Man sets fire to a moving train in Seoul over divorce in viral video
The accused, identified by his surname Won, allegedly poured petrol inside a running train on Seoul Subway Line 5 and set it ablaze while it was passing through an undersea tunnel between Yeouinaru and Mapo stations on May 31.
According to the Seoul Southern District Prosecutors' Office, Won has been charged with attempted murder, arson on a moving vehicle, and violating the Railway Safety Act. Authorities said he committed the act out of frustration over the outcome of his divorce proceedings.
Disturbing footage from the incident, now widely shared on social media, shows the man walking inside the subway coach with a bottle in hand, pouring a flammable liquid on the floor. Moments later, he sets himself and the surrounding area on fire, triggering panic among passengers.
The blaze left six passengers injured, while 23 others—including the accused—were treated for smoke inhalation. In total, 129 people received emergency medical assistance.
According to The Chosun Daily, the damage to public property has been estimated at over 330 million won (approximately ₹ 2 crore), with one subway car severely burnt.
Won was transferred to prosecutors on June 9 following police custody. Authorities say investigations are ongoing to assess gaps in subway security and prevent such incidents in the future.
Meanwhile, South Korean police have detained six US citizens who were attempting to deliver around 1,300 plastic bottles filled with rice, dollar notes and Bibles to North Korea, a police official said on Friday.
The group had been trying to float the bottles by sea at a border island west of the capital Seoul near the isolated North before being spotted by a military patrol, the official at the Incheon Ganghwa Police Station told Reuters.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
South Korean woman says Gurgaon mall cut utilities at her restaurant; police play mediator
For over a decade, South Korean national Hyeyoung Lee has been running her restaurant, MISO, at Global Foyer Mall on Gurgaon's Golf Course Road. Earlier this week, to her shock, she received a demand notice of Rs 9 lakh from the mall management for damage to the building caused by alleged water leakage from her restaurant. She refused to pay the amount — resulting in the disconnection of her electricity and water supply, police said. On Thursday, Lee lodged a written complaint against the mall management alleging harassment over wrongfully calculated unpaid dues. The firm that runs the mall refuted the claims. In a video posted by the woman on Instagram Friday, she said she's been running her restaurant for 12 years. 'For the last 24 hours, my light and water have been disconnected. I have made so many requests, but no one is listening. I had given a written complaint at Sushant Lok Police Station, but till now no one has come to help me out,' she stated in the video. On Friday, police arranged a meeting between the parties concerned at the Sushant Lok police station to discuss the issue. 'Despite the matter being of a civil nature, Gurugram police facilitated a meeting between the two sides. The dispute over electricity and water was resolved during the meeting. Both parties agreed to hold another meeting on Monday, in the presence of their legal teams, to address the pending Rs 9 lakh dispute,' a Gurgaon Police spokesperson said. The electricity connection was restored (for now) around 12.30 pm Saturday, the woman told The Indian Express. Lee (43), who has been living in Gurgaon since 2011, said she has been facing issues with the mall management since last October, when they allegedly began sending her inflated water bills. 'I've been receiving water bills of Rs 25,000 per month. When my restaurant was on the ground floor, it never exceeded Rs 5,000,' she claimed. She also alleged that the management is harassing her so that she vacates the premises, adding that she has three years left on her current lease. On August 5 (Tuesday), the realty company operating the mall issued a 'final and non-negotiable' notice to the restaurant alleging multiple breaches — that its water leakage caused Rs 9.5 lakh damage to passenger lifts, and Rs 2 lakh damage to the false ceiling, risking collapse. It demanded that the payment be made within 24 hours and threatened disconnection of services, legal action, and eviction if it was not met. Lee refuted the allegations. 'The leak is from one of their pipelines. There are no pending bills, our accountants have tallied and verified multiple times.' The water leak has also destroyed parts of her restaurant, she claimed. Dhirendra Singh, director of Rajdurbar Buildcon Private Limited, which runs the mall through a holding company, told The Indian Express Saturday that the matter has been resolved. He rejected all allegations, particularly of wrongful bills being demanded and plans to evict the restaurant. 'They have accepted their dues amounting to around Rs 12 lakh+GST,' he claimed. 'There are a hundred other shops in the mall, and no one else has ever filed any complaint against us. Why would I create issues towards getting rental income?' he added.
