logo
Pet ban for neglectful Fife owner after underfed bulldog put to sleep

Pet ban for neglectful Fife owner after underfed bulldog put to sleep

The Courier15-05-2025

A Glenrothes man's bulldog had to be put to sleep after police found it malnourished, infected and shut away alone in a filthy bedroom.
Steven Wolohan admitted causing the dog called Hugo unnecessary suffering at his home in Dunbeath Drive.
A police officer carrying out a welfare check alerted the Scottish SPCA after finding the 27-year-old's pet in a room strewn with faeces.
Kirkcaldy Sheriff Court heard that Wolohan's home had been inspected by the animal welfare charity about a year earlier.
Wolohan appeared in the dock to admit a charge under Section 19 of the Animal Health and Welfare (Scotland) Act 2006.
The offender, who according to his lawyer 'wasn't keeping on top of his own affairs,' was spared jail, but banned from keeping animals for five years.
Prosecutor Christine Allan said a SSPCA inspector received an anonymous call on June 17, 2022.
The caller reported a dog in poor condition which was often left alone for long periods and never walked.
Wolohan was reluctant to let the inspector inside his home, but agreed to bring seven-year-old Hugo to the door.
The dog was in good condition but had an ear issue which Wolohan was advised to have treated by a vet.
When the inspector returned 11 days later, Wolohan revealed he hadn't taken Hugo to a vet as he had to pay for dog food instead.
He was given a large bag of dog food by the inspector but subsequently stopped responding to calls and cards.
More than a year later, the charity was again asked to attend at Wolohan's home – this time by a police officer carrying out a welfare check.
The PC reported that on August 4 in 2023, Hugo was found shut away in a bedroom in poor condition and was in a home full of mouldy faeces.
The kitchen was dirty with rubbish and appliances strewn around the floor, the hallway had various items rolled up and in the living room there were multiple piles of faeces, including diarrhoea.
The property smelled of urine and faeces.
Hugo was found lying on a dirty bed in an upstairs bedroom with rubbish and beer cans on the floor.
He was removed from the property while police continued to search for Wolohan.
Hugo was taken to St Clair Veterinary Practice in Kirkcaldy and assessed by Dr Melanie Tardif-Faessel.
She found that although Hugo should have weighed between 35 and 40kg, he was in fact only 28kg.
He scored 2/9 on the Purina scale, his ribs were visible and he'd lost muscle mass.
Hugo had sores on his paw pads, mild periodontal disease and dandruff.
His ear condition had worsened and it wasn't possible to examine inside with an otoscope due to the discharge of pus and abnormal narrowing.
The vet found Hugo's dietary needs hadn't been being met for weeks.
He continued to receive treatment at the Scottish SPCA clinic but a decision was taken later that month to euthanise him.
At an earlier hearing, Wolohan admitted that between June 17 2022 and August 4 2023, he caused a dog he was responsible for to suffer unnecessarily by an act or omission.
He failed to provide the dog with appropriate care and treatment, in particular adequate nutrition whereby the dog lost body weight.
He also failed to obtain vet advice or treatment for the dog for a number of health conditions including ulcerated ear canals, body weight loss and loss of muscle mass.
Prosecutors previously accepted Wolohan's not guilty plea to a second charge of failing to take reasonable steps in the circumstances to ensure the welfare of the dog.
Wolohan's lawyer Martin McGuire said: 'It's fair to say during the course of 2022 and 2023, Mr Wolohan's personal circumstances had deteriorated.
'He wasn't taking care of himself, let alone the dog.
'Mr Wolohan found himself in a situation where he was drinking to excess and there was substance misuse.
'He wasn't maintaining his own affairs.
'He was in a state of depression, he simply wasn't able to progress matters.
'As he understands, the court can impose a period of imprisonment today. The matter does clearly reach the custody threshold.'
Sheriff Mark Allan imposed a direct alternative to custody, ordering Wolohan to complete 150 hours of unpaid work over the next year.
He also placed Wolohan under supervision for a year and on an 8pm to 6am curfew every night for six months.
The sheriff also furnished Wolohan with a pet ban.
He said: 'Mr McGuire is absolutely right to acknowledge on your behalf that this offence passes the custody threshold.
'But for the fact that there is available a significant and stringent package of community-based disposals, you would otherwise be going to prison for this offence.
'Because of the severity of the matter before the court, the harm and suffering caused to this animal, you will be disqualified from owning or keeping an animal for a period of five years from today.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Family of tragic Scots dad savagely murdered by ‘cold-blooded' best pal say he should never be freed
Family of tragic Scots dad savagely murdered by ‘cold-blooded' best pal say he should never be freed

The Sun

time2 hours ago

  • The Sun

Family of tragic Scots dad savagely murdered by ‘cold-blooded' best pal say he should never be freed

