Taxpayer money for a church school? We know where that leads
For today's sermon on courage, I would like the church to open their King James Bibles to Matthew 27:24: 'When Pilate saw that he could prevail nothing, but that rather a tumult was made, he took water, and washed his hands before the multitude, saying, I am innocent of the blood of this just person: see ye to it.'
While Pontius Pilate knew Jesus was an innocent man, the Roman governor authorized his crucifixion in large part because he was afraid of appearing disloyal to Caesar and losing power.
The constitutional crisis our country currently finds itself in may be new to America, but as we see in the Gospel of Matthew, the wreckage caused by political expediency began in ancient times.
Which brings us to St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School, a proposed online faith-based charter school in Oklahoma that is seeking public funding, a decision to be determined by the U.S. Supreme Court this year. Last summer, the state's Supreme Court rejected the contract St. Isidore had with Oklahoma. However, Gov. Kevin Stitt objected, saying in a statement, 'I'm concerned we've sent a troubling message that religious groups are second-class participants in our education system.'
Now, let me tell you what I'm concerned with: the 2019 audits by the Catholic Church in Oklahoma that found abuse allegations against 22 clerics to be substantiated. Alleged predators responsible for the care of children were systemically transferred by superiors from state to state from 1960 until 2018.
'The long and the short of it is you trusted us, and we failed,' Oklahoma City Archbishop Paul Coakley wrote in a public letter following the reports. 'I also am sorry for the complicity and negligence of those who failed to respond adequately to reports of abuse, for whatever reason, whether they are bishops, priests, deacons, religious or lay persons representing the Church.'
While Catholic leaders in Oklahoma were applauded for acknowledging past failures, that did not protect the church from facing millions in lawsuits over those allegations and others. In fact, in 2022, 10 current and former students filed a $75-million lawsuit accusing Mount St. Mary Catholic High School in Oklahoma City of fostering 'a rape culture,' saying the school 'did not take reasonable steps to report or stop the rampant rape culture and ongoing sexual abuse.' A federal judge dismissed the case in 2023 because the statute of limitations had run out — not ruling on the merits of the allegations.
These are just recent headlines from one state. From 2004-23, the Catholic Church paid more than $5 billion to settle sexual abuse cases tracked by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and certain U.S. religious communities.
Whatever else you take from those examples and statistics, this much is clear: The Catholic Church isn't hurting for cash. I can't help but wonder why on Earth taxpayer money would be needed to fund Catholic schools.
It's not that I'm against faith-based education. My son attended a private Christian school. But I am against any attempt to tear down the wall between church and state. Just turn to the example of Pontius Pilate to see what can happen when secular power tries to exert control over religious life.
History is full of enough evidence to warn us away from this mingling. We don't need a test case in Oklahoma to prove the point.
In 1534, when England's Parliament passed the Act of Supremacy, King Henry VIII became the supreme head of the Church of England, breaking with the papacy. Because Henry wanted to divorce his first wife, the pope's rule had become … inconvenient.
The king pressured English church officials who knew better into making him the religious leader as well as the monarch. And when Henry's second wife did not produce a male heir, he had her executed so he could marry a third woman. He faced no consequences. Why? Political expediency. Parliament washed its hands of the controversy, because lawmakers could tell themselves the king was above the law and above the church. And as with Pontius Pilate, history shows the attempt to sidestep accountability was futile.
The people who founded the United States were trying to leave behind that entanglement and corruption. They embraced the 1st Amendment to keep the government out of religious life and to keep religion out of government.
For taxpayers to fund a religious school would pull us back toward tyranny.
This week White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller said he wanted the country's children to 'be taught to love America.' I agree. And that begins with protecting America from becoming a theocracy.
