Our Similarities Prove Intelligent Design, Not Evolution!
Disclaimer: The views and interpretations expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the beliefs or positions of WiProud. This article is intended for informational and discussion purposes only. Readers are encouraged to explore multiple perspectives and conduct their own research when forming conclusions about religious texts and beliefs.
Something that Darwinists claim to be one of the greatest pieces of evidence for the theory of evolution and common ancestry are biological similarities. This idea states that different species share common ancestors proven by similar physical structure and/or biology. Such similarities include the number of bones in our arms, legs, neck, the presence of a liver, a digestive system, or even an appendix. One of the most debated similarities that Darwinists present as proof for our own evolution is that certain types of primates actually share a few of the same blood types as humans. On the surface this all sounds like excellent solid evidence; but is it really? Is there no other explanation that can be offered to justify these similarities?
First and foremost, one advantage that the seasoned scientist has over the general public would be the public is severely lacking in their understanding of the complexity of life and the universe. It would be very easy for a scientist to withhold specific details of discoveries that contradict their narrative, either omitting them or downplaying their importance. I believe the study of the complexity of life and the universe is one of those topics that is overly de-emphasized and even ignored. It's actually the discovery of the complexity of life and the universe that has brought many scientists to faith in God. But, since evolution is the socially accepted explanation for our origins, this narrative is aggressively driven. The problem is, what is presented to be hard core facts really does not support anything. Remember this; it is always the interpretation of the exact same set of facts that can lead us to one conclusion or the other. Additionally, the interpretation must be logically sound when held under scrutiny, not quickly skimmed over resulting in a fast-food like outcome. Allow me to give you a far more plausible explanation for these similarities.
Imagine, if you would, that you are a painter. As such, you would have your own artistic style. You would select the type of canvas you like to use, the colors you frequently paint with, and even the brands of paints and tools you prefer to work with because you know what works for you. This would all achieve the desired artistic outcome you are looking for. Your paintings have some variety, but they all have your unique artistic touch. Soon others would eventually recognize your work by your familiar style and technique as well. Because you use the same tools and paint, along with your particular style, have created many similarities in your paintings.
Now let's say I have two of your paintings hanging in my home. Could you imagine someone looking at them and concluding that one painting descended from the other, proven by their similarities? Sounds crazy. My guess is most would presume the same person painted both of the pictures due to artistic similarities; and they would be correct.
Is it crazy to think that there are close similarities because we all have a common designer that is highly intelligent? Would it also be crazy to say this designer used what works several times for different types of life?
'You can take a lug nut off of a Pontiac and put it on a Buick, but that doesn't mean the Pontiac evolved from the Buick. It means they were both made by General Motors.'
– Dr. Kent Hovind
'The proof that Darwinists really need is evidence of species change, not similarity of structure or function. Lacking that evidence, an attempt to prove the point by appearance is shallow at best.'
– Vance Ferrel, 'Science vs. Evolution' p. 660.
As stated above, there really is a lack of 'species change' which is the deal breaker. Charles Darwin himself stated it in his book, 'Origin of Species',
'Why is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain; and this is the most obvious and serious objection which can be urged against this theory.'
– Charles Darwin, Origins of Species, pg. 413
Darwin understood that the lack of intermediate species was the hole in his theory. Missing these links really blows the doors off of any arguments for evolution. With that said, similarities cannot be explained by Darwin's theory. Of course you may argue that many missing links have been found; such as Nebraska Man, Piltdown Man, Peking Man, Lucy, and others. However, if you were to dig into the historical facts of these findings you would learn that all these have been faked by those seeking the fame of discovering the 'missing link'.
Not only have we never found physical evidence for species changing, we have also never observed this process ourselves either. If all living creatures descend from a common ancestor, why do we not see this taking place today by any measure? If primates evolved into humans, why then do we STILL have primates on this earth? We have thousands of years of recorded human history on this planet, but we have NEVER recorded one type of species evolving into another. The burden of proof really is on the Darwinist. Not to mention, due to the overwhelming complexity of life, it really is a mathematical IMPOSSIBILITY for life to emerge from random change with zero intelligence.
'In the real world of scientific observation, as opposed to metaphysical speculation, however, no more complex system can ever 'evolve' out of a less complex system, so the probability of the naturalistic origin of even the simplest imaginary form of life is zero.'
– Henry Morris, PH.D.
The truth is the creation of life requires intent and intelligence. This intelligence appeared to have used similarities in several living things, most likely because it was deemed a good design for its intended purposes. However, this intelligence also displays a vast amount of creativity with life's abundance of differences as well. What is this intelligence? I propose it's the God of the bible, but don't take my word for it.
'In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.'
– Gen 1:1 KJV
'… The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork.'
