
Kahnawake Council called out on cannabis
The Mohawk Council of Kahnawake (MCK) must prevent cannabis dispensaries before it's too late, representatives of the 207 Longhouse demanded as hundreds of Kahnawa'kehró:non confronted Council chiefs outside the band office Wednesday.
The call to dismantle plans to introduce three privately run cannabis stores in Kahnawake, with money from a fee levied on non-Indigenous customers flowing back to the MCK, comes as a list of 14 applicants are under review ahead of a lottery to determine who will be permitted to open one of three dispensaries on the territory.
Those who are chosen stand to generate untold revenues from the sale of cannabis. Those who attempt to open unsanctioned dispensaries, on the other hand, would be liable for criminal charges, according to MCK chief Tonya Perron, who leads the portfolio.
According to Joe Deom, spokesperson for the Longhouse, which organized the protest, opponents of the plan have no faith that Council will be able to rein in the cannabis industry once it opens its doors on the territory.
'We understand that the band council is almost to the point of choosing who's going to have a dispensary of cannabis, and before that happens we want to nip it in the bud and prevent it from happening, because once they're in, it's harder to get rid of them,' said Deom.
'Even though they might authorize three dispensaries, the rest of the population here will take it upon themselves to put up their own shop, and there's no means that we can see that the band council can stop that from happening.'
He also cited fears around health and Kanien'kehá:ka cultural values in explaining the Longhouse's opposition to the plan.
While the approach to introducing the cannabis dispensaries to Kahnawake has been several years in the making, going back to when it first became clear the drug would be legalized in Canada, many Kahnawa'kehró:non have pointed to the uncontrolled proliferation of shops in Kanesatake since then as an illustration of their worst fears.
In Kahnawake's sister community, an unregulated cannabis industry has been marred by land grabbing, tree cutting, and fears that some shops have brought organized crime to the territory. In one case, a known gang affiliate, Arsène Mompoint, was murdered in broad daylight in front of the Green Room dispensary.
Just this weekend, residents of Kanesatake described being overwhelmed by an influx of thousands of outsiders attending parties at the scores of shops dotting Route 344 to celebrate 4/20 – the biggest day of the year for cannabis aficianados.
'What we don't want is our community to be overrun the way other communities are overrun by cannabis shops, and that brought in a lot of criminal elements to these communities, especially Kanesatake,' said Deom. 'That's what our main concern is.'
MCK chiefs have argued, however, that regulations and a local police force empower Kahnawake to ensure that the industry is safe and controlled here in town.
'We're in a very different situation than Kanesatake,' MCK grand chief Cody Diabo told the protesters.
When the crowd arrived at the MCK building on Wednesday morning on a march from the greenspace at the Golden Age, 10 Council chiefs were waiting to hear out the protesters, even as no promises were made to change course. Karihwakatste Deer and Kaherihshon Fran Beauvais read out a statement from the Longhouse.
Only Diabo addressed the protesters on behalf of the MCK, frequently receiving jeers from the crowd. He was also the only MCK chief to acknowledge, with a furtive hand raise, that he had voted for the plan, even as he declined to endorse it.
'I'm conflicted as well. I have my own opinions on it,' said Diabo, who suggested cannabis is already purchased on the territory, whether through unregulated transactions or by mail from the government-sanctioned seller.
'What's out there right now that people are consuming? They're going to Oka to get things. It's in the territory. People are selling,' he said.
Health and safety were top of mind for Council, he said, arguing that work to make the regime safe is why it has taken eight years to get to this point. An aspect of the plan, he noted, would be for prevention tools to be boosted by revenues from the sanctioned sale of cannabis.
Students were a major contingent at the protest, even during the middle of a school day.
Layla Phillips is a grade 11 Kahnawake Survival School (KSS) student and a member of the student council there.
'We walked here to make sure we made a statement, because we really truly believe in this, that it shouldn't be here. We don't need this here in Kahnawake. As a student body, we made a decision to come out,' said Phillips.
Phillips' twin and fellow KSS student, Anna Phillips, was also in attendance to show support for the cause. The pair estimated there is virtually no support for cannabis dispensaries among students at KSS.