@LZGranderson
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Uinta Basin Railway group looks to fund project with $2.4 billion in federal bonds
Anglers fish on the Colorado River near an idle Union Pacific freight train in western Grand County on June 12, 2023. (Chase Woodruff/Colorado Newsline) The group pushing for a rail line in eastern Utah that would allow the state to ramp up oil production is hoping to fund the project through $2.4 billion in U.S. Department of Transportation bonds. The Seven County Infrastructure Coalition for years has been lobbying for the 88-mile Uinta Basin Railway, which would connect the oil-rich region of northeastern Utah to national rail lines, facilitating the export of waxy crude oil to refineries on the Gulf Coast. To pay for the railway, the coalition — which consists of representatives from Dagget, Carbon, Duchesne, Emery, San Juan, Servier and Uintah counties — approved a resolution last month announcing its intent to seek $2.4 billion in private activity bonds from the U.S. Department of Transportation. That's a $500 million increase from 2023, when the coalition passed a similar resolution seeking $1.9 billion in federal bonds. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX The railway extension could allow for the transport of an estimated 350,000 barrels of oil each day, massively increasing the state's oil production. The refineries in Salt Lake City, for instance, currently have a market capacity of 85,000 barrels per day. But connecting the Uinta Basin to national rail lines means increased oil exports through Colorado, which has proved to be a major sticking point. In 2022, environmental groups and Colorado's Eagle County sued the coalition, arguing that the federal Surface Transportation Board — the agency tasked with the environmental review — fell short in its analysis, failing to consider the risks of the railroad expansion. The project cleared a major roadblock in May after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned a prior court ruling that found the environmental review was incomplete. The ruling returns the case to a lower court for consideration. 'This was not only a win for the Seven County Infrastructure Coalition and counties in the state of Utah, but a win for the United States in being able to move forward with a major infrastructure project,' said Greg Miles, a Duchesne County Commissioner who sits on the board of the coalition, during a public meeting Thursday. 'There's a lot of things that oil does for us in our lives.' And although it still faces regulatory and legal hurdles, the coalition has made several moves over the last month toward financing the railroad. On Thursday, it heard public comments related to the bonds. The Department of Transportation's Private Activity Bonds program is a tax-exempt financing option from the federal government aimed at supporting private-public partnerships. The program has financed bridge replacements, highways, rail lines and other transportation-related ventures. U.S. Supreme Court rules in favor of controversial Utah oil train That $2.4 billion is the total estimated cost for the project, according to the coalition, although it's unclear how much money will come from private investments. But funds for the bond program are running dry. According to the department's data, there's only $500 million left to allocate, the program having dished out $29.4 billion of its $30 billion cap. It's up to Congress to replenish the program. 'How is the coalition going to get this money? And when?' asked Deeda Seed with the Center for Biological Diversity during the meeting Thursday. Seed also raised concerns over the 'ballooning' cost of the railway, which has increased in the last few years. 'How does this project pencil out? We have no clue, the public has no clue, especially when President Trump hopes the price of oil will decline to $40 to $50 per barrel,' she said. Just about all of the roughly two-dozen commenters on Thursday spoke against the railway, and using bonds to fund it — they cited concerns over the project's rising cost, potential harm to wildlife and habitat, the negative impact on air quality, and how a derailment could harm the Colorado River and the people who rely on it for drinking water. 'I deplore subsidizing the increase of oil production in the Uinta Basin, which will increase the ozone and air pollution, at a time when all federal subsidies are being cut for renewable energy,' said Joan Entwistle, a Summit County resident. 'It's just another example of how we're putting the thumb on the scale for fossil fuels.' 'The tariffs are being imposed at a level of 50% for steel. Clearly, that is going to raise the prices. Railroads are notorious for cost overruns,' said David Bennett, also a Summit County resident. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE


Atlantic
an hour ago
- Atlantic
Photos of the Week: Treetop Walk, Camel Bath, Moose Move
Protests against federal immigration operations in California, a Catholic pilgrimage in Spain, a lawn-mower race in France, a rescue operation in the Mediterranean, and much more A volunteer uses a syringe to feed medicine to a fox after it was rescued, at the hospital run by the Fox Project near Tonbridge, England, on May 22, 2025. It was released on June 9. Timur Matahari / AFP / Getty Local tourists enjoy white-water rafting on the Palayangan River in the Pangalengan district of Bandung, West Java, on June 8, 2025. Lillian Suwanrumpha / AFP / Getty Visitors take pictures at Khlong Lan waterfall in Khlong Lan National Park, in Thailand's upper-central Kamphaeng Phet province, on June 10, 2025. Stefano Rellandini / AFP / Getty A humanoid robot named Alter-Ego, developed by the Italian Institute of Technology, stands in front of a dolphin during a test event at the Aquarium of Genoa, Italy, on June 10, 2025. The robot interacted with visitors by providing information about cetaceans and their