Perspective: Christians must withstand temptations to compromise their faith
Whenever a new pope is elected, the mainstream secular media is abuzz with speculation about his politics and ideology. Is the pope conservative or liberal? What does he believe about particular political figures, parties, or movements? Did he favor the election of Donald Trump or Kamala Harris as the U.S. president?
More insidiously, many journalists and commentators seek to manipulate the new pontiff's first public words in light of the prevalent ideological trends in our culture: Does the pope's message that the church welcomes all people, sinners included, mean that the Catholic Church will revise its teachings on marriage? Sexuality? Abortion? Euthanasia? Will it get in line with the dogmas, whatever they are, prevailing among the day's cultural elites?
The implicit message is clear: faith — whether that of the people in the pews or of the leaders of the Christian community — can be cleanly divided into ideological categories. 'Progressive' Christians and a 'progressive' pope, for example, believe in inclusion, diversity, non-judgmentalism, and ensuring that all those pesky dogmas and doctrines don't make anyone feel uncomfortable. On the other hand, those 'conservative' and 'traditionalist' Christians are 'reactionaries' who unduly prioritize doctrine and seek to exclude those who in various ways fall short of doctrine's requirements.
To this way of thinking, what makes a faithful Christian is not the universal confession of faith and the lifelong struggle to adhere to faith's demands. Christianity can, rather, be taught and practiced in divergent ways according to one's political or ideological preferences.
I suppose we ought not to be surprised by the fact that many religious folks are swept along by cultural trends, even trends that are manifestly antithetical to biblical principles and the firm and constant teaching of scripture and tradition. 'Twas ever thus. (Indeed, 'twas thus for the ancient Hebrews, too, as scripture makes more than abundantly clear.)
And Christians who fall in line with a trend find ways to say that the trend, whatever it is, is compatible with Christian faith — even dictated by it. It's hard for human beings to actually be countercultural, and Christians are human beings just like everybody else.
We make a million excuses for going along with what's wrong — and pretty soon we find ourselves going along with calling it right.
So when Marxism is in vogue, there will be self-proclaimed Christian Marxists (perhaps doing business as 'liberation theologians'). When fascism is fashionable, there will be self-identified Christian fascists, as there were under Mussolini in Italy, for example. When racial subordination and segregation is the cultural norm, there will be some who seek to baptize it (these voices may even come from within the church: consider the three prominent Louisiana Catholics who were excommunicated in 1962 by Joseph Rummel, then archbishop of New Orleans, for distorting Catholic doctrine to try to justify their opposition to racial desegregation).
When eugenics is popular among the cognoscenti, there will be Christians claiming that eugenic practices and policies constitute authentic Christian love in practice. If polyamory becomes the next cause embraced by the cultural elite — as seems to be gradually occurring — we will start hearing about the Christian case for group marriage: 'God is love! And God teaches us to love one another, instead of keeping our love confined to just one other person.' And on and on.
Why does this constantly happen? Well, being the frail, fallen, fallible human beings that we are, we crave social acceptance and we like to fit in. Moreover, we human beings are naturally influenced by the ways of thinking favored by those who are regarded by the predominant culture as sophisticated, up-to-date and important. When push comes to shove, it's quite difficult to be true to the Christian faith — the social and personal costs are too high.
We who are Christians praise the martyrs and honor their memories, but we are loath to place in jeopardy so much as an opportunity for career advancement, or the good opinion of a friend — much less our lives. So we tend to fall in line or at least fall silent. We deceive ourselves with rationalizations for what, in truth, amounts to either conformism or cowardice.
We place the emphasis on whatever happens in the cultural circumstances to be the acceptable parts of Christian teaching and soft-pedal or even abandon the parts that the enforcers of the day's cultural norms deem to be unacceptable. We make a million excuses for going along with what's wrong — and pretty soon we find ourselves going along with calling it right.
But the Gospel's demands call us to something higher. Jesus says, 'If you want to be my disciple, you must take up your cross and follow me.' To be sure, the Lord offers mercy to those who, though they yielded to the intense pressures and temptations to deny him or his precepts, later return, like the prodigal son.
This is Christianity's true and unadulterated teaching. God's mercy is abundant, yes, and with mercy comes the opportunity for repentance — but to authentically repent for the times we have denied the Lord to please the world, we must rescue ourselves from the palatable half-truths and watered-down faith that the secular culture incessantly urges us to adopt.
