Fear hospital contractor may quit
It comes after the Otago Daily Times reported CPB Contractors' lawyer, Tom Horder, had publicly slammed the government's approach to contracting major infrastructure projects.
The Australian construction giant is set to build the new Dunedin hospital, but Mr Horder said New Zealand governments over the past decade had gone with the lump-sum model for contracts, which had been inappropriately applied to major projects, with "disastrous" results.
Former Labour health minister Pete Hodgson, who led the early stages of the project, said Mr Horder's remarks were "concerning, to say the least".
"If Health New Zealand Te Whatu Ora [HNZ] go back to the market, sooner or later CPB are going to say, we will not build this thing at a fixed price at $1.88 billion because we won't get subbies [subcontractors] to come and do their bit."
Mr Hodgson said there was always a risk of unknown problems with major infrastructure projects.
"It probably just goes with the territory that you walk into problems that will have to be resolved once they've been discovered — and you can't prediscover them."
He described HNZ's approach to contracting the new hospital as a "shambles" and a potential reputational risk.
"If CPB pull out, then I'm sure [Christchurch-based construction company] Southbase and others would look at it, but they would be adding money, and some of that money would be the risk of the client's behaviour.
"They cannot stop changing their minds."
This would lead to further delays and ballooning costs beyond the $1.88b set aside by the government, he said.
"HNZ have been deciding and undeciding themselves for years now and that means that the Crown, or the health system, will get a reputation across Australasia for being a bad client. That puts the price up."
The project was delayed for several months last year after the government deliberated over whether to build a new hospital on the former Cadbury's site or retrofit the existing hospital.
Financial commentator Bernard Hickey told the ODT he would not be surprised if CPB decided to walk away from the contract.
"It was a mistake [to stop work] because it alienated and shocked so many people who had geared up for significant infrastructure spending for many years; they had invested in people, invested in plant.
"When you're in the contracting game, you need certainty."
An HNZ spokesman said it was progressing commercial negotiations with CPB and was also finalising designs following decisions announced by the new Minister of Health, Simeon Brown, in January.
"While negotiations are continuing, Health NZ is progressing work to get pile capping and foundations work under way by the middle of this year."
Mr Horder has been contacted for comment.
Mr Brown met CPB on February 3.
"Contract negotiations for the completion of the new Dunedin hospital are being led by HNZ," Mr Brown said yesterday.
"What matters now is getting the best possible value for taxpayers — and delivering the hospital that the people of Otago and Southland have been waiting far too long for.
"New Zealanders elected this government because they wanted action, not excuses. ... This government is focused on delivery — and that's exactly what we are doing."
matthew.littlewood@odt.co.nz
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
an hour ago
- Otago Daily Times
Health plan doubts
Anyone ploughing through the 85-page New Zealand Health Plan document might wonder if the wait was worth it. The lack of detail and some of the disconnection between it and planned amendments to existing health law, and other actions already taken or signalled by the government, are among the issues. There is also the thorny question of whether it can do what it says it will. According to Health Minister Simeon Brown, the plan, covering financial years from 2024 to 2027, outlines how Health New Zealand Te Whatu Ora will deliver on the government's health priorities. But Auditor-general (AG) John Ryan, who, under existing law, must audit the costed plan before it goes to the minister, could not give it a green light. He was unable to form an opinion on whether the plan provided a reasonable basis for delivering publicly funded health services to achieve desired improvements in health or gave reasonable effect to the Government Policy Statement on Health. Mr Ryan said the plan did not provide a clear explanation of how the actions intended to improve aspects of the health system had been selected and prioritised, and how they would contribute to the achievement of the desired improvements and targets. Health New Zealand said the plan was indicative of the level of maturity of the organisation and not costed to the level of traceability and integration between the financials, activities and desired improvements from a fully mature plan. The government plans to do away with the requirement for the AG to audit the plan, and its delivery. This move is included in the wide-ranging Healthy Futures (Pae Ora) Amendment Bill, submissions