'We don't want to look at our community and see non-Natives all over the place risking the safety of our children, our cousins, our family members, and having cannabis stores in the community just encourages people to come into it,' said Anna.
'Honestly, it hurts to know that people are so self-involved for something like that to allow it into the community to breach the safety of your family members,' Anna added. 'I want a community that we can be proud of and that's safe. Letting the cannabis stores in is going to hurt that.'
Speaking to Council, Deer argued that the $220 million lawsuit against the MCK by Magic Palace, which was shuttered after allegations of ties to organized crime, is a harbinger of things to come on the cannabis file.
'Our own community members are going to sue you, even though you think you're doing this right by making laws and regulations,' she said.
'You could say no right now, and you're choosing not to,' another community member shouted at Diabo. 'It's embarrassing.'
Community member Leith Mahkewa told the crowd that she visited the community she comes from over the weekend, describing what her 10-year-old said when they returned to Kahnawake.
'He said, 'Ista, look,' she said. 'You come into Kahnawake and it says 'Vapes, Vapes, Vapes,' just like back home where it says 'Weed, Weed, Weed,'' she said.
'It's shameful. It's embarrassing. And you're all going to be weeping and regretting and feeling guilty later on,' she said, adding the 'black snake' of the cannabis market will be impossible to control and that those in office will be responsible for the havoc it wreaks for generations.
'My concerns are for all the generations coming up, the young people now, even the young adults, all the younger ones, all the kids in the school, the generations to come,' said community member Eleanore Paul during the march.
'We have enough mind-altering substances going around already that we don't need the sale of this to come into our community and destroy the minds of our people.'
A referendum was broached by some at the protest, though many expressed opposition on the grounds that members of the Longhouse generally refuse to vote. Diabo acknowledged this fact and suggested, in any case, that this route has already been rejected by the community.
'I can't change what was in the past,' he said. 'A referendum was proposed at a community meeting of a previous Council, and they chose to go with the poll.'
One of the chiefs on the cannabis file, Jeremiah Johnson, was long opposed to the stores as a private community member prior to joining Council this term.
'I'm very proud of our community members for coming together and marching and showing that they have a voice and using that voice,' Johnson told The Eastern Door. 'I'm always very supportive of people protesting and voicing their concerns. That's what I'm very proud of most.'
He said Council will discuss the protest that transpired and how to move forward, and he said he will continue to argue for a halt.
'I've always argued to reverse course. Since I first came on Council, it was my opinion that I did not agree with the current direction the cannabis industry was going. I had attempted to call for referendum already. Only myself and one other Council member were in support of that referendum, so hopefully we can make a better argument for it now.'
Short of a change of direction, Johnson said he will do everything he can to try to make sure the industry is compliant with regulations aimed at community safety.
Former MCK chief Gina Deer, who worked on the cannabis file when it first began, was involved in the survey that helped inform the current direction of the cannabis plan. While she said that was the right choice at the time, after several intervening years, it may be time to reconsider.
'We were working with what at the time was the will of the people, but now here we are several years fast-forward, and I thought the mention of a referendum was a good idea because things do change, and Council has reversed things,' she said.
She also argued that if the plan moves forward as is, revenues that are generated by it must benefit the community in clear, tangible ways, unlike with gaming, she said.
Diabo downplayed the possibility of a referendum following the protest, but said it's possible things could change course in some way. 'Really at this point I'd say coin toss,' he said. 'I can't really give a definitive answer on that.'
Perron said that while the protest's message was clear, in 2018 Council was hearing a very different message from a different subsection of the community and that there continues to be a lot of disagreement about the best way forward.
'Their message was 'stay out of it, Council. We should be able to do this. We should be able to sell. It's our right,'' Perron said.
The current policy has grown out of taking into account voices from all sides while emphasizing a prudent approach that will protect the community, she said. She emphasized that her own views are irrelevant and that it is her role to try to represent the community's wishes, even when there is no consensus.
'That's what I've been trying to do for seven years is listen to everybody and ensure there's something that will at least provide for both health and public safety,' she said.
She also suggested that had Council not committed to developing a regulatory framework and providing licenses, a moratorium on cannabis stores may not have worked.