– Psa 19:1 KJV
'For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:'
– Rom 1:20 KJV
Disclaimer: The views and interpretations expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the beliefs or positions of WiProud. This article is intended for informational and discussion purposes only. Readers are encouraged to explore multiple perspectives and conduct their own research when forming conclusions about religious texts and beliefs.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
For the latest news, weather, sports, and streaming video, head to FOX2548 & WIProud.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Yahoo
Nepal 'cloudburst' video is AI generated
"Live video footage of cloudburst in Nepal," reads the Hindi-language caption of a video posted on X on May 25, 2025. It appears to show torrents of water emptying out of a cloud onto already flooded fields. It was shared as monsoon rains in eastern Nepal caused at least one death, according to the Kathmandu Post, as well as widespread flooding and disruptions to transport (archived link). Meteorologists in Nepal said the monsoon clouds had entered the country two weeks ahead of schedule, with the National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Authority predicting that around two million could be affected by monsoon-related disasters (archived link). The video was also shared among Hindi-speaking users on Facebook and Instagram. "What a terrifying scene... it seems like water gushing out of a dam," reads a comment on one of the posts. Another comment reads: "A very scary scene... May God protect everyone." But Nepalese authorities told AFP that no such weather phenomena had occurred in the country. "Monsoon (season) has begun in Nepal so many areas are receiving rain. But there has been no incident of any cloudburst recently," Dinkar Kayastha, an information officer with the Department of Hydrology and Meteorology, said on June 5. A reverse image search on Google using keyframes from the falsely shared video led to the same footage posted in a YouTube short on May 19 (archived link). The video's Thai-language caption includes the hashtag "AI", and the user who posted the video also posted others with the same hashtag that appear to have been AI generated (archived link). The director of Purdue University's Machine Learning and Media Forensics Lab, Shu Hu, also told AFP that there are visual inconsistencies in the video which confirm the clip was generated using AI (archived link). "The red roof was absent at the beginning of the video but appeared later," he said on June 3. AFP has debunked other false claims that utilised AI-generated footage here.
Yahoo
07-06-2025
- Yahoo
Many Dead Sea Scrolls may be older than experts thought, AI analysis suggests
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Many of the Dead Sea Scrolls may be older than experts thought, according to an artificial intelligence (AI) analysis. Consisting of about 1,000 ancient manuscripts etched onto animal skin, papyrus and copper, the Dead Sea Scrolls contain the earliest known versions of texts from the Hebrew Bible — including copies of the books of Genesis, Exodus, Isaiah, Kings and Deuteronomy — and date from the third century B.C. to the first century A.D. Now, scientists have used an AI program, dubbed Enoch, to analyze the handwriting patterns on the scrolls, revealing that they may be older than experts thought. The study authors say their findings, published June 4 in the journal PLOS One, are a significant step in dating some of the earliest versions of the Bible. However, not all experts are convinced. "With the Enoch tool we have opened a new door into the ancient world, like a time machine, that allows us to study the hands that wrote the Bible," lead study author Mladen Popović, director of the Qumran Institute at the University of Groningen in the Netherlands, said in a statement. "Especially now that we have established, for the first time, that two biblical scroll fragments come from the time of their presumed authors." Discovered by Bedouin shepherds inside the West Bank's caves of Qumran from 1946 to 1947, the ancient manuscripts range from legal documents and calendars to sections of the Hebrew Bible and psalms, written mostly in Hebrew but also in Aramaic and Greek. Previous dating of the scrolls relied on paleography — the study of ancient writing systems — with some undergoing radiocarbon dating in the 1990s. However, castor oil had been applied to some of the manuscripts in modern times to improve their legibility. This oil is also a contaminant that can disrupt radiocarbon dating, so the results from these techniques remain a topic of debate. Related: Ancient 'curse tablet' may show earliest Hebrew name of God In an attempt to clear things up, the researchers first cleaned 30 samples from different manuscripts to remove the castor oil, before successfully radiocarbon-dating 27 of them. They found that two of these scroll fragments were younger than past analyses suggested but that other fragments were older. Then, the scientists set about creating their Enoch AI model. Enoch was trained on the handwriting of 24 of the newly dated manuscripts and their radiocarbon dates. After verifying the model with 13 further selected images from the same manuscripts, the researchers presented it with 135 undated manuscripts. They found that it agreed with the estimates made by scholars 79% of the time. Yet the results for the remaining 21% of the scrolls point to a mystery, with Enoch giving them a range of dates that could make them older, hard to determine, or even a century younger than initial estimates. They also suggest that two different writing styles, known as the Hasmonean and Herodian scripts (named after the Jewish Hasmonean dynasty and Herod, the Roman client king, respectively), could have overlapped for longer than previously thought. Nonetheless, Enoch also corroborates earlier paleography, notably for a scroll titled 4Q114, which contains three chapters from the Book of Daniel. Analysts initially estimated 4Q114's writing to have been inked during the height of the Maccabee uprising in 165 B.C. (a part of the Hanukkah story) due to its description of Antiochus IV's desecration of the Second Temple in Jerusalem. The AI model's estimate also falls within this range, between 230 B.C. and 160 B.C. But for some paleographers, the results are hardly surprising. RELATED STORIES —2,700-year-old archaeological site in Jordan may be a biblical place visited by King David —20 of the most bizarre stories from the Bible —Ancient Yahweh worshipper's jar bears Hebrew script in biblical city "The results of this study are very interesting, and presumably important, but not Earth-shattering," Christopher Rollston,a professor and chair of biblical and Near Eastern languages and civilizations at The George Washington University, told Live Science in an email. "Most of the conclusions of this article also dovetail with what the great palaeographers in the field, such as the late Frank Moore Cross, had already stated more than 60 years ago." Rollston also criticized the notion that the new tool could enable researchers to "study the hands that wrote the Bible" as "at the very least, gross hyperbole." No manuscripts of the Hebrew Bible date to the First Temple period (circa 1200 to 586 B.C.), when it was originally composed, or to the early parts of the Second Temple period (538 B.C. to A.D. 70), he said. He noted that AI can be useful, but it should only be one of many techniques used to study ancient texts like the Dead Sea Scrolls. "Enoch could and should never be the only tool in the toolbox of someone wishing to determine the date for the writing of a manuscript. After all, human handwriting, and all of its variations and idiosyncratic features, is a deeply human thing," Rollston added. "Machines can be helpful in isolating features of a script, but the presence of a gifted palaeographer is at least as valuable as a machine-learning tool."
