logo
Trump administration releases huge trove of documents about Dr Martin Luther King Jr - as President faces revolt over Epstein files

Trump administration releases huge trove of documents about Dr Martin Luther King Jr - as President faces revolt over Epstein files

Sky News22-07-2025
A huge trove of documents relating to the assassination of Dr Martin Luther King Jr has been released by the US government.
The disclosure, which was opposed by many of the civil rights hero's family, includes more than 240,000 pages of records that had been under court seal since 1977.
Dr King's two living children, Martin III, 67, and Bernice, 62, said their father's killing has been a "captivating public curiosity for decades".
But they emphasised the personal nature of their father's death and urged that the files be "viewed within their full historical context".
Dr King was shot and killed on 4 April, 1968, in Memphis, Tennessee, while headed to dinner with friends.
The night before the assassination, Dr King delivered his famous "Mountaintop" speech on a stormy night.
James Earl Ray was eventually apprehended after a long manhunt and pleaded guilty to the killing, but he later renounced his plea and maintained his innocence until his death in 1998.
Members of Dr King's family and others have questioned if Ray acted alone or if he was even involved at all.
Keen interest in the files
Historians, journalists and the public have been waiting to study the now-unsealed documents to see what else can be learned about Dr King's death.
It has long been established that then-FBI Director J Edgar Hoover was intensely interested in Dr King and others he considered radicals.
FBI records previously released show how his bureau wiretapped Dr King's telephone lines, bugged his hotel rooms and used informants to gather information, including evidence of Dr King's extramarital affairs.
"He was relentlessly targeted by an invasive, predatory, and deeply disturbing disinformation and surveillance campaign orchestrated by J Edgar Hoover through the Federal Bureau of Investigation," the King children said in their statement.
The Kings said they "support transparency and historical accountability" but "object to any attacks on our father's legacy or attempts to weaponise it to spread falsehoods".
0:14
Is it a distraction?
The release of the documents comes at a time when President Trump is facing an increasing revolt from the MAGA faithful over what is seen as his reluctance to release files relating to paedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein.
Following the release of documents relating to her father, Bernice King took to Instagram and posted a a black-and-white photo of Dr King, looking annoyed, with the caption: "Now, do the Epstein files."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Report: Ghislaine Maxwell's cushy new prison life
Report: Ghislaine Maxwell's cushy new prison life

Daily Mail​

time25 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Report: Ghislaine Maxwell's cushy new prison life

