
Putin Eyes Peacemaking Role As Israel-Iran Conflict Escalates
Vladimir Putin is eyeing the conflict between Israel and Iran as an opportunity to thrust himself to the forefront of the international stage, more than three years into his invasion of Ukraine.
The Russian president has pitched himself as a possible mediator -- though Moscow's closeness to Iran and Russia's invasion of Ukraine raise doubts about what kind of role he can play, experts say.
The assault on Ukraine and the war in Gaza have strained Moscow's traditionally good relations with Israel, home to a large Russian-born community.
At the same time, Russia has deepened military ties with Iran.
But while Moscow was quick to condemn Israel's strikes on Iran last Friday, Putin also wasted little time phoning both Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian to offer his role as a peacemaker.
"By positioning itself as an indispensable intermediary, Moscow aims to reassert diplomatic relevance despite its pariah status in Europe," said Nicole Grajewski, an analyst at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
It also wants to protect its ally Tehran, facing a potentially existential military clash.
"Russia does not want to see regime change in Iran, especially if it results in a pro-Western government," she added.
Moscow and Tehran in January inked a far-ranging strategic partnership agreement to broaden military ties, and Kyiv and its allies have long accused Iran of supplying Russia with drones and short-range missiles.
- 'Not objective' -
Russia is also seeking to regain influence in the Middle East following the fall of ally Bashar al-Assad in Syria.
"The regime change in Syria caused it to lose ground," said Tatiana Kastoueva-Jean of the French Institute of International Relations.
Russia has previously used the region to boost its international standing.
After being hit with sanctions for the annexation of Crimea, Russia "emerged from international isolation" by "becoming indispensable in the region," Kastoueva-Jean said.
Specifically, by backing Assad in the Syrian civil war and supporting the 2015 Iranian nuclear deal.
However, Moscow's much closer alliance with Tehran this time around could disqualify it from playing the role of trusted mediator.
"Since Russia is seen as Iran's ally, and they have a strategic partnership agreement, such mediation would not inspire confidence in Europe. Nor in Israel," Russian political analyst Konstantin Kalachev told AFP.
"A mediator should not sympathise with one side," he added.
French President Emmanuel Macron is among those to have pushed back at the idea of Putin as a moderator.
"I do not believe that Russia, which is now engaged in a high-intensity conflict and has decided not to respect the UN Charter for several years now, can be a mediator," he said over the weekend.
And asked if it had received a response to its overtures, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Tuesday that Moscow saw "a reluctance, on the part of Israel, to resort to any mediation services or to embark on a peaceful path towards a settlement."
- 'Woo Trump' -
One person who does not seem concerned at a possible role for Russia is Donald Trump, who said he was "open" to Putin playing middleman.
The US President is pushing his own rapprochement with Putin in a complete overhaul of the West's attempts to isolate and punish him for the Ukraine offensive.
Putin may welcome the opportunity to shift the conversation with the White House just as Trump grows increasingly frustrated over Russia's ongoing attacks on Ukraine and failure to strike a peace deal.
"Russia is trying to woo Trump on issues that go beyond Ukraine," said Kastoueva-Jean.
Even before Israel launched its wave of strikes on Iran last Friday, Putin was offering to help secure a deal between Iran and the United States over Tehran's nuclear programme.
But for many the idea of Putin playing peacemaker, more than three years into his invasion of Ukraine is a worrying prospect.
"It would legitimise Russia as an indispensable great power at a time when it is waging the biggest war of aggression on European soil since World War II," said Anna Borshchevskaya, an analyst at The Washington Institute.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
India's defence pact with Cyprus is more about expanding a strategic perch in Middle East's volatile backyard
As PM Modi shakes hands in Nicosia, he's not just building bridges to Europe—he's laying tracks to the Middle East. And in this game, small moves make big waves read more India's latest defence pact with Cyprus is making news. India will strengthen its defence ties with Cyprus through collaboration between the two countries' respective defence industries, Prime minister Narendra Modi said on Monday during a state visit to the island nation. Modi's two-day visit to Cyprus, ahead of his trip to Canada for the G7 summit, is the first by an Indian prime minister in over two decades— and it signals something bigger than a European foothold. