More pets to be allowed in military accommodation as ministers cut red tape
But from this week they will be allowed to keep up to two dogs, cats or smaller pets without needing permission, with the Ministry of Defence recognising the 'vital role' they play in family life and mental wellbeing.
Defence minister Al Carns said: 'As a dog owner and Royal Marine who served for 24 years, much of it in service accommodation, I'm delighted to be making it easier for our dedicated personnel to own family pets.'
Other changes introduced this week will see service personnel given more freedom to personalise their accommodation and new, easier processes for their family members to run a business from their home.
The changes are part of Defence Secretary John Healey's pledge to 'stop the rot' and improve standards in service accommodation.
He said: 'Our armed forces make extraordinary sacrifices to keep us safe every day.
'But for too long, military families have lived in substandard housing without basic consumer rights.
'These new measures are a key milestone as we deliver on our consumer charter to stop the rot in military accommodation and ensure our heroes and their loved ones live in houses they can truly call home.'
In April, Mr Healey announced a new 'consumer charter' for service accommodation, including more reliable repairs, a named housing officer for every service family and a higher minimum standard for housing.
The Government has also brought 36,000 military homes back into public ownership in an effort to reduce costs and improve standards.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Fears over 'serious nuclear incident' at Faslane naval base where Britain's Trident submarine's are kept
A serious nuclear incident took place at Britain's Trident submarine base in Scotland earlier this year, it has emerged. There was a Category A event at HMNB Clyde on Gare Loch in Faslane between January and April. The Ministry of Defence (MoD) defines a Category A incident as the most serious and those which carry an 'actual or high potential for radioactive release to the environment'. But the government department has insisted the incident at HMNB Clyde did not pose a risk to the public or result in any radiological impact to the environment. The naval base is the Royal Navy's headquarters in Scotland and is home to Britain's nuclear submarines which includes the Vanguard vessels armed with Trident missiles. The Category A event, which was first reported by The Herald, will raise concerns over the maintenance of the weapons at the facility. It was revealed in a written parliamentary answer by defence procurement minister Maria Eagle after she was asked to provide the number of Nuclear Site Event Reports (NSERs) at the Faslane and Coulport naval bases. NSERs detail incidents at nuclear facilities and are categorised based on their safety significance and impact. She disclosed that there had been a category A event at Faslane between January 1 and April 22 as well as two category B, seven category C and four category D incidents. Ms Eagle added that there were five further events deemed 'below scale' and less serious. While Coulport, where Britain's nuclear missiles and warheads are held, experienced four category C and nine category D events during the same period. The SNP has demanded an urgent explanation from the government over a 'catalogue of failures' which include a separate contamination nearby. 'I cannot provide specific detail for the events as disclosure would, or would be likely to, prejudice the capability, effectiveness or security of any relevant forces,' Ms Eagle told SNP MP Dave Doogan who tabled the question. 'I can assure the honourable member that none of the events listed in question 49938 caused harm to the health of any member of staff or to any member of the public and none have resulted in any radiological impact to the environment.' The minister insisted that NSERs 'are raised to foster a robust safety culture that learns from experience, whether that is equipment failures, human error, procedural failings, documentation shortcoming or near-misses'. The incident is the second serious one to take place at Faslane naval base in two years after a Category A event was recorded in 2023. And there were two similar events between 2006 and 2007. It comes after it was revealed that radioactive water was released from the Royal Navy nuclear weapons base in Coulport into Loch Long after several old pipes burst. The substances leaked into the water because the Royal Navy inadequately maintained a network of around 1,500 pipes on the base, according to a regulator. 'Nuclear weapons are an ever-present danger and this new information is deeply worrying,' SNP deputy leader Keith Brown said. 'With repeated reports of serious incidents at Faslane and now confirmed radioactive contamination in Loch Long, it's clear there is a direct threat to our environment, our communities, and our safety. 'Worse still, the Labour government is refusing to provide any details about the Category A incident, or the full extent of the contamination, including who could potentially be affected. 'While Westminster ploughs billions of public money into weapons of mass destruction, the SNP is focused on building a better Scotland. 'But only with independence, can we scrap Trident, clean up the mess it has left behind, and ensure this kind of reckless nuclear policy is never forced on Scotland again.' An MoD spokesman said: 'We place the utmost importance on handling radioactive substances safely and securely. Nuclear Site Event Reports demonstrate our robust safety culture and commitment to learn from experience. 'The incidents posed no risk to the public and did not result in any radiological impact to the environment. It is factually incorrect to suggest otherwise. Our Government backs our nuclear deterrent as the ultimate guarantor of our national security.'