Ghislaine Maxwell is already ruffling feathers at her cushy new lockup in Texas, where Daily Mail can reveal she's receiving special treatment that is irking fellow inmates. The disgraced British socialite, 63, barely a week into her controversial transfer to Prison Camp Bryan amid whispers of a possible Trump pardon, has been tucked away in a 'protective unit' of the barracks, surrounded by older prisoners nearing release and deemed less likely to lay a finger on her. Maxwell will be able to rub shoulders in the prison with a rogues' gallery of white-collar infamy. Holli Coulman, who runs Pink Lady Prison Consultants and coaches soon-to-be inmates on surviving life behind bars, says Maxwell's placement shields her from younger, more volatile prisoners who might be tempted to target her. Her transfer from a federal prison in Tallahassee, Florida, reportedly came after she was 'bombarded' with death threats from violent inmates who branded her a 'snitch' for spending two days talking to Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche about the men linked to Jeffrey Epstein. Now inmates in her new prison think it is 'unfair' that Maxwell was given the transfer, which appears to have breached the Bureau of Prison rules as she is serving 20 years for trafficking underage girls to the late [child predator]. In another twist, Maxwell could now shave up to 135 days off her sentence by completing prison programs – under a law signed by President Donald Trump in 2018. Such programs were not available at FCI Tallahassee, the prison where Maxwell had been serving her sentence since her 2022 conviction. Maxwell's shock transfer came after the Epstein story became a headache for the president when his Department of Justice and the FBI tried to shut it down. The July 7 memo from both agencies essentially closing the Epstein case led to howls of outrage from the president's supporters. In response, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche met Maxwell for two days at a federal courthouse in Florida to see what new information she could provide. Days later, and after Trump said he had the power to pardon Maxwell if he wanted to, she was moved to her new prison. Experts have previously told Daily Mail of their shock at the move as nobody who is convicted of a crime as serious as Maxwell typically gets such treatment. They called Prison Camp Bryan a 'cushy country club' compared to FCI Tallahassee. Maxwell's arrival at her new digs has caused shock among the 635, all female, inmates, according to Coulman, a former executive assistant to a Hewlett-Packard vice president who was jailed for 21 months for wire fraud in 2015. Pink Lady now has 10 clients in Prison Camp Bryan. Coulman said that Maxwell's 'protective unit' was designed to keep her away from inmates who might attack her. 'The bunks are all arranged in rows and around where she is are women aged 45 or older who are near to their release date,' she said. 'They are in for non-violent crimes and this means that they don't want to get into trouble. 'Maxwell is being kept away from younger inmates who are in for things like drugs or have longer to serve,' said Coulman who learned of the move from her clients inside the lock-up. 'They would be more likely to say something or do something: I would bet Maxwell has already had some snide comments. 'The girls are very upset that she's in there. She's got more than 10 years left to serve and she's in for a sexual offense. She should not be at Bryan and they feel like it's special treatment. 'They don't like her.' Coulman said that Maxwell will likely try to get a job in the prison law library or some other kind of 'administrative role'. 'I don't see her teaching GED classes.' Coulman said. At Bryan, Maxwell will also benefit from the First Step Act, which Trump signed into law in 2018 during his first administration. The law allows prisoners to take off up to 15 days from their sentence for every 30 days of a qualifying program that they attend. According to Coulman, the courses include Finance 101, women's wellness, a course on family and re-entry into society and a module on diabetes. If Maxwell finishes all nine courses available at the prison, it will give her 135 days – more than four months – off her sentence. 'They could expand the number of courses and Maxwell could get even more time off her sentence', Coulman said. The only thing stopping Maxwell from doing so will be that Prison Camp Bryan is understaffed, like the rest of the federal prison system. In an effort to placate his supporters, Trump has backed releasing transcripts of the grand jury hearings in Maxwell and Epstein's cases. But Maxwell's lawyers said they are opposing such a motion and said that the government had not met its burden to justify the release of the documents. Part of the reason is that they reportedly only include one law enforcement agent testifying in both cases about Epstein and Maxwell's conduct, meaning that the public will be reminded of her criminal actions. This week, the House oversight committee issued subpoenas to Bill and Hillary Clinton and a slew of former senior government officials to provide 'testimony related to horrific crimes perpetrated by Jeffrey Epstein.' The committee's Republican chair, James Comer, said he wanted to hear from the former President and First Lady as Bill Clinton knew Epstein for more than a decade and flew repeatedly on his private plane, dubbed the 'Lolita Express'. Maxwell even attended the wedding of the Clintons' daughter Chelsea in 2010, after Epstein had been to prison for having [sexual relations] with underage girls. Daily Mail has contacted the White House, the Bureau of Prisons and Maxwell's lawyer for comment.

Calls to Social Security may be rerouted to other field offices that have no jurisdiction over person's case
Calls to Social Security may be rerouted to other field offices that have no jurisdiction over person's case

The Independent

time27 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Calls to Social Security may be rerouted to other field offices that have no jurisdiction over person's case

Phone calls to Social Security are being rerouted to other field offices where workers don't have jurisdiction over some claims, according to staffers, as the beleaguered agency struggles to cut down on wait times amid thousands of staff losses and high demand. Amber Westbrook, a union chapter president and field office employee serving the Chicago region, said the system means that when certain calls come in, she can't 'actually take care of the issue.' "Our system is very specific to the office that we can do things in," she told NPR, which reported on the phone routing plan. "So I, physically, if another claim is open in another office, I cannot clear their case. It's just kind of the way that they retain that to make sure that things are accurate and complete." The agency confirmed the phone routing plan, but said, 'All [Social Security Administration] field offices are equipped to handle inquiries and resolve issues for callers, irrespective of where a caller lives or where their case originated.' Social Security has been in turmoil throughout the Trump administration. By April, it had lost about 7,000 employees or about 12 percent of its workforce, through resignations, retirements, and firings under the Trump administration's DOGE initiative. At the same time, retirees flooded the system with calls, waiting an average of 93 minutes for a response during the first five months of the Trump administration. In July, the agency pulled some workers from its field offices to provide support on the Social Security 1-800 number. The beginning of that month was also the last time the government updated a site showing call wait times, dismaying observers. 'The 1-800 number — they do offer a critical role at the agency, but it's triage, whereas customer service representatives actually clear work for the agency,' Jessica LaPointe, president of Council 220 of the American Federation of Government Employees, told The Washington Post at the time. The move created what she called a 'vicious cycle of work not getting cleared, people calling for status on work that's sitting because the claims specialists now are going to have to pick up the slack of the customer service representatives that are redeployed to the tele-service centers.' Benefit recipients have complained of declining service. "Whatever cuts they're making or whatever they're doing — I've dealt with Social Security before, and I never had these long wait times," 72-year-old Robert Zeidler previously told Business Insider. "You have to go through some major hoops to get anything done." The administration has already abandoned some Trump-era initiatives. In July, it announced it was rolling back a plan to limit telephone-based service for four routine processes like reporting a change in address or getting tax documents, after an outcry that moving to more online-based systems could hinder access for less technologically savvy seniors on Social Security. That month, Social Security also backed off a plan to ' as a means to pressure them out of the country.

