
Australia's relations with Israel are lying in tatters
That was then. Now, Australia's Labor government, headed by left-wing prime minister Anthony Albanese, and his factional ally, foreign minister Penny Wong, are clear that their sympathies are no longer with Israel almost two years after the 7 October atrocities.
Last week's decision that Australia's government will recognise Palestine at next month's UN General Assembly session was message enough to Israel's prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, and his government. This week, however, the deterioration of relations between Canberra and Jerusalem went toxically further.
What a farce of tit-for-tat and name-calling
With almost no notice, Albanese's government cancelled the visa of Simcha Rothman, a senior right-wing member of Netanyahu's governing coalition and chairman of the Knesset's Constitution, Law and Justice committee. On Tuesday, Rothman was due to start a short speaking tour organised by the conservative Australian Jewish Association. According to the Association's chief executive, Robert Gregory, Rothman was to engage with and support the local Jewish community as it confronts rising anti-Semitism. His visa was applied for five weeks ago and approved ten days ago. If Rothman was going to be knocked back, Gregory told Australian TV, the visa should never have been issued.
Indeed, the exercise looks intended to make a political point. The Australian Department of Home Affairs cancelled Rothman's visa. In a long and detailed official statement of reasons, the bureaucratic decision-maker justified the decision, concluding:
I am satisfied that the visa holder's presence in Australia would or might be a risk to the good order of the Australian community or a segment of the Australian community – namely the Islamic community.
There's no question Rothman wouldn't be best friends with Australian Muslims. He is, after all, from one of Israel's conservative religious parties. Some of his public statements on the conflict in Gaza have been, to put it mildly, intemperate and robust, but it also appears that selective quotes on Gaza and Hamas were taken from Rothman's media interviews to support the decision. But as an elected member of Israel's parliament, whose visit was mainly to be focused on Australia's Jewish community, should he have been banned not only from entry to Australia now, but for the next three years?
Home Affairs minister Tony Burke thinks so. 'Our government takes a hard line on people who seek to come to our country and spread division,' he said.
If you are coming to Australia to spread a message of hate and division, we don't want you here. Under our government, Australia will be a country where everyone can be safe, and feel safe.
Indeed, even though his official delegate signed the decision, it's inconceivable that Burke would not have been consulted. Given his own Sydney constituency has a large Muslim minority, his harsh language on the visa cancellation is hardly surprising.
Nor did the Australian government ban several controversial Islamist visitors undertaking speaking tours in the past year. These included speakers who, on the record, celebrated Hamas and its barbaric actions.
After Israel's foreign minister, Gideon Sa'ar, quickly retaliated for Rothman's treatment by cancelling the visas of three Australian officials attached to the Palestinian Authority in Ramallah, his counterpart Wong aggressively went further, declaring:
At a time when dialogue and diplomacy are needed more than ever, the Netanyahu government is isolating Israel and undermining international efforts towards peace and a two-state solution.
She added, 'This is an unjustified reaction, following Australia's decision to recognise Palestine.' Like a quarrelling spouse determined to defy facts to win their point, Wong sought to blame Israel for her own government's precipitate actions against an Israeli MP. Dialogue and diplomacy, indeed.
Yet the spat got still worse. Angered by Australia's decision to recognise Palestine, and obviously stung by personal reflections on him by Albanese in justifying Australia's recognition decision, Netanyahu himself let fly on Twitter. He also wrote a caustic open letter to his opposite number, labelling Albanese 'weak' and, effectively, an enabler of anti-Semitism. To which home affairs minister Burke replied, telling the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, 'Strength is not measured by how many people you can blow up or how many children you can leave hungry.'
What a farce of tit-for-tat and name-calling. Netanyahu took the bait, but having declared words are bullets, the Australian government fired a fierce fusillade of its own.
Relations between Australia and Israel are now more than frayed: they're absolutely tattered. Having rushed to join Britain, France and Canada in recognising a Palestinian state in a fit of 'me too', thereby winning Hamas's praise, Albanese and his ministers are using Palestine recognition less to influence outcomes in Israel and Gaza and more to prove to their left-wing activist supporters, and Muslim voter base, just whose side they are on. Him being little loved in Australia, Netanyahu's over-the-top reaction perversely benefits Albanese in the court of Australian public opinion.
