&w=3840&q=100)
New Zealand to charge foreign tourists up to NZ$40 at popular sites
Bloomberg
New Zealand will begin charging foreign tourists up to NZ$40 ($24) to visit its most popular tourist destinations such as Milford Track and Mount Cook as the government seeks ways to help spur economic growth.
The country's pristine national parks and great walks are 'truly special to New Zealanders' and foreigners should pay a fee at high traffic sites, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said in a speech Saturday. The NZ$62 million in annual revenue generated will be re-invested into those locations, he said.
'I have heard many times from friends visiting from overseas their shock that they can visit some of the most beautiful places in the world for free,' Luxon said. 'It's only fair that at these special locations, foreign visitors make an additional contribution of between NZ$20 and NZ$40 per person.'
New Zealand has earmarked tourism as a key avenue to generate economic growth as the nation's recovery from a recession last year gathers pace. The government from November will replace a costly transit visa for Chinese travelers in a bid to attract visitors.
The government will initially consider introducing the fee at Cathedral Cove, Tongariro Crossing, Milford Track and Mount Cook, sites where foreigners often make up 80 per cent of visitors, Luxon said.
'At the same time, there will be no charge for New Zealanders to access the conservation estate,' he said. 'It's our collective inheritance and Kiwis shouldn't have to pay to see it.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
3 hours ago
- Economic Times
Tibet's Yarlung Zangbo Dam: China's new tool for environmental destruction, Brahmaputra domination
Synopsis China has commenced construction on the Motuo Hydropower Station in Tibet, raising concerns in South Asia. The project, estimated at USD 170 billion, could give Beijing control over the Brahmaputra River, impacting millions downstream. India and Bangladesh have voiced concerns about potential water weaponization and ecological damage, while activists decry exploitation. ANI Tibet's Yarlung Zangbo Dam: China's new tool for environmental destruction, Brahmaputra domination China has begun construction on what it claims will be the world's largest hydropower project, the Motuo Hydropower Station, deep in the politically sensitive region of Tibet. Costing an estimated USD 170 billion and projected to generate 300 billion kilowatt-hours of electricity annually (roughly the amount consumed by the UK in a year), the dam is raising serious alarm across South to The Institute for Energy Research (IER), the Motuo project will consist of five cascade hydropower stations in the lower reaches of the Yarlung Zangbo River, which becomes the Brahmaputra once it crosses into India and then Bangladesh. This gives Beijing direct control over a vital transboundary river that supports millions downstream and effectively hands China a dangerous new geopolitical weapon.A 2020 report by the Lowy Institute, cited by IER, warned that "control over these rivers effectively gives China a chokehold on India's economy." Experts now fear the Yarlung Zangbo could be used as a "water bomb," either draining the Brahmaputra during dry seasons or triggering devastating floods in India's Arunachal Pradesh and Assam states. Indigenous groups like the Adi tribe, who rely on the Siang River, one of the Brahmaputra's upper tributaries, stand to lose local ecosystem in the region, among the richest in the Himalayas, could be irreversibly damaged. Both India and Bangladesh have voiced formal concerns, with India reportedly exploring a countermeasure: a buffer dam on the Siang to offset sudden Chinese water discharges. IER notes that for China, this mega-project is about more than electricity. It serves Beijing's wider goals of industrialising Tibet and exporting power eastward to China's urban centres under the "xidiandongsong" policy, literally, "sending western electricity east." But activists and Tibetans see a darker motive: exploitation masked as development. Just last year, hundreds of Tibetan protesters were rounded up, beaten, and arrested for opposing another hydropower China's climate pledges of a carbon peak by 2030 and net-zero by 2060, IER argues the Motuo Dam is less about clean energy and more about strategic leverage. With glacial melt driving the river's flow, seasonal variability could undermine energy output. Still, Beijing appears undeterred, treating the project more as a geopolitical instrument than an environmental IER concludes, the Motuo dam exemplifies China's readiness to weaponise water, putting regional security, ecological balance, and human rights at grave risk.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Tibet's Yarlung Zangbo Dam: China's new tool for environmental destruction, Brahmaputra domination
