Many said RFK Jr. would launch a war on vaccines, medicine. Is it here?
Many said RFK Jr. would launch a war on vaccines, medicine. Is it here?
Show Caption
Hide Caption
RFK Jr. says COVID-19 vaccine no longer recommended for some
The COVID-19 vaccine is no longer recommended for healthy children and pregnant women, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. says.
When Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was announced as President Donald Trump's U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary nominee, there were media outlets and commentators who suggested RFK Jr. would "wage a war" on vaccines. Concerns about his views were so widespread that vaccines and research-backed science were both a focus during his confirmation hearing.
So is the moment his opponents cautioned about now upon us?
It's been a busy week for the 'Make America Healthy Again' leader – from updating the COVID vaccine guidelines, to threatening to bar government scientists from publishing in leading medical journals.
Kennedy's COVID vaccine rollbacks and comments on scientific research are concerning, and it might be difficult for people to absorb all the medical news and recommendations they're hearing about, says Dr. Richard Besser, president and CEO of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and former acting director of the CDC.
Similar to how Kennedy wooed supporters with his commitment to cracking down on ultraprocessed foods and artificial food dyes, his comments against scientific journals contain a nugget of truth – companies can fund research, and people need to be able to trust the scientific studies used to inform health decisions.
'It's a tricky situation when you have someone who is sharing valuable information about the impact of ultraprocessed food and the influence that the large companies can have on policy, and how we have to change that, while at the same time he is spreading falsehoods about the value of vaccination on people's health,' Besser says.
RFK Jr., vaccine recommendations and what changed
On May 15, Kennedy told people not to take 'medical advice' from him after being asked about the measles vaccine by Wisconsin Democrat Rep. Mark Pocan.
'What I would say is my opinions about vaccines are irrelevant,' he said.
But on May 27, Kennedy announced in a video clip shared to X that the COVID-19 vaccine would no longer be included in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's recommended immunization schedule for healthy children and pregnant women, in a move that breaks with previous expert guidance.
Traditionally, the CDC's Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices would meet and vote on changes to the immunization schedule or recommendations on who should get vaccines before the director of the CDC makes a final call. The committee has not voted on the changes Kennedy announced, and a CDC representative was not included in Kennedy's video.
Kennedy also spoke on the 'Ultimate Human' podcast, calling the New England Journal of Medicine, the Journal of the American Medical Association and The Lancet, three of the most influential medical journals in the world, 'corrupt.'
'Unless those journals change dramatically, we are going to stop NIH scientists from publishing in them and we're going to create our own journals in-house,' he said, referring to the National Institutes of Health, an HHS agency and the world's largest funder of health research.
He added that these journals publish studies funded and approved by pharmaceutical companies. And there is some merit to Kennedy's statements – major food and drug companies have funded scientific research. According to a 2015 article published in The Lancet, Coca-Cola disclosed spending $118.6 million over five years on scientific research and health and wellbeing partnerships; several influential medical organizations, including the American Cancer Society, received funding from the company.
RFK Jr.'s changes raise 'grave concerns' from scientific community
Kennedy's move to change COVID vaccine guidelines contradicts his previous claims that he wouldn't "take away anybody's vaccines."
However, the changes to the guidelines may affect what is covered by insurance and who has access to the shot if they still wish to receive it. Federal vaccine recommendations affect what private insurances will cover, and Medicaid only covers the full cost of recommended vaccines.
Besser says Kennedy's updated guidelines 'raise grave concerns about the stability of our vaccine recommendations.'
'There was no opportunity for people to explore the data that may be behind this decision or to ask questions,' he explains, 'which makes me feel that there could be other decisions coming with the same lack of transparency.'
To lead their healthiest possible life, Besser recommends that people, especially parents, consult their trusted health provider to 'sort through the massive amounts of information being thrown at them."
Contributing: Sudiksha Kochi
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Epoch Times
3 hours ago
- Epoch Times
COVID Variant That's Been Circulating Since 2024 Still Dominant Strain in US: CDC
Recent data published by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) shows that a COVID-19 variant that has been circulating since last year is currently the dominant variant in the United States. The LP.8.1 COVID-19 variant, an offshoot of the Omicron strain, was first detected in June 2024, health officials have said. CDC data show that it makes up 73 percent of all cases detected in the country as of May 24, according to an update issued on June 1. The XFC variant is No. 2 at 10 percent, and the XEC variant is third at 4 percent.
