Trump-Putin meeting: How much territory does Russia control in Ukraine?
The leaders are expected to discuss 'land swapping', suggesting that Trump may support an agreement where Russia will maintain control of some of the Ukrainian territory it currently occupies, but not all.
In a news conference at the White House on Tuesday, Trump said, 'Russia's occupied a big portion of Ukraine. They occupied prime territory. We're going to try to get some of that territory back for Ukraine.'
But the idea of a swap also suggests that Ukraine might need to give up some land that it currently controls.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has repeatedly said that any deal involving the ceding of Ukrainian land to Russia would be unsuccessful.
What does Putin want?
Last month, Trump warned that tougher sanctions would be put in place unless Russia halted fighting with Ukraine within 50 days. That deadline has now passed, and no new measures have hit Moscow, but the US has imposed 50 percent tariffs on India to punish it for its continued purchase of Russian oil.
Trump has demanded that Putin agree to a ceasefire on Friday to avoid the US imposing further tariffs on other countries buying Russian energy assets.
Putin has stated that he wants full control of Ukraine's eastern regions, including Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhia and Kherson, parts of which Russia annexed in 2022, along with Crimea, which it annexed in 2014.
If Kyiv were to agree, it would mean withdrawing troops from parts of Luhansk and Donetsk, where much of the recent fighting has been concentrated.
Bloomberg reported on August 8 that US and Russian officials were working towards an agreement that would 'freeze the war', and allow Moscow to keep the territory it has taken.
In addition, Putin has consistently demanded that Ukraine remain a neutral state, abandoning its ambitions to join NATO.
Can Ukraine even cede territory?
Ukraine giving up land it has lost during this war and previously, in 2014, is not a welcome option.
On Saturday, Zelenskyy said that he would not 'gift' land to Russia, and that Ukrainians would not give up their land to Russian occupiers.
More than this, ceding any territory would be illegal under the Ukrainian constitution.
How much of Ukraine does Russia control?
Russia occupies about one-fifth – 114,500 square km (44,600 square miles) – of Ukraine's land.
The active front line stretches some 1,000km (620 miles) through the regions of Kharkiv, Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhia and Kherson.
Russia controls about three-quarters of the Zaporizhia and Kherson regions.
Additionally, small parts of the Kharkiv, Sumy, Mykolaiv and Dnipropetrovsk regions of Ukraine are under Russian occupation. Across the Sumy and Kharkiv regions, Russia controls about 400 sq km (154 sq miles) of territory. In Dnipropetrovsk, Russia has taken a tiny area near the border.
Russia controls about 46,570 sq km (17,981 sq miles), or 88 percent, of the territory known as Donbas, made up of the Luhansk and Donbas regions. Russia occupies almost all of Luhansk and three-quarters of Donetsk.
Ukraine still holds about 6,600 sq km (2,550 sq miles) of Donbas, although Russia has been focusing most of its energy along the front in Donetsk, pushing towards the last remaining major cities not in its control.
This has been part of its efforts to secure what is known as the 'fortress belt'.
What is the fortress belt?
The 'fortress belt' stretches some 50km (31 miles) along a strategic highway between the towns of Kostiantynivka and Sloviansk.
The fortress belt includes key towns — Sloviansk, Kramatorsk, Druzhkivka, Oleksiyevo-Druzhkivka and Kostiantynivka – which have remained under the control of Ukrainian troops since 2014 and are of significant strategic importance as logistical and administrative centre.
Attempts by Russian troops to capture Sloviansk and the cities of the fortress belt in 2022-2023 were unsuccessful, and Ukrainian counteroffensives drove the Russian forces far from key positions.
'Ukraine's fortress belt has served as a major obstacle to the Kremlin's territorial ambitions in Ukraine over the last 11 years,' the Washington, DC-based think tank Institute for the Study of War (ISW) reported on August 8.
Russian advances: What's the situation on the ground now?
In August, Russian forces made significant gains, advancing about 10km (6 miles) beyond the front lines as they intensified efforts to seize the fortress belt from the southwest, concentrating forces in the Toretsk and eastern Pokrovsk directions.
Al Jazeera military expert Alex Gatapoulous said, 'I'm not sure what Ukraine has to offer in terms of territory. Russia has it all and is slowly winning this conflict, albeit at a great cost.