conservation. Fatemeh Bahrami / Anadolu / Getty An aerial view of camels in the sea on Qeshm Island, located near the Strait of Hormuz in southern Iran, on June 2, 2025. Shepherds give their camels sea baths during the summer months to keep them keep clean and cool in the intense heat. Alex Wroblewski / AFP / Getty Congressional staffers from the office of Senator Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire move Marty the Moose to her office in the Hart Senate Office Building in Washington, D.C., on June 10, 2025, as part of the annual Experience New Hampshire event. A banner with a photograph of President Donald Trump hangs behind a section of eight-foot-tall security fencing outside the Agriculture Department, on June 12, 2025, in Washington, D.C., ahead of this weekend's military parade and gathering on the National Mall. Tayfun Coskun / Anadolu / Getty Hundreds of protesters gather in Los Angeles on June 8, 2025, to demand an immediate end to ICE workplace raids, as the Trump administration continues its immigration operations in the city. Police officers stand in line outside the Geffen Contemporary at MOCA, in front of Barbara Kruger's artwork Untitled (Questions) , in Los Angeles, as police clashed with protesters nearby, on June 8, 2025. Anti-ICE protesters march in downtown San Antonio, Texas, on June 11, 2025. Ronaldo Schemidt / AFP / Getty L.A. County Sheriff's Department deputies fire a nonlethal weapon at a man after he threw a can at them following a protest against federal immigration operations near L.A. City Hall, on June 11, 2025. Vortices swirl in the air as a Japan Ground Self-Defense Force V-22 Osprey aircraft flies during a live-fire exercise at the East Fuji Maneuver Area on June 08, 2025, in Gotemba, Shizuoka Prefecture, Japan. Silas Stein / DPA / Getty A view from an observation tower on the treetop walk in Bad Wildbad, in Baden-Württemberg, Germany, on June 8, 2025 Hazem Bader / AFP / Getty Muslims perform the evening prayer around the Kaaba, Islam's holiest shrine, in the Grand Mosque complex, in Mecca, Saudi Arabia, on June 6, 2025. Pilgrims light candles at the shrine of El Rocío near Aznalcázar, Spain, on June 7, 2025, during an annual pilgrimage of devotees of the Virgin del Rocío. Jaime Perez Rivero / Anadolu / Getty A boat carrying 86 migrants from Sudan, Mali, Nigeria, and Ghana departed Libya on June 5, heading for Europe across the Mediterranean Sea. The boat ran into trouble, and during an ensuing rescue operation, the sight of the Libyan Coast Guard caused panic among those on board, causing many to jump into the sea, fearing they would be sent back to Libya. Members of the Spain-based NGO Open Arms and others were able to rescue all aboard. Cars drive away from a storm during a Project ICECHIP operation to study hail and powerful storms on June 5, 2025, in Morton, Texas. Activists with the Gilbert Baker Foundation carry a 1,000-foot rainbow flag along the parade route during the WorldPride 2025 celebrations, on June 7, 2025, in Washington, D.C. Jaime Saldarriaga / AFP / Getty A tattoo artist works on a client during the 15th Expotattoo Colombia Fair in Medellín, Colombia, on June 7, 2025. Patrick Pleul / DPA / Getty A male stag beetle walks on a branch in an oak forest near the Spree River in Kersdorf, Brandenburg, Germany, on June 8, 2025. Brookfield Zoo's Pepe visits the pitcher's mound prior to a baseball game between the the Kansas City Royals and the Chicago White Sox in Chicago, on June 8, 2025. Andrew Milligan / PA Images / Getty Meerkat pups play at Blair Drummond Safari Park, near Stirling, Scotland. Four pups were born on May 10 to parents Cardi B and Biggie—the third litter for the pair since they came to the park in 2022. Francois Nascimbeni / AFP / Getty Drivers compete during the tenth edition of the 24-hour lawn mower endurance race in Les Petites-Armoises, France, on June 7, 2025. Pope Leo XIV waves as he arrives in the popemobile for the Pentecost Vigil prayer at St Peter's Square, on June 7, 2025, in Vatican City. Pilgrims stand on the shore of the Quema River near Aznalcázar, Spain, a crucial point in the annual Catholic pilgrimage to the shrine of the Virgin of El Rocío, on June 6, 2025. Walter Diaz / AFP / Getty A view of the Perito Moreno Glacier at Los Glaciares National Park, near El Calafate, Santa Cruz province, Argentina, on June 8, 2025 Wang Wangwang / VCG / Getty An aerial view of the 'Fudao' walkway winding through the forest of Jinniu Mountain Park, on June 11, 2025, in Fuzhou, Fujian province, China Sam Panthaky / AFP / Getty Part of the tail section of Air India flight 171 is pictured after it crashed in a residential area near the airport in Ahmedabad, India, on June 12, 2025. The London-bound passenger plane crashed shortly after takeoff, smashing into buildings, and 241 of the people aboard the plane were reportedly killed, with only one survivor. Alan Taylor is a senior editor at The Atlantic.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump finds victories at the Supreme Court in rush of emergency cases
By Andrew Chung (Reuters) -Since President Donald Trump returned to office in January, his administration has bombarded the U.S. Supreme Court with emergency requests seeking immediate intervention to free up his initiatives stymied by lower courts. The strategy is paying off. Once a rarely used pathway to the nation's top judicial body, its emergency docket now bulges with an unprecedented volume of requests for rapid attention by the justices in clashes over Trump's far-reaching executive actions. As the Republican president tests the limits of executive power under the U.S. Constitution, Trump's administration has made 19 emergency applications to the court in less than five months, with one other such application filed by lawyers for migrants held in Texas who were on the verge of deportation. The court already has acted in 13 of these cases. It has ruled in Trump's favor nine times, partially in