RegalCare at Worcester among nursing facilities cited in Medicare and Medicaid fraud case
The allegations against RegalCare Management are outlined in a complaint filed by the Massachusetts U.S. Attorney's Office and the state Attorney's General's Office.
RegalCare at Worcester, 25 Oriol Drive, is one of 19 skilled nursing facilities reviewed by the agencies.
The complaint alleges that "RegalCare systematically caused Medicare to be billed for the highest level of skilled rehabilitation therapy services at RegalCare's facilities in Massachusetts and Connecticut, despite patients not clinically needing those services," according to a news release from the office of U.S. Attorney Leah B. Foley.
The complaint references RegalCare owner Eliyahu Mirlism, company executive, Hector Caraballo and Stern Therapy Consultants, which works with RegalCare.
The facilities in the complaint provide transition care to patients following a hospital stay. Government programs, notably Medicare and Medicaid, reimburse such facilities, based on submitted claims.
A request for comment from RegalCare was not immediately answered.
This article originally appeared on Telegram & Gazette: RegalCare at Worcester cited in Medicare and Medicaid fraud case
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
Native Americans want to avoid past Medicaid enrollment snafus as work requirements loom
Jonnell Wieder earned too much money at her job to keep her Medicaid coverage when the COVID-19 public health emergency ended in 2023 and states resumed checking whether people were eligible for the program. But she was reassured by the knowledge that Medicaid would provide postpartum coverage for her and her daughter, Oakleigh McDonald, who was born in July of that year. Wieder is a member of the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes in Montana and can access some health services for free through her tribe's health clinics. But funding is limited, so, like a lot of Native American people, she relied on Medicaid for herself and Oakleigh. Months before Oakleigh's first birthday, the date when Wieder's postpartum coverage would come to an end, Wieder completed and returned paperwork to enroll her daughter in Healthy Montana Kids, the state's version of the Children's Health Insurance Program. But her paperwork, caught up in the lengthy delays and processing times for applications, did not go through. "As soon as she turned 1, they cut her off completely," Wieder said. It took six months for Wieder to get Oakleigh covered again through Healthy Montana Kids. Before health workers in her tribe stepped in to help her resubmit her application, Wieder repeatedly called the state's health department. She said she would dial the call center when she arrived at her job in the morning and go about her work while waiting on hold, only for the call to be dropped by the end of the day. "Never did I talk to anybody," she said. Wieder and Oakleigh's experience is an example of the chaos for eligible Medicaid beneficiaries caused by the process known as the "unwinding," which led to millions of people in the U.S. losing coverage due to paperwork or other procedural issues. Now, tribal health leaders fear their communities will experience more health coverage disruptions when new federal Medicaid work and eligibility requirements are implemented by the start of 2027. The tax-and-spending law that President Trump signed this summer exempts Native Americans from the new requirement that some people work or do another qualifying activity a minimum number of hours each month to be eligible for Medicaid, as well as from more frequent eligibility checks. But as Wieder and her daughter's experience shows, they are not exempt from getting caught up in procedural disenrollments that could reemerge as states implement the new rules. "We also know from the unwinding that that just doesn't always play out necessarily correctly in practice," said Joan Alker, who leads Georgetown University's Center for Children and Families. "There's a lot to worry about." The new law is projected to increase the number of people who are uninsured by 10 million. The lessons of the unwinding suggest that "deep trouble" lies ahead for Native Americans who rely on Medicaid, according to Alker. Mr. Trump's new law changes Medicaid rules to require some recipients ages 19 to 64 to log 80 hours of work or other qualifying activities per month. It also requires states to recheck those recipients' eligibility every six months, instead of annually. Both of these changes will be effective by the end of next year. The Congressional Budget Office estimated in July that the law would reduce federal Medicaid spending by more than $900 billion over a decade. In addition, more than 4 million people enrolled in health plans through the Affordable Care Act marketplace are projected to become uninsured if Congress allows pandemic-era enhanced premium tax credits to expire at the end of the year. Wieder said she was lucky that the tribe covered costs and her daughter's care wasn't interrupted in the six months she didn't have health insurance. Citizens of federally recognized tribes in the U.S. can access some free health services through the Indian Health Service, the federal agency responsible for providing health care to Native Americans and Alaska Natives. But free care is limited because Congress has historically failed to fully fund the Indian Health Service. Tribal health systems rely heavily on Medicaid to fill that gap. Native Americans are enrolled in Medicaid at higher rates than the White population and have higher rates of chronic illnesses, die more from preventable diseases, and have less access to care. Medicaid is the largest third-party payer to the Indian Health Service and other tribal health facilities and organizations. Accounting for about two-thirds of the outside revenue the Indian Health Service collects, it helps tribal health organizations pay their staff, maintain or expand services, and build infrastructure. Tribal leaders say protecting Medicaid for Indian Country is a responsibility Congress and the federal government must fulfill as part