Visions du Réel Crowns ‘The Prince of Nanawa' as Grand Prix Winner, ‘The Vanishing Point' Claims Burning Lights Award
Clarisa Navas' 'The Prince of Nanawa' has taken home the Grand Prix at international Swiss doc fest Visions du Réel, while Bani Koshnoudi's 'The Vanishing Point' earned the top award in the Burning Lights section.
More from Variety
Raoul Peck on His Cannes-Bound George Orwell Documentary and the Threat of Dictatorship: 'Terror Comes Slowly'
'The Golden Swan' Director on Bringing to Screen Her Brother's 'Journey From Hate to Reconciliation' Before Murder by Terrorists
Rosie O'Donnell's Doc 'Unleashing Hope: The Power of Service Dogs for Children With Autism' Sets April Debut on Hulu (EXCLUSIVE)
Argentina's Navas, best known for her 2020 San Sebastián-winning film 'One in a Thousand,' spent a decade filming 'The Prince of Nanawa.' The documentary follows the story of Ángel, a charismatic boy with fierce love for his Guarani roots and a vision for his Paraguayan hometown of Nanawa. With a camera in hand, Ángel helps craft his own story.
The jury, comprising Japanese film festival director Hama Haruka, U.S. filmmaker Eliza Hittman ('Never Rarely Sometimes Always,' 'Beach Rats') and Greek director Athiná-Rachél Tsangári ('Attenberg,' 'Chevalier,' 'Harvest'), praised the film as 'a work that straddles autofiction, fiction and non-fiction with confidence and humility… The camera becomes a communal, familial instrument that passionately records the microcosm of youth as it negotiates borders and boundaries. The filmmaker's gaze is hospitable and tender – without ever sentimentalizing or othering their subject.'
The Grand Prix comes with a 20,000 CHF ($24,000) cash prize.
The Special Jury Award in the same section went to 'To Use a Mountain' by Casey Carter, which investigates the six rural U.S. sites once considered for nuclear waste disposal. Marie Voignier's 'Anamocot,' which chronicles a French scientist's lifelong search for the mythical Mokélé-Mbembé, received a Special Mention.
Koshnoudi, an exiled filmmaker and visual artist whose work has been shown in exhibitions around the world, picked up the festival's second most prestigious award for 'The Vanishing Point,' which breaks her family's decades-long silence about a disappeared cousin executed during the 1988 purges in Iran.
In their citation, the jury, made up of U.S. filmmaker Scott Cummings ('Realm of Satan,' 'Never Rarely Sometimes Always'), French producer Thomas Hakim ('All We Imagine as Light'), and Georgian-Swiss director Elene Naveriani ('Blackbird, Blackbird, Blackberry') called it 'a bold and radical exploration of shared pain and collective resistance,' commending how the filmmaker 'opens her family history to unlock a kaleidoscope of materials, both personal and political, past and present, that culminates in a manifesto of resistance against the regime.'
The award comes with a 10,000 CHF ($12,000) cash prize.
David Bim's 'To the West, in Zapata' had a strong showing, picking both the Burning Lights Special Jury Prize and the International Critics' Prize – Prix FIPRESCI.
A Special Mention also went to 'Fierté nationale: de Jéricho vers Gaza' by Sven Augustijnen, which follows a Palestinian diplomat's journey from the occupied West Bank to Gaza's border.
In the National Competition, 'The Multiple Lives of Andres' ('Les Vies d'Andrès') by Switzerland's Baptiste Janon and Belgium's Rémi Pons claimed the top prize. Inspired by a novel about an early 20th century cart driver, the film depicts his contemporary twin, a truck driver navigating a contemporary Europe obsessed with profit. The prize comes with 15,000 CHF ($18,000).
Laura Coppens' 'Sediments' picked up the runner-up Special Jury Award, and 'Toute ma vie' by Matias Carlier received a Special Mention.