'I truly believe that if we hadn't done any of that, that our community might look different than it does today,' she said.
Perron said that regulation can help ensure a safe cannabis market in Kahnawake and said local authorities are equipped to clamp down on unlicensed shops that could pop up.
'If they have no license, the Peacekeepers will have no choice but to act accordingly because it would be an offence under the criminal law, which, we do apply the criminal law here,' Perron said.
Following the protest, Deom expressed hope that the MCK will be encouraged to heed the call to back down on dispensaries.
'They're not going to make a decision in front of us. They're going to go in, they're going to talk about it. We don't know what they're going to say,' said Deom, who suggested that if Council still decides to move ahead with welcoming cannabis dispensaries, the Longhouse will look at further actions.
The MCK has already begun licensing cannabis growers, but there is yet no date announced for the distribution of dispensary licenses. While the number of licenses is capped at three, the regulations on cannabis instruct that this maximum will be reviewed at least once a year.
marcus@easterndoor.com
Marcus Bankuti, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
44 minutes ago
- The Hill
Higher ed reform shouldn't punish low-income students
Congress is understandably concerned about the return on federal investment in higher education and the $1.6 trillion in federal student loan debt. But in its rush to fix a system that too often fails low-income students, the Trump administration's 'one big, beautiful bill' would further reduce opportunity and access for those very students and jeopardize the work of colleges and universities doing the most to serve them. If passed, the bill would enact sweeping changes to federal financial aid and accountability rules. Some of its goals are worthy. Colleges should be transparent about student outcomes. They should be accountable for quality. And no student should graduate, or drop out, with insurmountable debt. But reducing access to loans for the students who face the steepest barriers to opportunity is not the way to achieve those goals. One provision of the proposed bill would eliminate subsidized federal loans, which currently prevent interest from accruing while undergraduates are still in school. For students from low-income backgrounds who already borrow more than their wealthier peers, this would significantly increase the cost of a college degree. Another proposal would cap the amount of aid a student could receive at a national median cost by program, without regard for the individual student's or family's specific economic need. The legislation would also eliminate PLUS Loans and raise the minimum course load required to receive full Pell Grant aid, even though many working students enroll part-time by necessity, not choice. Reducing Pell Grant access is counterproductive to lowering student debt. Pell Grant recipients already account for seven of every 10 federal student loan borrowers, and, on average, incur $4,500 more in debt than other non-Pell graduates Capping graduate student borrowing, especially in health and public service fields, would undercut workforce development just as we face national shortages of nurses, teachers and social workers. And the bill's 'risk-sharing' proposal, which would penalize colleges when student loans are forgiven, even through programs like Public Service Loan Forgiveness, would shift resources away from need-based aid and student support and discourage institutions from enrolling those most in need. That includes institutions like the University of Mount Saint Vincent, which I lead. Ours is a small, private, nonprofit university in the Bronx founded in 1847 to educate young women at a time when few others would. Today, we serve students of every background, and more than half are the first in their family to attend college. More than half of our undergraduates receive Pell Grants. Ninety percent of our graduate students are preparing for public service careers in education, nursing or healthcare. And like many mission-driven colleges, we make enormous investments in financial aid and academic support, precisely because we know what it takes for low-income and first-generation students to thrive. This bill threatens our ability to invest in students and potential. It would impose a six-figure penalty, rising annually, because we enroll the very students we were founded to serve. That's not accountability. That's a deterrent. And we are not unique. Hundreds of small, private colleges across the country, many of them religiously affiliated, offer intimate learning environments, close faculty support and flexible programs that enable students to work while pursuing their degrees. These institutions are among the most accessible and most responsive options for students who are otherwise being left behind in higher education. The better path forward is one that strengthens accountability for all institutions without dismantling the tools that low-income students need to access and afford college in the first place. That means preserving need-based aid, not narrowing it. And it means supporting colleges that produce teachers, nurses and public servants, not penalizing them. At a time when the U.S. risks falling behind in educational attainment and workforce readiness, we should be doubling down on institutions that help students rise. The question isn't whether reform is needed, but whether we're reforming the right things. Susan R. Burns, Ph.D., is president of the University of Mount Saint Vincent in the Bronx.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Blues vs. Non-Blues 5-Year Enrollment Trends Analyzed by Mark Farrah Associates