on which close today. Mr Brown says removing requirements for auditing the plan pre- and post-delivery aligns HNZ with other crown entities. The organisation would still have its annual financial statements and statement of performance audited by the AG. While we understand there might be concern such an audit before the plan becomes public may be time-consuming, it is hard not to see this removal of specific scrutiny of the plan altogether is more about avoiding criticism rather than ensuring greater transparency and accountability. It is not the only time recently the Auditor-general's office has been critical of health plans. We have already written of the AG's concerns about whether the government's push for more planned surgery to the private sector may result in patients with complex issues, not suited for such referral, waiting longer than they otherwise might have. As the office pointed out at the health select committee last week, faster care did not necessarily mean more equitable care. It is still not clear how HNZ plans to ensure its plans do not exacerbate inequity, which should include looking at unmet need. The health plan has some clangers in it which do not align with the current government position. In the section on improving timely access to primary and community care, it says "we are resolving pay equity claims and improving nursing recruitment and retention by ensuring there is consistency in nurses' pay". That would have been a surprise to those in the sector who still do not have pay parity with their colleagues in HNZ and whose pay equity claims were scuppered after the government's ambush law changes earlier this year. Public health advocates may have been buoyed by the statement "we aim to reduce the availability and social acceptance of alcohol" in the section on modifiable risk factors, along with reference to strengthening compliance and regulatory approaches in this area. However, recent RNZ reporting showed initial plans to reduce off-licence sale hours now appear to be off the table nationally, and there will be an emphasis on reducing red tape for alcohol retailers to make life easier for them. Hard on the heels of the release of the health plan came another damning report about the health post-code lottery, this time for the treatment of heart disease, the biggest single cause of death in New Zealand. It was another illustration of how much work the government has to do to convince the public it has a cohesive plan for an equitable health system.
Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
Faster, More Accurate Brain Tumour Diagnoses For Kiwis
Minister of Health More than 100 New Zealanders have already benefited from a groundbreaking diagnostic tool that is delivering faster, more accurate brain tumour diagnoses, Health Minister Simeon Brown says. DNA methylation profiling, the international gold standard for diagnosing brain tumours, has been rolled out at Auckland City Hospital over the past year. 'This technology is a game-changer for brain tumour diagnosis in New Zealand. It enables doctors to pinpoint the exact tumour type with greater precision and in less time, meaning patients can start the right treatment sooner,' Mr Brown says. 'Until now, diagnosis was typically made by microscopic examination. In some complex cases, samples were sent overseas for methylation profiling, but that could take up to six weeks. 'Having this cutting-edge capability in New Zealand means more Kiwi patients can access this advanced diagnostic technology locally. Turnaround times are faster, around four weeks, and quicker for urgent cases. 'It also means we can prioritise urgent cases, deliver answers sooner, and give patients and their families greater certainty.' In some recent cases done locally, methylation profiling has significantly altered the initial diagnosis. In others, it has identified rare or unexpected tumour types that may have been missed using traditional methods. The Auckland-based service is one of only three in Australasia, with samples from hospitals around the country also being sent to Auckland for analysis. Along with improving access and outcomes for patients, it is also significantly cheaper than sending samples offshore. 'Delivering faster access to cancer treatment is a key focus for the Government, which is why it is one of our five national health targets. Faster, more accurate diagnosis for brain tumours that may be cancerous is a vital part of that. 'By providing local access to the world's best diagnostic tools, we are improving outcomes for New Zealanders,' Mr Brown says.
NZ Herald
17 hours ago
- NZ Herald
On The Up: Mount Maunganui start-up Dispute Buddy wins global grant for legal tech growth
A small legal tech start-up run from Mount Maunganui has won a global growth grant to help establish itself in overseas markets. Dispute Buddy, founded by Jenny Rudd, was one of two start-ups chosen from a pool of 400 New Zealand-based entrants to win a $5000 Airwallex Global Grant.