Australia's government willingly accuses their cancelled Israeli visitor, Rothman, of fomenting discord and division. Yet they are doing precisely that themselves. In this political climate, many in Australia's Jewish community no longer feel safe there, and some are contemplating leaving the country of their birth. Rightly or wrongly, they feel their own government is abandoning them.
Australians smugly like to think of themselves as a diverse but harmonious people. As this tawdry diplomatic episode highlights, however, Australia's much-vaunted multicultural society increasingly is fragmenting into a loose collection of ethnic and religious tribes, its politics pandering to what divides, not what unites.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
Famine officially declared in Gaza for first time by UN-backed group
Famine will be declared in Gaza City for the first time by the international body responsible for monitoring world hunger, The Telegraph can reveal. The UN-backed Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) – a globally recognised system for classifying the severity of food insecurity and malnutrition – has been used to declare just four famines since it was established in 2004, most recently in Sudan last year. Although the IPC has previously warned famine is imminent in parts of Gaza, it has until now stopped short of making a formal declaration, citing a lack of hard data. However, on Friday morning, it will formally declare a famine in Gaza City, the last remaining major built-up area of Gaza and home to some 500,000 people. The declaration will outrage the Israeli government, which has consistently denied that famine is taking place in Gaza and is currently moving on Gaza City. Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, said on Thursday he would give final approval for the takeover of the city, one of Hamas's last strongholds. In order to declare a famine, three strict criteria must be met: at least 20 per cent of households face an extreme lack of food, at least 30 per cent of children suffer acute malnutrition, and two people for every 10,000 die each day due to 'outright starvation'. The IPC will state that a famine is taking place in the 'Gaza Governorate', which comprises Gaza City, three surrounding towns, and several refugee camps, according to a briefing shared with its partner organisations and seen by The Telegraph. 'After 22 months of relentless conflict, over half a million people in the Gaza Strip are facing catastrophic conditions, characterised by starvation, destitution and death,' says the IPC briefing. It adds that the famine is projected to expand to the governorates of Deir Al-Balah and Khan Younis by the end of September on current projections. Another 1.07 million people – over half of Gaza's population – are already facing 'emergency' levels of food insecurity, the second-highest level on the scale, the briefing adds. The Telegraph has contacted the Israeli government for comment. Mr Netanyahu has faced international backlash over the situation in Gaza, with Israel earlier this month announcing measures to let more aid into Gaza. He insisted 'hundreds of trucks' had been allowed in and said that if Israel was implementing a 'starvation policy', then 'no one in Gaza would have survived after two years of war'. He pointed to disturbing images of Evyatar David, a 24-year-old Israeli hostage who looked severely malnourished in a video released by Hamas. He said: 'The only ones who are being deliberately starved in Gaza are our hostages.' The Israeli prime minister vowed on Thursday to take over all of Gaza City militarily. The wide-scale operation in the city could start within days, with preliminary operations already under way in the area. Earlier this week it was announced that call-up orders were being issued to 60,000 reservists of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) ahead of the full-scale assault on the city. Israeli troops are now said to have established a foothold on the outskirts of the city after days of intensive bombing, and Palestinians are fleeing the area in large numbers. The IPC – whose 21 partner organisations include Save the Children, Oxfam and Unicef – is forecasting that food security in Gaza will continue to deteriorate between the middle of August and end of September. 'During this period, almost a third of the population – nearly 641,000 people – are expected to face catastrophic conditions, while the number of people in emergency will likely increase to 1.14 million,' it says. This marks 'the first time a famine has been officially confirmed in the Middle East region', the briefing says, although the region has suffered hunger crises historically. It is only the fifth time a famine has been formally declared by the IPC, with the previous four all in sub-Saharan Africa. Israel has been under intense pressure to allow more food into Gaza, facing international criticism over its aid blockade, which has ebbed and flowed since the Hamas attacks on Oct 7 in which nearly 1,195 were murdered and 251 were taken hostage. Gaza's Hamas-run health ministry said on Thursday that 271 people had so far died from starvation in Gaza, 112 of them children. More than half of that figure has been in the last three weeks alone. In total, the Palestinian death toll from 22 months of war stands at 62,192, according to figures from Gaza's health ministry. Mr Netanyahu last month defended Israel's handling of the humanitarian disaster in the enclave, claiming 'there is no starvation in Gaza'. 'We enable humanitarian aid throughout the duration of the war to enter Gaza – otherwise, there would be no Gazans,' Mr Netanyahu said. The famine declaration comes as David Lammy, the Foreign Secretary, signed a statement accusing the Israeli government of a violation of international law over its plans to press ahead with an illegal settlement that would divide the occupied West Bank Britain and Israel have been at loggerheads ever since Sir Keir Starmer announced the UK would recognise a Palestinian state in September. Israel's military on Thursday said it had warned medical officials and international organisations to prepare for the planned evacuation of Gaza City's residents ahead of its ground offensive to occupy it. The officials were told that 'adjustments' were being made to hospitals in southern Gaza to receive patients, a statement said.


