Russia counters Ukrainian drones by turning off Russians' mobile internet
It is a big disruption in a country where smartphones provide the only online access for millions of people.
The Government regularly touts an array of online services, including filing tax returns and applying for jobs, and President Vladimir Putin claimed this year that Russia was 'a step ahead of many other nations'.
Even so, 'they can turn off the internet', said Katya, 32.
She described how the Government had encouraged reliance on apps and web services — and then exercised control over internet access — as a 'digital gulag'. Like others interviewed, she asked to be identified only by her first name out of fear for her safety.
She and her partner made it home from their recent weekend getaway, after struggling with a partially downloaded map and phoning her partner's mother to top up their debit card to pay for fuel.
The Russian Government has a record of restricting online freedoms, including trying to block the country's most popular messaging app and throttling YouTube.
But the mobile internet shutdowns are the collateral damage of war, a response to Ukraine's spectacular drone attacks on long-range bombers at Russian bases on June 1.
Cellphones use parallel mobile networks, one for calls and another for the data used by phone apps — or drones.
The internet blackouts shut down the data network but calls still go through. Wireless connections, which do not depend on mobile networks, can allow phones to stay online.
Day-to-day orders to shut down the mobile internet come from regional officials responding to reported drone intrusions, rather than from Moscow, according to documents viewed by the New York Times.
The Russian Communications Ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
'The Kremlin has been asking regional authorities to put up a defence against the drones — there's nothing else they can do but turn the internet off,' said Mikhail Klimarev, head of the Internet Protection Society, an exiled Russian digital rights group.
The threat of drones also regularly shuts down Russian airports for hours. About 300 flights were cancelled in Moscow in one weekend alone.
By late this month, the cellular internet was down every day, for at least a few hours, in some part of at least 73 of Russia's 83 regions, according to a tally by Na Svyazi, a group of volunteers living abroad that monitors internet access in Russia.
Yelena, who lives in Rostov-on-Don in southern Russia, said that her daughter commuted to and from school by bus, paying her way with a transport card, but that the system didn't work during an outage. A few times, Yelena said, she has had to wire the fare to the bus driver's phone.
Russians first experienced such shutdowns in the early months of the war, but they were limited to the areas bordering Ukraine.
This year, authorities switched off mobile internet in Moscow for a few days before the annual Victory Day parade in May, a major event for Putin, who was hosting several world leaders, including China's leader, Xi Jinping.
That outage exposed Muscovites' reliance on apps for contactless payments, taxis, car sharing, food delivery, and shopping, but discontent was fairly muted.
'The regions used to be wary of potential public repercussions and had not resorted to such shutdowns,' Sarkis Darbinian, a Russian lawyer and internet expert who lives in exile, told the New York Times.
The lack of protests in Moscow gave regional authorities the signal that 'you can just turn the internet off' without causing a backlash, he said.
A Ukrainian drone pilot in the Kharkiv region of northeastern Ukraine in April. Photo / Tyler Hicks, the New York Times
After the Ukrainian attacks on June 1, the shutdowns began to afflict the vast breadth of the country.
Dmitry Peskov, the Kremlin spokesperson, blamed the inconveniences around the Victory Day parade on 'a dangerous neighbour', an apparent reference to Ukraine.
When he was pressed recently about more widespread shutdowns, he said: 'Everything that's linked to ensuring public safety is justified'.
Internet blackouts have hit e-commerce companies and consumers most directly, although the scale of the economic impact is unclear.
They have also hampered businesses not usually associated with phone apps.
In the northwestern city of Pskov, a municipally owned heating company complained last month that it had not been able to finish repairs on a pipeline on time because of the outages.
The internet shutdowns have become so frequent and widespread that they have given rise to online memes and songs. In Rostov-on-Don, Pavel Osipyan, a media personality, released a music video making light of the inconveniences.
'How can you tell you're from Rostov without saying it?' he rapped. 'Show me one bar for the internet.'
In Izhevsk, a city known for weapons production about 1290km from Ukraine, mobile internet has often been turned off since June 1. Arina, 23, said residents there had been calling emergency services, looking for an explanation, only to be told that it was a safety measure and that they should be patient.
The precautions do not always work. In the middle of one shutdown, Ukrainian drones hit a factory in Izhevsk that makes surface-to-air missiles, killing three people and injuring scores more.
No air-raid alert was issued while mobile internet was down, leaving locals unsure what was happening.
Another day, Arina was at home when she said she heard an air-raid siren. She had no idea what was going on: No one could post from the scene.
'The Government keeps mum or says everything is fine, but everyone can see things are not fine,' she said.
Yekaterina Mizulina, head of the pro-Kremlin League for a Safe Internet, asked on social media this month why 'the internet is being throttled, and the drones keep coming and coming'.
Many people affected by the blackouts speak of resignation. Neighbours and friends are annoyed but seem to be taking the disruptions as a new norm.
In the courthouses where Sofia, a law student from the southern city of Krasnodar, spends her afternoons, lawyers, their clients and families often chat about the outages, but their reaction tends to be that the shutdowns are just one more burden.
'They just laugh it off,' she said.
Regions from Tula in the southwest to Omsk in Siberia have said recently that they will introduce public wireless internet to allow residents to stay online when mobile networks go down.
Shutdowns have reached the easternmost parts of Russia, which have not been hit by drones, prompting some to question the official rationale.
Artyom, a remote technology worker from Khabarovsk, 25km from the Chinese border, expressed concern that the blackouts could be a part of the Kremlin's strategy to restrict information. He called it 'a very convenient lie' to blame the drone threat.
'Drones don't make it to Khabarovsk,' he said. 'I don't see any connection here.'
