logo
After months of turmoil, Senate committee approves Stitt's OSBE nominations: How we got here

After months of turmoil, Senate committee approves Stitt's OSBE nominations: How we got here

Yahoo21-05-2025

Three of Gov. Kevin Stitt's four recent nominees to the Oklahoma State Board of Education have passed a key milestone: confirmation by the Senate Education Committee.
The nominations of Michael Tinney, of Norman; Ryan Deatherage, of Kingfisher; and Becky Carson, of Edmond are advancing to the full Senate for a final vote. Under state law, the Senate must be finished with its work by May 30. Acting on executive nominations typically is done in the final days of the annual legislative session.
Tinney, Deatherage and Chris Van Denhende, of Tulsa, have served on the board, which oversees public education in Oklahoma, since February — clashing frequently with the board's chair, state schools Superintendent Ryan Walters — while Carson's first board meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, May 21.
Van Denhende had his nomination confirmed earlier in May by the Senate committee during a fiery meeting.
'This shouldn't be a controversial board,' Senate President Pro Tempore Lonnie Paxton said, 'but unfortunately it has become that way.'
When the Senate Education Committee met Tuesday, May 20, Tinney's nomination passed 10-2, with Deatherage's nomination advancing on a 9-2 vote. Carson sailed through with a 10-0 vote. The only senators voting against the nominations of Deatherage and Tinney were the committee's most far-right members, Sen. Dusty Deevers, R-Elgin, and Sen. Kendal Sacchieri, R-Blanchard.
Stitt had named Tinney, Deatherage and Van Denhende to the board on Feb. 11 to replace three sitting members. He named a fourth new member, Carson, to fill an open seat on April 28. The governor said in February the board shakeup was due to 'ongoing controversy' at the Oklahoma State Department of Education and disappointing standardized test scores.
During his first two years in office, Walters received no pushback from the board on multiple controversial decisions, such as issuing a statewide Bible-teaching mandate or seeking to create an administrative rule that would allow the state Education Department to not just ask for the immigration status of students, but also of their parents.
That's changed since Stitt appointed Tinney, Deatherage and Van Denhende to the board. During two meetings, the three men have challenged Walters on multiple occasions.
The circumstances regarding Tinney's nomination featured significant additional political drama. Senate tradition requires the nomination be carried by the senator for the district in which the nominee resides, or by the Senate president pro tempore. But Sen. Lisa Standridge, R-Norman, declined to carry the nomination of Tinney, who lives in her district. Standridge has cited her friendship with Kendra Wesson, one of the three board members ousted by Stitt in February, as her reason.
The Senate president pro tempore, in such cases, can also carry a nomination, but initially, Paxton, R-Tuttle, declined to do so. But after discussions with Stitt and others, Paxton changed his mind. He said Tuesday that Standridge had asked him to carry Tinney's nomination.
'We've had some time to see him on the board and see how he performs on it, so he looks like the right person for the job and (we) wanted to make sure that that we were able to get that through,' Paxton said.
Paxton said he discussed Tinney's nomination with Stitt.
"The governor feels very confident that he made the right appointment and would love to see that appointment to stay on there,' Paxton said of their conversation. 'He said, 'We can find somebody else, but why go find somebody else when you have a qualified person that's willing to serve?''
Tinney said he was in far southwestern Oklahoma when he heard the news.
'You guys know the kind of hurdles my nomination overcame and I don't want to rehash all that, but I'm just thankful that things got worked out and thankful I got the opportunity to be heard,' Tinney said after his hearing. 'I'm just going to hope I'll be confirmed by the Senate and then I'll get over to doing my job.'
During Tinney's 37-minute hearing, Deevers grilled him about whether it might be a conflict of interest for Tinney to serve on the state board, given that Tinney's wife, Ginger, serves as the executive director of Professional Oklahoma Educators, a union-like professional organization. He also asked about a vote Tinney took in a recent board meeting against suspending the license of the teacher accused of child neglect. Tinney said everyone deserves due process in such a setting.
Deevers remained unconvinced, saying Tinney had 'too severe a conflict of interest' to serve on the board.
In response to a question from Sacchieri about his loyalty to the governor, Tinney replied, 'I will not be a 'yes' man.'
Deatherage's hearing lasted about 23 minutes. Deevers asked him about what Title 70 — a portion of state law that governs education and the board — says concerning the board's role. Deatherage likened board members to coaches, who tell the team captain — the superintendent — what plays to run.
'The board guides and checks and makes sure … schools are winning,' Deatherage said.
Deevers also asked Deatherage about a recent controversy regarding how Walters pushed through new state social studies academic standards. Deatherage, Tinney and Van Denhende all have said they didn't have sufficient time to read the final version of the standards, and that they felt deceived when Walters said they had to vote during the February meeting to meet legislative deadlines, when the actual deadline wasn't until the end of April.
Carson's hearing lasted only 13 minutes. Deevers asked her only one question and Sacchieri offered a couple of others. Carson said her mantra in education was the question, 'Is it good for kids?'
She also said 'our children … are watching us. What message are we sending them?'
The committee also approved, without opposition, the nomination of Tulsa venture capitalist Tracy Poole to the OSU/A&M Board of Regents, which governs Oklahoma State University, Langston University, Oklahoma Panhandle State University, Northeastern Oklahoma A&M College and Connors State College. OSU President James Hess joined three other system presidents at the hearing to support Poole's nomination.
Also approved was the re-nomination of current Regional University System of Oklahoma Regent Connie Reilly, of Okemah.
This article originally appeared on Oklahoman: Gov. Stitt's OSBE nominations get Senate committee confirmation