North Wales Chronicle
4 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Diane Abbott advised Jeremy Corbyn against founding new party, event told
Ms Abbott, who served as Mr Corbyn's shadow home secretary when he was Labour leader, said she had spoken to him before its launch, and said it was not a good idea. Speaking at an event at the Edinburgh Book Festival, the current longest-serving female MP said: 'There were people around Jeremy encouraging him to set up a new party, and I told him not to. 'It's very difficult under first-past-the-post system for a new party to absolutely win. If it wasn't first-past-the-post, then you can see how a new party could come through, but I understand why he did it.' Ms Abbott said she thought the party, formed by her long-time friend Independent MP Mr Corbyn (Islington North) alongside Independent MP Zarah Sultana (Coventry South), would outperform people's expectations. It was launched last month, but is still without a formal name. She said she believed it would take advantage of a broader discontent with politics in Britain. She paid tribute to Mr Corbyn and Ms Sultana but said: 'At this point in time, it's difficult to see how a brand new party wins. 'However, I think Jeremy's party is going to do a lot better than people think because a lot of people who are not necessarily terribly left-wing people, are a tiny bit disappointed about the way we've gone in the past year.' The MP for Hackney North and Stoke Newington indicated her disappointment with the Labour Government. She had the whip withdrawn for the second time in two years in July, after she expressed a lack of regret about comments to the Observer in 2023 that suggested that Jewish, Irish and Traveller people experience prejudice, but not racism. However, she implied she would not join Mr Corbyn's party. Ms Abbott said: 'It's a tricky state of play. I wouldn't have thought that you'd have a Labour Government and they'd be cutting winter fuel allowance for the elderly and benefits for the disabled.' She was also critical of the Government's proscription of Palestine Action and labelled the decision 'a complete disgrace'. 'What they are seeking to do is proscribe protest as such,' she said. 'I mean, we all saw the pictures of the people in Trafalgar Square – 500 people? Half of them over 60. Come on, these are terrorists? I think this is an attempt to bear down on (protest).' She added her more than 40 years in Labour meant it was too late to leave it. She was elected to Parliament in 1987, and was the only black female MP in the Commons for a decade until Labour's landslide under Tony Blair. In response to a question about whether she thought she would ever be accepted 'at the heart' of the Labour Party, she replied: 'I think I am at the heart of the Labour Party, it's other people who aren't.' Ms Abbott, whose book A Woman Like Me, was the subject of the interview in the Scottish capital by campaigner Talat Yaqoob, also told the audience of her anger at not being called by Commons speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle in the aftermath of racist comments by Conservative Party donor Frank Hester in 2024. She said she had stood during a Prime Minister's Question session more than 40 times to be called to speak, after Sir Keir Starmer, Rishi Sunak and Sir Ed Davey had all spoken about the incident. Mr Hester was reported to have said Ms Abbott made him want to 'hate all black women' and that she 'should be shot'. The remarks brought widespread condemnation, including from Sir Keir, but she told the event her office was used to receiving racist abuse. 'I've been an MP for 38 years, and custom practice in the chamber is if you're being talked about, you get called. It's just a courtesy. I was so shocked that I wasn't called. 'But I heard later from someone who had reason to know, that what happened was that Rishi didn't want me called, because (Hester) was a Tory donor and it would look bad for them, and I'm afraid Keir Starmer didn't want me called because he wanted to milk the issue (for) political advantage, without mentioning me.' She said Sir Keir had approached her after the questions session and asked what he could do to help. 'I said, 'Yes, you can restore the whip'. And as if he hadn't heard, he said, 'Is there anything I can do for you?' It was like he was deaf. And I said, 'Yes, you can restore the whip', and he realised I wasn't going to play that game and he went off.'