China has commenced construction on the Motuo Hydropower Station in Tibet, raising concerns in South Asia. The project, estimated at USD 170 billion, could give Beijing control over the Brahmaputra River, impacting millions downstream. India and Bangladesh have voiced concerns about potential water weaponization and ecological damage, while activists decry exploitation. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads China has begun construction on what it claims will be the world's largest hydropower project, the Motuo Hydropower Station , deep in the politically sensitive region of Tibet. Costing an estimated USD 170 billion and projected to generate 300 billion kilowatt-hours of electricity annually (roughly the amount consumed by the UK in a year), the dam is raising serious alarm across South to The Institute for Energy Research (IER), the Motuo project will consist of five cascade hydropower stations in the lower reaches of the Yarlung Zangbo River, which becomes the Brahmaputra once it crosses into India and then Bangladesh. This gives Beijing direct control over a vital transboundary river that supports millions downstream and effectively hands China a dangerous new geopolitical weapon.A 2020 report by the Lowy Institute, cited by IER, warned that "control over these rivers effectively gives China a chokehold on India's economy." Experts now fear the Yarlung Zangbo could be used as a "water bomb," either draining the Brahmaputra during dry seasons or triggering devastating floods in India's Arunachal Pradesh and Assam states. Indigenous groups like the Adi tribe, who rely on the Siang River, one of the Brahmaputra's upper tributaries, stand to lose local ecosystem in the region, among the richest in the Himalayas, could be irreversibly damaged. Both India and Bangladesh have voiced formal concerns, with India reportedly exploring a countermeasure: a buffer dam on the Siang to offset sudden Chinese water notes that for China, this mega-project is about more than electricity. It serves Beijing's wider goals of industrialising Tibet and exporting power eastward to China's urban centres under the "xidiandongsong" policy, literally, "sending western electricity east." But activists and Tibetans see a darker motive: exploitation masked as last year, hundreds of Tibetan protesters were rounded up, beaten, and arrested for opposing another hydropower China's climate pledges of a carbon peak by 2030 and net-zero by 2060, IER argues the Motuo Dam is less about clean energy and more about strategic leverage. With glacial melt driving the river's flow, seasonal variability could undermine energy output. Still, Beijing appears undeterred, treating the project more as a geopolitical instrument than an environmental IER concludes, the Motuo dam exemplifies China's readiness to weaponise water, putting regional security, ecological balance, and human rights at grave risk.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
4 hours ago
- First Post
India–China thaw: Strategic signalling, not concession
Earlier this month, it was announced that India is resuming the issuance of tourist visas for Chinese citizens. Just before this, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh and National Security Advisor Ajit Doval visited China for meetings of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation. External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar travelled to China shortly after and met with Chinese President Xi Jinping. This was the first such meeting since the Galwan Valley clash of 2020. This is a strategic signal from India amidst new circumstances created by some of the most powerful states in the existing international system. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD India's recent uptick in diplomatic ties with China is not a concession; instead, it reflects India's calculated posture of strategic signalling. With the bilateral trade agreement with the US currently stalled and the global economic landscape shifting rapidly, India is engaging with China not to resolve old disputes but to gain strategic leverage through the creation of optics. Since late 2024, India and China have entered into a deliberate but structural phase to engage with each other to reduce tensions along the Himalayan border. After experiencing four years of protected standoff following the deadly Galwan face-off, the diplomatic levers have shifted. The latest phase began with an important breakthrough on October 21, 2024, when both countries agreed on a border pact, letting each other patrol at previously restricted friction points like Depsang and Demchok. The agreement helped significantly in restoring trust and establishing communication between two powerful neighbours. After this agreement there has been a flurry of diplomatic exchanges between both the powers. These consistent meetings, though, suggest a pattern in which both nations are trying to reduce mistrust and restore a dialogue to prevent further crisis. Both nations are engaging at a greater pace than they ever were doing. For India, this is about asserting sovereignty while avoiding conflict. For China, it is about projecting stability along its southern frontier as it faces growing pressure in the Western Pacific and domestic economic headwinds. Yet the question remains: Why is India doing this now when the Line of Actual Control (LAC) is still contested? New Delhi is pursuing economic de-risking, not decoupling from China. Despite all the geopolitical friction, India remains deeply entwined with Chinese capital, tech, and rare earth dependencies. India acknowledges this fact and is opting for stability management. Chasing a compartmentalised relationship that seeks to discuss boundary questions without foreclosing economic activities. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD However, India finds itself in utmost precarity when China also responded with bans and curbs on rare earth materials. Additionally, in an attempt to limit technology transfers to India, along with skilled workers, the Chinese government has recalled hundreds of Chinese engineers and technicians from Foxconn's iPhone factories in India. Foxconn is meeting the shortages by bringing in Taiwanese technicians. India is neither unaware nor unresponsive. Similarly, the suspicion runs through: Will this ongoing round of discussions succeed in producing lasting peace, or is it merely a tactical de-escalation? Historical experience suggests otherwise. The Galwan incursions occurred in the backdrop of the Wuhan summit in 2018 and the Chennai informal summit in 2019, which were also celebrated as turning points. Also, the fundamental issue, the differing perceptions of the LAC, remains unresolved. Confidence-building is underway, but confidence itself remains fragile. The recent diplomatic engagements in Beijing, including discussions on 'de-escalation' and 'normalising people-to-people exchange', occur against a backdrop where India perceives the complete resolution of the border issue as a prerequisite for normal relations, while China prefers to compartmentalise the border issue, pushing for cooperation while maintaining territorial claims and even military posturing. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD While both sides have expressed a desire for a 'positive trajectory' and optimism for 'stable and constructive ties', the talks were steered towards managing disagreements rather than fundamentally resolving them. Opening direct air services and the Kailash Manasarovar yatra are positive steps but do not address the core issue of strategic and territorial disputes. Beijing, on the other hand, strongly objected to Prime Minister Narendra Modi's public birthday greeting to the Dalai Lama in July 2025, reiterating its opposition to any official engagement with the Tibetan spiritual leader. While both nations appear to agree on the need for immediate stability, their long-term goals diverge. India seeks a restoration of the pre-2020 border status and a rules-based order in Asia and elsewhere; China, meanwhile, aims to assert regional influence with and without direct confrontation, and examples range from Doklam to Galwan to China trying to wipe out the identity of Tibet, building the biggest dam on the Yarlung Tsanpo to throttle the downstream Brahmaputra River in India, and so on. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Operation Sindoor also served as an indirect test of tensions between India and China. Beijing's response, calling India's retaliation against terrorism 'unfortunate', caused a rift in New Delhi. While urging 'restraint on all sides", China notably refrained from denouncing the terror provocation or addressing India's security concerns. After Operation Sindoor, the deputy chief of army staff for India also issued a warning on Sino-Pakistan collusion during the operation. If there's one significant shift in India's approach, it is a more layered diplomacy—engaging China bilaterally but also within the framework of multilateral forums like the SCO and Brics, while continuing strategic balancing elsewhere. It is not containment nor alignment, but calibrated coexistence. For Beijing too, stabilising ties with Delhi serves a larger goal: preventing a second front while managing the US pressure in East Asia. Given that the US has lifted export restrictions on Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA) tools and software bound for Chinese buyers, and the EU is desperately engaging with China, there is no clarity on whether India can ever count on Western powers. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD India understands China as a threat and has been at the receiving end of more conflicts, military and otherwise, with China than any other country in the world. However, it is also a neighbour and a powerful one, with which India will have to manage its relationship. There is no better way in such a complex scenario except diplomacy and optics. Sriparna Pathak is a professor of China Studies at OP Jindal Global University and a senior fellow at the Jindal India Institute. Gaurav Sen is a senior research fellow at the School of International Studies, JNU, New Delhi. He is the author of the book 'Peril of the Pacific: Military Balance and Battle for Taiwan'. The views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the authors. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
