logo
Los Angeles grocers partner with FEMA for wildfire resource assistance

Los Angeles grocers partner with FEMA for wildfire resource assistance

CBS News05-02-2025

Three Los Angeles-area grocery stores will host mini resource stations this weekend, to provide critical resources for businesses, employees and residents impacted by the recent wildfires.
Representatives with the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the Small Business Administration and the County of Los Angeles will be at resource stations set up at Ralphs and Food 4 Less stores in Malibu, Venice, and Pasadena on Saturday, Feb. 8.
At these locations, FEMA will provide essential information and resources for individuals and families impacted by the fires, while the SBA will assist affected businesses, homeowners and renters with financial guidance and recovery support.
"We know how overwhelming recovery can be after a disaster, and we want people to know they're not alone," said Curtis Brown, Federal Coordinating Officer. "By working with Ralphs and Food 4 Less, we're bringing support directly to the communities that need it most—making it easier for families and businesses to get the help they need to rebuild and move forward."
Saturday's event runs from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. at the following locations:
Food 4 Less - 1329 N Lake Ave, Pasadena
Ralphs - 910 Lincoln Blvd, Venice
Ralphs - 23841 Malibu Rd, Malibu
Bracken's Kitchen will serve free hot meals to those affected by the fires at the Pasadena Food 4 Less throughout the week, while supplies last.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Chicago Sports Network finally coming to Comcast, but on higher-priced plan
Chicago Sports Network finally coming to Comcast, but on higher-priced plan

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Chicago Sports Network finally coming to Comcast, but on higher-priced plan

