NAACP breaks 116-year tradition and skips inviting president to its annual convention
The NAACP announced it will not invite President Donald Trump to its national convention next month, marking the first time in the civil rights organization's 116-year history that a sitting U.S. president has been excluded.
'This has nothing to do with political party,' NAACP President Derrick Johnson said. 'Our mission is to advance civil rights, and the current president has made clear that his mission is to eliminate civil rights.'
In a statement, Johnson slammed the current administration's attacks on civil rights as the reason for breaking from the organization's long-standing tradition to invite the sitting president.
'The president has signed unconstitutional executive orders to oppress voters and undo federal civil rights protections; he has illegally turned the military on our communities, and he continually undermines every pillar of our democracy to make himself more powerful and to personally benefit from the U.S. government,' Johnson said.
Johnson noted that the convention is meant to be a safe space for all, regardless of political ideology, and while the NAACP had previously invited presidents with whom it had policy disagreements, they had to break tradition this year.
'To that end, the NAACP has made the decision to break with tradition and not invite Donald Trump or J.D. Vance this year,' the statement continued. 'This administration does not respect the Constitution or the rule of law. It would be a waste of our time and energy to give a platform to fascism, which would be unacceptable.'
The convention is taking place from July 12 to 16 in Charlotte, North Carolina, and comes as the NAACP has filed multiple lawsuits against Trump.
Most recently, the NAACP sued the Department of Education in March for withholding federal money for schools that declined to end their diversity, equity and inclusion programs.
With reporting from the Associated Press.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
10 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Trump Reveals New Price Tag for Canada To Join 'Golden Dome' Defense System
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump increased the proposed price for Canada's participation in the U.S. Golden Dome missile defense system. "They want to be in," Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One on Monday. "Seventy-one billion they're going to pay." The new price tag is $10 billion higher than Trump's earlier public demand for Canadian entry into the program. Newsweek has contacted the White House and Canada's prime ministerial office via email for comment. Canada's defense ministry directed questions to Prime Minister Mark Carney's office. President Donald Trump speaks in the Oval Office of the White House on May 20, 2025, in Washington. President Donald Trump speaks in the Oval Office of the White House on May 20, 2025, in Washington. AP Photo/Alex Brandon Why It Matters Trump revealed initial plans for the Golden Dome missile defense system earlier this year, touting the design as "state of the art." The president said the Golden Dome would be up and running by the end of his administration, shielding North America from "next-generation" threats like ballistic, cruise and hypersonic missiles. According to Defense One, a defense official said in March that it would take at least five to seven years to develop the Golden Dome's space-based weapons. Russia, China and North Korea have heavily invested in their militaries, including in long-range weapons. What To Know Trump said Canada had requested to be part of the development of the Golden Dome. Canada and the U.S. already work together under the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) to detect incoming threats to North America. Trump said Canada would "have to pay a lot of money" for the Golden Dome, indicating Washington would make a separate deal for the missile defense system with Ottawa in addition to a trade agreement. Trump said access to the Golden Dome would come with a $61 billion price tag for Canada "if they remain a separate, but unequal" country. It would be free if Canada became the 51st state, Trump said. In response to Trump's earlier remarks, Canadian Ambassador to the United Nations Bob Rae likened the terms to a "protection racket" and reaffirmed Canada's sovereignty. Canada has railed against Trump's repeated reference to it becoming part of America. Carney, who won re-election in April on Canadian infuriation about Trump's overtures toward Canada, said last month it was positive to "have protections in place for Canadians" but added: "There will be discussions that could have an impact on Canada, but Canada wouldn't be a part of them." But Canada brings something to the table with nearly 4 million square miles of lines of sight for U.S. sensors to defend against missiles that China and Russia are developing to fly over the North Pole, which is a gap in U.S. air defenses, Politico reported last month. The Golden Dome is loosely modeled on Israel's famed short-range Iron Dome air defense system. The Iron Dome, however, is designed to intercept the kind of attacks common against Israel, unlike long-range missiles able to cross continents. As it stands, the U.S. does not have a joined-up system for intercepting large-scale intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) strikes launched from Russia or China, although it would be able to take out the relatively small number of missiles that North Korea could fire at the U.S. The U.S. currently has 44 ground-based interceptors (GBIs) deployed around the country—40 are in silos in Alaska, with four at the Vandenberg Air Force Base in California as part of its Ground-Based Midcourse Defense system. Around 2028, the Pentagon will add 20 next generation interceptors, or NGIs, to the 44 GBIs. Whatever is missed by these interceptors would likely fall to the U.S. Navy's Aegis system. Trump has framed the Golden Dome system as the end result of a program kicked off by President Ronald Reagan in the 1980s, popularly known as "Star Wars." The Golden Dome will use space-based sensors and interceptors to knock out missiles "even if they are launched from space," Trump said. The Golden Dome, using space-based weapons to strike targets closer to the ground, "will be transformational," the Council on Geostrategy, a U.K.-based think tank, said in a paper published last month. It said the missile shield will have "far-reaching strategic consequences." The Congressional Budget Office said in May that the bill for the space-based part of the Golden Dome could come in at $542 billion over the next two decades. The Trump administration said the estimated price tag stands at about $175 billion. An initial $25 billion has been earmarked in next year's budget. What People Are Saying General Chance Saltzman, head of the U.S. Space Force, told lawmakers at a congressional hearing last month: [The space-based weapons envisioned for the Golden Dome] "represent new and emerging requirements for missions that have never before been accomplished by military space organizations." Mao Ning, a spokeswoman for the Chinese Foreign Ministry, during a press briefing: "This highly offensive system violates the principle of peaceful use of outer space. It will exacerbate the risk of turning outer space into a battlefield and starting an arms race and shake the international security and arms control system." Glen VanHerck, a retired Air Force general and former head of the U.S. Northern Command, told Politico in May: "What Canada really brings is terrain. If we can position, or Canada positions, over-the-horizon radars further north in the Arctic, that dramatically increases the United States and Canada's ability to see over the pole into Russia, into China and other places." What Happens Next The Pentagon and U.S. Northern Command are in the process of drafting an initial capabilities document, according to a U.S. official. This article contains reporting by The Associated Press.
