Aoun in Deir al-Qamar: For a united Lebanon and example of coexistence
"On this blessed day, we ask the Virgin Mary, Our Lady of the Hill, to protect Lebanon and its people, so that our beloved land may enjoy peace and prosperity, and we seek her intercession so that the country remains united in all its community diversity, and remains an example of civilization and coexistence in the heart of the East," he said.
The president was welcomed by the heads of the convent and the superior general of the Maronite Order, Father Edmond Rizk, in the presence of the Apostolic Nuncio, Archbishop Paolo Borgia. The mass saw significant political attendance: MPs Marwan Hamadeh, Georges Adwan, Farid Boustany, Camille Shamoun, Ghassan Atallah, Najat Aoun, as well as several other figures.
In his homily, Father Rizk said that the presence of the president on this occasion remained a tradition until 1974, thanking Aoun for upholding it this year.
"We pray for our wounded country in these delicate circumstances, where crises pile up... Our prayers accompany you in your exercise of national responsibilities," he said, addressing the president.
Lebanon was shaken by the war between Hezbollah and Israel in 2023-2024, which continues in various forms despite a cease-fire agreement last November. The issue of the party's weapons, and the state's monopoly on arms, has returned to the forefront, creating deep tensions in the country. The government is expected to discuss this issue on Tuesday. On the occasion of Army Day on Aug. 1, Aoun reaffirmed the state's determination to regain its monopoly over weapons and the decision over war and peace, which garnered him much positive feedback but also harsh criticism from Hezbollah supporters.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Nahar Net
2 hours ago
- Nahar Net
Qassem refuses to commit to arms handover while Israel continues attacks
Qassem refuses to commit to arms handover while Israel continues attacks Hezbollah chief Sheikh Naim Qassem said Tuesday his group would not accept any timetable on handing over its weapons to the Lebanese state while Israeli strikes continue, as the government held a session on the issue. "Any timetable presented for implementation under... Israeli aggression cannot be agreed to," Qassem said in a televised address, urging the state to develop "plans to face the pressure and threats" and not to "deprive the resistance (Hezbollah) of its capacities and strength." "The resistance is fine, strong and dignified, its supporters are resilient and coherent, and its fighters are ready to offer the dearest sacrifices," Qassem added. The Iran-backed Hezbollah emerged badly weakened from more than a year of hostilities with Israel, including two months of all-out war that saw its arsenal pummeled and a slew of senior commanders killed, among them leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah. Long the strongest political force in Lebanon -- with detractors accusing it of using the threat of its weaponry to impose its will on domestic decisions -- Hezbollah has also seen that influence diminish since the conflict. Israel has kept up regular raids on Lebanon despite the November truce, mostly saying it is striking Hezbollah targets, and has threatened to keep doing so until the group has been disarmed. "Are we being asked to engage in dialogue, or to surrender our weapons without dialogue?" Qassem said. "We cannot accept Lebanon committing to gradually giving up its strength while all the strength cards remain in the hands of the Israeli enemy," he added. Qassem also criticized a recent proposal presented by U.S. envoy Tom Barrack on disarming the group. "Whoever looks at the deal Barrack brought doesn't find an agreement but dictates," he said, arguing that "it removes the strength and capabilities of Hezbollah and Lebanon entirely." Hezbollah is the only faction that kept its weapons after Lebanon's 1975-1990 civil war, doing so in the name of "resistance" against Israel, which occupied the country's south until 2000. Last month, Barrack urged Lebanon to "act now" to impose a state weapons monopoly. A Lebanese official with knowledge of the talks told AFP that "Washington is pressuring Lebanon to make Hezbollah hand over its weapons according to a timetable, but without (the U.S.) providing any guarantees." President Joseph Aoun last week said Lebanon was committed to removing "weapons from all armed groups including Hezbollah" and seeing them surrendered to the Lebanese Army. Lebanon is at "a crucial stage" and must choose "between collapse and stability," Aoun had said, linking international support for the crisis-hit country to disarming the group. In his speech, Qassem said that "we do not agree to any new deal other than the existing deal between the Lebanese state and the Israeli entity," referring to the November ceasefire. Qassem also warned Israel against launching any new "large-scale aggression." 'Israel's interest is not to widen the aggression because if they expand, the resistance will defend, the army will defend and the people will defend,' Qassem said. "This defense will lead to the fall of missiles inside the Israeli entity,' he added. Before discussing the fate of its weapons, which it considers a matter of domestic defense strategy, Hezbollah has demanded that reconstruction of areas destroyed during the war begin, and that Israel stop its attacks, withdraw from five areas it occupies and release Lebanese prisoners.