Chicago sports fans, get your TV clickers – and your checkbooks – ready. Eight months after launching, the Chicago Sports Network will finally hit the airwaves Friday on Comcast, but it's going to cost subscribers more to watch the White Sox, Bulls and Blackhawks. Advertisement The nascent sports network is joining the Comcast lineup on the higher-priced Ultimate tier as part of an inaugural carriage agreement with the cable giant. CHSN will be live for Friday night's play between the Kansas City Royals and the White Sox at Rate Field, making the home team's 64th game of the season the first one available to one million Chicago-area Comcast subscribers. Terms of the carriage deal, announced Friday morning, were not disclosed. 'We are excited to bring the White Sox, Bulls, and Blackhawks to fans across the region with the launch of CHSN for Xfinity TV and Comcast Business customers,' Chris Smith, senior vice president of Comcast's Chicago region, said in a news release. CHSN will be on Channel 200, where NBC Sports Chicago resided until pulling the plug last fall. For Comcast customers on the lower-priced basic plan, Channel 200 already bears a message that CHSN requires a subscription upgrade to watch. Advertisement The Ultimate tier costs an additional $20 per month, on top of the $20.25 regional sports network fee Comcast charges Chicago-area subscribers each month. Comcast has been issuing a monthly $8.85 credit to partially offset that fee during the ongoing negotiations with CHSN. For basic subscribers that don't choose to upgrade, the $8.85 credit will become a permanent adjustment, bringing the regional sports fee down to $11.40 per month. The Marquee Sports Network, the pay-TV home of the Cubs, remains on the lower-priced basic tier, at least for now. The CHSN carriage deal ends a protracted TV blackout for frustrated Chicago-area Comcast subscribers, who may have missed the entire Bulls and Blackhawks seasons, and a big chunk of the current White Sox campaign. 'On behalf of the entire CHSN team, we're proud to welcome Comcast's Xfinity TV customers to a network built exclusively for Chicago sports fans,' Jason Coyle, president of Chicago Sports Network, said in the news release. 'With more than 300 live Bulls, Blackhawks, and White Sox games each year, along with original programming that highlights Chicago's pro, college, and high school sports, CHSN delivers the most comprehensive and locally focused coverage available. This deal allows us to reach even more fans across the city and suburbs, deepen connections, and reinforce CHSN as the home for Chicago sports all day, every day.' Advertisement A joint venture between the Sox, Bulls, Blackhawks and Nashville, Tennessee-based Standard Media, CHSN went live Oct.1 on pay-TV platforms DirecTV and Astound, and over the air on WJYS-Ch. 62. It soon added streaming service FuboTV and its own direct-to-consumer streaming app, but until now, was unable to strike a deal with Comcast, the market's largest pay-TV provider. Comcast was a partner in the predecessor NBC Sports Chicago, the regional sports network which ended a 20-year run in September at the conclusion of a White Sox season that saw the team set an MLB record for losses. Sources familiar with the negotiations said Comcast has been looking to move both CHSN and Marquee Sports Network to its more expensive Ultimate tier, something it has done with other regional sports networks across the U.S. in recent months. While CHSN has been blacked out, Marquee, which launched in 2020, has remained on Comcast through a series of short-term extensions after its inaugural carriage agreement expired Sept. 30. A Marquee spokesperson did not return a request for comment. Advertisement The Cubs, who are leading their division with one of the best records in baseball, likely give Marquee more leverage in negotiations with Comcast, according to industry analysts. In New York, Comcast threatened to black out the Yankees' YES network before opening day as it looked to move the broadcasts to its Ultimate tier. The Federal Communications Commission weighed in and an agreement was reached to keep the YES network on Comcast's basic tier, at least for now. Jerry Reinsdorf, chairman of the White Sox and Bulls, made a visit to FCC Chairman Brendan Carr in April to lobby for government help in getting CHSN on the air with Comcast in Chicago. But the carriage agreement appears to have played out on Comcast's terms, with CHSN moved to a higher-priced tier, requiring subscribers to pay a premium price to watch the White Sox, Bulls and Blackhawks. For years, those three teams and the Cubs were partnered with Comcast on NBC Sports Chicago, and offered to subscribers — for a monthly fee — as part of the basic package. The Cubs broke off to start Marquee in 2020, and the remaining teams went on to form CHSN. Advertisement In launching the new network, the Sox, Bulls and Blackhawks essentially traded Comcast for Standard Media, a small TV station owner that engineered the over-the-air strategy employed by CHSN, and is leading distribution negotiations with the pay-TV providers. Standard Media, which owns 15% of CHSN, is part of Standard General, the New York-based hedge fund that also controls Bally's, including its Chicago flagship, a $1.7 billion casino complex rising up at the site of the former Freedom Center printing plant in River West. Carriage fees make up the bulk of the revenue for regional sports networks. Most of that is funded by cable subscribers, whether they watch regional sports networks or not. But as cord-cutting accelerates, pay-TV providers have cut back on the fees they are willing to pay for regional sports networks, long the cash cows of the cable bundle. While the terms of the new CHSN-Comcast carriage agreement have not been disclosed, moving the sports network to the higher-priced tier is a way for the cable provider to make the deal work financially, while shifting the cost more directly to subscribers. Advertisement How many Comcast subscribers upgrade their plans to get CHSN, remains to be seen. During their inaugural seasons on CHSN, the Hawks and Bulls both missed the playoffs. Meanwhile, the White Sox, coming off the most losses in major league history last year, have the worst record in the American League through 63 games this season. But for die-hard fans ready to pay another $20 a month for the privilege, the remainder of the White Sox season, and the rest of CHSN's programming, is finally there on Comcast. rchannick@