News24
11 minutes ago
- News24
‘Formal' talks never the plan, says Presidency as Trump leaves G7 without meeting Ramaphosa
US President Donald Trump met with President Cyril Ramaphosa in the White House four weeks ago. Be among those who shape the future with knowledge. Uncover exclusive stories that captivate your mind and heart with our FREE 14-day subscription trial. Dive into a world of inspiration, learning, and empowerment. You can only trial once.
Politico
14 minutes ago
- Politico
GOP megabill faces grim polling for Republicans
As the Senate continues to work through the House-passed megabill, the public's opinion of the legislation is starting to shape — and so far it's not looking good for Republicans. A series of polls released in recent days have revealed the bill, which would be President Donald Trump's signature piece of legislation in his second term's first year, is broadly unpopular except with self-proclaimed MAGA Republicans. The 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act', which narrowly passed the House late last month, includes tax changes and Medicaid cuts, two key issues that are still being debated by the Senate as it rushes to meet Trump's July 4 deadline. Here are three takeaways from the recent surveys: Three separate polls released in the last week showed that more Americans who are aware of the legislation do not support it, though the split remains largely along party lines. A Washington Post-Ipsos poll released Tuesday found that 42 percent of Americans are not in favor of the bill, while 23 percent support it and 34 percent say they have no opinion. A KFF Health Tracking poll also found more adults dislike the bill than support it, with 64 percent of adults having an unfavorable view of the legislation and 35 percent having a favorable view. Meanwhile, a Quinnipiac University poll released last week found that 53 percent of voters oppose the bill, with 27 percent supporting and 20 percent not offering an opinion. Separated along party lines, a majority of Republicans who have an opinion support the legislation, but not by the margin in which Democrats oppose it. Across the three polls, 49 percent to 61 percent of Republicans support the bill. Among Democrats, however, 70 percent to 90 percent are against it. The KFF Health Tracking poll asked Republicans and Republican-leaning independents if they are a 'supporter of the MAGA movement,' which revealed a further split in the polling. Among self-professed MAGA Republicans, support for the bill went up to 72 percent, while Republicans who did not identify as part of the MAGA movement held an unfavorable view of the bill at a 2-to-1 margin, 66 percent to 33 percent. Since the House passed the megabill, Democrats have worked to define the bill by its reductions to Medicaid spending. The fresh round of polling shows their messaging may be having some success. In the Quinnipiac poll, just 10 percent of voters said federal funding to Medicaid should decrease, and 47 percent of voters surveyed favored increased funding for the program. When asked about the bill's Medicaid cuts, 67 percent of adults surveyed in the KFF poll said the decrease in funding left them with an unfavorable view of the bill. But work requirements — one of the changes to Medicaid championed by Republicans — has broad support. In The Washington Post-Ipsos poll, 52 percent of adults said they support 'requiring low-income childless adults to prove they are working or disabled to get health insurance through Medicaid,' compared with 33 percent who oppose the requirement (15 percent had no opinion). KFF's poll showed even greater support for the work requirements, at 68 percent, including half of Democrats and nine in 10 Republicans. However, when respondents were informed of some of the barriers that work requirements create — like filing paperwork to prove eligibility — support dropped in both polls. Across all of the polls, most Americans still haven't heard of Republicans' premier piece of legislation, which gives both parties the opportunity to shift public opinion with their messaging. In The Washington Post-Ipsos poll, 66 percent of adults said they had heard little or nothing at all about the bill, compared with 34 percent who had heard a great deal or a good amount. In KFF's poll, 50 percent of adults said they had heard little or nothing at all about the legislation. In the Quinnipiac poll, a majority of voters were aware of the bill, with 36 percent saying they have heard or read 'a lot' and 32 percent saying they have heard or read 'some.' Fourteen percent said they had heard or read 'not too much' and 18 percent said 'not much at all.' The Quinnipiac poll surveyed 1,265 self-identified registered voters from June 5-9, and had a margin of error of plus or minus 2.8 percent. The Washington Post-Ipsos poll was conducted from June 6-10 and surveyed 1,167 U.S. adults with a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percent. The KFF Health Tracking poll was conducted June 4-8 and surveyed 1,321 U.S. adults, with a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percent.
