Tom Hiddleston expecting second child as partner Zawe Ashton reveals baby bump at UK premiere of ‘The Life of Chuck'
Actors Zawe Ashton and Tom Hiddleston are preparing to welcome their second child. The couple confirmed the news on Saturday, June 7, with Ashton revealing her pregnancy in a feature for Vogue.
The announcement came just ahead of the U.K. premiere of 'The Life of Chuck', Tom Hiddleston's latest film, which screened as part of SXSW London. Ashton accompanied him at the event, where she proudly showed her baby bump in a flowing sky-blue silk crepe gown by British designer Emilia Wickstead.
This marks the couple's second child together. Ashton, 40, and Hiddleston, 44, had their first baby in October 2022, following a public baby bump debut earlier that year during a screening of Ashton's film 'Mr. Malcolm's List'.
The pair first met in 2019 while performing together in 'Betrayal', a West End and Broadway play in which they starred opposite each other. Their off-stage relationship began soon after and became public in 2021 when they walked the red carpet at the Tony Awards. Zawe Ashton and Tom Hiddleston at the red carpet for the premiere of 'The Life of Chuck'.
Though both actors have kept much of their private life out of the spotlight, Hiddleston made a rare comment about their relationship in March 2022 during an interview with the 'Los Angeles Times', simply saying, 'I'm very happy.'
Ashton is known for her work on stage and in films, while Hiddleston continues to enjoy global recognition for his role as Loki in the Marvel Cinematic Universe.
Fans were delighted by the news of their growing family and praised the couple for keeping things graceful and grounded. With their second child on the way, Ashton and Hiddleston look set to continue balancing their high-profile careers with family life.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Tom Hiddleston expecting second child as wife Zawe Ashton reveals baby bump at UK premiere of ‘The Life of Chuck'
Actors Zawe Ashton and Tom Hiddleston are preparing to welcome their second child. The couple confirmed the news on Saturday, June 7, with Ashton revealing her pregnancy in a feature for Vogue. The announcement came just ahead of the U.K. premiere of 'The Life of Chuck', Tom Hiddleston's latest film, which screened as part of SXSW London. Ashton accompanied him at the event, where she proudly showed her baby bump in a flowing sky-blue silk crepe gown by British designer Emilia Wickstead. This marks the couple's second child together. Ashton, 40, and Hiddleston, 44, had their first baby in October 2022, following a public baby bump debut earlier that year during a screening of Ashton's film 'Mr. Malcolm's List'. The pair first met in 2019 while performing together in 'Betrayal', a West End and Broadway play in which they starred opposite each other. Their off-stage relationship began soon after and became public in 2021 when they walked the red carpet at the Tony Awards. Zawe Ashton and Tom Hiddleston at the red carpet for the premiere of 'The Life of Chuck'. Though both actors have kept much of their private life out of the spotlight, Hiddleston made a rare comment about their relationship in March 2022 during an interview with the 'Los Angeles Times', simply saying, 'I'm very happy.' Ashton is known for her work on stage and in films, while Hiddleston continues to enjoy global recognition for his role as Loki in the Marvel Cinematic Universe.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
John Hancock: America's unsung founding father and revolutionary mark
It is unlikely Hancock will be restored to the top tier of the founders, but remembering him better could reap dividends NYT JOHN HANCOCK: First to Sign, First to Invest in America's Independence by Willard Sterne Randall Published by Dutton 272 pages $34 When John Hancock scrawled his enormous signature at the bottom of the Declaration of Independence, it was a brave act; capture by the British might have meant execution. The musical 1776 has Hancock claiming that he wrote it out supersized 'so Fat George in London can read it without his glasses!' But despite his courage, Hancock remains a little hard to see. Unlike Adams and Jefferson, he did not leave extensive writings. Unlike Washington, he did not play a leading military role (though he longed to). Unlike all three of them, he did not make it to the presidency, but served as a precursor of sorts in the Continental Congress. These deficits have left their mark. Historians generally neglect Hancock when they write collective biographies of the founders, and there are no major monuments to him. There will be 250 statues in Donald Trump's National Garden of American Heroes that is supposed to be completed by July 4 next year. The actress Ingrid Bergman and the Jeopardy! host Alex Trebek have made the cut, but not the American who did more than most to define Independence Day. The Declaration of Independence may have been composed by a different founder, but, as the historian Willard Sterne Randall writes in John Hancock, it was Hancock who led the Second Continental Congress to appoint the committee that drafted it. He also raised funds for the Continental Army, oversaw shipbuilding efforts for the Navy and kept Congress together even as it fled Philadelphia when the British came too close for comfort. For all these reasons, it is welcome news to have a biography that presents a compelling case for a reappraisal. Randall tells the story of an 18th-century American who seemed preordained to follow the path of his father and grandfather into the ministry, but then swerved in another direction when his father died and a wealthy uncle offered to adopt him. At times, the narrative structure resembles the twists and turns