Simon Miller Pre-Fall 2025 Collection
Simon Miller Pre-Fall 2025 Collection

Vogue

time4 hours ago

  • Vogue

Simon Miller Pre-Fall 2025 Collection

The Simon Miller girl is growing up. While Chelsea Hansford has always envisioned her customer as a working creative, she has spent the last several years tailoring the brand's look to mid-career professionals. 'We've been honing in on our audience that's a little older—thirties, forties,' she said. 'She's an interior designer, she's an artist, she's a gallerist, she's a businesswoman, the founder of VC.' Hansford is catering to her audience of free-spirited venture capitalists and gallerinas with an expansion of suiting and poplin pieces. Perhaps the biggest boon for business: this season, for the first time, Simon Miller is offering a sleeveless version of its staple Lock top, a poplin button-up with an open back flap and an adjustable waist-cinching tie. But there is also an abstract floral suit and a knit mini shift dress worn over matching pants, both of which could work for an 8-to-8 kind of day. As weddings have become multi-day events, Hansford is also thinking of brides who don't want to break the bank. A white sequined pantsuit befits a City Hall wedding, while a body-skimming strapless dress could suit a rehearsal dinner. 'It doesn't necessarily mean we're the go-to destination for gowns, but we want to be her destination for guest of wedding, and fun parties, and events, and cocktails as well,' she said. Hansford recently opened the first brick-and-mortar Simon Miller store in California in downtown Los Angeles's Arts District, counting Hauser & Wirth and hip eatery Manuela as neighbors. For her, its location—and company—are indicative of where Simon Miller is heading. 'I wanted to do our own thing that represented where we're going as a brand and champion the arts, and that's more of the working creatives,' she said. 'That's our customer.'

Gavin Newsom is trying to rescue Hollywood. It may be too late.
Gavin Newsom is trying to rescue Hollywood. It may be too late.

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Gavin Newsom is trying to rescue Hollywood. It may be too late.