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD India's defence partnership with Cyprus is less about cozying up to Europe and more about expanding a strategic perch in the Middle East's volatile backyard. Cyprus—a tiny Mediterranean island at the crossroads of Europe, Asia and the Middle East—has been deeply influenced by Russian interests over the past 30 years, becoming a hub for Russian oligarchs and the country's financial sector to launder money and avoid Western sanctions. This island which was once a bustling vacation spot is now in the middle of an international game of hide and seek. By deepening ties—think joint naval drills, counterterrorism pacts, and real-time intelligence-sharing—India is positioning itself to monitor and shape the region's geopolitics. This small island, often overlooked, is a linchpin between Europe, the Middle East and India in various sectors like energy, trade, digital connectivity, given the island nation's geographical location as the nearest European Union country to the Middle East and India. Cyprus is no mere speck. It is a hotspot for geopolitics, sandwiched between the Middle East's never-ending turmoil, Russia's shady influence, and Turkey's aspirations. Because of its advantageous location, the island is a gateway to Europe, Asia, and the Middle East—it is 65 miles from Turkey and 100 miles from Syria. Cyprus becomes an essential hub when you combine it with the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor, a trade and energy route that Modi is heavily betting on. The goal for India, a rising power with aspirations to rule the world, is to gain influence in an area where the global order is shaped by terrorism, gas, and oil. Amid their growing relationship, it also subtly criticizes Turkey, an ally of Pakistan. India's move to strengthen defence ties with Cyprus, announced during Modi's visit on June 15, 2025, is a masterstroke disguised as a diplomatic handshake. The joint declaration with Cyprus President Nikos Christodoulides outlined plans for more Indian navy port calls, joint maritime training, and a terrorism intelligence-sharing mechanism. This isn't just about naval flags waving in Larnaca. It's about India planting a flag in a region where Russian oligarchs and Middle Eastern financiers thrive in the shadows. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Cyprus has long been a playground for Russia's elite. Oligarchs use its banks to launder billions, with estimates suggesting Russian-linked deposits once hit $30 billion annually. The island's lax regulations and EU status make it a magnet for dirty money, much of it tied to Middle Eastern deals—think oil, arms, and real estate. India, with its growing clout and hunger for intelligence, sees Cyprus as a listening post. By sharing counterterrorism data, Delhi could gain insights into illicit networks fuelling conflicts from Syria to Yemen. Imagine Indian intelligence officers sipping coffee in Nicosia, picking up whispers about Iranian proxies or Russian arms deals. The India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor, or IMEC, a grand plan to link India to Europe via the Middle East. Cyprus, as the EU's easternmost outpost, is a natural hub for transshipment and logistics. Modi called it a 'catalyst for peace and prosperity,' but let's be real: it's also about securing energy routes and countering China's Belt and Road. Cyprus's natural gas fields, contested by Turkey, add another layer. India, eyeing energy security, could invest in these fields, reducing reliance on volatile Gulf supplies. A 2022 defence cooperation agreement already set the stage for joint exercises; now, India's navy could patrol waters where Turkish drills stir tensions. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The Turkey angle can't be ignored. Ankara's support for Pakistan, especially after the April 2025 Pahalgam attack, has India fuming. Cyprus, locked in a decades-long feud with Turkey over the island's northern third, is a natural ally. When Cyprus condemned Pakistan's cross-border terrorism and vowed to raise it at the EU, India took note. Modi's visit, fresh off Operation Sindoor, was a deliberate signal: India backs Cyprus's sovereignty, a diplomatic middle finger to Turkey. This isn't just about defence—it's about reshaping alliances in a region where Turkey's influence looms large. But Cyprus's gray-zone status as a hub for Russian and Middle Eastern money makes it a double-edged sword. India's intelligence-sharing ambitions could pull it into murky waters, where oligarchs and warlords play. Delhi must tread carefully—aligning with Cyprus risks antagonising Moscow, a key defence partner. Yet, the payoff could be huge: real-time data on terrorist financing, drug trafficking, and arms smuggling, all critical for India's security as it navigates Middle Eastern chaos. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Beneath its idyllic Mediterranean charm, Cyprus simmers as one of the world's most volatile geopolitical flashpoints. This tiny island, with its Russian yachts and Middle Eastern cash, is India's backdoor into a volatile region. By cozying up to Cyprus, India gains a front-row seat to the region's secrets, from oligarchs' bank accounts to terrorist networks. India's defence play here isn't about chasing European dreams—it's about staking a claim in the Middle East's high-stakes chess game. As Modi shakes hands in Nicosia, he's not just building bridges to Europe—he's laying tracks to the Middle East. And in this game, small moves make big waves. The writer is a columnist. His articles have appeared in various publications like The Independent, The Globe and Mail, South China Morning Post, The Straits Times, etc. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.


India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
Trump to lunch with Pakistan army chief Munir, PM Modi rejects invitation, Pakistan is worried but good news for India due to...
