'Short-sighted': Dublin representatives slam plan to remove only public toilets in city centre
A DECISION TO remove Dublin city centre's only public toilet facility has been labelled 'shortsighted' as the city council cites a 'significant' reduction in usage.
The facility – a cabin-like structure located beside the entrance to St. Stephen's Green Shopping Centre at the top of Grafton Street – was originally constructed in 2020 as a temporary measure at the height of the covid pandemic.
It was intended to plug the sanitary gap left by retail and hospitality spaces which were forced to close under strict lockdown measures.
A similar facility was established in Wolfe Tone Square at the same time, but was closed in 2022 due to anti-social behaviour complaints.
According to a Dublin City Council (DCC) report to be presented to councillors on Monday, the St. Stephen's Green facility accommodated around 20,000 people per week in 2021, but that figure has now dropped to roughly 1,500.
In addition to the cost of maintaining the toilets, reported to be around €400,000 per year, the operator of the unit which provided all security functions has since ceased trading, leading the DCC to the decision to remove the installation.
The report claims the council's waste management service had sought alternative toilet installations in the city, but was warned by a potential service provider that installing automated toilets in the city centre was not advisable due to 'the significant risk associated with anti-social activity'.
However, this claim does not wash with Green Party councillor for Dublin South East Inner City, Claire Byrne, who says the decision is 'shortsighted'.
'I don't buy the anti social behavior argument,' she said.
Advertisement
Claire Byrne, councillor for Dublin South East Inner City
Rollingnews.ie
Rollingnews.ie
'Dublin just seems to fail every single time. We're stuck in these constant pilot temporary solutions, and nothing ever really gets properly done. This is just another example of that.'
She added: 'I think it's shortsighted, and it's just not meeting the basic needs of the city.'
Byrne also attacked the DCC's publically stated justification for removing the toilets.
'I know they're citing the costs, but that's not news. We've known the costs for a long time.
'We do need to ask why it's costing €400,000 per year to run the facility. Surely the operator pulling out presents an opportunity to secure a more cost-effective provider rather than just closing it down.'
Byrne criticised how the council is pointing to lower demand from members of the public as a sound reason to shut down the public facility.
'They're citing a drop in usage numbers down to 1,500 people a week using them, but that's still 1,500 people who clearly have to access the toilet.'
Social Democrats TD Gary Gannon added his voice to the condemnation, saying the council should be adding more toilets, not taking them away.
'We've seen this same story play out again and again – an unwillingness to plan ahead, an allergy to practical public investment, and a government that doesn't understand how cities actually work.
He added: 'This isn't just about one toilet at the top of Grafton Street — it's about the wider issue of how we design public spaces. People deserve free, clean, accessible toilets in parks, at transport hubs, and in city centres. That's not too much to ask.'
The issue will be discussed further on Monday at a meeting of the Dublin South East Area Committee.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
8 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Opposition accuses Government of making 'sacrificial lambs' of renters
The Taoiseach has been accused of turning renters into "sacrificial lambs" under the Government's new rent rules. The Government announced sweeping changes to the rent system on Tuesday that will cap rent increases at the rate of inflation. However, in times of high inflation, hikes for most tenancies will be limited to a maximum of 2%. The changes will also end 'no-fault evictions' for larger landlords — those with four or more tenancies — who will no longer be able to terminate a tenancy where the tenant has met their obligations, except in very limited circumstances. However, speaking during Wednesday's leaders' questions, Social Democrats deputy leader Cian O'Callaghan said the Government was "gambling" with the changes. Sinn Féin leader Mary Lou McDonald branded them "a shambles". Mr O'Callaghan said the reality of the rental market was "dystopian". "Instead of protecting renters, [the Government's] big plan is to use them as sacrificial lambs and to bleed them dry. Incredibly, yesterday the minister for housing, James Browne, claimed that rents would eventually come down but he could not tell us when this was going to happen. Before being put in charge of housing, the minister was responsible for gambling. It now seems he is gambling with renters' future and betting against them. Taoiseach Micheál Martin rejected the criticisms, saying renters would not be affected in the short-term. 