
Asylum-seeking is one of Britain's few growth industries – but its YOU the taxpayer pouring £4.5million A DAY into it
THE next time you have to wait days for a GP appointment, your car hits a pothole, the police fail to turn up when you report a crime or you struggle to pay the gas bill, please try to remember it's all for a good cause.
After all, the Government can't be wasting all their time, money and effort providing basic public services, or helping you to make ends meet, when they've got far more important priorities than us mere voters.
4
4
There may never be enough money to build more hospitals and prisons, hire more police and nurses, or to repair the roads but, never fear, there will ALWAYS be enough cash in the Treasury coffers to pay for the ever-spiralling cost of asylum seekers.
And, make no mistake, that cost is now eye-wateringly huge. The latest figures from the National Audit Office are staggering as close to £4.5million of taxpayers' hard-earned money will now be spent EVERY DAY on hotel bills and other accommodation for asylum seekers.
The spending watchdog predicts that housing costs originally expected to total £4.5billion over the decade up to 2029 will now cost us a whopping £15.3billion over that same period.
That's £175,000 spent every HOUR and more than £2,900 every single MINUTE on making life comfortable for the 110,000-plus mostly young men of fighting age who have come to our shores in recent years from countries and cultures a world away from our own.
And with more than 11,000 new arrivals since the New Year (a whopping 40 per cent rise on the same months last year), the problem is only set to get worse.
So don't expect your taxes to come down or those potholes to get fixed any time soon.
But don't worry, not everyone is losing out. These days, asylum is one of Britain's few growth industries!
After all, the Channel boat gangs are still raking in millions for their dinghy taxi service.
And government contractors such as Serco are drowning in profits for providing accommodation, as are the hoteliers and private landlords getting guaranteed income on five-year leases, not to mention all the human rights lawyers, NGO staffers and translators with their snouts in the trough.
Utterly bizarre
It is absolutely galling to see these enormous sums being spent on people arriving here illegally when the Government has taken away the Winter Fuel Allowance from millions of our own pensioners and put up Employer National Insurance Contributions for even the lowest-paid workers.
Sir Keir Starmer promised ahead of the General Election to 'smash the gangs' and close down the asylum hotels. So that's all working out terribly well, isn't it?
It's no surprise then, that Labour and the Tories, with their abysmal immigration records, are facing fierce competition from Reform UK in the polls and also at the ballot box last week.
Sir Keir Starmer promised ahead of the General Election to ' smash the gangs ' and close down the asylum hotels. So that's all working out terribly well, isn't it?
Now he's desperately resorting to a plan — to be announced next week — to tackle LEGAL migration by requiring all new migrants coming to the UK to be fluent in English to get a visa and to apply for permanent settlement.
Isn't it utterly bizarre that no one thought of this before?
Meanwhile, Tory leader Kemi Badenoch is calling for an annual binding vote in Parliament on a migration cap and ending immigration appeals under the Human Rights Act.
This from the party that oversaw a record 728,000 net migration figure last year after promising way back in 2010 to get that figure down to 'the tens of thousands'.
The old 'uns are always the funniest, aren't they?
4
There is, however, one tiny spark of hope coming from Germany, where the new coalition government led by Friedrich Merz has announced a major U-turn on Angela Merkel's open borders policy of the past ten years that saw three million arrivals.
Border officials there have now been ordered to turn away any undocumented migrants claiming asylum unless they are obviously genuine desperate cases.
Germany's move — spurred only by the electoral threat to mainstream parties from the hard-right, anti-immigration AfD Party — could well create a domino effect across Europe as national border after national border is closed.
While the Channel migrants keep pouring in on their rickety dinghies, our hard-earned taxes will continue to pour out to pay for their room and board.
If Germany can do that, why can't Britain? It's a fair question and one to which we will be unlikely to get an answer.
Our politicians are far too busy handing out our taxpayers' largesse to the hordes of illegal migrants and visa over-stayers who now reside among us.
While the Channel migrants keep pouring in on their rickety dinghies, our hard-earned taxes will continue to pour out to pay for their room and board.
Meanwhile our public services crumble, our pensioners sit in the cold and the cost of living keeps going up.
The spending watchdog has laid out the true cost of asylum seekers to the public purse but, for most taxpayers, the sums just don't add up any more.
SIR KEIR HAS BREXIT TO THANK
I LIKE to give credit where it's due so I will happily offer my congratulations to Sir Keir Starmer and his trade negotiators for two big wins this week.
Not only did they manage to clinch a 'full fat' trade deal with India, the world's fourth biggest and fastest growing economy, they also succeeded in getting a deal with the US, the world's largest economy, to cut tariffs on steel, aluminium and cars – the first such agreement since Donald Trump launched his global tariff war.
4
I hope that, in return, Starmer and his Labour Remainer chums will also cheerily give credit to Brexit for making those deals possible.