'There is already movement around Pokrovsk in the east, and Konstantinivka is also in danger of encirclement. If Ukraine hasn't built defensive positions in-depth, Russian forces will have the ability to break out into open country. This is a really dangerous time for Ukraine. They've lost all the Russian territory they had taken in Kursk and have little to trade with.'
How has the war progressed over the past three years?
In the war's early weeks, Russia advanced from the north, east and south, rapidly seizing vast areas of Ukrainian territory, with fierce battles in Irpin, Bucha and Mariupol – the latter of which fell to Russian forces in May 2022. The siege of Mariupol was one of the deadliest and most destructive battles of the war. Ukrainian officials estimated tens of thousands of civilian deaths.
By March 2022, Russian forces seized the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant, the largest in Europe, and by April of that year, Russia controlled 27 percent of Ukraine.
By late 2022, Ukraine had turned the tide with major counteroffensives in Kharkiv and Kherson, with Kyiv reclaiming 54 percent of the land Russia had captured since the beginning of the war, according to ISW data, reducing Russian-occupied land to just 18 percent of the country.
In August 2024, Ukraine launched a significant incursion into Russia's Kursk region, marking a notable escalation in the conflict. This offensive saw Ukrainian forces advancing approximately 10km (6 miles) into Russian territory, seizing control over an estimated 250 sq km (96.5 sq miles), all of which has since been retaken by Russia.
By late 2024 and into 2025, the war had settled into a grinding impasse, with both sides suffering heavy losses. However, Russia's recent incursions, pushing towards Sloviansk, allude to the potential for another offensive to take land it has historically struggled to capture.
What was the pre-war situation?
Prior to Russia's full-scale 2022 invasion of Ukraine, Russia had held Crimea, which it annexed from Ukraine in 2014.
Moscow also supported separatists in the Donbas region, leading to the creation of the self-declared Donetsk and Luhansk People's Republics. Russia officially recognised these entities on February 21, 2022, and launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine three days later.
The war in Ukraine has resulted in one of the largest and fastest-growing displacement crises in Europe since World War II. According to the UN, approximately 10 million Ukrainians have been displaced, which is about 21 percent of the country's pre-war population.
Of these, 3.7 million remain internally displaced within Ukraine, while 6.9 million have fled abroad as refugees.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
an hour ago
- Al Jazeera
Russia-Ukraine war: List of key events, day 1,269
Here is how things stand on Saturday, August 16: Fighting The Ukrainian military said that it struck the Syzran oil refinery in Russia's Samara region overnight, reporting a fire and explosions at the refinery, which it said produces a range of fuels and is one of the biggest in Russian energy company Rosneft's system. The Ukrainian military also said it struck the port of Olya in Russia's Astrakhan region, hitting a ship transporting drone parts and ammunition from Iran. Russia is preparing to test its new nuclear-capable, nuclear-powered cruise missile and, if successful, plans to use the results to bolster its negotiating position with the West, Ukrainian military intelligence said. Ukrainian regional officials said Russia fired a ballistic missile into the Dnipropetrovsk region in eastern Ukraine, killing one person and wounding at least one other, while a drone damaged civilian infrastructure and caused a fire in the Sumy region in the northeast. Russian troops also took control of the settlement of Oleksandrohrad in the Donetsk region of eastern Ukraine, Moscow's Ministry of Defence said. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy criticised Russia for continuing to attack Ukraine in advance of the meeting in Alaska between United States President Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin. 'On the day of the negotiations, they also kill people. And that says a lot,' Zelenskyy said. Alaska summit Trump and Putin held their much-anticipated meeting in the Alaskan city of Anchorage, with the Russian leader receiving the red carpet treatment and a US military flyover as he deplaned. Both leaders provided brief statements to reporters after the shorter-than-expected meeting, which failed to achieve its primary goal – a deal bringing an end to Russia's war in Ukraine. Speaking to reporters after the meeting, Putin said his country is committed to ending the war, but the conflict's 'primary causes' must be eliminated. Putin also warned Ukraine and its European allies not to throw a 'wrench in the works' and cautioned against attempts to use 'backroom dealings to conduct provocations to torpedo the nascent progress'. Trump praised the 'extremely productive meeting', in which he said 'many points were agreed to'. He conceded, however, that there remain sticking points with Moscow, including at least one 'significant' one. Trump said he would call NATO officials and President Zelenskyy to discuss the meeting, and cautioned that 'there's no deal until there's a deal'. As Trump thanked Putin for his time, he said he hoped they would meet again soon. Putin quickly responded by saying, in English with a laugh, 'Next time, in Moscow' – a proposal which Trump appeared reticent to accept. Speaking to Fox News later, Trump said Zelenskyy and Putin intend to set up another meeting to try to reach a ceasefire. He also emphasised that it is up to the Ukrainian leader to 'get it done'. New consultations aimed at resolving points of tension in bilateral relations between Russia and the US will take place soon, said Russia's ambassador to the US, Alexander Darchiev, according to the RIA Novosti state news agency. International aid USAID is concerned that the Trump administration's cancellation of independent aid monitoring contracts for Ukraine has increased the risk of waste, fraud and abuse, according to the Department of State, Pentagon and USAID inspectors general in a new report. Norway's government said it was donating one billion kroner ($98.29m) to Ukraine for the purchase of natural gas ahead of winter. Ukraine had been forced to increase gas imports after Russian missile attacks damaged production facilities in the east of the country.