USA Today
3 hours ago
- USA Today
'Saddened and heartbroken': Attack rocks Boulder days after Israeli staffers slain
'Saddened and heartbroken': Attack rocks Boulder days after Israeli staffers slain Show Caption Hide Caption FBI investigating 'attack at Colorado mall The FBI is investigating a report of a "targeted attack" in a Boulder, Colorado mall. An attack that rocked Boulder, Colorado, on Sunday on a group gathered to support Israeli hostages comes less than two weeks after two Israeli Embassy staff members were brazenly shot to death in the nation's capital − and amid a rise in incidents of antisemitism across the United States. A male suspect was arrested after multiple people were set on fire in Boulder in the vicinity of a walk to remember the remaining Israeli captives in Gaza abducted by Hamas on Oct. 7, 2023. The suspect, identified by authorities as Mohamed Sabry Soliman, 45, yelled "Free Palestine" during the attack, Mark Michalek, special agent in charge at the FBI's Denver field office, said. Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser said in a statement that the attack appeared to be a "hate crime given the group that was targeted." Weiser said the group meets weekly at the Pearl Street Mall in downtown Boulder to urge the release of the Gaza hostages. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, a prominent Jewish Democrat, condemned the attack in a post on X. "This is horrifying, and this cannot continue. We must stand up to antisemitism." Colorado Gov. Jared Polis also blasted the incident as a "heinous act of terror. Hate-filled acts of any kind are unacceptable." In a statement on social media, the Boulder Jewish Community Center said it was in touch with law enforcement about the Jewish community in the city, noting that safety is the "highest priority." "We are saddened and heartbroken to learn that an incendiary device was thrown at walkers at the Run for Their Lives walk on Pearl Street as they were raising awareness for the hostages still held in Gaza," the Boulder Jewish Community Center said. Israeli Embassy staffers slain as they exited Jewish Museum On May 21, Yaron Lischinsky, 30, and his girlfriend Sarah Lynn Milgrim, 26, were gunned down in Washington, D.C., as they exited the Capital Jewish Museum about a mile from the White House. Elias Rodriguez, 31, was charged with two counts of first-degree murder and was also facing several firearms charges and counts of killing foreign officials. Authorities said that the attack is being investigated as a hate and terrorism crime. Yechiel Leiter, Israeli ambassador to the United States, said the two victims killed were a "young couple about to be engaged." And just days after that shooting, a dual U.S. and German citizen was arrested in New York for allegedly attempting to firebomb a branch office of the U.S. Embassy in Tel Aviv, Israel, authorities said. ADL: Antisemitism reports spiking Reports of incidents of antisemitism have continued to rise for a second year in a row, accoding to an annual report released by the Anti-Defamation League in April. ADL researchers counted 9,354 incidents of antisemitic assault, harassment, and vandalism across the country in 2024 − a 5% increase from 2023, which was also a record-breaking year. The number of incidents was the highest since the ADL started tracking antisemitism data in 1979. Tensions heightened over the Gaza war Israel's war on Gaza, in response to the Oct. 7 Hamas attack − which killed 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and saw 251 taken as hostages into Gaza − has led to a climate of heightened tensions throughout the United States. It also comes at a time when the Trump administration has detained pro-Palestinian protesters without charges and halted funding to certain U.S. universities that have been the site of Gaza protests. Israel's campaign has devastated much of Gaza, killing over 54,000 Palestinians and destroying most buildings. Contributing: Will Carless, Thao Nguyen, John Bacon
New York Post
3 hours ago
- New York Post
Michelle Obama couldn't be more wrong about women Trump voters
I'm a pro-choice feminist — and a Democrat — who just happened to vote for Donald Trump for president. And I resent Michelle Obama's sneering, demeaning, strangely ignorant and massively sexist remarks about women, our reproductive systems and, especially, our vote. In the latest episode of the podcast, 'IMO with Michelle Obama & Craig Robinson,'' the former first lady and lefty pro-abortion activist mounted her high horse and disgracefully disparaged a woman's decision to exercise her right to choose what to do with her body. That is, when that choice is to have a baby. On the podcast she shares with her celebricat brother, the 61-year-old mother of two daughters, insanely breathed strength into the pro-life crowd by declaring bizarrely that creating life is 'the least' of what a woman's reproductive system does. Advertisement 'I attempted to make the argument on the campaign trail this past election was that there's just so much more at stake and because so many men have no idea about what women go through,' Obama said, delving treacherously close to Democratic-style word salad. 'Women's reproductive health is about our life. It's about this whole complicated reproductive system that the least of what it does is produce life.' When does a reproductive system have nothing to do with reproduction? Willful ignorance Mrs. O showed stupendously willful ignorance about her fellow ladies' inner workings. Advertisement 'It's a very important thing that it does, but you only produce life if the machine that's producing it — if you want to whittle us down to a machine — is functioning in a healthy, streamlined kind of way,' Obama added. I guess she missed that day in biology class. Speaking with OB/GYN Dr. Sharon Malone, whose husband, Eric Holder, served as attorney general under former President Barack Obama, Michelle then took aim at the male of the species. Advertisement She attacked guys who, she said, 'sit on their hands' over abortion and are choosing to 'trade out women's health for a tax break or whatever it is.'' But the crescendo came when she denounced women like me of handing the election to President Trump because — get this — we were too stupid or timid to vote for the worst candidate ever to grace a ballot, simply because she is female. In Obama's world, we voted for Trump to please men. Seriously? Advertisement 'There are a lot of men who have big chairs at their tables, there are a lot of women who vote the way their man is going to vote,'' she actually said. 'It happened in this election.' So there it is. Michelle Obama, pretend women's rights warrior, is so condescending to the fairer sex, she insults millions of people bearing XX chromosomes by claiming they were merely trying to please 'their'' man by going for Trump. Hey Michelle — sorry to stick a fork into your Trump Derangement Syndrome — but I, for one, simply voted my mind, my heart, my pocketbook and, yes, my reproductive organs. Despite Democratic hysteria, it's clear to me that the president has no intention of eliminating abortion rights throughout this country. Own opinions There also exist many other issues that concern me. These include runaway crime, the largesse afforded by the previous presidential administration to countless numbers of illegal immigrants, including violent criminals. There's also epic inflation and unchecked antisemitism on college campuses and elsewhere. There's more, but that's a start. In each case, things got so out of hand, I believed Trump had the best chance of saving this nation. Advertisement He couldn't do any worse. I'm no shrinking violet, Michelle. I believe in equal rights — for everyone. And I believe my man is entitled to his own opinions.