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ukrainian delegation to brief senators amid Russia sanctions push
Ukrainian delegation to brief senators amid Russia sanctions push

Politico

time17 minutes ago

  • Politico

Ukrainian delegation to brief senators amid Russia sanctions push

A Ukrainian delegation is set to brief U.S. senators Wednesday as lawmakers weigh a sweeping sanctions bill targeting Russia and its biggest energy customers, China and India. Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), who told POLITICO he organized the meeting with Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), said all 100 senators were invited to attend the closed-door session. 'It's a pivotal moment in Ukraine — and crunch time for the Senate on this bill,' said Blumenthal, noting that the legislation now has 82 co-sponsors, evenly divided between Democrats and Republicans. The visiting delegation, he told POLITICO, includes Andriy Yermak, a top adviser to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Ukraine's deputy defense minister, Serhii Boyev, is traveling with Yermack. The sanctions package from Blumenthal and Graham is designed to increase pressure on Russia's wartime economy by targeting countries that buy oil and gas — a move Blumenthal said could be a 'game changer.' He also pointed to recent long-range drone attacks deep inside Russia — dubbed 'Operation Spiderweb' — as evidence of Ukraine's agility and resolve. Those strikes, he said, counter 'a false narrative that Ukraine is losing the war,' and could shift momentum in Washington in favor of increasing aid for Ukraine.'They can strike air bases 4,000 miles from Ukraine; They can hit anywhere,' Blumenthal said. 'Just in the skill and audacity of these attacks, it will rank with the United States raid on Osama bin Laden and the Israeli pager operation as one of the great military achievements in recent years.' Blumenthal said the White House remains hesitant to support the sanctions bill, but the battlefield momentum could sway President Donald Trump and skeptical lawmakers. 'Events will move the White House — and maybe some of the president's friends here,' he said, referring to Graham. 'Congress can … move ahead. [Trump] doesn't have to support it.'