of their trust and treaty obligations to tribes. The Trump administration prevented states from disenrolling most Medicaid recipients for the duration of the public health emergency starting in 2020. After those eligibility checks resumed in 2023, nearly 27 million people nationwide were disenrolled from Medicaid during the unwinding, according to an analysis by the Government Accountability Office published in June. The majority of disenrollments — about 70% — occurred for procedural reasons, according to the federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. CMS did not require state agencies to collect race and ethnicity data for their reporting during the unwinding, making it difficult to determine how many Native American and Alaska Native enrollees lost coverage. The lack of data to show how the unwinding affected the population makes it difficult to identify disparities and create policies to address them, said Latoya Hill, senior policy manager with KFF's Racial Equity and Health Policy program. KFF is a health information nonprofit that includes KFF Health News. The National Council of Urban Indian Health, which advocates on public health issues for Native Americans living in urban parts of the nation, analyzed the Census Bureau's 2022 American Community Survey and KFF data in an effort to understand how disenrollment affected tribes. The council estimated more than 850,000 Native Americans had lost coverage as of May 2024. About 2.7 million Native Americans and Alaska Natives were enrolled in Medicaid in 2022, according to the council. The National Indian Health Board, a nonprofit that represents and advocates for federally recognized tribes, has been working with federal Medicaid officials to ensure that state agencies are prepared to implement the exemptions. "We learned a lot of lessons about state capacity during the unwinding," said Winn Davis, congressional relations director for the National Indian Health Board. Nevada health officials say they plan to apply lessons learned during the unwinding and launch a public education campaign on the Medicaid changes in the new federal law. "A lot of this will depend on anticipated federal guidance regarding the implementation of those new rules," said Stacie Weeks, director of the Nevada Health Authority. Staff at the Fallon Tribal Health Center in Nevada have become authorized representatives for some of their patients. This means that tribal citizens' Medicaid paperwork is sent to the health center, allowing staff to notify individuals and help them fill it out. Davis said the unwinding process showed that Native American enrollees are uniquely vulnerable to procedural disenrollment. The new law's exemption of Native Americans from work requirements and more frequent eligibility checks is the "bare minimum" to ensure unnecessary disenrollments are avoided as part of trust and treaty obligations, Davis said. The GAO said the process of determining whether individuals are eligible for Medicaid is "complex" and "vulnerable to error" in a 2024 report on the unwinding. "The resumption of Medicaid eligibility redeterminations on such a large scale further compounded this complexity," the report said. It highlighted weaknesses across state systems. By April 2024, federal Medicaid officials had found nearly all states were out of compliance with redetermination requirements, according to the GAO. Eligible people lost their coverage, the accountability office said, highlighting the need to improve federal oversight. In Texas, for example, federal Medicaid officials found that 100,000 eligible people had been disenrolled due to, for example, the state system's failure to process their completed renewal forms or miscalculation of the length of women's postpartum coverage. Some states were not conducting ex parte renewals, in which a person's Medicaid coverage is automatically renewed based on existing information available to the state. That reduces the chance that paperwork is sent to the wrong address, because the recipient doesn't need to complete or return renewal forms. But poorly conducted ex parte renewals can lead to procedural disenrollments, too. More than 100,000 people in Nevada were disenrolled by September 2023 through the ex parte process. The state had been conducting the ex parte renewals at the household level, rather than by individual beneficiary, resulting in the disenrollment of still-eligible children because their parents were no longer eligible. Ninety-three percent of disenrollments in the state were for procedural reasons — the highest in the nation, according to KFF. Another issue the federal agency identified was that some state agencies were not giving enrollees the opportunity to submit their renewal paperwork through all means available, including mail, phone, online, and in person. State agencies also identified challenges they faced during the unwinding, including an unprecedented volume of eligibility redeterminations, insufficient staffing and training, and a lack of response from enrollees who may not have been aware of the unwinding. Native Americans and Alaska Natives have unique challenges in maintaining their coverage. Communities in rural parts of the nation experience issues with receiving and sending mail. Some Native Americans on reservations may not have street addresses. Others may not have permanent housing or change addresses frequently. In Alaska, mail service is often disrupted by severe weather. Another issue is the lack of reliable internet service on remote reservations. Tribal health leaders and patient benefit coordinators said some tribal citizens did not receive their redetermination paperwork or struggled to fill it out and send it back to their state Medicaid agency. Although the unwinding is over, many challenges persist. Tribal health workers in Montana, Oklahoma, and South Dakota said some eligible patients who lost Medicaid during the unwinding had still not been reenrolled as of this spring. "Even today, we're still in the trenches of getting individuals that had been disenrolled back onto Medicaid," said Rachel Arthur, executive director of the Indian Family