If Trump is finally ‘done' with Putin, a new dimension of uncertainty opens up
If Trump is finally ‘done' with Putin, a new dimension of uncertainty opens up

The Independent

time27 minutes ago

  • The Independent

If Trump is finally ‘done' with Putin, a new dimension of uncertainty opens up

In a remarkably calm and candid interview with the BBC's Gary O'Donoghue a few weeks ago, Donald Trump was asked if he was 'done' with Vladimir Putin. The president replied directly: 'I'm not done with him, but I'm disappointed in him.' A week later, as if to prove the point, President Trump announced a 50-day deadline for Mr Putin to end the war. Last week, with zero response from the Kremlin and continued attacks on Ukrainian civilians, that deadline was brought forward to the end of this week, and Mr Trump sent his personal envoy, Steve Witkoff, to Moscow. There is no immediate sign that Mr Witkoff has achieved any kind of breakthrough with the Russian leader. Mr Trump's patience with the Russians, previously seeming irrationally inexhaustible, must be wearing extremely thin. It may be that, much against his intentions both in the campaign last year and in his diplomacy during his first term, President Trump may well be soon 'done' with Mr Putin. That opens up a whole new dimension of uncertainty. Having, in effect, made the US 'switch sides' in the war on Ukraine to the consternation of Nato allies, could it be that Mr Trump will come full circle and back President Zelensky, a man he roundly abused in that shameful incident in the Oval Office in February? With the capricious Mr Trump, it is hard to tell. It is unlikely that he'll change his view that the war is futile, that Ukraine cannot win, and that he does not want American money or, still less, personnel, committed to yet another 'forever war'. But that does not mean he is going to adopt a stance of neutrality. He has been willing to ship substantial quantities of armaments to Ukraine, albeit with European allies paying for them – and the minerals deal does give America some material stake in the survival of Ukraine. Moreover, Mr Trump – increasingly resentful about the Kremlin rebuffing his overtures and Mr Putin stringing him along – has threatened further sanctions on Russia, where once he was eager to drop them and build closer trade links with Russia (in a stark contrast with policy towards America's closest allies and the rest of the world). He is presently engaged in a trade war and war of words with the Indian government about its open willingness to buy Russian oil and, thus, fund Russia's war machine. This new pressure on third parties, including China, goes much further than President Biden's policy, and does indeed put America closer onside with what Kyiv wishes it to do. Tariffs are an offensive and self-defeating weapon in economic terms, but in the diplomatic context they can prove highly effective. Neither India nor China should want to lose access to the US market merely to prop up Mr Putin's stumbling economy. Some analysts think that, with increasing isolation, Russia could be bust within months. Should Mr Trump have a strategic purpose, it should be to stay out of the Ukraine conflict militarily but still to seek to bring the fighting to an end. That is easiest done by making the Russian war machine bankrupt. In such circumstances, President Putin will be much more willing to agree to a ceasefire and restart talks. Without such pressure, the rational thing for the Russians to do is to press on with their 'meat-grinder', making slow but gradual territorial gains, leveraging their advantage in manpower and the assistance of powers such as China, Iran and North Korea. It may not be a coincidence that Saudi Arabia led Opec in boosting fossil fuel production, lowering global prices and reducing the value of Russian exports – illicit or otherwise. President Trump may also soon subscribe to the European cap on the price of Russian oil purchases and take a more aggressive stance towards Russia's 'shadow fleet' of unregistered tankers that are used to ferry oil into international markets and avoid sanctions. They are hard to trace, but not invisible, and can be impounded. At any rate, his Ukraine policy has proved a failure for Mr Trump. CNN has counted 53 occasions, dating back to 2023, when Mr Trump claimed that he would end the war in Ukraine within 24 hours, or the like, and he has obviously not even begun to do so. More recently, he claimed that he meant it 'figuratively', as a deliberate, purposeful exaggeration. Some doubt that – but there is little prospect for any kind of peace unless Mr Trump decisively steps up the pressure on Mr Putin. 'Peace through strength' is another of Mr Trump's favourite sayings, but it has not always been lived up to. This time he needs to mean it.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store