The populist right takes a victory lap
The populist right takes a victory lap

Politico

time29 minutes ago

  • Politico

The populist right takes a victory lap

MORAL COMPASS — A who's who of Republican elites is set to gather this evening at the National Building Museum for a swanky gala hosted by American Compass, the institutional home of conservative economic populism in Washington. The black-tie affair is nominally being held to commemorate the fifth anniversary of the think tank, which was founded in 2020 by the conservative economist and former Mitt Romney adviser Oren Cass. But among American Compass's supporters in the capital, the event is broadly understood to represent a victory lap of sorts, marking the ascendancy of Cass's brand of economic populism in the Trump era and the newfound prominence of two of American Compass's primary political allies: Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio — both of whom are scheduled to speak at tonight's event. Yet despite American Compass's success in establishing itself as a buzzy hub of new conservative economic thinking in Washington, the gala comes at a particularly fraught moment for this ascendant wing of the GOP. Cass's brand of economic thinking — which rejects the GOP's traditional mélange of free trade, tax cuts and deregulation in favor of trade protectionism, industrial policy, immigration restriction and a relatively friendlier stance toward organized labor — has made definite inroads in Washington, as the Trump administration's aggressive tariff policies and public courting of organized labor suggest. But the limits of the administration's commitment to American Compass-style populism have been put on stark display in recent weeks thanks to the fight over Trump's 'big, beautiful' domestic spending bill. The legislation, which is currently under consideration in the Senate, includes a slew of decidedly un-populist provisions — tax cuts for corporations and high-earners, rollbacks to Medicaid coverage and funding cuts for food assistance programs for low-income Americans — and has been met with unusually strong resistance among populist-leaning Republicans in the upper chamber, especially Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley, who has publicly opposed the bill's Medicaid cuts. Notably, Cass has also spoken out publicly against some of the bill's tax provisions. In a recent interview with POLITICO Magazine, Cass criticized congressional Republicans for their inability to articulate a coherent economic rationale for proposed tax cuts, calling the negotiation process 'a death march through a series of choices that nobody really wanted to be making.' He also called out the House package for exacerbating America's ongoing 'fiscal crisis' by adding to the national debt — a claim that the Trump White House continues to deny, despite multiple independent estimates showing that the bill would add over $3 trillion to the debt over the next decade. The tension inside the Building Museum will be heightened by the presence of Vance and Rubio, both of whom serve as ambassadors of sorts between the GOP's economic populist wing and the Trump White House. In the Senate, both Vance and Rubio emerged as leading champions of Cass-style economic populism, with Vance taking a stand on tariffs and rail-safety regulation, and Rubio positioning himself as a vocal advocate of targeted industrial policy as a tool for the U.S. to compete with China. Vance's elevation to the No. 2 spot in the administration was also a major win for the cohort: Vance and Cass have been friendly for nearly a decade, Cass told me, dating back to the publication of Hillbilly Elegy in 2016. The two have deepened their political ties in recent years as well, with Vance headlining a conference hosted by American Compass in 2023 and hiring the group's former research director to his Senate office. But now that both men have left the Senate for Cabinet-level roles in the administration, they have had to downplay any ideological daylight between Trump's economic agenda and the conservative populist's vision. That's especially true on tax reform — where American Compass and others in the movement have unsuccessfully urged the administration to raise rates on corporations and high-earners — and welfare cuts, where populist have come out against the 'big, beautiful' bills cuts to Medicaid and other popular social safety net programs. The departure of Vance and Rubio from the Senate has also thrust Cass and his fellow economic populists into another sort of political bind. When acting as a unified bloc in the upper chamber, Vance, Rubio and Hawley (and, to a lesser extent, other populist-curious Republican senators like Tom Cotton and Eric Schmitt) wielded significant leverage over leadership. But with Vance and Rubio now out of the picture, Hawley has been forced into the uncomfortable position of allying with more moderate (and MAGA-skeptical) Senate Republicans like Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski to push populists' preferred changes to Trump's mega-bill. That dilemma points to a broader challenge facing Cass and his fellow conservative populists at the dawn of the second Trump administration. Although American Compass has found champions among a handful of high-profile Republicans in Washington — and, importantly, has made inroads with a broad swath of younger Republican staffers on the Hill — they've yet to win broad-based support among rank-and-file Republicans. In particular, Republicans in the House have kept American Compass's heterodox economic argument at a comfortable arm's length, giving the anti-tax budget hawks in the Freedom Caucus disproportionate power over the economic agenda in the lower chamber. That lack of broad-based political support is partly a function of the relative novelty of American Compass's message — it is, after all, only five years old — and partly a result of the personality of its founder. Cass, a bespectacled and soft-spoken budget wonk, has always appealed more to the self-styled conservative intellectuals in the Senate than he has to the conservative bomb-throwers in the House. Cass is also not a typical go-along-to-get-along creature of the Washington swamp: As his recent criticisms of the 'big, beautiful' bill suggest, he is one of the few MAGA-aligned conservatives in Washington who is still willing to offer principled criticisms of the administration's actions — a tendency that has not always endeared him to White House officials. A self-described policy nerd, he is also something of an odd fit within the smashmouth rhetorical frame of the MAGA mainstream. With all these low-level tensions simmering in the background, the gala represents an opportunity for two of the administration's