Al Jazeera
an hour ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump-Putin meeting: Key takeaways from Alaska summit
In the lead-up to his much-touted Friday summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin, United States President Donald Trump expressed confidence in his ability to make concrete progress towards securing a ceasefire in Ukraine at the meeting. Putin received the red carpet treatment as he was met with a lengthy handshake by Trump as he deplaned at the Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson military facility in the Alaskan city of Anchorage. The warm greeting set a congenial tone for what were always going to be tough negotiations. But there was a more subdued atmosphere a few hours later as Trump and Putin departed on their respective planes – with no clear breakthrough on the war in Ukraine. Here are some key takeaways from their meeting: 'No deal until there's a deal' While the meeting was anticipated to take about seven hours, it wrapped up in less than three. Trump and Putin addressed a gathering of journalists after the talks with relatively brief pre-prepared statements. Neither leader took any questions. Putin said his country is committed to ending the war, but the conflict's 'primary causes' must be eliminated for an agreement to be long-lasting. Putin also warned Ukraine and the European Union against throwing a 'wrench in the works' and cautioned against attempts to use 'backroom dealings to conduct provocations to torpedo the nascent progress'. A relatively subdued Trump praised the 'extremely productive meeting', in which he said 'many points were agreed to'. He said there is a 'very good chance of getting there' – referring to a ceasefire – but conceded that there remain sticking points with Moscow, including at least one 'significant' one. He cautioned that it's 'ultimately up to them' – referring to Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. 'There's no deal until there's a deal,' he said. And there was none by the time Trump and Putin left Alaska. A PR coup for Putin The Russian leader has become an increasingly maligned and isolated figure in the West since waging war on Ukraine in February 2022. But on Friday, that ended, with a red carpet welcome, a flypast by US fighter jets and warm applause from Trump. Putin himself seemed pleased, grinning out the window as he drove off the tarmac with Trump in the presidential Cadillac limousine known as 'The Beast'. 'For three years they [Western media] have been talking about Russia's isolation, and today they saw the red carpet that greeted the Russian president in the United States,' Maria Zakharova, spokesperson for the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, gloated after the summit, on Telegram. Talking business Before the meeting, it was widely anticipated that Putin would attempt to dilute peace talks with talk of bilateral trade and cooperation. Trump had asserted that there would be no discussion of business with Putin until the pair had made substantive progress on bringing about a ceasefire in Ukraine. This plan, however, seems to have been derailed somewhat, with the Russian president saying in his post-meeting statement that the pair discussed their collaboration in the areas of tech and space. 'It's clear that US and Russian investment and business cooperation has tremendous potential. Russia and the US can offer each other so much. In trade, digital, high-tech and in space exploration, [and] we see that Arctic cooperation is also very possible,' he told reporters. Russia has previously tried to pitch its vast reserves of rare earth minerals – critical for several cutting edge sectors – to the US to broker a breakthrough. Next up: Another meeting – and pressure on Ukraine As Trump thanked Putin for his time, he said he hoped they would meet again soon. Putin quickly responded by saying, in English with a laugh, 'Next time, in Moscow'. 'I'll get a little heat on that one, but I could see it possibly happening,' he said in response. Trump has previously asserted that he hopes to host a trilateral meeting on ending the war in Ukraine very soon, this time attended by Ukraine's Zelenskyy, too. In Alaska, the US leader said he would now call NATO officials and Zelenskyy to discuss the meeting. In an interview with Fox News' Sean Hannity after the meeting, Trump was asked how he rated the summit on a scale of 10. He described the meet as a '10 out of 10'. 'We got along great,' he said. Then, he emphasised the importance of the Ukrainian leader agreeing to a deal. 'Now, it's really up to President Zelenskyy to get it done. And I would also say the European nations, they have to get involved a little bit. But it's up to President Zelenskyy,' he said, adding that he'll attend the next meeting 'if they'd like'. 'Make a deal,' he said, in a message apparently for Zelenskyy.
