logo
Stalwart of southern rugby memorialised by competition, shield

Stalwart of southern rugby memorialised by competition, shield

Pip Jones, of South Otago, holds up the new shield which bears the name of her father, Otago rugby great Tuppy Diack, who died recently. PHOTO: PETER MCINTOSH
A former Gore man, who died last month, will be memorialised through a new rugby competition and shield.
The Tuppy Diack Shield will make its debut this season.
Diack, who died in Dunedin, aged 94, played for both Otago and Southland.
He also played one test for the All Blacks, in 1959.
Born in Invercargill, he was once the head boy at Gore High School.
The former winger was revered and in a fitting tribute,
Southland Country, Southland Metro, Otago Country and two Dunedin metropolitan teams will contest a new competition for the Tuppy Diack Shield.
It will be a straight round-robin, attached to the end of the club rugby season. The opening round will be on August 2.
Otago Rugby Football Union game development manager Michael Smith said it was a great shame Diack had died before he got to see the competition in action.
However, Diack had been aware of the idea and was very pleased to put his name to it.
The wood the shield is made from is from a fallen totara tree in the Catlins area and was carved by Patrick Bowden and members of the South Otago Turners Club.
The tree was understood to have been about 1000 years old.
"It's a great bit of wood," Mr Smith said.
The new competition was a way to bridge the gap between club and provincial rugby, as well as offering players who missed out on representative opportunities something else to aim for, Mr Smith said.
After the competition an Otago B and Southland B team will be selected for a triangular tournament that will include a Canterbury team. — APL
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

British and Irish Lions tour highlights Australia's rugby revenue advantage over NZ
British and Irish Lions tour highlights Australia's rugby revenue advantage over NZ

NZ Herald

time9 hours ago

  • NZ Herald

British and Irish Lions tour highlights Australia's rugby revenue advantage over NZ

The past six weeks or so have been one giant commercial flex by Australia, illustrating, through projection, the enormous difficulties New Zealand Rugby (NZR) faces commercialising the full potential of the All Blacks – the world's best-known rugby brand – in a country of just five million people. Beauden Barrett prepares for a shot at goal against the Lions in 2017. Photo / Photosport But the numbers tell a story that is much deeper than population discrepancy, and Australia monetised the Lions tour more effectively than New Zealand ever could, not just because it has almost six times as many people. It has diversified its economy in a way agriculture- and tourism-reliant New Zealand hasn't, and with a growing financial services and manufacturing base, Australia has significantly higher volumes of wealthy types to enable higher ticket pricing. Australia sold 50% more tickets in 2025 than New Zealand managed in 2017, but it made 300% more profit – illustrating that it clearly took a significantly higher yield. Some of this will be because Australia's greater corporate horsepower means it can ramp up hospitality prices, knowing the Mossman set – the high financiers, hedge fund managers, property magnates – have the means and desire to pay, whereas in New Zealand, packages are tailored so they remain affordable to the small and medium enterprises that dominate the business landscape. Australia is looking to attract the investment banking community, New Zealand is targeting the local car dealership. And the Australians had an enormous infrastructure advantage – playing games in stadiums (Perth, Adelaide, Sydney) – that have all either been built or majorly renovated in the past 10 years. The highest individual attendance was 90,000 at the MCG, the lowest 23,000 in Canberra – with the average coming in at nearly 51,000. It has been raining cash in Australia because it has supportive state governments that have seen the value in building stadiums and then spending again to attract major events. This isn't a populist move to appease sports fans to win votes, it's a basic acceptance that the hospitality industry needs all the help it can get and that hotel beds need people sleeping in them. Meanwhile, in New Zealand, the All Blacks are held hostage by political indecision, a seemingly crippling fear within sitting Governments to invest in infrastructure and a general Presbyterian strain of pettiness within the populace that sees the building of modern stadiums and the subsequent pursuit of attracting big events as some kind of moral failing and pathway to irretrievably frivolous lifestyles. The Lions will come here in 2029 and NZR is unlikely to make a significantly larger profit than it did in 2017. The only real difference will be that in 2029, the tour will have access to a new and larger (9,000 more seats than the existing temporary facility) stadium in Christchurch – but that's not going to shift the dial, and unlike Australia, it is an unimaginable prospect that either the national Government or local authorities are going to start throwing cash around to try to attract fixtures. This difference in attitude between New Zealand and Australia around government investment in events was further illustrated this week when Christchurch was announced as the host city of Super Rugby Pacific's Super Round next year. Te Kaha stadium in Christchurch, pictured when it was under construction in August 2024. The Government contributed nothing – apparently reneging on a circa $1m commitment at the last minute. Whereas the Western Australian government has coughed up $5m to bring the Bledisloe Cup to Perth in October. All this makes it at least understandable why NZR is increasingly looking to take the All Blacks offshore to lift its match-day revenue. Last year, NZR made $32m in match-day revenue – but an estimated $5m of that came from playing a test at Twickenham against England, and another estimated $4m-$6m from playing tests in both Tokyo and San Diego. The five domestic tests – two at Eden Park, two in Wellington and one in Dunedin – likely generated between $21m-$23m, a figure that compares with the estimated $22m that is generated by the Rugby Football Union from hosting a single test at Twickenham. New Zealand is punitively small and poorly equipped when set against the commercial ambition of the All Blacks and if fixture allocation was viewed exclusively through a financial lens, the national team would play most of its home tests in Australia, the UK, Japan and the USA. But of course, the view can't be narrowed to that extent, and a raft of considerations come into the mix about where the national team should play, and because of that, the All Blacks may be a significantly more recognisable brand and a superior high-performance outfit to the Wallabies, but they not in the same league when it comes to making match-day money. Gregor Paul is one of New Zealand's most respected rugby writers and columnists. He has won multiple awards for journalism and written several books about sport.

