Save $700 Off This Nebula X1 4K Projector and Speaker Bundle at Amazon
Anker's Nebula sub-brand is behind some of our favorite portable projectors, making them the go-to option for people who want to enjoy big-screen content on the go. Now, Amazon is offering a new bundle that includes a projector, stereo wireless speakers and more with a massive $700 off the price you'd normally pay.
Buying this bundle separately would mean handing over almost $4,000, which is a lot of money indeed. Even at $3,298, this isn't what most people would call an impulse purchase. But if you want a portable setup for movies, TV shows and gaming, now is the time to consider placing your order before this deal ends.
The cornerstone of the bundle is, of course, the Nebula X1 4K projector with its 56,000:1 contrast ratio and 3,500 ANSI lumens of brightness. It offers Dolby Vision support and can project an image of up to 300 inches which makes it great for just about anything. It's built to be used outdoors and even comes with a handle so you can carry it around more easily.
Hey, did you know? CNET Deals texts are free, easy and save you money.
While this projector does come with built-in speakers, they can't compare with a proper audio solution. That's why this bundle includes a pair of wireless speakers that offer an extra 160 watts of audio output for a much improved experience. Those speakers are joined by a pair of microphones so you can get your karaoke on, too.
Finally. you'll get a handy carry case that can house all of your new projector gear when you're on the move, so you can be sure that it'll get to your destination in one piece.
Why this deal matters
Projectors have gotten smaller and more portable than ever, and this bundle gets you everything that you need for a great outdoor experience. Whether you're watching the latest blockbuster movie or keeping the kids entertained with their favorite shows, this is a deal that you won't want to miss. It can also make a great Father's Day gift.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
27 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Owned by Google, Fitbit Versa 4 is Now Available at an All-Time Low as Amazon Clears Out Stock
Fitbit is now owned by Google following its acquisition a few years ago, and it has significantly improved its software and products to be the top brand among everyday users looking for a reliable fitness smartwatch. The Fitbit Versa 4 is currently available on Amazon at an all-time low price of $149, down from its list price of $199, and offers a substantial 25% savings for a limited time. See at Amazon Premium Fitness Features The Fitbit Versa 4 integrates premium fitness features with smart features in a polished and slender body. It has a bright 1.58-inch AMOLED display covered with Corning Gorilla Glass 3 for strength and clarity of vision. The device is water-resistant up to 50 meters so people can wear it when they swim or in damp conditions without fear of damage. The aluminum case and elastic strap provide a secure fit for wearing all day long. It really offers a complete fitness-tracking functionality: It has an onboard GPS and GLONASS to track pace and distance correctly without having a phone on one's person. Its users can choose from more than 40 exercise modes including HIIT, yoga, strength training, and running along with auto-exercise detection so that no workout goes unrecorded. The watch also includes 24/7 heart rate monitoring with high or low heart rate alerts to keep users in their target heart rate training zones. The Active Zone Minutes motivates users to stay in their own target heart rate zones, enhancing the effectiveness of workouts. Fitbit Daily Readiness Score which is included with the additional six-month Premium membership makes personalized suggestions to train harder or take a rest day based on recovery. Combined with the Cardio Fitness Score (VO2 Max), the user can utilize these and optimize training for cumulative improvements. Versa 4 also monitors blood oxygen levels at night and during high-altitude training, and skin temperature changes to detect trends that affect health. What's more, it boasts a personalized Sleep Profile, sleep stage percentage breakdowns (light, deep, and REM), and a Sleep Score to allow users to understand and improve their sleep. Its smart wake-up alarm also wakes users at the optimal point in their sleep cycle for better mornings. Furthermore, the watch also includes stress management functionality such as a daily Stress Management Score, guided breathing, and mindfulness content to promote mental well-being. In addition to fitness, the Versa 4 also seeks to improve daily life by making functions like on-wrist Bluetooth calls, text messages, and app messages possible. There is voice response and quick reply for Android users, and Fitbit Pay and Google Wallet enable effortless contactless payments. The watch is also compatible with Amazon Alexa for voice guidance and Google Maps for directions, so it's an all-around companion to workouts as well as regular activity. Battery life is great, with over six days of daily wear time per charge, which removes the frustration of frequent recharging. Combined with its light weight (about 15% lighter and 10% thinner than its predecessor), the Versa 4 is comfortable and easy to wear for prolonged use. Don't miss out, this is a deal similar to last Black Friday's one. See at Amazon