The audience award went to Sundance Grand Jury Prize winner 'Cutting Through Rocks' by Mohammadreza Eyni and Sara Khaki.
Visions du Réel's artistic director Émilie Bujès praised the 2025 selection as 'a true bulwark against the standardization of both cinema and ideas.'
'The 154 films presented at the 2025 festival offer a myriad of prisms through which to explore contemporary documentary cinema and to discover bold, personal, and singular cinematic voices. I'm delighted to see that this year's awards reflect this ambition, notably including films created over extended periods of time. This confirms our deep commitment to offering powerful and original cinematic experiences,' she said.
All winning films had their world premieres at Visions du Réel.
The festival runs until Sunday evening, with its curated online selection available until 20 April.
Find all the awards for Visions du Réel 2025 here:
International Feature Film CompetitionGrand Jury Prize'The Prince of Nanawa' by Clarisa Navas
Special Jury Award'To Use a Mountain' by Casey Carter
Special Mention'Anamocot' by Marie Voignier
Burning Lights Competition'The Vanishing Point' by Bani Khoshnoudi
Special Jury Award'To the West in Zapata' by David Bim
Special Mention'Fierté nationale: de Jéricho vers Gaza' by Sven Augustijnen
National Competition'Les Vies d'Andrès' by Baptiste Janon and Rémi Pons
Special Jury Award in the National Competition'Sediments' by Laura Coppens
Special Mention'Toute ma vie' by Matias Carlier
International Medium Length and Short Film CompetitionJury Prize for the Best Medium Length Film'Les Voyageurs' by David Bingong
Jury Prize for the Best Short Film'Another Other' by Bex Oluwatoyin Thompson
Special Youth Jury Award for a Medium Length Film'Objects Don't Randomly Fall From the Sky' by Maria Estela Paiso
Special Youth Jury Award for the Best Short Film'The Town That Drove Away' by Grzegorz Piekarski and Natalia Pietsch
Special Mention from the Jury of the International Medium and Short Film Competition'Khmerica' by Thibaut Amri, Antoine Guide and Lucas Sénécaut
Wide AngleAudience Award in the Wide Angle Competition'Cutting Through Rocks' by Mohammadreza Eyni and Sara Khaki
International Critics' Award – FIPRESCI AwardFirst feature film presented in the International Feature Film Competition or the Burning Lights Competition'To the West, in Zapata' by David Bim
Interreligious AwardFeature film of the International Competition that highlights questions of meaning and human solidarity'Nuit obscure – 'Ain't I a Child?'' by Sylvain George
Perception Change Project AwardPrize awarded to a film that sheds light on the current issues that will define the world of tomorrow'The Family Approach' by Daniel Abma
Zonta AwardThe ZONTA Creation Support Award rewards a female filmmaker whose film, selected in the Burning Lights or National Competition sections, reveals mastery and talent and calls for support for future creations.'And the Fish Fly Above Our Heads' by Dima El-Horr
Best of Variety
Emmy Predictions: Cristin Milioti, Jenny Slate and Paul Giamatti Make Big Moves in the Limited Races
Emmy Predictions: Supporting Actress (Limited/TV Movie) — Netflix Boasts Multiple Standouts With Erin Doherty, Emma Corrin, and Fatima Bojang
Emmy Predictions: Supporting Actor (Limited/TV Movie) — Will 'Adolescence' Young Breakout Star Owen Cooper Make History?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Woman Tattoos 'Scannable' Red Bull Barcode on Her Forearm but Reveals It's Not Actually Her Favorite Drink (Exclusive)
NEED TO KNOW A Swiss woman got a Red Bull barcode tattooed on her forearm — and it works in retail locations across the country At the time, Dew was working retail and had to strategically place the tattoo so she wouldn't accidentally scan it while ringing up customers "I have A LOT of tattoo plans," she shares. "If I had the money, I would be covered all over"Dew, a 22-year-old Swiss woman, quickly went viral on TikTok when she shared a video of herself buying a Red Bull. But instead of scanning the can's barcode, Dew whipped out her upper forearm and scanned her tattoo instead — and sure enough, the sale went through. Now, she's opening up to PEOPLE about the tattoo's functionality and the wide range of opinions it seems to evoke. It started as a joke — Dew, whose hair is dyed purple and whose skin is already populated with tattoos, occasionally encountered rude people who dubbed her appearance as "emo" and asked if she had "barcodes," or scars on her arms. Dew wanted