After all, if the PM had succeeded in his three-year battle after the 2016 referendum to keep us in the EU, the UK would not be a sovereign state able to negotiate our own trade treaties.
What a delicious irony – after former US President Barack Obama warned we'd be at 'the back of the queue' for a free trade deal if we dared to vote Leave – that it is Remoaner-in-Chief Starmer who has put us right at the front.
And not DESPITE Brexit but BECAUSE we voted to Leave.
THE events to mark the 80th anniversary of VE Day have been joyful and moving as we remember the huge sacrifices made by ordinary British men and women both on the battlefield and on the home front.
So how dispiriting it is to see poll after poll suggesting that young Brits today would NOT be willing to go to war to defend our nation.
Is it any wonder they feel this way after decades of being told that their country is responsible for almost everything bad that's ever happened in the world?
Why would they be proud of what Britain stands for and the vital role we have played in building and defending Western civilisation?
Of course no one wants war but freedom from tyranny, and values such as liberty, equality, democracy, tolerance and the rule of law, are ALWAYS worth fighting for.
And, yes, worth dying for too.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Herald Scotland
25 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
MPs call for UK to recognise Palestine after Government sanctions ministers
In response, Mr Falconer did not rule out the move, saying he had 'no doubt' he would return to the Commons to update MPs. It came as the UK imposed an asset freeze and travel ban on Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, Israel's security minister and finance minister, respectively. The move came alongside Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Norway. When asked about the recognition of Palestine by Liberal Democrat foreign spokesperson Calum Miller, Mr Falconer said: 'The two-state solution conference next week is an important moment we're discussing with our friends and allies our approach to that conference and no-doubt I will return to this house, with your permission Mr Speaker, to discuss further.' Surrounded by security guards, Israel's National Security Minister, Itamar Ben-Gvir, centre, has been sanctioned by the Government (Leo Correa/AP) Mr Miller had said: 'The time has also come to listen to members on all sides of this House and officially to recognise the independent state of Palestine. Will the Government commit to taking this vital step at next week's summit in New York? 'Recognition will demonstrate the UK's commitment to self-determination but also make clear that, building on today's announcement, the UK will do all it can to wrest control away from the extremes and give both Israelis and Palestinians hope of a lasting peace.' Conservative MP for Herne Bay and Sandwich, Sir Roger Gale, had chastised the Government for not taking more action. He said: 'When the minister came to the despatch box, I had expected to hear something constructive. What we've heard is the sanctioning of two people. The United Kingdom Government could unilaterally recognise Palestine. The United Kingdom Government could show the world and lead.' He added: 'When is the Government going to do something?' Labour MP Abtisam Mohamed (Sheffield Central), who was denied access to the occupied West Bank earlier this year, agreed with the calls. She said: 'Annexation is real. It is happening. Partners in the region are calling for recognition before it's too late.' Ms Mohamed continued: 'Does the minister agree with me that we must not throw recognition into the long grass? That failure to recognise next week at the UN conference implies that Israel does have a veto, and that the Israeli government will continue to annexe and terrorise Palestinians in the West Bank. If we do not recognise now, there will be no Palestinian state to recognise.' Mr Falconer said: 'Recognition is right at the centre of any discussion of a two-state solution.' The minister had earlier told MPs the two-state solution between Israel and Palestine was in critical danger. He said the rhetoric of Mr Ben-Gvir and Mr Smotrich did not represent the majority of Israelis. He said: 'This is an affront to the rights of Palestinians, but it is also against the interests of Israelis, against their long-term security and democracy.' Later in the session, Green Party MP Ellie Chowns (North Herefordshire) accused the Government of doing the 'bare minimum' while Conservative former minister Kit Malthouse further pressed the minister on whether recognition at the summit is now 'off the table'. Mr Falconer said 'we are doing everything we can', adding: 'We are so incredibly frustrated by the scenes that meet us, meet everybody behind me, and I would say gently to (Mr Malthouse), he has no monopoly on the morality of this situation.' The minister went on to say settler expansion had increased hugely in recent years, and last year had seen the worst settler violence against Palestinians in the West Bank on record. He added that this year is on track to be just as violent. 'This is an attempt to entrench a one-state reality,' he told MPs. He continued: 'The gravity of this situation demands further action. The reality is that these human rights abuses, incitement to violence, extremist rhetoric comes … from individuals who are ministers in this Israeli government.' Abtisam Mohamed who, along with fellow Labour MP Yuan Yang, was denied entry to the West Bank earlier this year (Roger Harris/UK Parliament/PA) Mr Falconer added: 'We have told the Israeli government that we would take tougher action if this did not stop. It still did not. The appalling rhetoric has continued unchanged. Violent perpetrators continue to act with impunity and with encouragement. 'So, let me tell the House now, when we say something, we mean it. Today we have shown, with our partners, two extremists we will not stand by while they wreck the prospects for future peace.' Shadow foreign secretary Dame Priti Patel said: 'The situation in the Middle East and the suffering we are seeing is serious and completely intolerable. Dame Priti added: 'We all want to see a better future for the Israeli and Palestinian people, and the UK must continue to play a leading role in achieving this.' She told MPs the previous Conservative government considered sanctioning the two ministers. 'The minister will be aware that the sanctioning of individuals is always under review, that is the right policy,' she said. 'And in the case of Israel, this has been previously considered even by Lord Cameron, who has spoken of that in the last government.' DUP MP Sammy Wilson (East Antrim) suggested Mr Falconer is 'pandering to the increasingly loud anti-Israel voices on his backbenches', adding: 'The minister must know that this will not bring peace to Gaza.' Mr Falconer replied: 'I have spoken about the perilous decline of the situation in the West Bank, and indeed events of the last two weeks, and I've also spoken about the importance of co-ordinating with allies. So, I don't think I have anything further to say.'