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
Written by: Nataliya Vasilyeva and Alina Lobzina
Photographs by: Maxar Technologies, Tyler Hicks
©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsroom
7 hours ago
- Newsroom
When it's worth waiting for democracy
Undemocratic and a breach of human rights. That's what most experts and officials think of the Government's proposed changes to the electoral law. Last week Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith announced a suite of changes around who can vote and how they do so. Those include more opportunity for digital enrolment methods and introduce automatic enrolment updates. But the big one is the moving of the enrolment deadline. At the last election, you could rock up on election day, enrol and cast your vote at the same time. But under this bill New Zealanders would have to enrol 13 days before election day to be eligible to vote. Goldsmith says it's to ensure a final election result is achieved sooner but he's being met with fierce critics, including from some within his own party who think the change takes things a step too far. While entities like the Ministry of Justice can, and do, offer advice in the form of policy papers and regulatory impact statements, electoral law expert Graeme Edgeler says the final decision falls on the shoulders of who New Zealanders have elected to represent them – the politicians. 'The Government and the MPs are the ones that are elected, so they get to make the policy calls and argue for them and the opposition, if they want to, gets to argue against them,' he says. Edgeler says the Ministry of Justice had its own suggestions for reducing the number of special votes, for example, automatic enrolment updates. 'So if you tell MSD, 'Here's my new address,' they'll tell the Electoral Commission, 'Hey, this person has updated their address with us'; the Electoral Commission will see person's already enrolled … and so your enrolment should be updated automatically now,' he says. The Government took this suggestion on board, but Edgeler says stopping enrolment 13 days before election day takes things a step further. Goldsmith told RNZ that people don't start coalition negotiations until they know the final outcome. But while it might be a political preference to wait until the special votes are counted, Edgeler says there's nothing legally stopping politicians from starting negotiations as soon as election day finishes. 'The John Key-led National government, when it was first elected, it had its coalition negotiations complete and John Key was sworn in as Prime Minister before the special votes were announced,' he says. Edgeler says that's because the initial count on election night made the result clear, and he thinks that was the case with the last election as well. 'Prime Minister Chris Hipkins came out on election night and said, 'We've lost, we're not going to be the next government,' he says. National, Act and NZ First could have started coalition negotiations that same day if they had wanted to, so Edgeler doesn't think special votes delaying coalition negotiations is a good enough reason to push the enrolment deadline out to 13 days. Newsroom's political editor Laura Walters confirms that waiting until the final result is announced before starting negotiations is the preference of some political leaders. 'Winston Peters, the New Zealand First Leader, he doesn't like to actually start negotiations proper, if you will, until they have that final result back,' she says. Walters says Peters told her advanced enrolment also benefited political parties. 'He said if people don't enrol ahead of that voting period how do they know who they're campaigning to, who their message should be pushed towards,' she says. David Seymour was more blunt in his support of the change, saying only 'dropkicks' enrol on election day. But Walters says those 'dropkicks' include quite a broad sector of society. 'What we do know from Electoral Commission data is that these people tend to be younger, we've also seen a higher proportion of Māori and Pasifika and Asian, but especially Māori,' she says. Walters adds renters and people who move around a lot and forget to update their enrolment details as people who might also be caught out by these changes. Exactly how many people will be impacted by this change is unclear, but if last election is anything to go by, Walters expects the number of people impacted is in the hundreds of thousands. 'There were 450,000 people who registered or enrolled to vote during that advanced voting period and 110,000 people did that on election day,' she says. It's these figures the Attorney-General Judith Collins referred to in her report examining whether or not there was enough justified reason behind the changes to the election law. She ruled that denying voters the political franchise is a 'heavy price' to pay just to have the election result a week or two sooner. Aside from the automatic enrolment update Walters says reaction to the bill has been mostly negative. 'Essentially people are saying nothing should ever be done to suppress or reduce the number of people who are able to vote. Anyone who is eligible to vote, eligible to register to vote, should be given every opportunity to exercise that right. 'Is this worth it? Should the Government and the Electoral Commission be bearing a little bit more administrative cost, a little bit more administrative burden, maybe waiting a little bit longer after the election to get the results, isn't that just the cost of democracy?'
Scoop
8 hours ago
- Scoop
Greens Launch Petition Against Govt's Attack On Democracy
The Green Party has launched a petition calling on the Government to keep its hands off voting rights. 'We cannot allow this Government to rob New Zealanders of their democratic rights,' says the Green Party co-leader Marama Davidson. 'Make no mistake, the Government is making calculated changes to electoral law that erode the democratic rights of regular people and play into the hands of a wealthy few. 'By blocking voters and also opening the floodgates for anonymous donations from the rich, this Government is distorting the settings of our democracy in their favour. 'Who gets to vote and who gets to influence Parliament, decides the future of our country. These laws slam the door on everyday people while rolling out the red carpet for wealthy donors who bankroll parties in this Coalition Government. 'We are calling on the Prime Minister and the Minister of Justice to drop this anti-democratic legislation. 'A Green Government will reverse these rollbacks: restoring same-day enrolment, reinstating voting rights for prisoners, cleaning up campaign finance and extending the vote to 16-year-olds. 'Democracy is for everyone, we should be expanding voting and participation, not restricting it,' says Marama Davidson.
RNZ News
8 hours ago
- RNZ News
The Wednesday Politics Panel 30 July
politics world politics 7:35 pm today It's another hit of the most insightful and sharp 30 minutes in political analysis. Today Wallace is joined by journalists Patrick Gower and Andrea Vance. They are joined by former ACT MP Heather Roy. Together they examine and debate the main political stories of the week: the politics of austerity, does the government risk reaching the ends of the public's patience by pushing funding cuts; are the minor parties of the coalition overriding the government; are the changes to voting enrolment laws justified and should we be able to boo politicians?