CNET
33 minutes ago
- CNET
HP EliteBook X G1a Review: X Does Not Mark the Spot for This Biz Laptop
7.3 / 10 SCORE HP EliteBook X G1a $1,849 at HP Pros Strong overall performance Solidly built Comfortable keyboard Cons Basic display at elevated price Very pricey to have basic touchpad, too Heavy for a 14-inch laptop HP EliteBook X G1a 7.3/10 CNET Score $1,849 at HP HP's EliteBook X series is the step-down version of the flagship EliteBook Ultra line of the company's commercial laptops, and the EliteBook X G1a is an AMD-based model that cuts corners in a few important areas without a corresponding drop in price. I don't have a problem with the performance of the AMD Ryzen AI processor, which was on the same level as that of the Intel Core Ultra chip of the EliteBook Ultra G1i, but the EliteBook Ultra model I reviewed offers a high-resolution OLED display and trimmer design for nearly the same price. Between the two, the only slightly more expensive EliteBook Ultra G1i is the obvious choice for a 14-inch workhorse business laptop that's also easy to take on the road. HP EliteBook X G1a 14 Price as reviewed $1,849 Display size/resolution 14-inch 1,920x1,200 IPS LCD CPU AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX Pro 375 Memory 32GB LPDDR5-8533 Graphics AMD Radeon 890M Storage 1TB Ports 2 x Thunderbolt 4, USB-C 3.2 Gen 2, USB-A 3.2 Gen 2, HDMI 2.1, combo audio Networking Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 5.4 Operating system Windows 11 Pro 24H2 Weight 3.3 lbs (1.5 kg) There are four quadrants in HP's new EliteBook X series. There are AMD models labeled as G1a and Intel models labeled as G1i. For each half of the processor divide, there are regular laptop models and also two-in-one convertibles with Flip in their name. The EliteBook X G1a here is an AMD-based laptop with a Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 CPU, 32GB of RAM, integrated AMD Radeon 890M graphics and a 1TB SSD. The display is a basic, if bright (I'll get to that shortly), 14-inch IPS LCD with a 1,920x1,200-pixel resolution and standard 60Hz refresh rate. The full price of our test system is $2,629, but it's nearly always on sale for $1,849 or thereabouts. (And sometimes it's just listed at $1,849 with no mention of the higher full price. At any rate, you shouldn't pay more than $1,849 for it.) Higher-end models in the EliteBook X G1a series feature a 2.8K OLED display and 64GB of RAM. An OLED model with otherwise the same configuration as our test system is on sale for $1,999, and I think the display upgrade is well worth the $150 charge. The problem is the EliteBook Ultra G1i that I just looked at features the same 2.8K display (with admittedly a smaller 512GB SSD) and has a consistent sale price between $1,899 and $1,999. Even with the smaller SSD, it's a much better deal because of its superior design. The EliteBook X G1a starts at £1,296 in the UK and AU$3,445 in Australia. Matt Elliott/CNET HP EliteBook X G1a performance The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 processor is a member of AMD's Strix Point family of chips and features 12 cores and 24 virtual processing threads. The EliteBook X G1a turned in excellent multicore performance on our application benchmarks, especially when compared with laptops such as the EliteBook Ultra G1i using processors from Intel's Lunar Lake series, which lack multithreading (or Hyper-Threading, in Intel's parlance). Single-core performance was more even between the two, as was AI performance, but Intel has the advantage in integrated graphics performance. The EliteBook X G1a lasted for nearly 15 hours on our YouTube streaming battery drain test, which is long enough for most people not to need to recharge the laptop during the day but still hours shorter than the 20-plus-hour battery life of Intel- and Qualcomm-based laptops. It lasted a little more than an hour longer than the EliteBook Ultra G1i but has a lower-resolution IPS panel, which doesn't consume battery resources at the same clip as the Ultra's higher-res OLED display, making its slightly longer battery life less impressive. Solidly constructed The EliteBook X G1a is well built, but to the point of feeling a bit tank-like. The all-aluminum enclosure boasts straightforward looks with brushed silver surfaces surrounding a dark gray keyboard. The understated design, gently rounded corners and offset color of the