The Herald Scotland
25 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
UN urges UK to negotiate new Chagos deal that allows islanders to return
But a panel of experts appointed by the UN Human Rights Council said retaining the base and continuing to bar Chagossians from Diego Garcia 'appears to be at variance with the Chagossians' right to return'. The Chagossians were expelled from the islands between 1965 and 1973 to make way for the joint UK-US base and have not been allowed to return. Although the UK-Mauritius deal includes a £40 million trust fund for the benefit of the Chagossians, the UN experts expressed concern that this would not provide an 'effective remedy' for the islanders. They also criticised an apparent lack of consultation of the islanders prior to the deal, saying: 'We are gravely concerned about the lack of meaningful participation of Chagossians in processes that have led to the agreement.' The experts added: 'In light of these significant concerns, we call for the ratification of the agreement to be suspended and for a new agreement to be negotiated that fully guarantees the rights of the Chagossian people to return to all islands of the Chagos Archipelago, including Diego Garcia.' Conservative shadow foreign secretary Dame Priti Patel urged the Government to 'do the right thing (and) stop this'. She said: 'We have been warning from the start that this deal is bad for British taxpayers and bad for the Chagossian people. 'Now even the United Nations is saying the very same. 'Labour has completely ignored this community from the get-go, and failed to consult with them at every step of the way. 'It is why I have introduced a Bill in Parliament that would block the (agreement) and force the Government to speak to the people at the heart of their surrender plans.' The deal follows a 2019 advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice saying the islands should be handed over to Mauritius. As well as the fund for Chagossians, the UK has agreed to pay at least £120 million a year for 99 years in order to lease back the Diego Garcia base – a total cost of at least £13 billion in cash terms. The deal also includes provisions preventing development on the rest of the archipelago without the UK's consent, which the Government has argued will prevent countries such as China setting up their own facilities. The agreement has also been backed by the United States. The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office has been contacted for comment.


The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Federal agencies were reportedly tracking foreigners visiting with Musk afraid they were trying to influence the mogul
Federal agencies were tracking foreign nationals who visited Elon Musk over concerns that they could influence the tech billionaire, according to a report. Agencies, including the FBI and Department of Homeland Security, were reportedly among the agencies surveilling foreigners who met with Musk at his U.S. properties in 2022 and 2023, according to The Wall Street Journal, citing people familiar with the matter. Officials at the FBI and others were briefed on the investigation, The Journal reports, which focused on overseas visitors from Eastern Europe and elsewhere 'who might have been trying to influence him.' The investigation, which predates the second Trump administration, did not result in any charges, the outlet reports. The Department of Homeland Security declined to comment when approached by The Independent. The FBI and representatives for Musk did not immediately respond. Concern surrounded sensitive contracts Musk's five companies hold with the U.S. government and the 'unprecedented access' he has to top government officials, according to The Journal. Musk's own companies have been promised or awarded nearly $21 billion by the U.S. government since 2008, according to data analyzed by The Independent. The vast majority of the funding comes from federal contracts with SpaceX, the private space company Musk founded back in 2002. The company holds Defense Department contracts for satellite launches, including for the country's secretive National Reconnaissance Office. Reports surrounding Musk's foreign associates being tracked follow his dramatic exit from Washington, D.C., which saw his relationship with President Donald Trump implode last week. Musk helped re-elect the president by launching his super PAC last year. Eyebrows were raised by staffers within the America PAC over Musk's association with foreign nationals, according to The Journal. Sources familiar with the PAC's inner workings told the outlet that they brought in extensive vetting to 'keep foreigners out.' The Journal reported last October that Musk raising security concerns. Musk was said to have spoken to the Russian president on the phone about business and geopolitical matters, officials with knowledge of the alleged conversations told The Journal. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov confirmed one telephone call took place between Musk and Putin where they discussed 'space as well as current and future technologies,' the outlet reported, but denied there had been regular conversations. When reached for comment from Musk at the time, a SpaceX spokesperson told The Independent the claims in the Journal were 'misleading' and 'unsubstantiated.'