Nahar Net
2 hours ago
- Nahar Net
Shiite ministers walk out as cabinet tasks army with drafting plan to restrict arms before Aug. 31
by Naharnet Newsdesk 05 August 2025, 21:28 Lebanon's government on Tuesday tasked the army with developing a plan to restrict arms to the state by year end, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam said, an unprecedented move that paves the way for disarming Hezbollah. The government "tasked the Lebanese Army with setting an implementation plan to restrict weapons" to the army and other government forces "before the end of this year," with the plan to be presented to the cabinet by the end of this month, Salam told a press conference after a nearly six-hour cabinet session headed by President Joseph Aoun. Environment Minister Tamara al-Zein of the Amal Movement and Health Minister Rakan Nassereddine of Hezbollah had walked out of the cabinet session shortly before its end in protest at its decisions. State Minister for Administrative Development Fadi Makki meanwhile voiced reservations over the part related to setting a timetable before the army presents its proposal and before the continuation of discussions in the presence of all parties in the next cabinet session. Finance Minister Yassine Jaber of the Amal Movement and Labor Minister Mohammad Haidar of Hezbollah did not attend the session due to their presence outside the country. Salam also announced that Cabinet would discuss the latest U.S. paper in its session on Thursday. The Iran-backed Hezbollah emerged badly weakened from more than a year of hostilities with Israel, including two months of all-out war that saw its arsenal pummelled and a slew of senior commanders killed, among them leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah. Long the strongest political force in Lebanon -- with detractors accusing it of using the threat of its weaponry to impose its will on domestic decisions -- Hezbollah has also seen that influence diminish since the conflict. Hezbollah chief Sheikh Naim Qassem, in a televised address while the cabinet meeting was underway, said the Iran-backed group would not disarm while Israeli attacks continue. "Any timetable presented for implementation under... Israeli aggression cannot be agreed to," he said. Israel has kept up regular raids on Lebanon despite the November truce, mostly saying it is striking Hezbollah targets, and has threatened to keep doing so until the group has been disarmed. Qassem also criticized a recent proposal presented by U.S. envoy Tom Barrack on disarming the group. Hezbollah is the only faction that kept its weapons after Lebanon's 1975-1990 civil war, doing so in the name of "resistance" against Israel, which occupied the country's south until 2000. Last month, Barrack urged Lebanon to "act now" to impose a state weapons monopoly. A Lebanese official with knowledge of the talks told AFP that "Washington is pressuring Lebanon to make Hezbollah hand over its weapons according to a timetable, but without (the U.S.) providing any guarantees." The group will not surrender its weapons "without something in return -- the Americans know this well," the official added, speaking on condition of anonymity. Aoun last week said Lebanon was committed to removing "weapons from all armed groups including Hezbollah" and seeing them surrendered to the Lebanese Army. Lebanon is at "a crucial stage" and must choose "between collapse and stability," Aoun had said, linking international support for the crisis-hit country to disarming the group. Before discussing the fate of its weapons, which it considers a matter of domestic defense strategy, Hezbollah has demanded that reconstruction of areas destroyed during the war begin, and that Israel stop its attacks, withdraw from five areas it occupies and release Lebanese prisoners. But analysts say Hezbollah's options for pressing its demands are more limited since the conflict. According to David Wood from the International Crisis Group, Hezbollah could apply pressure to the government by saying "that the (disarmament) decision doesn't represent Lebanon's national interests." It could also encourage its supporters to demonstrate, but any violent escalation "that Hezbollah's leadership deliberately plans and calls for is still a pretty unlikely scenario," he said, noting a domestic confrontation was "not in Hezbollah's interest." However, with the government pushing for disarmament and Hezbollah demanding concessions first, Wood said a diplomatic track could run into an impasse.