a funny and effective reply to those comments, and thus, she chose the Red Bull barcode. In February 2024, around the time she got the tattoo, Dew was working a retail job and often manned the checkout, she tells PEOPLE. She decided to get the tattoo close to the inside of her elbow, so she could scan it when she wanted but not have to worry about accidentally scanning it while working, she says. Contrary to popular belief, though, Red Bull isn't Dew's favorite caffeine source. "I like Red Bull a lot, [though] I do admit its not my favorite energy drink," she shares. "However, Red Bull is quite silly and I thought this tattoo is silly, so why not?" In terms of function, the bar code does work consistently, and is accepted at retail locations across Switzerland, she revealed in a TikTok following her viral video. Sometimes she has to pull or spread her skin out, but otherwise it's "pretty easily scannable," she says. Her family likes the tattoo, mostly because there's a worm that wraps around the barcode as a fun decoration. She says the worm is actually inspired by a "silly doodle" that her sister once made that she adapted to fit in with the tattoo. Her friends are supportive for the most part, while others see the choice as "a bit insane." In addition to the barcode, Dew also has a tattoo of a screaming alpaca, as well as a lemon with the inscription, "lemonade 100% lemon, 0% sugar, 0% ade, just Lemon." She also has a little "L" on her left thumb and an "R" on her right thumb, plus a Legend of Zelda design and a burning moth. "I have A LOT of tattoo plans," she shares. "If I had the money, I would be covered all over." Read the original article on People
Vox
3 hours ago
- Vox
How The Fellowship of the Ring explains post-9/11 America
When Peter Jackson's epic adaptation of The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring debuted on December 10, 2001, it was considered a likely boondoggle. Hollywood hadn't launched a truly successful fantasy film franchise since the first Star Wars trilogy in the 1970s. If it was going to create one now, the savvy take was that the Harry Potter movies were a better bet, with a more active fan base and a simpler, more movie-friendly plot structure than that boasted by JRR Tolkien's labyrinthine Lord of the Rings trilogy. What's more, Peter Jackson's last major film, 1996's The Frighteners, was a flop. Jackson, Variety wrote at the time, with slight incredulity, 'must have convinced someone that he would do it right.' Vox Culture Culture reflects society. Get our best explainers on everything from money to entertainment to what everyone is talking about online. Email (required) Sign Up By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. Fellowship and its sequels became a template for what Hollywood success would look like over the next two decades. It showed executives that people were eager to see expensive, high-production value adaptations of intellectual property they already knew and loved, and that they would pay well for the privilege. It showed that audiences were willing to put up with a certain amount of lore — even labyrinthine lore — in exchange for high-stakes battles with a little artful CGI to make them look all the more epic. But Fellowship had a special resonance with its audience because of the moment in which it came out: a mere three months after September 11, 2001. It met an American audience ready and eager to throw themselves into the story of an epic battle between good and evil — one that good was definitely going to win. The parallels felt almost too good to be true. It met an American audience ready and eager to throw themselves into the story of an epic battle between good and evil — one that good was definitely going to win. 'With the world newly obsessed with the clash of good and evil, the time would seem to be ideal for 'The Lord of the Rings,'' mused Variety. 