LOS ANGELES — Gavin Newsom wants to claim the role of Hollywood's superhero. But California's iconic industry is so battered that even its governor may not be able to save it. Newsom has made doubling the state's film tax credit his No. 1 budget priority as he tries to lure back show business production that has fled in droves to other states and countries, even while he proposes slashing other pet causes such as expanded health care benefits. It's a clear bid to rewrite the 'California crack-up' script that has transfixed conservative media — and President Donald Trump — and play the leading man role that woos production back to its homeland. But Newsom's effort also calls attention to the yawning gulf between what the industry wants and what Sacramento can deliver. Already, there are fears that Newsom's best efforts could amount to too little, too late. Newsom has doggedly pursued support from the Los Angeles-based power players and their lavish political donations as he has climbed the ranks of California politics. But now, as his term's expiration date approaches and he eyes a potential 2028 White House bid, the industry exodus has opened a window for Trump to claim the title of industry savior for himself. The president, Newsom's frequent archnemesis, has disparaged the governor's stewardship of his state's signature industry as 'grossly incompetent.' California's film tax credit, which has languished for years behind more lucrative offers from states like Georgia or overseas options like the U.K., could be a place for Newsom to cement his bonafides as Hollywood's champion. The most active players lobbying for its expansion — a coalition of labor unions, studios and industry execs — feel 'an enormous sense of gratitude' toward Newsom, said Scott Budnick, the film producer behind 'The Hangover' and other blockbusters. But there's no guarantee that the heftier tax credit will make it through this fraught budget season unscathed. And even staunch supporters like Budnick acknowledge the effort, if successful, is only an initial step to a Hollywood course correction. 'My hope is we blow through this money, and we're gonna have to go back to the governor for even more next year, and we can show that it's an economic engine for the state as well,' he said. Complicating Newsom's Hollywood courtship is the pronounced funk that has pervaded the industry, which has been pummeled by a series of crises. The pandemic, the dual writers' and actors' strikes in 2023 and the historic Los Angeles wildfires in January have convulsed a town already rocked by changing business models. The industry-wide malaise has led some insiders to greet Newsom's tax credit push with a weary shrug or a sense this is a fruitless endeavor. 'The time for this discussion was 10, 15, 20 years ago,' said Richard Rushfield, editorial director and columnist with The Ankler, an industry newsletter. And even if he does notch a win with a doubled tax credit, it far from guarantees loyalty from a Hollywood political class that tends to prioritize other causes, such as LGBTQ+ issues or abortion rights, when backing a candidate. 'The overwhelming majority of Hollywood dollars that go into politics is not based on industry needs or priorities, but rather based on personal policy beliefs [and] values – often to the dismay of industry lobbyists,' said Donna Bojarsky, a longtime Democratic consultant and Hollywood fundraiser. In other words, Newsom's controversial podcast interview with conservative influencer Charlie Kirk may end up being more influential to Hollywood donor checkbooks than any budgetary mountains he moves for the film tax credit. 'Depression-era level' unemployment As a Northern Californian, Newsom was never one of Hollywood's own. But over the course of his governorship, he has diligently built bonds with industry heavy-hitters such as Netflix CEO Ted Sarandos, whom he frequently texts. Newsom met privately on Thursday with Jon Voight, the actor whom Trump named a 'special ambassador' to Hollywood. 'He has real relationships with Hollywood and that makes a substantial difference, as opposed to the way [previous governor] Jerry Brown was a bit more of an outsider,' said Jay Sures, vice chair of United Talent Agency who was appointed by Newsom to the University of California Board of Regents. 'He can pick up the phone and call just about any CEO and knows them on a first-name basis.' Among the Hollywood donor crowd, Newsom has mostly been regarded as a strong standout among national Democrats considered potential 2028 contenders — though many in the industry, burned by Trump's win in 2024, say they're still shopping around for the next fresh face. Newsom's vocal advocacy on national issues like abortion rights has won plaudits; his comments questioning the fairness of transgender athletes in girls' sports have been less warmly received. 'Gavin has very solid support, but of course, he has his detractors too. And his more recent actions have mystified some,' Bojarsky said. 'But generally people feel positively that he's a sophisticated, charismatic politician that is willing to be out there and take risks.' Lately, the wobbly state of the industry has become a major tentpole in Newsom's Hollywood outreach. FilmLA, which tracks the number of days movies, television shows and reality programs are shot in Los Angeles city and county, found that 2024 was the second-least productive year it had ever observed since its formation 30 years ago — only 2020, the height of the coronavirus pandemic, was worse. 'The levels of unemployment in this industry in Los Angeles are at Depression-era levels,' said Assemblymember Rick Chavez Zbur, one of the primary lawmakers championing the new film tax credit in the Legislature. 