his favor once, against him twice and postponed action in one case that ultimately was declared moot. Trump's wins have given him the green light to implement contentious policies while litigation challenging their legality continues in lower courts. The court, for instance, let Trump revoke the temporary legal status granted for humanitarian reasons to hundreds of thousands of migrants, implement his ban on transgender people in the U.S. military and take actions to downsize the federal workforce, among other policies. The court's 6-3 conservative majority includes three justice who Trump appointed during his 2017-2021 first presidential term. Six more emergency requests by the administration remain pending at the court and one other emergency request was withdrawn. Among the requests still to be acted upon are Trump's bid to broadly enforce his order to restrict birthright citizenship, to deport migrants to countries other than their own including politically unstable South Sudan and to proceed with mass federal layoffs called "reductions in force." Emergency applications to the court involving Trump policies have averaged about one per week since he began his second term. His administration's applications this year match the total brought during Trump's Democratic predecessor Joe Biden's four years as president. "The Trump administration uses every legal basis at its disposal to implement the agenda the American people voted for," White House spokesperson Harrison Fields told Reuters. "The Supreme Court will continue to have to step in to correct erroneous legal rulings that district court judges enter solely to block the president's policies." 'STRONG CASES' The administration has "not sought Supreme Court review in all the cases it could, and part of the story may be that the government is appealing what it thinks are strong cases for it," said Sarah Konsky, director of the University of Chicago Law School's Supreme Court and Appellate Clinic. Georgetown University law professor Stephen Vladeck, who wrote a book about the court's emergency docket, said in a blog post on Thursday that the results favoring Trump should not be attributed only to the court's ideological makeup. At a time when Trump and his allies have verbally attacked judges who have impeded aspects of his sweeping agenda, there is a "very real possibility that at least some of the justices ... are worried about how much capital they have to expend in confrontations with President Trump," Vladeck wrote. The onslaught of emergency applications has diverted the attention of the justices as they near the end of the court's current term. June is usually their busiest month as they rush to finish writing opinions in major cases. For instance, they have yet to decide the fate of Tennessee's Republican-backed ban on gender-affirming medical care for transgender minors. Among the emergency-docket cases, the court most recently on June 6 allowed Trump's Department of Government Efficiency, a key player in his drive to slash the federal workforce, broad access to personal data on millions of Americans in Social Security Administration systems and blocked a watchdog group from receiving records on DOGE operations. The court also has allowed Trump to cut millions of dollars in teacher training grants and to fire thousands of probationary federal employees. On the other side of the ledger, the court has expressed reservations about whether the administration is treating migrants fairly, as required under the Constitution's guarantee of due process. On May 16, it said procedures used by the administration to deport migrants from a Texas detention center under Trump's invocation of a 1798 law historically used only in wartime failed basic constitutional requirements. The justices also declined to let the administration withhold payment to foreign aid organizations for work already performed for the government. QUESTIONS OF TRANSPARENCY Trump turned to the emergency docket during his first term as well. His prior administration filed 41 such applications to the court. During the 16 years prior, the presidential administrations of Republican George W. Bush and Democrat Barack Obama filed just eight combined, according to Vladeck. The court has quickly decided weighty matters using the emergency docket in a way often at odds with its traditional practice of considering full case records from lower courts, receiving at least two rounds of written briefings and then holding oral arguments before rendering a detailed written ruling. It is sometimes called the "shadow docket" because cases often are acted upon without the usual level of transparency or consideration. Some recent decisions on the emergency docket have come with brief opinions explaining the court's reasoning. But typically they are issued as bare and unsigned orders offering no rationale. Konsky noted that the justices sometimes designate emergency cases for regular review with arguments and full briefing. "But in any event, the emergency docket raises complicated questions that are likely to continue to play out in the coming years," Konsky said. Among Trump's emergency applications this year, oral arguments were held only in the birthright citizenship dispute. The liberal justices, often findings themselves on the losing side, have expressed dismay. Once again "this court dons its emergency-responder gear, rushes to the scene and uses its equitable power to fan the flames rather than extinguish them," Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote in a dissent in the Social Security data case. "The risk of error increases when this court decides cases -as here - with barebones briefing, no argument and scarce time for reflection," Justice Elena Kagan wrote in the teacher grants case. Conservative Justice Samuel Alito defended the emergency docket in 2021, saying there is "nothing new or shadowy" about the process and that it has wrongly been portrayed as sinister.