keyboard area recall the styling of a MacBook Pro -- and so does the thickness and weight of the laptop. HP gives the dimensions of the EliteBook X G1a as being 0.4 inches at its front edge and 0.5 inches in back, but it feels fatter than that because it rests on thick rubber feet that make it sit up higher than a MacBook Pro, which has a height of 0.6 inches. The EliteBook X G1a is lighter than the 14-inch MacBook Pro but only slightly. It weighs 3.3 pounds, and the MacBook Pro is 3.4 pounds. The EliteBook Ultra G1i is thinner and much lighter at just 2.6 pounds. Matt Elliott/CNET You can get a 2.8K OLED panel on the EliteBook X G1a, but our test system came with the base display, a 1,920x1,200-pixel IPS panel with a 60Hz refresh rate and no touch support. If your job requires you to read text on the screen for large portions of your day, then you'll get sharper text with the 2.8K panel; text looked a little fuzzy on my test system. And if your job requires color-accurate work, then an OLED panel is a better choice. The EliteBook X G1a's IPS display didn't perform well on my tests with a Spyder X colorimeter. It covered 98% of the sRGB space and only 73% of the P3 and AdobeRGB gamuts. The display's level of brightness saves it from being merely average. In testing, it hit a peak of 465 nits, which, combined with its matte finish, makes it viewable in a variety of lighting conditions, including outdoors. Matt Elliott/CNET The keyboard is my favorite part of the EliteBook X G1a. Perhaps because of the thicker chassis, the keys have a more plush feel than the EliteBook Ultra. Typing on the EliteBook X feels similar to typing on a ThinkPad -- the keys are firm and solid with deep travel. However, the touchpad is another area where the EliteBook X takes a step down from the EliteBook Ultra. It's smaller than the Ultra's and lacks haptics. For a mechanical touchpad, it's fine -- the click response is soft and quiet but not mushy. But at the EliteBook X's price, the inclusion of a haptic touchpad isn't an unreasonable expectation. Matt Elliott/CNET You do get quad speakers like with the EliteBook Ultra, and they sound great. The webcam has a 5-megapixel sensor compared with the EliteBook Ultra's 9-megapixel camera, but the resolution suffices for all but professional streamers, who are almost assuredly using an external camera to produce content. The EliteBook X G1a's webcam produces a crisp, well-balanced image that will have you looking clear and natural to your video-conference mates. The webcam also has an IR cam, which, combined with the fingerprint sensor on the power button, provides two secure biometric login options on the EliteBook X G1a. The port selection is excellent. You get a pair of Thunderbolt 4 ports, split with one on each side of the laptop. There are also two 10Gbps USB ports, one Type-A and one Type-C, along with an HDMI port. You will not go wanting for ports with the EliteBook G1a, and you shouldn't need to bother with any adapters either. Matt Elliott/CNET Is the HP EliteBook X G1a a good laptop? It's a fine business laptop that offers solid performance with solid build quality, but there's not enough of a price gap between it and the EliteBook Ultra to choose it over the flagship model. For only $50 to $150 more (depending on the Ultra's sale price), you get an appreciably lighter design, high-res OLED display and haptic touchpad, all of which aren't included on my $1,849 EliteBook X test system. Sure, you can outfit the EliteBook X with an OLED display, but then the price difference between it and the Ultra all but disappears, making it an even less compelling option. Hide our expert take Photo Gallery 1/1 How we test computers Photo Gallery 1/1 The review process for laptops, desktops, tablets and other computerlike devices consists of two parts: performance testing under controlled conditions in the CNET Labs and extensive hands-on use by our expert reviewers. This includes evaluating a device's aesthetics, ergonomics and features. A final review verdict is a combination of both objective and subjective judgments. The list of benchmarking software we use changes over time as the devices we test evolve. The most important core tests we're currently running on every compatible computer include Primate Labs Geekbench 6, Cinebench R23, PCMark 10 and 3DMark Fire Strike Ultra. A more detailed description of each benchmark and how we use it can be found on our How We Test Computers page. Hide our expert take Geekbench 6 CPU (multi-core) HP EliteBook X G1a 14224 Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7441 13471 Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 12 11919 HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 11032 Lenovo Yoga Slim 9i 14 Gen 10 11029 Asus Zenbook S 14 10948 Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51T-75AF 10918 Note: Longer bars indicate better performance Geekbench 