high-profile emissaries to tend to some sore spots between the White House and the GOP's economic populists. Vance — who is slated to sit for a Q&A with Cass at the gala — has emerged as a particularly adept mediator among MAGA's various factions: In March, he used a similar speech at a high-profile gathering of right-leaning tech figures to broker a truce of sorts between the tech right and the populist-right. In that respect, the Building Museum serves as a thematically appropriate venue for the event. With Trump's domestic policy agenda dangling in a delicate legislative limbo, the administration needs to quickly build some bridges with the party's economic populists to get the bill across the finish line. Welcome to POLITICO Nightly. Reach out with news, tips and ideas at nightly@ Or contact tonight's author at iward@ or on X (formerly known as Twitter) at @ianwardreports. What'd I Miss? — Congress finally gets Trump's request to codify DOGE cuts to NPR, PBS, foreign aid: President Donald Trump has sent Congress a request to nix $9.4 billion in current funding for public broadcasting, National Public Radio and foreign aid — the first test of Republicans' willingness to back the administration's gutting of federal agencies. The 'rescissions' memo was officially transmitted today to Capitol Hill, according to Senate Appropriations Chair Susan Collins (R-Maine), but it has yet to be publicly released. The request now starts a 45-day clock — not counting breaks longer than three days — for Congress to either approve or rebuff Trump's request to claw back funding that's supposed to be flowing now. — Fetterman's chief of staff leaves amid string of departures: Pennsylvania Sen. John Fetterman's chief of staff is leaving her post, two people familiar with the matter confirmed to POLITICO today. The move is yet another key departure for a congressional office that's been marked by turnover amid mounting questions about the Democrat's health and shifting political persona. Axios first reported Krysta Sinclair Juris' plans to part ways with Fetterman's office. POLITICO has learned Cabelle St. John, who previously served as Fetterman's deputy chief of staff, senior adviser and scheduling director, is taking over as his new top aide. — Navy set to rename ship honoring Harvey Milk amid DEI purge: Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is set to rename a naval vessel named after gay rights activist Harvey Milk, with several other ships honoring civil rights activists and women also potentially being rechristened. The move targeting the ship named after the gay rights icon comes as LGBTQ+ communities kick off pride month celebrations across the country. The step furthers Hegseth's agenda to stomp out DEI initiatives at the Pentagon, which has included removing books from service academies and scrubbing some mentions of women and people of color in the armed services from DOD websites. — Musk goes nuclear on Trump's 'big beautiful bill': Elon Musk came out swinging against President Donald Trump's 'big beautiful bill' today, slamming the reconciliation package as a 'disgusting abomination' in a massive break from the president just days after stepping away from his role in the administration. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' Musk wrote on his social media platform X. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' Musk, who Trump had tapped to lead the federal expense-slashing Department of Government Efficiency, went on to criticize the bill for setting up Congress to 'increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion (!!!)' and saddle Americans with 'crushingly unsustainable debt.' AROUND THE WORLD SPY GAME — Ukrainian spies launched an underwater assault against the pillars of the Kerch Bridge connecting Russia's mainland with Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula, which Moscow has illegally occupied since 2014. 'The underwater supports of the piers were severely damaged at the sea bottom level — 1,100 kg of explosives in TNT equivalent contributed to this. The bridge is in an emergency state,' the Security Service of Ukraine, or SBU, Kyiv's main counterintelligence agency, said in a statement today after the attack. The bridge was closed for transport as of 3 p.m., Russian authorities reported, issuing no more details. The attack on the Kerch Bridge happened just two days after the SBU's daring Spiderweb drone operation damaged dozens of strategic bombers thousands of kilometers inside Russia. The Kerch Bridge was personally opened by Russian President Vladimir Putin in 2018 and today marked Ukraine's third attempt to strike it. QUITTING TIME — Dutch far-right figurehead Geert Wilders announced this morning that his party would quit the government in The Hague, throwing the Netherlands into turmoil. Wilders' Party for Freedom (PVV) left the coalition in a heated dispute over the government's position on asylum. 'No signature for our asylum plans. No changes to the [coalition] agreement. PVV is leaving the coalition,' Wilders posted on X. Prime Minister Dick Schoof announced this afternoon that he'd hand in the resignation of the government to the King, triggering a new election less than a year after his government took office. While the PVV members of the government are resigning, Schoof said that the remainder of the government — including himself — would stay on in a caretaker capacity until there's a new administration. Schoof called Wilders' move 'unnecessary and irresponsible.' But, he said, 'if one party lacks the will to continue [to carry out the government program], you cannot move forward with each other.' The outgoing Dutch government, a coalition between Wilders' far-right PVV, the populist Farmer-Citizens Movement (BBB), the centrist New Social Contract (NSC) and the liberal People's Party for Freedom and Democracy (VVD), had scheduled crisis talks this morning to discuss Wilders' demands for stricter asylum measures. Nightly Number RADAR SWEEP AI ANXIETY — While the advent of generative AI has bolstered unconventional uses of large language models like ChatGPT, it has also become a go-to therapist and interpreter for relationship woes. Users appreciate the platform's constant availability for emotional analysis and its stark evaluations of personal conversations. However, WIRED's Megan Farokhmanesh reports that such practices actually promote greater social anxiety in users while inhibiting the growth of their interpersonal communication skills. Privacy concerns also abound as users upload extensive chat records and personal information into the model to have it fully assess their emotional needs. Parting Image Marisa Guerra Echeverria contributed to this newsletter. Did someone forward this email to you? Sign up here.