CANONSBURG, Pa., June 10, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Health insurance companies provided fully insured coverage for approximately 186.5 million people in 2024, an increase of over 12.3 million from 2020. Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS) association members, parent organizations, and their subsidiaries insured about 37.5% of the total health insurance market. In the latest Healthcare Business Strategy report, Mark Farrah Associates (MFA), examined health insurance enrollment changes in key segments for Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS) and Non-BCBS companies between 2020 and 2024. Some highlights include: Individual enrollment for BCBS companies increased 36.6% over the last 5 years, and non-BCBS companies reported a 106.1% increase during the same period. Fully insured Group enrollment, which includes the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP), continued to experience decreases throughout the 5-year timeframe for both Blues and non-Blues plans. During the 5-year period, Medicare Advantage (MA) enrollment experienced a 32.8% increase for BCBS plans, and non-BCBS MA enrollment saw a 32.3% increase. Total 4Q24 Medicaid enrollment for BCBS plans was over 15.2 million and nearly 62.5 million for non-BCBS companies. To read the FREE full text of "Five Year Health Enrollment Trends Comparing Blues & Non-Blues Plans", visit the MFA Briefs library on Mark Farrah Associates' website. Healthcare Business Strategy is a FREE brief that presents analysis of important issues and developments affecting healthcare business today. If you would like to be added to our email distribution list, please submit your email to the "Subscribe to MFA Briefs" on our website. About Mark Farrah Associates (MFA) Mark Farrah Associates (MFA) is a leading data aggregator and publisher providing health plan market data and analysis tools for the healthcare industry. Our product portfolio includes Health Coverage Portal™, County Health Coverage™, Medicare Business Online™, Medicare Benefits Analyzer™, 5500 Employer Health PLUS, and Health Plans USA™. For more information about these products, refer to the brochures available under the Our Products section of the website ( or call 724-338-4100. Follow us on LinkedIn! View source version on Contacts Mark Farrah AssociatesAnn Marie Wolfe, amwolfe@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Business Wire
an hour ago
- Business Wire
Blues vs. Non-Blues 5-Year Enrollment Trends Analyzed by Mark Farrah Associates
CANONSBURG, Pa.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Health insurance companies provided fully insured coverage for approximately 186.5 million people in 2024, an increase of over 12.3 million from 2020. Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS) association members, parent organizations, and their subsidiaries insured about 37.5% of the total health insurance market. In the latest Healthcare Business Strategy report, Mark Farrah Associates (MFA), examined health insurance enrollment changes in key segments for Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS) and Non-BCBS companies between 2020 and 2024. Some highlights include: Individual enrollment for BCBS companies increased 36.6% over the last 5 years, and non-BCBS companies reported a 106.1% increase during the same period. Fully insured Group enrollment, which includes the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP), continued to experience decreases throughout the 5-year timeframe for both Blues and non-Blues plans. During the 5-year period, Medicare Advantage (MA) enrollment experienced a 32.8% increase for BCBS plans, and non-BCBS MA enrollment saw a 32.3% increase. Total 4Q24 Medicaid enrollment for BCBS plans was over 15.2 million and nearly 62.5 million for non-BCBS companies. To read the FREE full text of " Five Year Health Enrollment Trends Comparing Blues & Non-Blues Plans", visit the MFA Briefs library on Mark Farrah Associates' website. Healthcare Business Strategy is a FREE brief that presents analysis of important issues and developments affecting healthcare business today. If you would like to be added to our email distribution list, please submit your email to the " Subscribe to MFA Briefs" on our website. Mark Farrah Associates (MFA) is a leading data aggregator and publisher providing health plan market data and analysis tools for the healthcare industry. Our product portfolio includes Health Coverage Portal™, County Health Coverage™, Medicare Business Online™, Medicare Benefits Analyzer™, 5500 Employer Health PLUS, and Health Plans USA™. For more information about these products, refer to the brochures available under the Our Products section of the website ( or call 724-338-4100. Follow us on LinkedIn!