Al Jazeera
an hour ago
- Al Jazeera
Why is South Africa's army chief under fire for backing Iran?
South African Army Chief General Rudzani Maphwanya is facing backlash in his home country following the release of alleged comments he made during an official visit to Iran, which analysts say could further complicate the already turbulent relations between South Africa and the United States. The comments, which appeared to suggest that Iran and South Africa have common military goals, come at a time when Pretoria is attempting to mend strained relations with US President Donald Trump to stabilise trade. Last week, a 30 percent trade tariff on South African goods entering the US kicked in, alarming business owners in the country. That's despite President Cyril Ramaphosa's attempts to appease Trump, including by leading a delegation to the White House in May. Here's what to know about what the army chief said and why there's backlash for it: What did the army chief say in Iran? Meeting with his Iranian counterpart, Major-General Seyyed Abdolrahim Mousavi in Tehran on Tuesday, Maphwanya is reported to have stated that the two countries had close ties, according to Iran's state news agency, Press TV and the Tehran Times. 'Commander Maphwanya, recalling Iran's historical support for South Africa's anti-apartheid struggle, stated that these ties have forged a lasting bond between the two nations,' the Press TV article read. According to Tehran Times, he went on to say: 'The Republic of South Africa and the Islamic Republic of Iran have common goals. We always stand alongside the oppressed and defenceless people of the world.' Maphwanya also reportedly condemned Israel's 'bombing of civilians standing in line for food' and its 'ongoing aggression in the occupied West Bank', Tehran Times reported. His visit, the publication quoted Maphwanya as saying, 'carries a political message', and comes 'at the best possible time to express our heartfelt sentiments to the peace-loving people of Iran'. On the other hand, General Mousavi hailed South Africa's genocide case against the 'Zionist regime' at the International Court of Justice, and said that the effort was aligned with Iran's policies, according to Press TV. He also condemned the US and Israel's military and economic actions against Iran as 'violations of international laws and norms'. He added that Iran's army is prepared to deliver 'a more decisive response in the event of renewed aggression', Press TV reported. How has the South African government reacted? President Cyril Ramaphosa's office on Thursday clarified that the president was not aware of General Maphwanya's visit to Iran, although such a trip would normally be approved by the Ministry of Defence, not the president's office. Ramaphosa appointed Maphwanya as army chief in 2021. The general, in apartheid-era South Africa, served in the army wing of the African National Congress (ANC), which started as a liberation movement, and commanded a parliamentary majority until 2024. Presidency spokesperson Vincent Magwenya, at a press briefing, said the general's decision to visit Iran was itself badly timed. 'At this period of heightened geopolitical tensions and conflict in the Middle East, one can say the visit was ill-advised, and more so, the general should have been a lot more circumspect with the comments he makes.' He added, 'We are in the delicate process of resetting political relations with the US, but more importantly, balancing the trade relationship in such a manner that the trade relationship is mutually beneficial.' Similarly, the Ministry of International Relations and the Defence Ministry dissociated the government from the army chief's alleged comments. 'It is unfortunate that political and policy statements were reportedly made…The minister of defence and military veterans [Matsie Angelina Motshekga] will be engaging with General Maphwanya on his return,' a statement by the Defence Ministry on Wednesday read. Meanwhile, the Democratic Alliance (DA) party, one of the four parties that form the South African coalition government, is calling for the army chief to be tried in a military court on grounds of 'gross misconduct and a flagrant breach of the SANDF [South African National Defence Force] Code of Conduct.' 'According to Iranian state media, General Maphwanya went far beyond his constitutional and professional mandate, pledging 'common goals' with Iran, endorsing its stance on Gaza, and calling for deeper strategic alignment,' the DA said in a statement on Thursday. 