6 CPU (single-core) HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 2777 HP EliteBook X G1a 2729 Lenovo Yoga Slim 9i 14 Gen 10 2728 Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51T-75AF 2701 Asus Zenbook S 14 2681 Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7441 2448 Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 12 2321 Note: Longer bars indicate better performance Cinebench 2024 CPU (multi-core) HP EliteBook X G1a 991 Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7441 739 Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51T-75AF 610 Lenovo Yoga Slim 9i 14 Gen 10 583 HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 518 Asus Zenbook S 14 484 Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 12 488 Note: Longer bars indicate better performance Cinebench 2024 CPU (single-core) HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 123 Asus Zenbook S 14 122 Lenovo Yoga Slim 9i 14 Gen 10 121 Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51T-75AF 121 HP EliteBook X G1a 112 Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7441 109 Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 12 102 Note: Longer bars indicate better performance 3DMark Steel Nomad Asus Zenbook S 14 882 Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51T-75AF 871 HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 820 Lenovo Yoga Slim 9i 14 Gen 10 728 HP EliteBook X G1a 603 Note: Longer bars indicate better performance PCMark 10 Pro Edition HP EliteBook X G1a 7068 HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 6815 Lenovo Yoga Slim 9i 14 Gen 10 6812 Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51T-75AF 6811 Asus Zenbook S 14 6684 Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 12 6178 Note: Longer bars indicate better performance Procyon AI Computer Vision (integer) Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7441 1792 Asus Zenbook S 14 1790 Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51T-75AF 1759 HP EliteBook X G1a 1753 HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 1705 Lenovo Yoga Slim 9i 14 Gen 10 1585 Note: Longer bars indicate better performance Online streaming battery drain test Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7441 23:11 Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51T-75AF 22:13 Asus Zenbook S 14 15:20 HP EliteBook X G1a 14:50 HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 13:39 Lenovo Yoga Slim 9i 14 Gen 10 13:27 Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 12 8:34 Note: Longer bars indicate better performance
CNET
34 minutes ago
- CNET
Beyond the Hype: J.D. Power Customer Satisfaction Survey Confirms 5G Internet Might Be Here to Stay
Since its widespread launch in 2019, 5G home internet has become a staple in many urban homes and a viable solution for rural connectivity. While I generally tout a 'fiber-first' mindset when recommending cost-efficient, reliable high-speed internet options, 5G has often surpassed my expectations, and consumers seem to think so, too. J.D. Power data from 2024 and 2025 suggests that customers prefer fixed wireless internet, specifically 5G or 4G LTE, over both fiber and cable internet. The report finds that even while adoption has grown to nearly 12 million subscribers, a 47% increase since last year, customer satisfaction has remained stable in the past two years. J.D. Power Technology, Media & Telecom Intelligence Report June 2025 That's a significant achievement, even if subscribers are still in the 'honeymoon phase,' as Carl Lepper, senior director of the technology, media and telecommunications intelligence practice at J.D. Power, writes in the report. 'I think there's a bit of a halo effect,' Lepper told me. 'I do think there are a lot of people who were early adopters who loved it because it gave them an option they didn't have, and it gave them a price point they didn't have before.' That echoes the thoughts of a former CNET colleague, Rick Broida, who tested T-Mobile's 5G home internet service in 2021 and concluded, 'Imperfection is a lot more tolerable when you're paying less than half what you were before.' Locating local internet providers As more consumers sign up for 5G internet, the fact that the 5G home internet services continue to receive high marks is impressive. The American Customer Satisfaction Index also affirms customer satisfaction with 5G, with scores for non-fiber providers trending upwards. In contrast, fiber scores remained stagnant, and for the first time, T-Mobile 5G Home Internet tied with AT&T Fiber for first place overall. As an industry, broadband receives pretty low customer satisfaction scores overall, and it's not hard to see why. Everything from navigating confusing marketing lingo, dealing with sales-forward customer service and paying expensive monthly bills makes for a frustrating internet user experience. Plus, if you have an unreliable internet connection, it may not seem like you're getting the most out of your money. A recent CNET survey found that 63% of US adults are paying, on average, $195 more for their internet service than last year. J.D. Power Technology, Media & Telecom Intelligence Report April 2024 As an internet solution for rural communities without the luxury of fiber internet or the infrastructure of cable networks, 5G is an increasingly appealing alternative, especially over DSL, slower fixed wireless internet and satellite internet. Recent FCC data shows that the nation's biggest 5G provider, T-Mobile, covers 64% of households nationwide, and a significant portion of its coverage is rural. 