BP set for shareholder clash over climate goals as AGM season kicks off
BP is set for a clash between shareholders over its climate goals as the season for annual general meetings (AGM) kicks off.
The oil major's board is likely to face conflicting pressures during the meeting at its Sunbury-on-Thames hub on Thursday, with some investors backing a bigger slowdown in climate action while others protest against its recent retreat.
BP announced a drastic shift away from investing in renewables in favour of more oil and gas earlier this year, claiming that it went 'too far, too fast' on green energy.
Some shareholders had pushed for a refocus on fossil fuels in a bid to boost its profits and share price that have lagged behind its rivals.
BP's AGM opens a proxy season that could be overshadowed by uncertainty after US President Donald Trump's election accelerated corporate America's shift away from environment, social and governance (ESG) principles and encouraged energy giants to focus more on fossil fuels.
On the other hand, the UK energy giant's recent green retreat has angered environmental groups and contradicts guidance by global energy bodies designed to help limit climate change.
A group of 48 institutional investors recently also criticised the firm for not offering a direct vote on the oil major's revised strategy.
In protest, some shareholders are expected to vote against the resolution to reappoint chairman Helge Lund on Thursday as a way of expressing their dissatisfaction with the revised strategy.
Mr Lund, who played a key role in setting BP's green agenda, recently announced he will step down in 'due course' as the company plots a new course.
Given his impending departure, Tarek Bouhouch, from activist group Follow This, said a vote against the reappointment would have a 'sole ESG purpose' and send a 'strong signal'.
'BP has made a hasty, we even say panic-mode, U-turn on their climate promises,' he told the PA news agency.
'It took them a couple of weeks to scrub clear their five-year-old pledges.'
Follow This is not filing its usual climate resolutions at oil majors this year following political ESG setbacks and legal threats – having been sued by US giant ExxonMobil last year.
'We decided not to file amid a lot of uncertainty with regards to shareholders' rights and the economic fundamentals that are (being) debated and have had a chilling effect on the engagement for 2025,' Mr Bouhouch said.
Follow This instead hopes the oppose vote will reach at least 10%, marking a record high for opposition to board member reappointments at UK oil majors in at least the last decade.
Meanwhile, the decision not to file a shareholder resolution is part of a wider slowdown in activism this year.
Investors pressing companies on ESG matters filed a total of 355 shareholder proposals as of February 21 – down from 536 filed at the same point in 2024 and 542 filed at the same point in 2023, according to a report from activist group As You Sow.
Penny Fowler, co-director of corporate engagement at ShareAction, said that this proxy season responsible investors 'are rightly concerned about what the long-term financial risks of compounding climate change (are) and are asking that these powerful companies play their part in preventing the worst effects of global heating'.
'Communities around the world are grappling with the snowballing of harmful impacts from our changing climate, from super-storms to extreme heat and drought,' she said.
Back in 2020, BP announced some of the most ambitious goals among fossil fuel companies to cut oil and gas production by 40% by 2030 and invest heavily in renewables.
However, BP has said it now wants to increase its production to between 2.3 million and 2.5 million barrels of oil per day by 2030.