'The bottom line is, I repeat again, all existing tenants will not have their rents increase beyond 2% and no attempts by you to sow confusion will change that reality,' he said. Meanwhile, the minister for further and higher education has been accused of agreeing a decision that will deepen the accommodation crisis for students. People Before Profit TD Paul Murphy criticised James Lawless as he attended the Oireachtas committee on further and higher education and research. Mr Murphy said he noted how in the minister's opening statement to the committee he referred to the lack of affordable accommodation is a 'big barrier' for students attending tertiary education. 'Yet, you are part of the Government that yesterday signed off on a plan that is going to make that crisis for students a lot worse. 'Students are arguably the group that is hit hardest, so students who are in rental accommodation will effectively not have any rental protection whatsoever.' 'When asked about it, you say that you'll be meeting with Minister Brown to trash out how this will work,' Mr Brown said. I don't understand; You're there at the Cabinet. Student accommodation is one of the biggest issues in higher education. How have you not already thought this through? Mr Lawless rejected the criticism in an — at times — tense exchange with Mr Murphy. The plans will come into effect next March, he said. 'There's a lot of water under the bridge between now next March." He plans to sit down with James Browne and 'delve into the detail about how it affected student accommodation sector', he added. Committee chair Erin McGreehan said she did not think it was fair to interrogate the minister on plans that have not yet been finalized. 'Respectfully, I think your job as chair is not to defend [or] to protect the minister from questioning,' Mr Murphy said.
The Journal
9 hours ago
- The Journal
EU Minister: Europe's security fears are 'new Brexit' as Ireland must be pragmatic on defence
CONCERNS AROUND EUROPEAN security have become the 'new Brexit' for Irish officials and their EU counterparts, the European Affairs minister has said. Thomas Byrne, was speaking at an event in Dublin hosted by the Irish Institute of International and European Affairs , in which he outlined his views on the future for Ireland's interaction with EU defence mechanisms. The talk looked at the recently published EU White Paper on Defence which was released in March. Byrne, speaking as both European Affairs and Defence Junior Minister, spoke about Ireland's connections with NATO as well as the broader question of EU Defence. 'It is perhaps a telling reflection of the changed world we live in today, that 'Brexit' no longer forms part of our daily lexicon, and that my Ministerial role now combines European Affairs with Defence. 'It seems that security is, in effect, the new 'Brexit',' he said. Byrne spoke about the foundation of how Ireland conducts international relations. He referenced Article 29 of the Irish Constitution which does not permit Ireland joining an EU mutual defence pact. 'While Ireland does not see a home for itself in NATO, nor can we afford to live in a house of splendid isolation, either. 'I believe that we must approach our security and defence from a policy of 'principles-based pragmatism',' he said. Byrne said, that the State must follow that pragmatic approach to address threats as they arise and he called for closer ties with EU allies. 'In real terms, I believe that we need to see increased co-operation with our fellow EU members on security and defence,' he said. Minister Thomas Byrne speaking in Dublin today. Sarah Burke. Sarah Burke. 'Champion' Byrne explained that there was a need to continue increased investment in security and defence capabilities. He also said there was a need to 'champion' legislative reform governing the deployment of the Irish Defence Forces, such as amending the triple-lock. 'Our constitutional position is clear when it comes to an EU common defence. Our policy of military neutrality remains unchanged. 'And we will always act in accordance with our obligations under international law. But any bad actor will not hit our strengths. They will hit our vulnerabilities. Advertisement 'We simply cannot be locked into a state of stasis in responding to the geopolitical challenges, and security and defence risks, that face us,' he said. Byrne coined the phrase 'principles-based pragmatism' as the policy for how Ireland views its security and defence into the future. He noted that the upcoming June meeting of the European Council will follow the NATO summit in The Hague. 'The timing of the NATO meeting will underscore the fact that coherence and complementarity with NATO, will be part of the picture, for those EU Member States for whom NATO capability targets inform their capability needs,' he said. Byrne said that the last time he was European Affairs Minister, his opposite numbers in Finland and Sweden were preparing to join the NATO alliance. 