THE family of a murdered dad have told of their horror at him being killed by a childhood pal who considered himself a 'cousin'. Relatives of Chris McMahon, 31, found it 'unbelievable' that Stephen Kelly stabbed him in the neck and chest with an 18-inch hunting knife. 5 5 5 He also hit Chris on the head with a bottle, stamped on him and poured bleach into his mouth during a 'sustained' 20-minute attack. Chris's devastated mum, Margaret, 69, said: 'Never in a million years did I think Stephen would have done this to Chris. 'He would come to our house all the time. He was always here having his dinner as a wee boy.' Kelly claimed he killed Chris in the dad-of-two's home in Carluke, Lanarkshire, because he was being 'bullied' by him. But the dead man's older brother John, 37, said: 'He's a coward. He's hit Chris with a bottle to knock him out, then sat on top of him and stabbed him, then poured the bleach. 'That's not someone who has snapped because they were bullied. He's a cold-blooded killer.' Sister Kirsty, 41, said: 'There's two little kids here who will never see their daddy again.' Mum Margaret told how Kelly's mother knocked on her door after the brute called her, topless and covered in blood, to tell her what he had done. She said: 'She told me, 'You better call for help'. 'After I found out I couldn't believe she hadn't told me what happened. But then, maybe she couldn't say it.' Stabbing rampage leaves 11 people injured as witnesses describe horror of 'screams & blood everywhere' in Salem Kelly, of Carluke, was caged for 22 years at the High Court in Kilmarnock on May 28. Following the sentence Chris' parents Margaret, 69, and John 76, along with siblings Kirsty, 41 and John, 37, said they were relieved Kelly had been given life. Kirsty added: "It's been an agonising 19 months for our family, and justice has finally been served. But no sentence would ever be long enough because Chris is never coming back." 5 5

MoD ‘dishonest' to call 1994 Chinook crash an accident, say families
MoD ‘dishonest' to call 1994 Chinook crash an accident, say families

The Independent

time3 hours ago

  • The Independent

MoD ‘dishonest' to call 1994 Chinook crash an accident, say families

The families of people killed in the 1994 Chinook helicopter disaster have criticised the Ministry of Defence's description of the crash as a 'tragic accident' as 'dishonest, deceitful and disingenuous'. RAF Chinook ZD576 was carrying 25 British intelligence personnel from RAF Aldergrove in Northern Ireland to a conference at Fort George near Inverness when it crashed in foggy weather on June 2 1994 on the Mull of Kintyre, Scotland. All 25 passengers – made up of personnel from MI5, the Royal Ulster Constabulary and the British Army – were killed, along with the helicopter's four crew members. The families of those who died said earlier this month that they were beginning legal action against the Ministry of Defence (MoD) for not ordering a public inquiry. They want a High Court judge to be able to review information which they say was not included in previous investigations, and which they believe will shed new light on the airworthiness of the helicopter. The families, who have coalesced into the Chinook Justice Campaign, said failing to order a public inquiry is a breach of the UK Government's human rights obligations. An MoD spokesperson said: 'The Mull of Kintyre crash was a tragic accident, and our thoughts and sympathies remain with the families, friends and colleagues of all those who died. 'We have received a pre-action protocol letter from the Chinook Justice Campaign and are considering our response. Therefore, it would be inappropriate to comment further.' Solicitor Mark Stephens, who is representing the families, said: 'The statements issued by the Ministry of Defence in recent days are so blatantly at odds with the facts as we now know them that they have caused immense upset to the families and cast a further cruel and disgraceful shadow on this ongoing travesty of justice. 'We know that the RAF helicopter carrying the 29 service personnel who were killed, serving their country, had been grounded because of fatal flaws in the software on board. 'For the MoD to claim that this was a 'tragic accident' flies in the face of the facts and is blatantly and disgracefully at odds with the truth. 'It is nothing short of dishonest, deceitful and disingenuous and we demand a retraction.' The families have also called for the release of documents that were sealed at the time of the crash for 100 years, something revealed in a BBC documentary last year. The MoD has said that records held in the National Archives contain personal information and early release of those documents would breach their data protection rights. Mr Stephens said: 'For the Government to believe that data protection laws were designed to protect someone who is living – and who may have made a dreadful decision that night – rather than the truth emerging over 29 service personnel who were killed in an unairworthy aircraft, is a total abomination. 'This decision must be overturned, these files must be seen by a judge, and we will fight this in court if necessary.' Niven Phoenix, a commercial pilot whose father Ian was one of the senior RUC officers killed in the crash, said: 'This was about as far from a tragic accident as you could get. Locking the files away until we are all dead proves there is a cover-up about something. 'The MoD's statement that these files have been sealed to protect third party interests is yet another disingenuous, distasteful and outright dishonest assertion designed to hide the truth using data protection laws which only came into force in the UK long after the crash. 'The Government would prefer for all the children of the Chinook victims to die like their parents rather than provide access, answers and take accountability for past mistakes. This is not the duty of candour promised by Keir Starmer in his election manifesto.' Following the crash, the Chinook's pilots, Flight Lieutenants Richard Cook and Jonathan Tapper, were accused of gross negligence, but this verdict was overturned by the UK Government 17 years later, following a campaign by the families. A subsequent review by Lord Philip set out 'numerous concerns' raised by those who worked on the Chinooks, with the MoD's testing centre at Boscombe Down in Wiltshire declaring the Chinook Mk2 helicopters 'unairworthy' prior to the crash.