'Is it a better product than fiber? Absolutely not,' Lepper said. 'No one would say it is, but it's hitting all the other buttons just right.' 5G may not always be consistent, but it's getting better J.D. Power uses several metrics to gauge customer satisfaction with broadband, the most notable being the level of trust an internet user has with an ISP. Fixed wireless internet is generally more unreliable than fiber internet since it's more susceptible to congestion and requires proximity to a tower and good weather conditions. However, it has substantially improved over the years. Former CNET writer Eli Blumenthal switched from Spectrum to Verizon 5G and hands-on tested T-Mobile 5G and AT&T Internet Air. While Blumenthal didn't get consistent gigabit speeds with any provider, each connection handled the stress of heavy bandwidth tasks from multiple users just fine. In that vein, I'll note that CNET router expert and broadband writer Joe Supan spent a week testing AT&T Internet Air in his apartment in Seattle and found the speeds sorely lagging -- they barely passed 10Mbps down. Still, while Supan's experience emphasizes the potential inconsistencies of 5G internet, AT&T Internet Air is a preferred alternative to AT&T's legacy DSL network and is much easier to install in rural communities than fiber. Additionally, while fiber providers often emphasize lightning-fast speeds, that speed only gets you so far. Depending on your internet usage and the number of devices in your home, you probably don't need more than 100 or 300Mbps of download speed. Equipment upgrades from T-Mobile 5G Home Internet have allowed the provider to boost speed maximums to 415Mbps down. That's quite an improvement from when T-Mobile 5G Home Internet first debuted in 2021. Broida was one of the earliest adopters of the service, and he saw max speeds of 132Mbps down and a low speed of 6.8Mbps, but those average speeds were still more than fine to get through the work day. In fact, you probably won't be able to tell the difference between 300Mbps of download speed and 1,000Mbps of download speed. What you can pick up on, however, is latency, lag and congestion. The true measure of a good internet connection is it's overall reliability, and if this latest batch of high customer approval ratings for the service suggests anything, it's that 5G has some staying power. What's next for 5G? The promise and convenience of 5G lie in the fact that mobile network operators can use the same technology powering our phones to get us online at home. But that technology has some limitations, like the amount of licensed spectrum, for example. 'There is a finite amount of spectrum,' Alex Roytblat, vice president of worldwide regulatory affairs at the Wi-Fi Alliance, told me in a previous interview. 'It's like real estate.' Major 5G internet providers Verizon, AT&T and T-Mobile 5G Home Internet use a mixture of frequency bands, such as millimeter-wave, low-band and midband 5G spectrums, to optimize customer experience. 'The higher in frequency you go, the more challenging it becomes to propagate the signal,' Roytblat said. 'The attenuation of the signal becomes greater as the frequency increases.' Concerns of spectral efficiency, or the limits to what information we can transmit in a communication channel, are also at play in the effectiveness of 5G. In fact, due to 'network capacity,' T-Mobile 5G Home Internet has a waitlist of around 1 million people. After covering the broadband industry for nearly two decades, Lepper is optimistic about how 5G technology will evolve in the hands of today's major mobile network operators. 'I'm always amazed how much control the industry has over the new technology, and what's next is already ready to go,' Lepper said. 'I think 5G has been extremely well-marketed.' Telecoms like Huawei and Bell Canada have successfully tested new technology to improve spectral efficiency. In February, Verizon 5G achieved record-breaking upload speeds of 480Mbps, mainly due to the newly opened 6-GHz band. 'The MNOs [mobile network operators] of the world have such a strong network that is impressive now,' said Lepper. 'When it taps out, will they have the next thing ready to go? Absolutely.'