'They're big boys' - Razor dismisses concerns about Mo'unga's All Black rivals
'They're big boys' - Razor dismisses concerns about Mo'unga's All Black rivals

1News

time11 hours ago

  • 1News

'They're big boys' - Razor dismisses concerns about Mo'unga's All Black rivals

All Blacks head coach Scott Robertson has dismissed concerns he will have to carefully manage the expectations of Beauden Barrett and Damian McKenzie when Richie Mo'unga returns next year. Mo'unga, the All Blacks' first choice No.10 when he left for Japan after the 2023 World Cup final in Paris, will be available for selection from October next year, if not sooner should he receive an exemption from the New Zealand Rugby board. Mo'unga has signed only a short contract which will take him to the end of the 2027 World Cup in Australia. Barrett is also contracted to the end of 2027, with McKenzie committed until the end of 2029. The playmaker's return from Toshiba will provide a sudden lift in competition for the No.10 jersey and potentially to the detriment of his two rivals, but Robertson said that was just part of the game. 'They're big boys,' he said in Buenos Aires ahead of the first Rugby Championship Test against Argentina. ADVERTISEMENT 'They know the game. It's professional and we're here to compete. The jersey is bigger than everybody. Everyone knows it's always earned.' Robertson preferred to focus on the positives of Mo'unga's return, saying: 'I think everyone is pleased that he's coming back into our game and that he's going to be around for a Rugby World Cup. He's served our country for a long time and is coming back to do it again.' Barrett, who has recovered from a hand injury which kept him out of the third Test against France last month, will likely start at first-five against Argentina in Cordoba on Sunday morning NZT. Skipper and brother Scott, a lock, has also been passed fit from a calf injury. After wearing the No.10 jersey in Hamilton, McKenzie will likely have to settle for a bench role in Cordoba, with Will Jordan a near certainty to start at fullback. If and when Mo'unga wins the No.10 jersey back, Beauden Barrett and McKenzie would likely be competing for a spot on the bench as the days of the All Blacks having two specialist playmakers on the field from the start of Tests appear over. Mo'unga's return will also have consequences for utility back Ruben Love, who started at fullback in Hamilton in his second Test and first at home due to Barrett's hand issue.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store