(File) Trump-Munir meeting: In a major development that could impact the India-US relations, Pakistan army chief Field Marshal Asim Munir will meet US President Donald Trump for lunch at the White House on Wednesday, where Islamabad claims talks will held on the Kashmir issue and Pakistan's conflict with India, along with other pressing matters, including the raging Israel-Iran war. Munir's US trip as Trump admin readies to attack Iran Munir's meeting with Trump comes at a time when the US is mulling to get involved in Israel-Iran war, and send fighter jets and American troops to aid Israel in taking out Iranian nuclear facilities, especially the hardened Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant, which is built deep underground and cannot be damaged by conventional bunker buster bombs. In a public address in Washington DC, Asim Munir had declared Pakistan's 'clear and strong' support for Iran in its war with Israel while also backing US efforts to de-escalate the situation. While US readies to attack Iran, Asim Munir as well as the Pakistan's civilian government led by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, has announced strong support for Tehran in its war against the Jewish state, a situation that presents a major conundrum for Islamabad to balance its ties with Washington. Its is believed that US could use Pakistani airbases to launch attacks against Iran if it decides to get involved in the Israel-Iran war, and Trump's meeting with Munir could be meant to sway the Pakistani army chief to change Islamabad's stance on Tehran. Experts say that if America jumps into the war against Iran, then Pakistan's airbase can be used and that is why Trump is giving so much importance to Munir. The Pakistanis themselves are not able to digest the fact that the US President is meeting an Army Chief. Pakistani journalist and analyst Waqas wrote on X, 'It is surprising that Trump is going to have lunch with the Army Chief of Pakistan. That too when his counterpart is the PM of Pakistan. Meeting a low-level government official is out of protocol but it shows that Trump needs General Munir. Trump is going to talk about Pakistan's support in the war with Iran.' Geopolitical have pointed out the significance of Asim Munir being invited to a meeting with the US President at the White House, as it not the norm to host foreign Army chief in the Oval Office. 'Senior US officials often engage with Pakistani Army Chiefs, but rarely is one hosted at the White House by the US President. One of many reasons why Munir's scheduled meeting with Trump is so significant, especially as his administration considers its options regarding the war in Iran,' South Asia analyst Michael Kugelman wrote on X. Kugelman noted that the Trump-Munir meeting shouldn't only be seen through the lens of the Israel-Iran war as the there's been US-Pakistan engagement on critical minerals, crypto, and Counter Terrorism. 'Trump takes a deep personal interest in all of these. And Munir is empowered to talk about it all. Also, Kashmir,' he added. According to Derek J. Grossman, National Security and Indo-Pacific analyst, it was time for India to 'speak up'. 'India, time to speak up! Trump this week is scheduled to meet at the White House with Pakistani Field Marshal Asim Munir, who New Delhi believes is the terrorist mastermind behind attacks on Indians.' Good news for India? While Asim Munir being hosted at the White House is certainly a setback for India's diplomatic efforts to isolate Pakistan on the global stage, experts note that there may be silver lining for New Delhi as Iran would likely move closer to India if the Pakistan army chief is coerced into changing Islamabad's stance on the Israel-Iran conflict. 'Trump will meet Asim Munir. There is no doubt he (Trump) will seek cooperation from Pakistan against Iran, which includes providing Pakistani airbases to the US Army. This is a tempting offer for the Pakistani army, but Tehran could move closer to India if Islamabad allows US to attack it from its soil,' West Asia affairs expert Kabir Taneja wrote on X. PM Modi declined Trump invite Notably, it has also come to the fore that Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Wednesday rejected an offer to visit the US after attending the G7 summit in Canada. According to details, Trump, in a 35-minute telephone conversation with Modi, had requested the Indian Prime Minister to visit the US after departing from Canada, presumably to arrange a meeting with Pakistan's de-facto ruler, Asim Munir and the Indian PM, with the US President acting as mediator. However, PM Modi turned down the offer, reinforcing India's stance of not accepting any third-party mediation to resolve its issues with Pakistan 'Earlier today, Prime Minister Narendra Modi held a telephonic conversation with US President Donald Trump on the sidelines of the G7 Summit, which took place in Canada. During the conversation, which lasted over half an hour, PM Modi briefed the US President about India's Operation Sindoor and firmly conveyed the message that India has never accepted and will never accept mediation on the issues with Pakistan,' Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri informed..
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
'I may do it, I may not; No one knows what I'll do': Trump on striking Iran
Donald Trump said his patience with Iran had run out, as Israeli airstrikes intensified in Tehran. Meanwhile, Iran's Supreme Leader Khamenei rejected Trump's call for unconditional surrender Prateek Shukla New Delhi US President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that his patience with Iran had run out. His statement came amid intensified Israeli airstrikes around Tehran. Speaking to reporters outside the White House, Trump said Iran had made contact, but added, 'it's very late to be talking.' He refused to confirm whether the US would support Israel's bombing campaign against the Islamic Republic. 'There's a big difference between now and a week ago,' Trump said. 'Nobody knows what I'm going to do.' Asked if he is moving closer to striking Iran's nuclear facilities, Trump said, 'I may do it. I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do.' Iran's Supreme Leader rejects US demands In response, Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei rejected Trump's calls for unconditional surrender in a televised address — his first since Friday. 'The Americans should know that any US military intervention will undoubtedly be accompanied by irreparable damage,' Khamenei said. 'Intelligent people who know Iran, the Iranian nation and its history will never speak to this nation in threatening language because the Iranian nation will not surrender.' Israel continues strikes; civilians flee Tehran As the conflict escalated, Israeli airstrikes intensified, prompting residents to flee Tehran in large numbers. Highways out of the city were jammed with people trying to escape the bombing. 'As we promised – we will continue to strike at symbols of governance and hit the Ayatollah regime wherever it may be,' said Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz. According to Israel's military, 50 fighter jets struck 20 targets in Tehran, including facilities involved in missile production. The Israeli military also urged civilians to evacuate parts of the city for their own safety. Trump's tone has shifted in recent days — from hinting at a diplomatic solution to suggesting military involvement. In a series of social media posts on Tuesday, he speculated about targeting Khamenei and demanded Iran's 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!'