'Tolkien's tale of good people who band together against a Dark Lord and his minions has never been more timely than in our troubled age,' declared the New York Post. The Fellowship of the Ring introduced audiences to the peaceful, prosperous Shire, only to show them how its vulnerable borders left it open to attack by the faceless, subhuman hordes of the forces of evil. Tolkien's The Lord of the Rings, with its pacifist hobbit hero, is frequently read as an antiwar tract. But to an American audience that felt newly vulnerable and desperate for revenge, Jackson's Fellowship felt like a perfect allegory for why a 'war on terror' was not just desirable but in fact necessary. Writing in the New York Times in 2002, film critic Karen Durbin ran through the 'accidental echoes' between the Lord of the Rings films and the war on terror: 'Evil or 'Evildoers?' Sauron or Saddam? And how many towers?' The parallels were real. George W. Bush really did vow to rid the world of evil-doers, and Tolkien's characters really do spend a lot of time pontificating on the forces of evil. Incidentally, Lord of the Rings villain Sauron does sound a bit like former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein, and there is an unfortunate echo between the title of Tolkien's second volume, The Two Towers, and the twin towers of the World Trade Center. Even without those echoes, Durbin went on, there was an uncomfortable blurring between the spectacle of the films' battle sequences and military propaganda. 'Dehumanizing the other guy is the first step in training soldiers and fighting wars,' she wrote, decrying Jackson's plentiful scenes of animalistic and terrifying orcs marching on the small, scrappy fellowship. 'The danger is that this is what makes not just warfare palatable but extermination itself.' The interpretation of the whole Lord of the Rings franchise as an allegory of America's war on terror was so pervasive that when The Two Towers came out in 2002, Viggo Mortensen, the actor playing heroic Aragorn, spent a lot of his press tour trying to shut it down. 'I don't think that The Two Towers or Tolkien's writing or our work has anything to do with the United States' foreign ventures,' he said on Charlie Rose, 'and it upsets me to hear that.' (Tolkien, for the record, insisted that his story was 'neither allegorical nor topical' when the books' first audiences wanted to read it as a World War II narrative.) The message embedded in Fellowship would prove more apt as the war on terror went brutally on. In Tolkien's mythology, the ring's power will be misused by a nation that considers itself good just as surely as it will be misused by a group caricatured in the press as evil. No one can resist the corruptive force of pure power. At the time, The Lord of the Rings parallels felt uncanny. Looking back, they betray how difficult it was for anyone in America to see the world through any lens outside of 9/11 at the time — and how seductive it was to imagine oneself as part of a grand conflict that was both ethical and morally pure. The Lord of the Rings offered Americans a vision in which the forces of good, no matter how corruptible, went to war under a white flag, and the forces of evil, no matter how complicated their backstory, went to war under a black flag. It was more than escapist enough for America's bruised and reeling spirit in 2001. We, too, could be Aragorn, heroic and brave and good — and we could make our nemesis into Sauron, too evil even to have a face.
Tom's Guide
5 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
'Alien: Earth' might just be my favorite show of all time — and it proves the franchise is thriving
Hearing we were getting a TV show set in the 'Alien' franchise had me a little worried at first. As a superfan, I've always found the iconic sci-fi horror movies incredibly effective, especially in how much terror they pack into just 90 minutes of claustrophobic space. So, the idea of stretching that into eight hours of content definitely gave me some concerns. But now, having seen the first six episodes, I can confidently say I'm genuinely blown away. I'll admit some of my opinion might be a little biased, but I tried to distance my love for the franchise and be critical of 'Alien: Earth' fairly. Even then, it still blew me away. 'Alien: Earth' is pure sci-fi goodness, wrapped in a smart TV show format that's equal parts character drama and savage horror. There's so much to appreciate here, and showrunner Noah Hawley exceeded all expectations. He clearly knows the franchise inside and out, delivering exactly what fans want from an 'Alien' series. With a flashy marketing campaign (including an exhibit at the Natural History Museum in London) Disney and Hulu clearly want 'Alien: Earth' to be the next big TV event. And I'm not alone in thinking this: my colleague Rory Mellon called it the best new show of the year in his review. Now that 'Alien: Earth' is streaming its first two episodes on Hulu (and Disney Plus in the U.K.), I just have to talk about why it might rank as my No. 1 show of all time, and why you need to stream it right now. Most of the 'Alien' movies follow a group of human characters (plus an android) who come face-to-face with the Xenomorp, with each of them dying one by one until only the final girl remains. 