According to the International Energy Agency, no new fossil fuel projects are compatible with limiting global warming to 1.5C compared with pre-industrial levels, a goal adopted by most of the international community.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
3 Reasons GIS is Risky and 1 Stock to Buy Instead
Over the last six months, General Mills's shares have sunk to $54.81, producing a disappointing 17.1% loss while the S&P 500 was flat. This was partly due to its softer quarterly results and may have investors wondering how to approach the situation. Is now the time to buy General Mills, or should you be careful about including it in your portfolio? Get the full breakdown from our expert analysts, it's free. Even with the cheaper entry price, we're sitting this one out for now. Here are three reasons why there are better opportunities than GIS and a stock we'd rather own. Revenue growth can be broken down into changes in price and volume (the number of units sold). While both are important, volume is the lifeblood of a successful staples business as there's a ceiling to what consumers will pay for everyday goods; they can always trade down to non-branded products if the branded versions are too expensive. General Mills's average quarterly sales volumes have shrunk by 1.6% over the last two years. This decrease isn't ideal because the quantity demanded for consumer staples products is typically stable. When analyzing revenue growth, we care most about organic revenue growth. This metric captures a business's performance excluding one-time events such as mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures as well as foreign currency fluctuations. The demand for General Mills's products has barely risen over the last eight quarters. On average, the company's organic sales have been flat. Forecasted revenues by Wall Street analysts signal a company's potential. Predictions may not always be accurate, but accelerating growth typically boosts valuation multiples and stock prices while slowing growth does the opposite. Over the next 12 months, sell-side analysts expect General Mills's revenue to drop by 4.3%, a decrease from This projection is underwhelming and indicates its products will face some demand challenges. General Mills isn't a terrible business, but it isn't one of our picks. Following the recent decline, the stock trades at 12.9× forward P/E (or $54.81 per share). While this valuation is reasonable, we don't really see a big opportunity at the moment. We're fairly confident there are better stocks to buy right now. We'd suggest looking at one of our top software and edge computing picks. Market indices reached historic highs following Donald Trump's presidential victory in November 2024, but the outlook for 2025 is clouded by new trade policies that could impact business confidence and growth. While this has caused many investors to adopt a "fearful" wait-and-see approach, we're leaning into our best ideas that can grow regardless of the political or macroeconomic climate. Take advantage of Mr. Market by checking out our Top 9 Market-Beating Stocks. This is a curated list of our High Quality stocks that have generated a market-beating return of 183% over the last five years (as of March 31st 2025). Stocks that made our list in 2020 include now familiar names such as Nvidia (+1,545% between March 2020 and March 2025) as well as under-the-radar businesses like the once-micro-cap company Tecnoglass (+1,754% five-year return). Find your next big winner with StockStory today. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Where Could Air Canada Stock Be in 5 Years?
Written by Andrew Button at The Motley Fool Canada Air Canada (TSX:AC) stock has been taking a beating in recent years. In 2020, in the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, the stock fell all the way from $54 to $12, as the travel restrictions in that period caused the company's revenue to decline 80%. The company's stock later rallied when the first COVID vaccine was announced, but subsequently gave up the gains for reasons that are less clear. Today, Air Canada is in a much better place than it was in 2020. It's profitable. It has repaid much of its debt. Its revenue has recovered to its pre-COVID level and then some. Nevertheless, at around $19, AC stock is still nowhere near its pre-COVID stock price. What's going on here? There are a few lingering issues for Air Canada that have investors worrying about the stock, even though the underlying company is in a much better place than it was before the crash. The question is, why the apparent discrepancy? In this article, I will explore the reasons why Air Canada stock is still at a relatively low level and why I think it will be at a higher one in five years' time. One reason why some investors are concerned about Air Canada is because of the large amounts of capital expenditures (CAPEX) the company is undertaking in the next three years. CAPEX refers to spending on fixed assets like property, plant and equipment. In the case of an airline, it mainly refers to spending on new aircraft. Air Canada expects $3.4 billion in CAPEX in 2025, $4.3 billion in 2026, and $4.9 billion in 2027. After 2027, the CAPEX spend is expected to decline. The amounts of CAPEX above are fairly large. Notably, they exceed the company's past amounts of