Elon Musk turns on Trump and blasts ‘outrageous, pork-filled' spending bill
Elon Musk turns on Trump and blasts ‘outrageous, pork-filled' spending bill

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Elon Musk turns on Trump and blasts ‘outrageous, pork-filled' spending bill

Elon Musk appears to have turned on President Donald Trump by blasting his 'big beautiful bill' as an 'outrageous, pork-filled, disgusting abomination.' The denunciation comes just days after the tech mogul exited the White House. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,' Musk posted on X Tuesday. 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' He added: 'It will massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion (!!!) and burden America (sic) citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt.' The billionaire took a significantly stronger tone than his previous criticism of the spending bill now that he has left Washington, D.C. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt was asked about Musk's post during her Tuesday briefing. 'The president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill, it doesn't change the president's opinion,' Leavitt said. 'This is one big beautiful bill and he's sticking to it.' The bill, which will add a whopping $3.8 trillion to the country's debt over the next 10 years, is currently being debated in the Senate as Trump is railing against Republican senators who have criticized it. Musk previously said the bill 'undermines' the Department of Government Efficiency - which he led to help trim the federal budget. Musk has since left that role and last week was thanked by Trump in an Oval Office event. 'I was, like, disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly, which increases the budget deficit, doesn't decrease it, and undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing,' Musk said over the weekend. 'I think a bill can be big or it can be beautiful,' Musk said. 'But I don't know if it can be both. My personal opinion.' Musk's time at the White House was limited to 130 days as a special government employee. That period expired last week. During his time in government, Tesla stock dropped as much as 71 percent. The president appeared eager to end the mogul's time in government on a high. 'We'll remember you as we announce billions of dollars of extra waste, fraud and abuse,' Trump said Friday. 'DOGE has installed geniuses with an engineering mindset and unbelievably talented people on computers,' he continued. 'I actually asked Elon one time, 'What's their primary thing?' And they have a lot of primary things all having to do with being smart.' The bill looks to slash taxes and increase spending on oil drilling, the military and border security, while also making cuts to Medicaid and food assistance programs. It proposes $1.5 trillion worth of spending cuts to unlock $4.5 billion worth of tax cuts. If Republicans fail to find $2 trillion worth of savings, the amount of money left for tax cuts would be reduced by the difference between $2 trillion and the final number of spending cuts. Preliminary analysis from the Congressional Budget Office found that the bill would increase benefits for those earning the highest through an extension of the 2017 GOP tax plan. 'The changes would not be evenly distributed among households,' the agency estimates. 'In general, resources would decrease for households in the lowest decile (tenth) of the income distribution, whereas resources would increase for households in the highest decile.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store