Tom's Guide
05-06-2025
- Tom's Guide
The first 'Alien: Earth' trailer just landed — and it was more than worth the wait
Calling 'Alien: Earth' my most anticipated show of 2025 feels like an understatement. As a superfan of all things 'Alien' — it's not just my favorite film franchise but my favorite IP in all of media, period — I thought my hype levels for the upcoming FX show could not be higher, but the first "Alien: Earth" trailer has just made the wait until its premiere on August 12 almost painful. After months of teasing and a few short spots that showed very little beyond unsatisfying glimpses of the full beast to come, FX just dropped a full two and a half minute trailer, and it's truly glorious. The 'Alien' superfan in me was literally leaping out of my office chair with excitement several times. You can watch the trailer for yourself down below: Opening with a countdown interspersed with quick cuts from the trailer to come, the densely-packed first look does the one thing I was hoping it would: It focuses on the show's cast of characters rather than the Xenomorph. We learn of a young girl who is going to be 'the first person to transition from a human body to a synthetic." When has megacorporation playing God ever gone wrong in the 'Alien' universe? Next, we're introduced to the show's lead character, Wendy (Sydney Chandler), who appears to be said young girl now fully implanted into a synthetic body. Wendy volunteers to lead a group of soldiers to recover something hidden deep within a crashed spaceship, and no prizes for guessing what they're going to find on this vessel. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. The use of the series's now iconic musical cue, first introduced in 2012's 'Prometheus,' just adds to the overwhelming sense of dread. However, what has impressed me most about the trailer is the stunning production design. I did have a fear that in the transition from the big screen to the smaller one, some of the franchise's unique visual identity would be lost, but that appears to be an unnecessary concern. There's no denying that, based on this trailer, 'Alien: Earth' looks like ... well, 'Alien.' Smartly, the trailer is also extremely light on glimpses of the Xenomorph itself. The "Alien" series is always at its best when the headline monster is used sparingly, and I really hope this cards-to-the-chest approach is mirrored in the full series. Often, the threat that a tooth-tongued xeno is lurking in a dark corner is more impactful than a close-up encounter. If you've missed all the hype already surrounding 'Alien: Earth,' it's the first TV show set in the legendary sci-fi horror franchise, and comes from Noah Hawley, the creator of fellow FX series 'Fargo' and 'Legion.' Alongside Chandler, it'll feature Timothy Olyphant, Alex Lawther, Samuel Blenkin, Essie Davis, Adarsh Gourav and Kit Young. As noted, 'Alien: Earth' is set to premiere August 12 on FX and Hulu (or Disney Plus in the U.K.). Somebody get me a cryosleep pod, I can't wait that long. OK, so I've gone full fanboy above, but to add a cautious counterpoint, there is one aspect of the trailer that has me concerned. The hints of additional 'predatory' creatures beyond Xenomorph contained within the crashed spaceship have flared up my fears that this show will be a stealth setup for a new 'Alien vs. Predator' crossover. The inclusion of a Weyland-Yutani synthetic in the most recent trailer for the upcoming 'Predator: Badlands' adds more fuel to the fire. It's pretty hard to deny that all signs point to the 'Alien' and 'Predator' universes being smushed together once again. I don't hate the 'AVP' series — well, I don't hate the first 'AVP' movie; the sequel was hot garbage — it was my entry point into the 'Alien' franchise as a youth. A youth who was far too young to be watching such an R-rated flick. Nevertheless, I firmly believe that 'Alien' and 'Predator' are both better standalone, and I'd much rather the two weren't spliced together. Especially after the fantastic 'Alien: Romulus' (which I've now watched more than 10 times) got the series back on track in style, I'm just not convinced now is the time to try to make 'AVP' a thing again. However, like it or not, it certainly appears that is what's going to happen, in at least some form or another. Nevertheless, even my concerns about this potential crossover aren't enough to blunt my anticipation, and come August, I look forward to thoroughly annoying my friends (and a few colleagues) by literally never shutting up about 'Alien: Earth.' Here's hoping the final product thrills me as much as this trailer. Now I'm off to rewatch it frame-by-frame to find more clues.