'As I noted at the outset, Ireland does not see a home for itself in NATO. 'But, in taking a principles-based pragmatic approach to our security and defence, I believe that we should continue to partner with NATO in line with our existing principles, within frameworks such as Partnership for Peace. 'This partnership has proved successful for Ireland since 1999 and has acted to improve the inter-operability of our Defence Forces, including through our participation in UN, and EU missions, overseas,' he said. Guillaume de la Brosse of the European Commission speaking in Dublin today. Sarah Burke Sarah Burke 'Special relationship' Speaking also at the event was Guillaume de la Brosse who was involved in the drafting of the EU white paper on defence. He works in the European Commission's Defence Industry and Space Department. The document sets out plans up to 2030 and it includes a strategy to move away from a reliance on the US for mutual security. It also has said that it is to boost the defence industries in the EU so that they can increase the manufacture of equipment and weapons. De la Brosse said that the White Paper was to generate debate among member states but it respects the individual countries and their approaches to security. 'Europe is big. We have 27 member states. They all have their own history, their own relationship with defence. 'So you're [Ireland] not isolated in this kind of special relationship that you have with defence,' he said. 'I can tell you that the design of the white paper was a bumpy road to find the common ground between all member states to make sure that the reception of this white paper would be positive. That was one of the biggest challenge that we had to face,' he added. De la Brosse said, along with other speakers at the event, that the need for defence capability investment must run in tandem with a major expansion of Europe's military industrial base. 'We need to step up our efforts when it comes to our own security and defence. We need to do it by 2030 because we know, according to certain intelligence services, that Russia may be willing to test some of our member states in the upcoming years,' he said. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
RTÉ News
9 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Protest at Leinster House ahead of Central Bank vote
A protest is being held outside Leinster House ahead of a vote on a motion seeking to ban the Central Bank from facilitating the sale of so-called Israeli war bonds. The day-long 'Stop Funding Genocide' action was organised by the Ireland-Palestine Solidarity Campaign (IPSC). Government TDs will tonight vote on whether to ban the facilitation of the war bonds in Ireland, a cross-party motion brought forward by the Social Democrats. Last month, a similar motion brought forward by Sinn Féin was defeated by 87 votes to 75. Social Democrats TD Sinéad Gibney spoke at the protest, saying the Government had a second opportunity to stop the sale of Israeli bonds in Europe. She said: "Our Central Bank is currently facilitating Israeli bonds in Europe by approving the prospectus of Israeli bonds. "Every country has the right to raise bonds and sell them but the bonds that are being raised and sold by Israel right now are being used to fund this genocide. "The weapons, the bombs and the bullets that have killed 55,000 people, that have injured 126,000 people, they are partly funded by the sale of those bonds. "Our Central Bank says there's nothing they can do, but we can in the Dáil. So today we offer the Government another opportunity to stop the Central Bank from approving that prospectus, to play our part in stopping the sale of Israeli bonds in Europe." During the protest a group of women dressed in black held a 15-minute "keening" outside the gates of Leinster House - the action of wailing in grief. Senator Frances Black, who was among the attendees, said the "keeners" represented what the crowd was feeling. She said: "Our hearts are broken at this time by what we're seeing in Gaza and the West Bank, it's absolutely outrageous and we've seen that now for over a year and a half. "We've been confronted with scenes in Gaza that are so horrific they will haunt us and certainly haunt me as long we can remember." The Government has posed a counter-motion that outlines the actions the Coalition has taken so far against Israel. Earlier, the governor of the Central Bank told politicians that it cannot refuse to facilitate the sale of Israel war bonds as doing so would break EU capital markets rules. Gabriel Makhlouf outlined the position to the Oireachtas Committee on Finance and Public Expenditure this afternoon. He said the Central Bank was "absolutely appalled" by what is happening in Gaza. However, the bank is "required to perform" certain actions under EU rules, he said, adding "we are established by law, we are empowered by law, and we must always act within and in line with the law".