BBC News
2 minutes ago
- BBC News
More than 11,000 no-fault bailiff evictions in past year, figures show
More than 11,000 households in England have had their homes repossessed by bailiffs following a no-fault eviction process since last year when the Labour government came into its manifesto, Labour promised to "immediately abolish" Section 21, also known as no-fault, evictions which allow landlords to remove tenants without a reason. A bill ending the practice was announced last year and is expected to become law when Parliament returns from its summer charity Shelter said it was "unconscionable" that "renters continue to be marched out of their homes by bailiffs because of an unfair policy that the government said would be scrapped immediately". A spokesperson for the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government said: "No one should live in fear of a Section 21 eviction and these new figures show exactly why we will abolish them through our Renters' Rights Bill."We're determined to level the playing field by providing tenants with greater security, rights and protections in their homes and our landmark reforms will be implemented swiftly after the bill becomes law."The Renters' Rights Bill will introduce a new system giving new tenants a 12-month "protected period" where they cannot be evicted if the landlord wants to move in or sell the can still get rid of tenants for other reasons including non-payment of rent or criminal behaviour by the tenants. After the first year, landlords would have to give tenants four months' notice to leave, doubling the current time period, and provide a specific reason for ending a tenancy. In September, Housing Minister Matthew Pennycook had said he hoped the bill would be passed "within the first half or around summer next year". However, when Parliament paused for the summer, the bill had just been passed by the House of Lords, albeit with some changes September, the House of Commons will debate and vote on the changes. Both houses of Parliament will need to approve the bill before it can become law. In the latest figures, released by the Ministry of Justice, the number of repossessions by a county court bailiff following a no fault eviction rose from 10,576 between July 2023 and June 2024 to 11,402 the following represents an increase of 8%, a more modest rise compared to the previous two years which saw jumps of 29% and 60% if a tenant doesn't leave a property by a specified date, a landlord can make a possession claim to the courts, with an accelerated procedure, which could lead to a the year to June, there were 30,729 claims, a 4% decrease on the previous 12-month period. Mairi MacRae, Shelter's director of campaigns and policy, said: "To curb record homelessness and ensure renters can live free from the threat of no-fault eviction, the government must deliver on this commitment, pass the bill, and name an implementation date when Section 21 will finally be scrapped."The charity said around 950 households could be evicted for every month a ban is delayed. The National Residential Landlords Association echoed Shelter's demands for the government to set a date when the changes would come into said a "lack of certainty" had "led to a great deal of confusion and concern amongst landlords".The association also noted a rise of more than two weeks in the length of the court process for recovering properties over the past year.A spokesperson added it was "essential that we have clarity about what support will be given to the courts service to ensure it is able to cope with the added pressures which will be created by these reforms". Earlier this month, the homelessness minister Rushanara Ali was forced to resign after revelations about how she handled a property she was renting out. The i newspaper reported that a former tenant of Ali's had been sent an email in November giving four months' notice the lease would not be said shortly after she and the three other tenants had moved out, the house in east London had been re-listed at a rent £700 a month higher, in a practice that would be banned under the Renters' Rights bill would prevent landlords from re-listing a property for rent, if they have ended a tenancy in order to sell, for six months.
Glasgow Times
23 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Migrants attempting to enter UK in refrigerated trailers are ‘constant threat'
The study, published by logistics company Oakland International, stated that 4,415 instances of a truck or van being found with stowaways seeking to reach the UK were recorded between 2016 and 2023. An average of nearly 100 people per month were detected infiltrating trucks entering the UK between January and September last year. People hiding in trailers cause delays, increased costs, potential damage to goods and disposal of produce, researchers found. Companies transporting food, household goods and healthcare items dispose of an average of 56% of stock on an infiltrated lorry. The value of lost stock can be up to tens of thousands of pounds, research found. This can result in revenue loss several times higher. The report, produced with research company Analytiqa, stated: 'The use of refrigerated trailers to gain illegal access for stowaways remains a constant threat to food safety and contributes to considerable unnecessary waste and risk within the food supply chain.' Oakland International co-founder Dean Attwell said: 'The rise in clandestine infiltration is not just a statistic, it's a ticking time bomb for food safety, driver security and public health. 'Every compromised load puts the public at risk and costs the industry millions per year. 'We need urgent, co-ordinated action across the supply chain to implement robust security protocols, improve traceability and ensure accountability at every stage.' In cases where a vehicle is found carrying a hidden entrant, the Government can issue the transport company with fines of up to £10,000 per stowaway. Road Haulage Association senior public affairs lead Ashton Cull said failings within Border Force and the Clandestine Entrant Civil Penalty Scheme mean 'all the responsibility and liability is being unfairly shifted onto drivers and businesses who have taken all possible steps to secure their vehicles'. He added: 'We repeat our call for further and urgent investment in training and technology at our borders to help keep loads secure. 'We want to see a fair system in place that protects drivers, goods and businesses as well as our borders. 'We look forward to seeing greater urgency on this issue.' The Home Office was approached for a comment.