Robert P. George is McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence and Director of the James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions at Princeton University.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Stephen Miller Breaks Silence With ‘Pork' Prod at Elon Musk
Stephen Miller has broken his silence after Elon Musk turned on his billionaire bestie, Donald Trump. The deputy chief of staff, usually a prolific social media poster, had been silent for hours online after the volcanic fall out between the two men, despite social media erupting with Musk's bombshell allegations including a claim that the president was named in the Jeffrey Epstein files. It comes as Miller's wife, Katie, followed Elon Musk out of the White House and DOGE duties last month, reportedly for a new job working with the tech billionaire. While Miller did not tag Musk or mention any of the billionaire's personal claims about Trump in a belated Thursday night post, he instead took a jab by referencing a comment made by the 53-year-old earlier this week. 'The only 'new' spending in the bill is to defend the homeland and deport the illegals—paid for by raising visa fees. All the other provisions? Massive spending cuts. There is no 'pork' in the bill. Just campaign promises," Miller wrote. Miller was quoting a pointed comment made by Musk which claimed Trump's bill is a 'massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill,' adding it 'is a disgusting abomination.' The Trump confidante followed the veiled comment with another late-night post that read, 'Still trying to figure out what the objection is to a bill that combines record tax cuts with record spending cuts with record deportations.' Miller's relative silence on the issue was in stark contract with his flurry of posts throughout the week as the Musk and Trump drama boiled over, and the Trump adviser went on a posting spree in an attempt to save the bill's reputation. Miller also pulled out on a scheduled appearance on Larry Kudlow's Fox News show on Thursday afternoon, with the host apologizing for him. 'We lost Mr Miller to a meeting in the Oval Office,' Kudlow said. 'Perfectly understandable, when I was in government it would happen all the time, you'd have to kill a TV show, you're at the president's beck and call.' Miller then appeared in a White House discussion alongside Senior White House officials Taylor Budowich, Russ Vought and James Braid discuss Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' The half-hour YouTube video was posted Thursday night, with Miller the first to speak. 'The most important thing in politics in American is honoring the promises you make to the American people, the sacred trust between the voter and the man they elect, in this case the president of the United States,' Miller said, noting the president made numerous promises on the campaign trail that 'are codified in this legislation.' Miller reposted numerous videos uploaded from the discussion to X by the White House's Rapid Response team. Musk earlier unfollowed Miller's account on X on Thursday, in an unfollowing spree that also included right-wing media personality Charlie Kirk. Appearing on Kirk's podcast on Thursday, Kirk said to Miller, 'I want you to say again that this would be one of the greatest legislative accomplishments in Republican party history.' Miller began the interview by telling Kirk, 'You've been such a critical element of the success of the MAGA movement. I hope your audience appreciates how much we appreciate you.' The interview descended into both men talking up the 'big beautiful bill.' 'If Ronald Reagan had just done no tax on tips, they'd still be giving speeches today about it at the Reagan Library,' Miller claimed. 'There'd be whole statues, there'd be museum displays, they'd have entire industries built off just telling the story of when Reagan did no tax on tips. Isn't that right Charlie?" The 30-minute discussion did not mention Elon Musk calling the bill a 'disgusting abomination' or his wife Katie's employment status. Miller did say he was 'optimistic' the bill would be passed 'because I have faith in the power of the Trump voter.'
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
EU voices support for ICC after US sanctions judges
BRUSSELS (Reuters) -The European Union strongly supports the International Criminal Court, European Council Antonio Costa said on Friday, adding that it is "a cornerstone of international justice". His comments came a day after President Donald Trump's administration imposed sanctions on four judges at the International Criminal Court, an unprecedented retaliation over the war tribunal's issuance of an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and a past decision to open a case into alleged war crimes by U.S. troops in Afghanistan.
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tesla shares rebound on news of Musk and Trump talks after explosive feud cost firm $99bn in a day
Tesla shares are poised to jump as much as 5.7 per cent when stock markets open in the US later today after the business took a $99bn (£73bn) hit following an explosive feud between Donald Trump and Elon Musk. The share price of the electric vehicle (EV) manufacturer tanked from more than $322 at the start of Thursday's trading to $284 at the end of the day, more than a 14 per cent drop as a result of a back-and-forth argument between the pair, which covered everything from government contracts to the Epstein files. However, a ceasefire of sorts appears to have been brokered, and the two are due to meet on Friday - resulting in some investors surging back into Tesla stock. Even so, with futures markets showing around a 5.7 per cent rise in pre-trading just before 9am BST, that still means the market capitalisation of Tesla - the measure of its overall value by share price - will have dropped a full $99bn in a day. After-hours trading shows the buying and selling of shares outside of regular stock market opening hours, mostly dominated by big corporate investors. That is reflected in the futures price, which shows the stock price that a company will 'open' at. The large sell-off means Tesla has again lost its status as a $1tn company, though it still ranks in the top ten largest American companies. The one-day cost to Mr Musk's net worth personally was around $34bn (£25bn), according to Bloomberg's Billionaires Index, at the time stock markets closed in the US. He remains the richest person on the planet by a distance. Separate from share price woes, Mr Trump's tax and spending Bill could be set to cost Tesla. Eliminating tax incentives for US buyers purchasing EVs, in addition to a similar scheme in California, could cost Tesla more than $3bn, analysts estimate. Outside of Tesla, Mr Musk's other business interests could be hard-hit too if the US president presses ahead with his threats to cancel government contracts with SpaceX. Other car manufacturers across the UK and Europe have not reacted with notable share price changes after the feud took place outside their trading hours on Thursday. German-listed Volkswagen, BMW and Mercedes were largely flat in early trading, with the UK's Aston Martin Lagonda up 2 per cent. Ferrari is listed in New York and is up 0.4 per cent in pre-trading, with General Motors at 0.5 per cent and Toyota's US listing set to open 0.3 per cent up.