SFA president demands football banning orders for yobs as he reveals rule changes to help thugs crackdown
SFA president demands football banning orders for yobs as he reveals rule changes to help thugs crackdown

Daily Record

time3 hours ago

  • Daily Record

SFA president demands football banning orders for yobs as he reveals rule changes to help thugs crackdown

Mike Mulraney has spoken out after a spate of ugly incidents during last season SFA chairman Mike Mulraney has called for a crackdown on Scottish football 's yobs with more banning orders dished out by the courts. The football supremo is furious after a series of flashpoints last season and believes the only way to tackle the menace is more football banning orders - which can see thugs barred from all UK stadiums for up to ten years. ‌ Mulraney said: 'What I'd say there is that there is a difference between loving your club and expressing that with vigour and exhilarating fashion and so forth, and chucking a seat. ‌ 'It's straight forward. It's criminal. The problem for me at the moment with the flares and so forth is there is no jeopardy to doing that. 'Until there is jeopardy for action you tend not to be able to change people's behaviour. So if we want to change behaviour we need banning orders. When you get banning orders, people won't do it because they don't want to be banned.' Our national game saw a meteoric rise in unwanted flashpoints last season. Former Aberdeen defender Jack MacKenzie was whacked in the face by a seat thrown by his own fans on the final day of the league campaign at Tannadice. While missiles and other objects were thrown on to the pitch during three Old Firm league matches in succession. And before last December's Premier Sports Cup final, fans of both Celtic and Rangers ran riot in Glasgow city centre. ‌ At the Edinburgh derby on Boxing Day, a Hearts supporter was ejected from Tynecastle and arrested in relation to an alleged incident of racism. And the continuing use of pyro by fans all over the country continues to give authorities a major headache. But the latest figures for the season just finished show that just five fans were hit with FBOs. This is a marked drop from 37 in the 2023/24 season and 59 in 2022/23. In the last decade across Scotland, a total of 504 FBOs have been issued with Rangers and Hibernian supporters topping the table - much of which related to the pitch invasion after the 2016 Scottish Cup Final. ‌ There is now support at government level for enforcing more FBOs and Mulraney believes it has to happen. He stated: 'Right now there is no jeopardy. I believe the Scottish Government is supportive of our view on this now. I believe the police are supportive of our view on this now. 'We're football, we can't go and sort that out. We need the judiciary to sort that out and if they need to tweak the wording on the legislation, tweak the wording on the legislation, that's their game. ‌ 'For me, it's really simple. At this point in time, misbehaviour seldom carries jeopardy. 'There is almost no jeopardy for misbehaviour. It's about protecting those who are not guilty of anything. Everyone's forgetting about them, the 99.8 percent of fans who wouldn't dream of doing it. Who's looking after them? 'Instead of everybody asking us to focus on the 0.2 percent, the real question should be 'what are you doing to protect all these people who are not breaking the law?' ‌ At the last Old Firm game in April at Ibrox, a bottle was thrown at Celtic keeper Viljami Sinisalo with Rangers substitute Neraysho Kasanwirjo - who had been warming up nearby - entering the pitch to remove it. Sinisalo said other items were directed towards him. 'First of all, I was hit with something in my lower leg,' said the Finn. 'It wasn't just a bottle, there was lighters, vapes, coins, mugs, all sorts. 'Let's say that glass bottle hits me or hits someone else, what happens next? What if it hits you in the eye and you can't play football after that. Those are the questions that we need answers for.' ‌ When Rangers and Celtic met at Ibrox in January, an object was thrown from the crowd and struck visiting midfielder Arne Engels, who required treatment. 'It's not the first time it's happened,' added Sinisalo. 'I was there when Arne was hit, [team-mate] Greg [Taylor] has been hit, [former Celtic keeper] Joe Hart's been hit, staff members have been hit. 'It's up to the authorities and the club there. I'm just glad I never got hit because things could be bad if you get hit.' ‌ During the same game a Celtic fan was also filmed mocking Ibrox disaster victims. There has been a huge debate over the use of pyrotechnics and smoke bombs. A lot of the ultras' scene want to be given the green light but Mulraney said that won't happen because they are illegal within stadiums. He stated: 'They've made the law. They've said it's illegal. On you go. I'm not the police nor should I be and I think that's important as well. ‌ 'People have got to remember that. Those who say we need football to do more outside the stadiums. 'We cannot ever be allowed to be the police of society, for there is the road to damnation for a society. "My job is to protect the fans who don't want it to happen. ‌ 'My job is to protect the fan with asthma who's standing three seats away from the guy who's smoking him out and he's leaving the game. 'It's for the government and the judiciary to instil jeopardy and it's for me to put pressure on them. 'I can ask for a banning order but if they don't do it there's not a lot I can do about that other than keep and put pressure on to make it happen. 'So we're changing our rules to improve the position that we can and we will support the police, the government and anyone else who's interested in installing some form of jeopardy behind the law of the land that they've already made.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store