'In some of the unions, they have had unemployment levels of 40 and 50 percent.' Tax incentives are seen by the industry as a way to stop the bleeding — even if some economists say such credits can be revenue-losers for states. Proponents argue that in-state production has wide-reaching economic ripple effects that bolster not just the camera grips and makeup artists working on set, but dry cleaners, caterers and other small businesses that benefit from a local film shoot. The projects approved for the tax credit in California from 2020 to mid-2023 generated $7.3 billion in in-state economic activity, according to the California Film Commission. In recent weeks, awareness of the crisis crossed into the broader zeitgeist. Even a recent episode of HBO's acclaimed comedy 'Hacks' included a joke about the film tax credit, complete with a Newsom name drop. A Newsom aide said he was amused by the shoutout and happy the issue had 'broken through' — glossing over the fact that the industry's clear frustration with state government was manifest as a punchline on a hit television show. But it was a surprise social media missive from Trump that catapulted the issue to international attention, as the president touted his favorite policy tool, tariffs, as the solution to stanch the overseas production bleeding. Caught off guard by Trump's post, Newsom challenged the president on X to back a $7.5 billion federal tax incentive. Newsom, using the shorthand of finance and Silicon Valley, came up with the figure as a way to '10x' the $750 million tax break he was championing in California, according to the aide, who was granted anonymity to describe internal discussions. After proposing that enormous sum, however, Newsom has not been deeply involved in the Washington efforts that have stirred to life now that Trump has shown at least some awareness of runaway production. The governor has had some conversations with figures in Washington who are working on a federal proposal, such as Rep. Laura Friedman, a Democrat from Los Angeles and a former film producer. But, Friedman said, the push to craft a new federal incentive and for California to expand its existing tax credits are 'completely separate efforts.' 'His job is to get a budget allocation through the California Legislature … and it's not a slam dunk that they're going to get the money that he asked for,' said Friedman, who served eight years in the statehouse. 'If my experience in the Legislature is any indication, he's going to have a lot of work to do to make that happen. So he should be focusing there.' 'Help is on the way' Sacramento has always been a source of frustration for Hollywood, dating far earlier than Newsom's tenure. There was a sense that California leaders did little to boost their crown-jewel industry, giving other states and countries a prime opportunity to poach the business by offering lavish incentives. 'We, for so many years, have sat on our laurels, assumed dominance in this area because of the history of Hollywood and expected that we didn't need to do very much to retain this iconic industry,' said state Sen. Ben Allen, a Los Angeles Democrat who is one of the lead legislators involved in negotiations. 'Unfortunately, dollars speak louder than tradition.' One hurdle for advocates of a film tax credit is the perception that the program is a subsidy for glitzy Los Angeles studio execs and celebrities, a view that stoked regional rivalries with representatives from other parts of the state. This time, Newsom put a marker down in October — days before he knew the outcome of the presidential election and months before the typical budget negotiating season — about his intention to more than double the tax incentive, which currently sits at $330 million. 'We made a decision … to put a stake in the ground and go,' said DeeDee Myers, Newsom's chief economic adviser. 'That will give us time to make the case, to educate people, and it's also a signal to the industry: 'Hey, we've got your back, and help is on the way.'' The goal of $750 million has remained unchanged, even as the state's budget outlook darkened dramatically in recent months, setting off fierce battles for funding among competing Democratic interest groups. Newsom and his legislative partners have tried to avoid the usual political tripwires. To entice lawmakers far from Hollywood's center, they proposed a bonus for productions filmed outside of the 30-mile zone encircling Los Angeles. They made union entertainment workers, not studio bosses or celebrities, the face of their campaign. By portraying the incentive as a middle-class jobs program, they've largely neutralized objections from elsewhere in organized labor, which would otherwise target the tax credit as a corporate giveaway. 'This was the story of hundreds of union workers who have had to mortgage homes and foreclose on their homes and move to different states because of just how slow the business is,' said Budnick, an advocate for getting formerly incarcerated people into the pipeline for industry jobs. Hollywood hopes collide with Sacramento reality As budget negotiations careen toward a June 15 spending plan deadline, Newsom is trying to assure the anxious industry he'll be able to deliver. His office reiterated on Thursday he is 'fully committed' to securing a revamped $750 millon credit. Even if Newsom is able to claim victory in the final gauntlet of budget negotiations, it's far from assured that the effort will break through Hollywood's current malaise. A panel of top studio executives at the ritzy Milken Global Issues conference last month offered a stark illustration of the gap between Hollywood's expectations and the realities in Sacramento. Casey Bloys, who runs HBO, lamented how California's tax credits — which are capped and distributed via lottery — compared to Georgia's uncapped incentive program. 'Because it's capped, you can't plan,' Bloys said. 'You have to get into a lottery, and you're not sure if your show is going to get the tax break or not.' But an uncapped tax credit was never in the cards in California, especially in this fraught budget year. Newsom is betting that he can make at least some headway in pulling Hollywood out of its doldrums. But that success depends on the studios actually being open to returning to California — or if the enticements from outside its borders prove too tempting to pass up. 'My sense is that people throughout the industry — from the folks building sets to studio execs — recognize that Newsom is doing more than any governor in memory to try and save California's entertainment industry,' said Brian Brokaw, a Newsom adviser who sits on the California Film Commission. 'Ultimately what this will come down to is whether those who actually make the decisions about where to shoot share the governor's commitment to California.' The exodus of production from the state may be so long gone that nothing Newsom does now will substantially reverse the tide. But perhaps the governor's film tax flex could at least quell some uncomfortable questions about Hollywood flight under his watch — particularly if he wants to tout his record in a 2028 White House run. 'If he's going to run for president, this is gonna come up,' said Rushfield, the longtime industry watcher. 'And he's got to be able to say that he tried.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store