Health Clinic in Great Falls, Montana, in May. Arthur said staff at the clinic realized early in the unwinding that their patients were not receiving their redetermination notices in the mail. The clinic is identifying people who fell off Medicaid during the unwinding and helping them fill out applications. Marlena Farnes, who was a patient benefit coordinator at the Indian Family Health Clinic during the Medicaid unwinding, said she tried for months to help an older patient with a chronic health condition get back on Medicaid. He had completed and returned his paperwork but still received a notice that his coverage had lapsed. After many calls to the state Medicaid office, Farnes said, state officials told her the patient's application had been lost. Another patient went to the emergency room multiple times while uninsured, Arthur said. "I felt like if our patients weren't helped with follow-up, and that advocacy piece, their applications were not being seen," Farnes said. She is now the behavioral health director at the clinic. Montana was one of five states where more than 50% of enrollees lost coverage during the unwinding, according to the GAO. The other states are Idaho, Oklahoma, Texas, and Utah. About 68% of Montanans who lost coverage were disenrolled for procedural reasons. In Oklahoma, eligibility redeterminations remain challenging to process, said Yvonne Myers, a Medicaid and Affordable Care Act consultant for Citizen Potawatomi Nation Health Services. That's causing more frequent coverage lapses, she said. Myers said she thinks Republican claims of "waste, fraud, and abuse" are overstated. "I challenge some of them to try to go through an eligibility process," Myers said. "The way they're going about it is making it for more hoops to jump through, which ultimately will cause people to fall off." The unwinding showed that state systems can struggle to respond quickly to changes in Medicaid, leading to preventable erroneous disenrollments. Individuals were often in the dark about their applications and struggled to reach state offices for answers. Tribal leaders and health experts are raising concerns that those issues will continue and worsen as states implement the requirements of the new law. Georgia, the only state with an active Medicaid work requirement program, has shown that the changes can be difficult for individuals to navigate and costly for a state to implement. More than 100,000 people have applied for Georgia's Pathways program, but only about 8,600 were enrolled as of the end of July. Alker, of Georgetown, said Congress took the wrong lesson from the unwinding in adding more restrictions and red tape. "It will make unwinding pale in comparison in terms of the number of folks that are going to lose coverage," Alker said. This article was published with the support of the Journalism & Women Symposium (JAWS) Health Journalism Fellowship, assisted by grants from The Commonwealth Fund. KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF — the independent source for health policy research, polling, and journalism.


Axios
12 hours ago
- Axios
Medicaid effort to target undocumented immigrants may create enrollment hurdles
Federal health officials announced a new push on Tuesday to ensure that Medicaid and Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) enrollees are U.S. citizens or have a satisfactory immigration status. Why it matters: The effort could create new administrative hoops for enrollees to jump through. Driving the news: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services will begin providing states with "monthly enrollment reports identifying individuals whose citizenship or immigration status could not be confirmed through federal databases," the Department of Health and Human Services said in a statement. The reports will draw on data from sources including the Department of Homeland Security's Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) program. HHS emphasized that states are responsible for reviewing cases, verifying the immigration status of individuals on the CMS' reports, and "taking appropriate actions." All states will receive these reports within the next month, per the HHS. Reality check: Traditional Medicaid coverage is not available to undocumented immigrants. "Undocumented immigrants are not eligible to enroll in federally funded coverage including Medicaid, CHIP, or Medicare or to purchase coverage through the ACA Marketplaces," per the non-partisan Kaiser Family Foundation. HHS did not respond to Axios' request for comment. What they're saying:"Every dollar misspent is a dollar taken away from an eligible, vulnerable individual in need of Medicaid and CHIP," said CMS Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz. Between the lines: The change looks to put the burden of proof on the individuals whose immigration statuses the CMS cannot verify through the databases. By the numbers: Despite the assertions of Oz — and other parts of President Trump's administration — there is not evidence that undocumented immigrants are broadly receiving Medicaid benefits they're not eligible for. Medicaid reimburses hospitals for emergency care provided to individuals who meet other eligibility requirements but lack eligible immigration status. Emergency spending rose less than 1% of total Medicaid spending between 2017 and 2023, according to KFF. Immigrants in the country legally may also qualify for Medicaid or CHIP, but face eligibility restrictions. There is a five-year waiting period for these modified forms of Medicaid and CHIP, which states can eliminate for children and pregnant people. An early version of Republicans recently passed tax-and-spending bill would have cut federal payments to states that covered undocumented immigrants with their own funds. The provision was dropped after it was found to violate Senate rules. The White House claimed that the provision would "protect Medicaid for Americans by removing at least 1.4 million illegal immigrants from the program." The other side: The 1.4 million figure "is unequivocally false," according to Georgetown University's Center for Families and Children.
