armoured vehicles and tanks, millions more artillery shells,' Rutte added. Britain announced plans last week to build up to 12 nuclear-powered attack submarines and six munitions factories to rearm the country in response to what it said were threats from Russia. Rutte also warned that China is 'modernizing and expanding its military at breakneck speed'. 'NATO has to become a stronger, fairer and more lethal alliance,' he added. And he warned that if countries cannot commit to 5.0 percent for defence spending 'you could still have the National Health Service, or in other countries, their health systems, the pension system, etc, but you better learn to speak Russian. I mean, that's the consequence'.
Daily Tribune
2 days ago
- Daily Tribune
US aerospace industry anxious as tariffs loom
AFP | New York US airlines and aerospace manufacturers insist they have no use for tariff protections, warning that the proposed Trump administration levies could eat into the healthy trade surplus the sector has enjoyed for more than 70 years. At the request of President Donald Trump, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick's department launched an investigation on May 1 to determine whether to impose tariffs of between 10 and 20% on civil aircraft and parts, including engines. The US industry those tariffs were crafted to protect swiftly let the administration know it was not interested. 'Imposing broad tariff or non-tariff trade barriers on the imports of civil aviation technology would risk reversing decades of industrial progress and harm the domestic supply chain,' the Aerospace Industries Association (AIA) said in a letter addressed to Lutnick and obtained by AFP. The interested parties were given until June 3 to communicate their positions. The very next day, Lutnick announced that Washington aimed to 'set the standard for aircraft part tariffs' by the end of this month. 'The key is to protect that industry,' he said, adding: 'We will use these tariffs for the betterment of American industry.' But AIA and the Airlines for America (A4A) trade association voiced fear that far from helping, the tariffs would end up harming US manufacturers. No fix needed 'Unlike other industries, the civil aviation manufacturing industry prioritizes domestic production of high-value components and final assembly,' AIA pointed out. According to the organization, US aerospace and defense exports reached $135.9 billion in 2023, including $113.9 billion for civil aviation alone. This allowed the sector to generate a trade surplus of $74.5 billion and to invest $34.5 billion in research and development, it said. The sector employs more than 2.2 million people in the United States across more than 100,000 companies, which in 2023 produced goods worth nearly $545 billion. In its response to Lutnick, the A4A highlighted how beneficial the international Agreement on Trade in Commercial Aviation (ATCA) had been by helping to eliminate tariffs and trade barriers over nearly half a century. 'The US civil aviation industry is the success story that President Trump is looking for as it leads civil aerospace globally,' it insisted. A full 84% of production was already American, it said, stressing that Washington 'does not need to fix the 16 percent' remaining. 'The current trade framework has enhanced our economic and national security and is a critical component to maintaining our national security moving forward,' it said. For manufacturers, the potential tariffs would act like sand jamming a well-oiled machine that has been running smoothly for decades, experts warned. They would also throw off balance an ultra-sensitive supply chain still recovering from the Covid-19 pandemic. 'Competitive disadvantage' 'To avoid the situation getting worse, we advocate to keep aerospace outside of trade wars,' Willie Walsh, head of the International Air Transport Association (IATA), told the organization's general assembly last week. AIA meanwhile stressed that 'aircraft and parts are already in high demand and have a limited supply.' 'Integrating new suppliers and expanding capacity is complex, timely, and costly,' it warned, pointing out that finding suppliers capable of meeting rigorous safety certifications could 'take up to 10 years.' Delta Air Lines also argued for sticking with the status quo, cautioning that the proposed tariffs 'would hinder Delta's ability to maintain its current trajectory.' 'If component parts incur tariffs upon entering the United States, Delta will be at a competitive disadvantage to foreign competitors,' it said. 'The action would also impose an unexpected tax on Delta's purchases of aircraft contracted years in advance.' Delta chief Ed Bastian insisted in late April that the airline 'will not be paying tariffs on any aircraft deliveries we take,' adding that it was 'working very closely with (European group) Airbus' to minimize the impact. Delta pointed out in its letter to Lutnick that it currently had 100 aircraft on order from Boeing, and that it was demanding that its Airbus A220s be produced primarily in Mobile, Alabama. But if the tariffs are imposed, it warned, 'Delta would likely be forced to cancel existing contracts and reconsider contracts under negotiation.'
Daily Tribune
2 days ago
- Daily Tribune
Renault considering making drones in Ukraine
AFP | Paris French automaker Renault said yesterday that the government had asked it to look at making drones in Ukraine, but it had not yet made a decision. 'We have been contacted by the defence ministry. Exchanges have been made, (but) no decision has been at this stage because we are waiting on project specifics from the ministry,' a Renault spokesperson told AFP. A report by broadcaster Franceinfo had earlier said, without citing sources, that Renault was to open drone production lines 'dozens or hundreds of kilometres from the front line'. Ukraine relies heavily on drones in its fight against Russia's invading forces. On June 1, it used over 100 drones to strike Russian military aircraft deep inside Russian territory, in an operation called 'Spider's Web'. The news that Renault is considering building drones in Ukraine came two days after French Defence Minister Sebastien Lecornu announced that a 'big company making French cars' was going to join up with a French defence manufacturer to develop production lines in Ukraine 'able to produce drones'. The drones would be used by the Ukrainian military 'but we will also have our own French weapons benefit from constant tactical and operational training in real-world conditions,' Lecornu said Friday. The minister noted that the Ukrainian military was better in its use and development of drones that its French counterpart. The French government holds a 15 percent stake in Renault.