'Such political statements are explicitly prohibited for serving officers, violate the SANDF's duty of political neutrality, and undermine the constitutional principle of civilian control over the military,' the party added. Why is there backlash over the alleged comments? The US and South Africa's relations are at their lowest in decades, making this a particularly sensitive time, analysts say, as it follows June's 12-day war between Iran and the US-Israel coalition. President Trump slapped a 30 percent tariff on South African goods entering the US as part of his wide-ranging reciprocal tariff wars in April. The US is a major destination for South African goods such as cars, precious metals and wine. Trump's main gripes with Pretoria include South Africa instigating a genocide case against Israel, the US's ally, at the International Court of Justice, amid the ongoing war in Gaza. He earlier accused South Africa of strengthening ties with Iran. Trump has also wrongly claimed that white South Africans are being persecuted in the country under the majority Black leadership of the ANC, the country's main political party to which President Ramaphosa belongs. He also claims South Africa is confiscating land belonging to whites. White South Africans are a wealthy minority and largely descendants of Dutch settlers. Afrikaner governments controlled the country under the racist apartheid system until 1990. South African wealth, particularly land, continues to be controlled disproportionately by the country's white population. In recent times, fringe, extremist Afrikaner groups claiming that whites are being targeted by Black people have emerged, pointing to cases of white farmers being attacked by criminals on their farmland. Elon Musk, Trump's one-time adviser before their public fallout in June, had also made claims of white persecution and claimed that the South African government's business laws were blocking his internet company from operating in the country. He was referring to laws requiring that foreign businesses be partly owned by Blacks or other historically disadvantaged groups, such as people living with disabilities. The South African government denied Musk's accusations. In early May, Trump's government admitted 59 white 'refugees' in a resettlement programme meant to protect them. Previously, the US, under former President Joe Biden, was at loggerheads with South Africa over its close ties with Russia and its vocal criticism of Israel. The latest incident echoes a 2022 scandal when a sanctioned Russian cargo ship called the Lady R docked at Simon's Town Naval Base in the Western Cape, said analyst Chris Vandome of think tank Chatham House. The US alleged at the time that South African military supplies were loaded onto the ship and used in the Ukraine war, claims South Africa denied. 'It lies with South African foreign policy formation and the lack of clarity and consistency around it that has created this confusion whereby people think they are saying things in line with what the nation thinks,' he said. How has South Africa tried to appease the US? On May 21, President Ramaphosa led a delegation to the White House in a bid to 'reset relations' with Trump and hopefully secure lower tariff deals. At the heated meeting, however, Trump refused to back down from his claims of white persecution, despite Ramaphosa clarifying that South Africa was facing widespread crime in general, and that there was no evidence that whites in particular were being targeted. South Africa, during the meeting, offered to buy US liquefied natural gas and invest $3.3bn in US industries in exchange for lower tariffs. The delegation also agreed to a review of the country's business ownership laws. However, Trump's 30 percent tariffs went into effect last week. Analysts say it could put up to 30,000 South African jobs at risk, particularly in the manufacturing and agricultural sectors. Meanwhile, Ramaphosa's government promised to take further action to ease the burden on manufacturers and exporters. On Tuesday, Trade Minister Parks Tau told reporters that South Africa has submitted a revised proposal to Washington, without giving details. General Maphwanya's pronouncements this week, therefore, 'couldn't have come at a worse time' for South African diplomatic ties with the US, security analyst Jakkie Cilliers of the International Security Institute said, speaking to South African state TV, SABC. 'For the chief of the national defence force to pronounce so clearly and so unequivocally at this time is remarkably politically sensitive,' Cilliers said, adding that the general could be asked to resign upon his return. What has General Maphwanya said? Maphwanya, who the presidency said has returned to the country, has not put out public statements on the controversy. It is unclear how the government might sanction him. President Ramaphosa is set to meet with the army chief for briefings in the coming weeks, a presidency spokesperson said.