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
New Medicare program offers much-needed relief for caregivers of dementia patients
A new Medicare program covering services for at-home nursing care for dementia patients has received the green light to expand nationwide following a yearlong pilot program. It's a first for Medicare, spotlighting the needs of the more than 11 million unpaid family caregivers of people with dementia. The voluntary program, called GUIDE (Guiding an Improved Dementia Experience), initially started with a Biden administration executive order to test a new model focused on dementia care that pays for some family caregiver support. 'For unpaid caregivers, who face not only difficult care responsibilities and decisions, but also serious financial consequences with few opportunities for help with training or short-term respite breaks, the program is a significant start,' Cindy Hounsell, founder and president of the Women's Institute for a Secure Retirement (WISER), told Yahoo Finance. Approximately two-thirds of dementia caregivers are women, according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) data. The GUIDE program is now offered in 45 states — all but Alaska, the Dakotas, Kansas, and Mississippi — and includes roughly 330 Medicare-participating providers, including large academic medical centers, hospital health systems, small group practices, community-based organizations, and hospice agencies. The initiative has been approved for an eight-year run. More than 6.9 million people in the US are living with dementia stemming from a range of diseases such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's, according to a 2024 report from the National Institutes of Health. As the population in the US ages, cases are expected to jump to nearly 14 million by 2060. Most people with dementia in the US live at home. About 8 in 10 adults with dementia live in their homes with spouses or other family members, according to the CDC. How it works Eligible patients must be enrolled in Medicaid or original Medicare — not Medicare Advantage. To qualify, patients must have a diagnosis of moderate to severe dementia and not live in an assisted care facility, nursing home, or be receiving hospice care. They must also be patients of a participating provider. The program pays up to $2,500 each year per beneficiary for respite benefits, which cover the cost for in-home caregivers, overnight care, or adult day care. Last year, the national median pay for home health and personal care aides was $16.78 per hour. Translation: the program could cover 148 hours of in-home care, giving family caregivers a chance to take a break. The program doesn't provide Medicare patients with the funds to directly pay these caregivers who step in to lend a hand. It provides Medicare payments to those provider organizations that, in turn, cover the caregiver's pay. In addition, the program includes round-the-clock access to a support line to connect directly to a licensed nurse who can answer questions. This is particularly useful in case of emergencies and can defray a hospital visit in some cases, Hounsell said. Many family caregivers aren't trained to handle medical or nursing tasks such as managing catheters, performing injections, or monitoring vital signs. To address this gap, the new Medicare initiative provides access to caregiver training and education. Sign up for the Mind Your Money weekly newsletter By subscribing, you are agreeing to Yahoo's Terms and Privacy Policy Savings are two-fold Ideally, the program will cut costs for Medicare in fewer emergency room visits and short-term hospital stays for those with dementia. For families of those with dementia, the end goal is to help those patients stay at home longer and avoid the high cost of assisted care or nursing homes, which can be a massive drain on a family's finances. It often comes as a shock to people that Medicare doesn't cover the cost of long-term care facilities, which can quickly top tens of thousands of dollars. An apartment in an assisted-living facility had an average rate of $74,148 a year in 2024, according to the National Investment Center for Seniors Housing & Care — and costs go up as residents age and need more care. Units for dementia patients can run more than $94,000. 'Alternative payment models like this are critical to helping individuals remain in the setting of their choice,' said Mollie Gurian, vice president for policy and government affairs at LeadingAge, an association of nonprofit providers of aging services. 'These participating providers understand the complexity of caring for older adults with dementia and recognize that family and friends are essential members of the care team.' Kerry Hannon is a Senior Columnist at Yahoo Finance. She is a career and retirement strategist and the author of 14 books, including the forthcoming "Retirement Bites: A Gen X Guide to Securing Your Financial Future," "In Control at 50+: How to Succeed in the New World of Work," and "Never Too Old to Get Rich." Follow her on Bluesky. Sign up for the Mind Your Money newsletter Sign in to access your portfolio