Economic Times
3 hours ago
- Economic Times
UK's Keir Starmer is walking a fine line in tackling immigration
Reuters Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer Do you beat the populists or join them when they whip up public outrage over immigrant numbers? That's the dilemma facing center-left and center-right parties across Europe — and Britain is no exception. Nigel Farage, leader of the populist Reform UK party, is riding high in the opinion polls this summer while campaigning on the alleged links between crime and high immigration. Labour and the Conservatives struggle to respond: They have to tread a fine line between acknowledging genuine public fears and inflaming rank prejudice. To start with the statistics: Foreign nationals comprise one-in-eight of the 87,000 prisoners in England and Wales. The numbers of foreign sexual offenders (1,700) and violent criminals (3,250) in British prisons rose by 10% and 9%, respectively, last year. Ignore or deny these figures, and voters will suspect an establishment cover-up. Unfortunately, they have good cause to distrust their political leaders on this score. Labour councils have a woeful record on tackling rape gangs of south Asian origin, and in 14 years in office the Tories made a series of reckless promises to restrict migration that they never came close to keeping and which contributed to their heavy defeat at the last election. Shabana Mahmood, the justice secretary, has said she will expedite the removal of foreign criminals from prisons. Legislation already due to come into force next month opens up the deportation route to prisoners after serving 30% of their term behind bars (rather than half of the sentence as at present). Now Labour seems to find its own policies too laggardly — Mahmood wants to see rapists, drug dealers and serious burglary convicts removed straight after sentencing to their home countries, announcing on Sunday that the law will change to allow the 'immediate deportation of convicted foreign criminals.'If the traditional parties simply follow Farage's noisy agenda, they risk inflaming racial tensions — a self-fulfilling doom loop. Although legal migration numbers to the UK are declining, in the first six months of 2025 a record number of illegal migrants — around 25,000 — arrived in small boats across the Channel from France, a 50% increase on last year. Politicians can no longer afford to fob off concerns as exaggerated or limited to a few hard-hit areas; the impact of the boats on public opinion is felt as much in Sunderland as Southend. In this charged atmosphere, honest communications are vital. For one thing, many Britons are basing their views on topsy-turvy perception of the figures. A new poll by YouGov found that almost half of Britons (47%) think there are more migrants staying in the UK illegally rather than legally; crucially, this view is held by 72% of those who want to see mass removals. In reality, the majority of immigration is some Labour ministers have not helped their own reputations by obfuscating on this topic. Speaking to a BBC Question Time audience a month ago, Chief Secretary to the Treasury Darren Jones caused an uproar when he claimed that the majority of people crossing the Channel in small boats were "children, babies and women." In fact, 81% (5,183) of small-boat arrivals in the first three months of 2025 were men. Other ministers have taken a different tack, contextualizing crimes committed by asylum seekers as being little greater than the local White adult male cohort in Britain's unemployment blackspots. That message hardly reassures voters who live in those neighborhoods. At a recent press conference with French President Emmanuel Macron, Prime Minister Keir Starmer declared he would prove that 'social democracy has the answers' that Farage's 'performative populism' can't give. One such answer is an oversold, time-limited deal on migrants with France, launched last week. 'No gimmicks, just results', promised Starmer, adding "they will be sent back.' In truth, only 6% or about 50 a week are likely to be removed in exchange for accepting a similar number of genuine asylum claimants. Some deterrent. Starmer's message is muddled — he sometimes leans into Farage's inflammatory rhetoric too. The PM was forced to apologize for a speech a few months ago in which he warned that the UK was in danger of becoming 'an island of strangers' as a result of mass migration. His party thought this phrase was racialist dog-whistling. At other times, he's spoken of 'rounding up' migrants. And the PM has rhetorical competition — Robert Jenrick, the ferociously ambitious shadow justice secretary in a Conservative party that is hemorrhaging voters to Reform, believes in matching Farage for outrage. In one of his widely shared videos, Jenrick referred to data on sexual offences that show 'Afghans and Eritreans are more than 20 times more likely to be convicted of sexual offences than British citizens.' In London, he added '40% last year of all of the sexual crimes were committed by foreign nationals, despite the fact that they only make up 25% of the population.'That's one way of looking at the numbers. The BBC's head of statistics, Robert Cuffe, however, advises that the proportion of foreign nationals behind bars is smaller than their population share. Jenrick is an energetic campaigner, but Westminster wisdom says 'you can't out-Reform Reform.' His bet is he can defeat that truism — but it's easier for Farage to push the boundaries than it is for the Tories or Labour, who risk shedding moderate voters. Farage, the pied piper of populism, can always play a new tune. Reform's leader made headlines when he accused Warwickshire Police of a 