Chairman of Sheku Bayoh Inquiry decides against recusing himself
Mr Bayoh, 31, a father-of-two, died after he was restrained by around six police officers who were called to Hayfield Road in Kirkcaldy, Fife, on May 3 2015.
After considering the matter, Lord Bracadale has refused the application for his recusal.
In a decision published on Wednesday, he said: 'Having reviewed the facts, the fair-minded and informed observer would conclude that there was no real possibility that I was biased.'
The application for recusal of the chairman and assessors was lodged on behalf of the Scottish Police Federation, Pc Craig Walker and Nicole Short.
A spokeswoman for the inquiry said: 'The inquiry held a procedure and conduct hearing on June 12.
Sheku Bayoh died in 2015 (Family handout/PA)
'After careful consideration of written and oral submissions from core participants, Lord Bracadale has decided not to recuse himself or terminate the appointments of the assessors.
'Having regard to the relevant legal test, he has determined there is no apparent bias.
'Taking into account various considerations in respect of the handling of the inquiry, he has determined having meetings with the families was not unfair.
'There is much important work for the inquiry still to do, not least proceeding with closing submissions and moving towards the writing of the final report. The team is working at pace and will announce next steps in due course.'
The inquiry has been examining the circumstances of Mr Bayoh's death, and whether race was a factor.
Scotland's Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes said: 'I note the detailed and extensive consideration that has informed Lord Bracadale's decision and hope all parties involved can progress the important work of the inquiry as soon as possible.
'The Scottish Government remains committed to establishing the facts surrounding the circumstances leading to Mr Bayoh's death.
'However, as it is vital all public inquiries operate independently of government, it would be inappropriate of me to comment any further.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
44 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Salmond's family accuse Sturgeon of cashing in on smears against him
Alex Salmond's family has accused Nicola Sturgeon of using her memoir to 'cash in' with personal attacks against him. Christina Hendry, who is the late former first minister's niece, said the claims Ms Sturgeon made about Mr Salmond in her newly-published book were 'cruel' and 'distasteful'. Ms Sturgeon used the memoir, Frankly, to allege that Salmond could have been behind a leak to a tabloid newspaper that he was under investigation for sexual misconduct. She argued that the 2018 leak, which revealed the Scottish government's investigation into the claims, would have been 'classic Alex' as it would have allowed him to control the media narrative and 'cast himself as the victim of underhand dealing'. Pouring scorn on his claim that there was a conspiracy to imprison him, she said it was 'a fabrication, the invention of a man who wasn't prepared to reflect honestly on his own conduct'. Ms Sturgeon said the alleged conspirators were 'women who considered themselves victims of his behaviour' and were 'seeking support and comfort from each other'. She accused Salmond of trying to 'distort and weaponise' genuine shock or trauma in a way that was 'truly disgraceful', adding 'it strikes at the heart of why I find it so hard to forgive him'. Salmond was cleared of 13 sexual assault charges in a separate criminal trial in 2020, but his lawyer admitted his client could 'have been a better man'. Among the book's other claims were that Salmond had not bothered to read the White Paper on independence produced for the 2014 referendum, which was the prospectus for Scotland leaving the UK. Ms Hendry accused Ms Sturgeon of 'cowardice', saying she would not have made the claims while her uncle was still alive and argued 'she is using his name for relevance, to promote her book, to earn money'. The 30-year-old also attacked Ms Sturgeon for having 'such disregard for the family and their feelings', including the impact on Moira, Salmond's widow. Salmond's family broke its silence on the memoir as it emerged Mrs Salmond is 'reactivating' legal action against the SNP government, which he started before he died aged 69 last October. The Sunday Mail reported that a KC, two junior counsel and a lead investigator have been appointed in the case, which centres on the Scottish Government's botched investigation into sexual misconduct claims against him. Salmond alleged there was a conspiracy among senior SNP figures around Nicola Sturgeon to imprison him, which she has vigorously denied. At the time of his death the former first minister was seeking 'significant damages' and compensation for loss of earnings from the Scottish Government, totalling a reported £3 million. A family friend told the Sunday Mail: 'Her case against the Scottish Government is now live, the legal team is in place, the finance in place and this will be going ahead, no question of that. 