Ya Libnan
2 hours ago
- Ya Libnan
Lebanon Must Disarm Hezbollah—Or Risk Becoming the Next Gaza
In this photo released by the Lebanese Presidency press office, Lebanese president Joseph Aoun, centre, and Lebanese Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, left background, lead a Cabinet meeting to discuss the disarmament of Hezbollah, at the presidential palace in Baabda, east of Beirut, Lebanon, August 5, 2025. (Lebanese Presidency press office via AP) By : Ya Libnan Editorial Board The Lebanese Cabinet convened a highly anticipated session Tuesday at Baabda Palace, with one urgent item at the top of its agenda: the disarmament of Hezbollah. But even before the discussion began, the issue was quietly pushed to the end of the session—and now seems likely to be postponed yet again. Notably absent from the meeting were Finance Minister Yassine Jaber of the Amal Movement and Labor Minister Mohammad Haidar of Hezbollah, both reportedly abroad. Their absence—and the Cabinet's inability to confront the issue—speaks volumes about the paralysis that has gripped Lebanon's political system for years. Television networks have already reported that the government is leaning toward delaying any decision on Hezbollah's arms to a future session. But the Lebanese people can no longer afford delay. Postponement is not a strategy—it is surrender. If Lebanon does not take bold and immediate steps to disarm Hezbollah and assert the authority of the state, it will inch closer to a fate similar to Gaza: isolated, devastated, and governed by a militia rather than a legitimate government. For years, Hezbollah has acted as a state within a state—wielding arms, waging wars, and negotiating with foreign powers, all without the consent of the Lebanese people. Its weapons have turned Lebanon into a battlefield for regional conflicts, particularly between Iran and Israel. Every time Hezbollah acts independently, the entire country bears the consequences. Lebanon has already suffered enough. The economic collapse, political dysfunction, and the erosion of state authority are all symptoms of a deeper disease: the normalization of armed militias operating outside the control of the government. Hezbollah is not just a political party—it is an armed force loyal to a foreign power, operating with impunity within a sovereign state. Gaza was once a vibrant coastal strip. Today, it is a shattered enclave, isolated from the world and caught in endless cycles of violence. The world watched in horror as Gaza was pummeled into rubble, but behind the tragedy lies a painful truth: when militias replace the state, the people suffer. This is Lebanon's warning. Hezbollah may claim to defend the country, but in reality, it is dragging Lebanon toward the abyss. Israel has made it clear that it will not tolerate a second front in the north forever. The next war, if it comes, will not spare Beirut, the South, or the Bekaa Valley. It will destroy what remains of Lebanon's infrastructure, economy, and fragile hope. For too long, the international community has treated Hezbollah's weapons as an 'internal matter.' This convenient fiction has allowed the group to expand its power while Lebanon disintegrates. It is time for the Arab League, the United Nations, the European Union, and Lebanon's Western partners to stop hiding behind diplomatic niceties. Arab states—especially Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and the Gulf countries—must support Lebanon's sovereignty by backing its institutions and pressuring for disarmament. Conditional financial aid, targeted sanctions on militia leaders, and a coordinated diplomatic push can help tip the balance. Disarmament won't happen overnight, but without external pressure and support, it won't happen at all. Millions of Lebanese are paying the price for Hezbollah's militarism. From sanctions to isolation, Lebanon's people are suffering not because of natural disasters or foreign invasions, but because of a man-made crisis fueled by weapons in the hands of unaccountable actors. Civil society, religious leaders, and the youth must break the silence. Every delay in addressing Hezbollah's weapons is a betrayal of Lebanon's sovereignty and future. The Lebanese army must be empowered—politically, militarily, and morally—to be the sole defender of the nation. No country can survive with two armies and two decision-making centers. Lebanon now stands at a crossroads. One path leads to sovereignty, reform, and peace. The other leads to war, devastation, and irrelevance. There is no middle road. This is not about vengeance or politics—it is about national survival. Hezbollah can either become a political party like any other, or it must be disarmed. Anything less ensures Lebanon's collapse. The question now is simple: does Lebanon want to be a sovereign nation—or another Gaza?