free cash flow, seeming to imply that Air Canada will be cash flow negative in the years ahead. Is this CAPEX such a big risk for Air Canada? In my opinion, no. Airplanes tend to be in service for decades, meaning that a lot of CAPEX now does not mean a lot of CAPEX in the future. Also, Air Canada's revenue has far surpassed levels seen in past years, so unprecedented CAPEX does not necessarily mean chronic cash burn. Overall, I don't think Air Canada's CAPEX is going to ruin the company. Another reason why people are concerned about Air Canada is because of Donald Trump's trade wars. Earlier this year, Trump slapped a 25% tariff on Canada, ostensibly to counter the flow of fentanyl into the United States. In response, many Canadians pledged to cancel vacations to the United States. Later, data collection firms reported that Canada-U.S. air travel did decline — one story claimed by as much as 70%. Air Canada said that it saw an impact but denied that its U.S. travel hours went down by 70%. Again, this strikes me as not that big of a risk. Canadians are most likely replacing U.S. travel with inter-provincial travel and overseas travel. Air Canada's most recent earnings release confirms this: revenue was stable year-over-year, and free cash flow was positive. On the whole, Air Canada looks like a bargain at 8.8 times earnings and 1.6 times operating cash flow. I think it will be worth more in five years' time than it is today. The post Where Could Air Canada Stock Be in 5 Years? appeared first on The Motley Fool Canada. More reading Made in Canada: 5 Homegrown Stocks Ready for the 'Buy Local' Revolution [PREMIUM PICKS] Market Volatility Toolkit Best Canadian Stocks to Buy in 2025 Beginner Investors: 4 Top Canadian Stocks to Buy for 2025 5 Years From Now, You'll Probably Wish You Grabbed These Stocks Subscribe to Motley Fool Canada on YouTube Fool contributor Andrew Button has positions in Air Canada. The Motley Fool recommends Air Canada. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 2025
Hamilton Spectator
25 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Marines temporarily detain man while guarding LA federal building
LOS ANGELES (AP) — Shortly after they began guarding a Los Angeles federal building Friday, U.S. Marines detained a man who had walked onto the property and did not immediately hear their commands to stop. The brief detention marked the first time federal troops have detained a civilian since they were deployed to the nation's second-largest city by President Donald Trump in response to protests over the administration's immigration arrests. The Marines were activated earlier this week but began their duties Friday. The man, Marcos Leao, was later released without charges and said the Marines were just doing their jobs. A U.S. Army North spokesperson said the troops have the authority to temporarily detain people under specific circumstances. He said those detentions end when the person can be transferred to 'appropriate civilian law enforcement personnel.' Leao's detention shows how the troops' deployment is putting them closer to carrying out law enforcement actions. Already, National Guard soldiers have been providing security on raids as Trump has promised as part of his immigration crackdown . Leao, a former Army combat engineer, said he was rushing to get to a Veterans Affairs appointment when he stepped past a piece of caution tape outside the federal building. He looked up to find a Marine sprinting toward him. 'I had my headphones in, so I didn't hear them,' Leao said. 'They told me to get down on the ground. I basically complied with everything they were saying.' Leao was placed in zip ties and held for more than two hours by the Marines and members of the National Guard, he said. After Los Angeles police arrived, he was released without charges, he said. The Los Angeles Police Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. 'I didn't know it was going to be this intense here,' he said later. A U.S. official told the AP that a civilian had stepped over the line. He was warned they would take him down and they did, according to the official, who requested anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter. About 200 Marines out of the 700 deployed arrived in the city Friday, joining 2,000 members of the National Guard that have been stationed outside federal buildings this week in Los Angeles. Another 2,000 Guard members were notified of deployment earlier this week. Before the unusual deployment, the Pentagon scrambled to establish rules to guide U.S. Marines who could be faced with the rare and difficult prospect of using force against citizens on American soil. The forces have been trained in de-escalation, crowd control and standing rules for the use of force, the military has said. But the use of the active-duty forces still raises difficult questions. 'I believe that this is an inevitable precursor of things yet to come when you put troops with guns right next to civilians who are doing whatever they do,' said Gary Solis, a former Marine Corps. prosecutor and military judge. He said it's an example of Trump's attempt to unravel the Posse Comitatus Act, which bars active-duty forces from conducting law enforcement. ___ Watson reported from San Diego and Baldor from Washington. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