'cover-up' for refusing to reveal the nationality and asylum status of two Afghans charged with the alleged rape and kidnap of a 12-year-old girl. This week, Starmer and Home Secretary Yvette Cooper were forced to call for more transparency; existing policing guidelines do not include 'sharing ethnicity or immigration status.' The government pledges to 'smash' the trafficking gangs behind illegal migrant arrivals and is spending an extra £100 million ($134 million) to gather better intelligence. Many are skeptical that these efforts will bear much fruit given the financial attractions of the business and the cunning of the solutions are available. Starmer could join European nations intent on revising the terms of international conventions on migration drawn up before the days of hyper-mobile globalization. He could also work with European partners on reviving schemes to warehouse asylum applicants in third-party countries, even if it meant accepting that the Tories' plan to do so in Rwanda was right in principle, if wrong in destination. Denmark's Social Democratic government has successfully reduced migration numbers by insisting asylum status is only temporary, restricting family reunification and offering reduced social security benefits to new arrivals. For now, Starmer's migration policy is more performative than real. Talking less and doing more, faster, might provide a better route through the migration maze. (Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates) Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. 3 years on, Akasa's next challenge: Staying in the air against IndiGo's dominance Jane Street blow pushes Indian quants to ancient Greek idea to thrive Berlin to Bharuch: The Borosil journey after the China hit in Europe FIIs are exiting while retail investors stay put. Will a costly market make them pay? Stock Radar: TVS Motor breaks out from 1-month consolidation to hit fresh high; time to buy or book profits? FMCG sector: Both a consumption & tactical play; 7 stocks that have an upside potential of up to 30% F&O Radar| Deploy Short Strangle in Nifty for Theta decay benefits within index range These large- and mid-cap stocks may give more than 25% return in 1 year, according to analysts
NDTV
3 hours ago
- NDTV
Trump Plans To Evict Homeless From Washington, May Deploy National Guards
Washington: President Donald Trump pledged on Sunday to evict homeless people from the nation's capital and jail criminals, despite Washington's mayor arguing there is no current spike in crime. While details of the plan were unclear, the administration is preparing to deploy hundreds of National Guard troops to Washington, a US official told Reuters, a controversial tactic Trump used recently in Los Angeles to tackle immigration protests over the objections of local officials. Trump has not made a final decision, the official said, adding that the number of troops and their role are still being determined. Unlike in California and every other state, where the governor typically decides when to activate Guard troops, the president directly controls the National Guard in Washington, DC. Past instances of the Guard's deployment in the city include in response to the January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol by a mob of Trump supporters. "The Homeless have to move out, IMMEDIATELY," Trump posted on his Truth Social platform. "We will give you places to stay, but FAR from the Capital. The Criminals, you don't have to move out. We're going to put you in jail where you belong." The White House declined to explain what legal authority Trump would use to evict people from Washington. The Republican president controls only federal land and buildings in the city. Trump plans to hold a press conference on Monday to "stop violent crime in Washington, DC" It was not clear whether he would announce more details of his eviction plan then. There are 3,782 single persons experiencing homelessness on any given night in the city of about 700,000, says the Community Partnership, an organization working to reduce homelessness in DC Most such individuals are in emergency shelters or transitional housing, rather than on the street, it says. A White House official said on Friday more federal law enforcement officers were being deployed in the city following a violent attack on a young administration staffer that angered the president. Alleged crimes investigated by federal agents on Friday night included "multiple persons carrying a pistol without license," motorists driving on suspended licenses and dirt bike riding, a White House official said on Sunday. The official said 450 federal law enforcement officers were deployed across the city on Saturday. The city's police department says violent crime was down 26% in D.C. in the first seven months of 2025, compared with last year, while overall crime was down about 7%. The Democratic mayor of Washington, D.C., Muriel Bowser, said on Sunday the capital was "not experiencing a crime spike." "It is true that we had a terrible spike in crime in 2023, but this is not 2023," Bowser said on MSNBC's the Weekend. "We have spent over the last two years driving down violent crime in this city, driving it down to a 30-year low." Bowser said Trump was "very aware" of the city's work with federal law enforcement after meeting him several weeks ago in the Oval Office. The U.S. Congress has control of D.C.'s budget after the district was established in 1790 with land from neighbouring Virginia and Maryland, but resident voters elect a mayor and city council. For Trump to take over the city, it is likely that Congress would have to pass a law revoking the law that established local elected leadership.