'Alex may not be here to defend himself but his family are determined to stand up to those who continue to attack him.' 'An element of cowardice' Ms Hendry told the Scottish Sun on Sunday: 'She should not have to be going through this and neither should any of the family. I find it very distasteful. In some ways it is quite cruel. 'She is using his name for relevance, to promote her book, to earn money – she could have said these things in the past few years. 'She has chosen to wait until he is no longer here to defend himself. It's left to the family to deal with this and there's an element of cowardice to that.' Asked if she believed Ms Sturgeon was cashing in on her infamous fall-out with her uncle, Ms Hendry replied: 'Yes. I can't see any other reason. It seems quite a coincidence that the time she is saying this is the time she is selling her book.' Salmond won a judicial review in 2019 after a previous court case found that the way the Scottish Government investigation into the sexual misconduct allegations against him was handled was unlawful and 'tainted with apparent bias'. The Scottish Government only conceded the case at the 11th hour, resulting in Mr Salmond being handed £512,250 of taxpayers' money to cover his legal costs. Ms Sturgeon declined to comment on either the family's complaints about her book or the renewed legal action. The Scottish Government was approached for a response.
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Alex Salmond's widow suing Scottish Government
Moira Salmond, 88, has appointed a team of lawyers to restart Salmond's case against the government he once led. At the time of his death, Salmond was pursuing legal action through the Court of Session and Police Scotland following his acquittal of charges of sexual assault at the High Court in Edinburgh in 2020. The action related to a flawed Scottish Government investigation into the complaints levelled against him. READ MORE: Rachel Reeves failed to raise Grangemouth with refinery owner days before closure In the August prior to his heart attack in October, Salmond's lawyer Gordon Dangerfield told the Court of Session that Salmond was seeking "significant damages" and compensation for loss of earnings that could stretch into the millions. Moira's determination to proceed is said to be driven by comments made in Nicola Sturgeon's memoir, Frankly. Moira previously released a rare public statement following an interview in which Sturgeon discussed Salmond's behaviour.
South Wales Guardian
3 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
For Women Scotland launches legal action against Scottish ministers on gender
For Women Scotland's legal battle with Scottish ministers on the definition of a woman ended in the UK Supreme Court, which ruled in April that the words 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex. However, the group said that it now has 'little choice' but to take further legal action as some policies regarding transgender pupils in schools and transgender people in custody remain in place – which the group said is 'in clear breach of the law'. The schools guidance for single-sex toilets says it is important that young people 'where possible, are able to use the facilities they feel most comfortable with'. The prison guidance allows for a transgender woman to be admitted into the women's estate if the person does not meet the violence against women and girls criteria, and there is no other basis to suppose that she poses an unacceptable risk of harm to those housed in the women's estate. For Women Scotland has now applied to the Court of Session seeking to quash the policies, which it says are 'inconsistent with the UK Supreme Court judgment of April 16 2025'. It has raised an ordinary action for reduction (quashing) of the policies relating to schools and prisons, with the news first reported by Sunday Times Scotland. In a statement, the group said: 'Nothing has persuaded the government to take action and both policies remain stubbornly in place, to the detriment of vulnerable women and girls, leaving us little choice but to initiate further legal action. 'The Scottish ministers have 21 days to respond to the summons. If the policies have not been withdrawn by then we will lodge the summons for calling, and the government will have to defend its policies in court. 'We are asking the court to issue a declarator that the school guidance and the prison guidance are unlawful and that they be reduced in whole. 'We are also asking that both policies are suspended in the meantime.' A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'It would be inappropriate to comment on live court proceedings.' For Women Scotland previously brought a series of challenges over the definition of 'woman' in Scottish legislation mandating 50% female representation on public boards. The last step of these ended in the Supreme Court ruling, which the campaign group's supporters hailed as a 'watershed for women'.