'Alien: Romulus' leans heavily on this concept, and while I still love this format (and wouldn't mind seeing it used in future 'Alien' movies), I'm glad 'Alien: Earth' breaks away from it. Don't get me wrong, in the first two episodes we follow a group of search and rescue soldiers who encounter the Xenomorph aboard the Weyland wreckage (and soon discover exactly what they're up against). Episode 5 takes that format almost entirely, feeling like a 60-minute 'Alien' movie, which was incredible. But for the most part, the series breaks that mold in a really smart way. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. That comes down to its storytelling structure and how Hawley clearly wanted to explore the concept of 'man is the monster' even further. Instead of following characters' traumatic survival on a spaceship, we're introduced to Prodigy, a major Earth-based corporation that, in 2120, is one of five companies governing the planet. Prodigy is another example of corporate greed, led by the ego-inflated, shoe-hating CEO Boy Kavalier, who is very unlikeable (Samuel Blenkin delivers one of the strongest performances). After learning about the Weyland research vessel crashing into his city, he becomes determined to obtain everything on that ship including every species that was caged on board. 'Alien: Earth' strays from the usual movie format by introducing multiple species and showing how organizations like Prodigy constantly hunt for the next big innovation. Instead of characters dying one by one, the group of hybrids in 'Earth' must survive the very organization that created them. Unfortunately, in the process, they encounter several species (and the deadly Xenomorph) under far from ideal circumstances. In essence, 'Alien: Earth' expands the franchise's storytelling from a simple survival horror into a deeper, more layered drama about corporate power, scientific experimentation, and diverse alien threats. It's a remarkable piece of TV. I think any 'Alien' fan will agree that the franchise has always been visually stunning. Even the clean aesthetic of 'Prometheus' was pleasing to look at, alongside the grittiness of 'Romulus' and the rough, gritty look of 'Alien 3' (despite some dodgy special effects). 'Alien: Earth' takes all these elements and meshes them together. We experience the claustrophobic terror of spaceship corridors, the sleek corporate design of scientific labs inside Prodigy's main building, and the fresh addition of the natural setting at the Neverland research facility, which is something new for the franchise. From the very first scene in episode one, it nails the vibe. You could probably guess it's 'Alien' even if you closed your eyes and listened to the sound alone, including the iconic clicking of the computer interface. Every aspect of the TV show screams 'Alien' and I found myself almost jumping with excitement when something recognizable pops up. The set design, haunting music, and satisfying opening title sequences only add to the quality of this incredible series. Most of all, I had so much fun watching 'Alien: Earth,' and I was sad every time an episode ended. Franchise fans will eat it up, and even those who haven't encountered any piece of 'Alien' media can still enjoy this show with no prior knowledge. Hawley does an incredible job setting up the story and characters without relying on lore from the movies. Plus, even though we see 'more Xenomorph on screen,' the design is still incredible. I'm glad they stuck with practical effects for the costumes, especially since other species required special effects. The Xenomorph looks as cool as ever with its flashy silver fangs and dripping drool, and horror fans will especially love how gory things get. This show actually has some pretty shocking scenes, to say the least. Based on the first six episodes, I could easily say 'Alien: Earth' is my favorite show of all time. Maybe. 'The Walking Dead' has been my top show for years and one I've rewatched the most, so it's hard to say anything could truly top that. But 'Alien: Earth' is definitely giving it a run for its money. In fact, I'd fight a Xenomorph barehanded to experience this sci-fi masterpiece again for the first time. The first two episodes of "Alien: Earth" are now streaming on Hulu in the U.S and Disney Plus in the U.K.