Glasgow Times
4 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
Diane Abbott advised Jeremy Corbyn against founding new party, event told
Ms Abbott, who served as Mr Corbyn's shadow home secretary when he was Labour leader, said she had spoken to him before its launch, and said it was not a good idea. Speaking at an event at the Edinburgh Book Festival, the current longest-serving female MP said: 'There were people around Jeremy encouraging him to set up a new party, and I told him not to. 'It's very difficult under first-past-the-post system for a new party to absolutely win. If it wasn't first-past-the-post, then you can see how a new party could come through, but I understand why he did it.' Ms Abbott said she thought the party, formed by her long-time friend Independent MP Mr Corbyn (Islington North) alongside Independent MP Zarah Sultana (Coventry South), would outperform people's expectations. It was launched last month, but is still without a formal name. She said she believed it would take advantage of a broader discontent with politics in Britain. Former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn and then-shadow home secretary Diane Abbott during a visit to Finsbury Park Mosque in 2019 (Victoria Jones/PA She paid tribute to Mr Corbyn and Ms Sultana but said: 'At this point in time, it's difficult to see how a brand new party wins. 'However, I think Jeremy's party is going to do a lot better than people think because a lot of people who are not necessarily terribly left-wing people, are a tiny bit disappointed about the way we've gone in the past year.' The MP for Hackney North and Stoke Newington indicated her disappointment with the Labour Government. She had the whip withdrawn for the second time in two years in July, after she expressed a lack of regret about comments to the Observer in 2023 that suggested that Jewish, Irish and Traveller people experience prejudice, but not racism. However, she implied she would not join Mr Corbyn's party. Ms Abbott said: 'It's a tricky state of play. I wouldn't have thought that you'd have a Labour Government and they'd be cutting winter fuel allowance for the elderly and benefits for the disabled.' She was also critical of the Government's proscription of Palestine Action and labelled the decision 'a complete disgrace'. Diane Abbott in 1986 when she was Hackney North and Stoke Newington Labour election candidate (PA) 'What they are seeking to do is proscribe protest as such,' she said. 'I mean, we all saw the pictures of the people in Trafalgar Square – 500 people? Half of them over 60. Come on, these are terrorists? I think this is an attempt to bear down on (protest).' She added her more than 40 years in Labour meant it was too late to leave it. She was elected to Parliament in 1987, and was the only black female MP in the Commons for a decade until Labour's landslide under Tony Blair. In response to a question about whether she thought she would ever be accepted 'at the heart' of the Labour Party, she replied: 'I think I am at the heart of the Labour Party, it's other people who aren't.' Ms Abbott, whose book A Woman Like Me, was the subject of the interview in the Scottish capital by campaigner Talat Yaqoob, also told the audience of her anger at not being called by Commons speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle in the aftermath of racist comments by Conservative Party donor Frank Hester in 2024. She said she had stood during a Prime Minister's Question session more than 40 times to be called to speak, after Sir Keir Starmer, Rishi Sunak and Sir Ed Davey had all spoken about the incident. Mr Hester was reported to have said Ms Abbott made him want to 'hate all black women' and that she 'should be shot'. The remarks brought widespread condemnation, including from Sir Keir, but she told the event her office was used to receiving racist abuse. 'I've been an MP for 38 years, and custom practice in the chamber is if you're being talked about, you get called. It's just a courtesy. I was so shocked that I wasn't called. 'But I heard later from someone who had reason to know, that what happened was that Rishi didn't want me called, because (Hester) was a Tory donor and it would look bad for them, and I'm afraid Keir Starmer didn't want me called because he wanted to milk the issue (for) political advantage, without mentioning me.' She said Sir Keir had approached her after the questions session and asked what he could do to help. 'I said, 'Yes, you can restore the whip'. And as if he hadn't heard, he said, 'Is there anything I can do for you?' It was like he was deaf. And I said, 'Yes, you can restore the whip', and he realised I wasn't going to play that game and he went off.'