of Henry Fielding's 1749 novel, Tom Jones, about a foundling with a hearty appetite for life. Tutored by his uncle, Hancock proved to have an exceptional nose for business. In the 1760s, as relations deteriorated between England and its American colonies, Hancock was on the front lines as a well-informed importer who understood the ways in which local tempers were flaring over tariffs on goods like paper and tea. As the English tightened the screws, he extended lines of credit to Boston's lesser merchants, a financial tie that meant the Massachusetts business community moved in lockstep with him when he wanted to pressure the Crown with a boycott. Randall also effectively conveys the real affection that bonded Hancock and his fellow Bostonians, whom he helped with purchases of firewood during particularly cold winters and fireworks displays when there was happier news to celebrate. His philanthropy earned him many friends, but his expensive tastes grated on more abstemious leaders like Samuel Adams. Hancock was elected to office, first locally, and then, when he assumed the presidency of the Continental Congress in May 1775, as a leader of the not-quite-United States. In 1777, exhausted, he requested a leave, and returned to Boston for a spell. After that, he never completely regained his national stature, although he served capably in local offices and helped Massachusetts survive its own internal fissures, including Shays' Rebellion in the 1780s. If the early Revolutionary period represented Hancock's apogee, he stayed true to the patriot cause for many years after. Unlike another financial genius who was rising at that moment — Alexander Hamilton — he was suspicious of a strong central government and yet he worked to secure the approval of the US Constitution in Massachusetts. Weakened by gout, he began to fade just as the country was coming together. For all of these reasons, Hamilton gets the $10 bill and the musical. Randall handles the arc of Hancock's life efficiently, but there remain unasked questions relating to slavery. There is some evidence that Hancock, as the governor of Massachusetts, impeded the extradition of people who had escaped bondage in the South and that he endorsed compensation for forced labour. The author does not investigate these subjects, nor does he linger over the way the peculiar institution might have helped bolster Hancock's inherited fortune. It is unlikely Hancock will be restored to the top tier of the founders, but remembering him better could reap dividends. With his financial acumen, propensity for dramatic gestures and flamboyant signature, he might appeal to the right, and a certain Sharpie-wielding president. With his respect for due process and democracy, and his direct support of those in need, he also represents values that might be associated with the left. To bring a divided people closer together, as he did in 1776, would be a good way to honour a founder who has been waiting a long time for his close-up.
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
King Charles 'livid' as favorite holiday tradition may be canceled
Image credits: Getty Images Imagine waiting for the holidays to be able to practice your favourite hobby and then getting the news that you won't be able to do that because of a certain reason. Disheartening, right? Well, it seems King Charles is sharing this emotion as his cherished pastime during the holiday season could be facing a cancellation. The Sun recently reported there is a potential shortage of pheasants at the king's Sandringham Estate and thus his chances of a full shooting calendar could be affected this winter. According to many, shooting is one of his favourite pastimes during the holiday season which might not be a part of this year's calendar. 'King Charles III is livid, frustrated and disappointed, reflecting both his deep personal attachment to the cherished family tradition and his broader commitment to his royal heritage,' said Hilary Fordwich, British royal expert to Fox News Digital. 'He's also annoyed that the mishap reflects rather poorly on the management of Sandringham, which he inherited from his mother, Queen Elizabeth II,' she explained. 'The shoot gathers his extended royal family and guests, reinforcing bonds while upholding a long-standing aristocratic tradition. The root of the problem is that Charles has always opposed importing birds from elsewhere, preferring to maintain the estate's game population. The eco-friendly approach has failed.' Image credits: Getty Images The tradition which serves as an occasion of gathering for friends and family is known as the Boxing Day shoot and is described as the central part of the royal family's holiday plans. However, due to the decreased number of birds the king who is suffering from an undisclosed form of cancer, might have to cancel it. 'Allegedly, King Charles is disappointed that one of his favourite Christmas family traditions may not take place this year,' added Helena Chard, British broadcaster and photographer. 'The Sandringham shoot is questionable due to a lack of Sandringham pheasants on the estate. It seems the family will have to bond, enjoy and celebrate over another hobby, or possibly clay pigeon shoots are the way forward.' While natural reasons might be the cause for the shortage of birds, according to The Sun, a long-serving gamekeeper who was responsible for managing the bird population was recently let go in a staff shake-up thus resulting in the lack of birds. 'It was a total cock-up,' a source claimed to the outlet. 'No birds, no bang, just red faces. The king wasn't having it.' According to Chard, the shortage might be for the better and make the king review the tradition which has been condemned by animal rights groups.
