logo
UN and the stalled two-state solution for Palestine and Israel

UN and the stalled two-state solution for Palestine and Israel

The Sun3 days ago
UNITED NATIONS: The United Nations has played a central role in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict since its 1947 partition plan, which sought to divide British-mandate Palestine into Jewish and Arab states.
While Israel accepted the resolution, Arab states and Palestinians rejected it, leading to war and the displacement of 760,000 Palestinians—an event known as the Nakba, or 'catastrophe.'
In 1967, after the Six-Day War, the UN Security Council passed Resolution 242, calling for Israel's withdrawal from occupied territories.
However, ambiguities in the resolution's wording left its implementation unclear.
By 1974, the UN General Assembly recognized Palestinian self-determination and granted the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) observer status.
The 1993 Oslo Accords, brokered outside the UN, marked a significant peace effort, establishing Palestinian autonomy and the Palestinian Authority.
Yet, UN decisions on Palestine have often hinged on U.S. influence. Since 1972, the U.S. has vetoed over 30 resolutions to shield Israel, though it occasionally abstains, as seen in 2016 when the Security Council condemned Israeli settlements.
In 2011, Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas sought full UN membership, but U.S. opposition stalled the bid.
Instead, the General Assembly granted Palestine 'non-member observer state' status in 2012. A renewed 2024 membership push was again blocked by a U.S. veto.
Despite this, 142 UN members recognize Palestine, and recent Assembly rulings have expanded Palestinian participation rights. - AFP
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mideast studies in US in crossfire of Trump-Harvard fight
Mideast studies in US in crossfire of Trump-Harvard fight

New Straits Times

time25 minutes ago

  • New Straits Times

Mideast studies in US in crossfire of Trump-Harvard fight

THE issue of academic research on the Middle East has become a political flashpoint in the United States, where critics of Israel allege a "Palestine exception" exists when it comes to free speech rights. Case in point, recently a special edition of the prestigious Harvard Educational Review (HER) was in the works, entirely dedicated to the hot-button issue of the Palestinians – the articles had been painstakingly written, edited and approved. But authors said they received an unusual demand for a final readout by lawyers, which soon derailed their efforts. The publisher's stunning late-stage decision to scrap the entire edition reflects the overheated political climate in the US where academic research on the Middle East has attracted accusations of so-called "wokeism" and "anti-Semitism" from President Donald Trump, as conflict rages in the region. The edition began taking shape when, in March 2024 – six months after the October 7 Hamas attacks on Israel and the Israeli reprisals in the Gaza Strip – the renowned Harvard publication called for papers for a special issue on "Education and Palestine." Anthropologist Thea Abu El-Haj and her colleagues submitted a paper on "scholasticide," a term describing the destruction of an education system, like in Gaza, with reference to the experience of Palestinian teachers during the Lebanese Civil War between 1975 and 1990. But then the authors received phone calls informing them that the text would have to be submitted to Harvard's Office of the General Counsel for a "risk assessment." "I have been publishing for decades in academic journals – including HER twice –and I have never been asked for this kind of review," said El-Haj, a professor at Columbia University's Barnard College. After the authors objected to "censorship," the director of Harvard Education Press Jessica Fiorillo, told the authors the special issue had been cancelled in its entirety. Fiorillo denied "censorship" in a memo to the authors, seen by AFP, blaming inadequate review because the editors insisted on limiting the publisher's involvement to copyediting – without touching the "politically charged content." "The only explanation that makes sense to me is that this is another instance of what has been called the 'Palestine exception' to free speech," said El-Haj, accusing Harvard of not upholding free speech while proclaiming to champion it amid its fight with Trump. Since returning to power, Trump has accused prestigious US universities of anti-Semitism for failing to protect Jewish students during protests against Israel's war in Gaza. In an escalating war of attrition against Harvard, Trump sought to cut more than US$2.6 billion of funding to the Ivy League university, while seeking to block entry of international students – a quarter of its enrolment. Harvard said it had strengthened measures to protect Jewish and Israeli students while fighting the government's measures in court. "The chilling climate for scholarly inquiry about Palestine at Harvard (and beyond) has been difficult for some time. Faculty, staff, and students have understandably felt a generalised cloud of fear and anxiety," Margaret Litvin, an Arabic literature professor at Boston University, told AFP. At the start of the year, Harvard also adopted a definition of anti-Semitism used by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA). That definition is contested, however, as critics argue it may prevent criticism of Israel. That distinction appears to be at the heart of the furor over the "education and Palestine" edition of the HER, said Chandni Desai, a University of Toronto professor, who was supposed to pen an article for the journal. Harvard University did not comment. The submitted articles would "likely fail" to have passed the IHRA definition test because "all the pieces are critical of Israel," Desai said. "We've never seen an entire special issue collection being cancelled – especially after... contracts have been signed and reviews and revisions done."

Finland marks 50 years of Helsinki Accords amid Ukraine war tensions
Finland marks 50 years of Helsinki Accords amid Ukraine war tensions

The Sun

time25 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Finland marks 50 years of Helsinki Accords amid Ukraine war tensions

HELSINKI: Finland on Thursday hosts a conference marking 50 years since the signing of the Helsinki Final Act, a landmark agreement on respecting borders and territorial integrity. The event takes place amid heightened tensions following Russia's invasion of Ukraine, which has severely tested the principles enshrined in the 1975 accord. Keynote speakers include Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, though both will deliver their remarks remotely. Finnish Foreign Minister Elina Valtonen, the current OSCE Chairperson-in-Office, will open the conference. Russia confirmed its participation but will not send high-level representatives. Foreign ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova stated, 'Russia does not see the expediency of participating at a high political level,' though representatives will still engage in discussions. The Helsinki Final Act, signed by 35 nations including the US and Soviet Union, established the OSCE and enshrined principles such as sovereignty, non-use of force, and inviolability of borders. These commitments have been undermined by Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine, triggering the worst crisis in OSCE history. Ukraine has repeatedly called for Russia's expulsion from the OSCE, though Moscow remains a member. In 2024, Russian lawmakers voted to suspend participation in the OSCE parliamentary assembly, calling it discriminatory. Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andriy Sybiga, attending the conference, will hold talks with Finnish President Alexander Stubb and other officials. Discussions will focus on 'synchronising allied pressure on Moscow,' according to Ukraine's foreign ministry. Finland, which closed its 1,340-kilometre border with Russia in late 2023 over alleged migrant orchestration by Moscow, remains a key player in regional security discussions. – AFP

Trump says Canada's Palestine statehood stance may hurt trade deal
Trump says Canada's Palestine statehood stance may hurt trade deal

Free Malaysia Today

timean hour ago

  • Free Malaysia Today

Trump says Canada's Palestine statehood stance may hurt trade deal

Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney said that Canada plans to recognise the State of Palestine at a UN meeting in September. (AP pic) WASHINGTON : US President Donald Trump said today that it will be difficult to make a trade deal with Canada after the country announced it is backing Palestinian statehood. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Carney announced yesterday that Canada is planning to recognise the State of Palestine at a meeting of the UN in September. Canada's announcement follows France and Britain in recognising a Palestinian state. Israel and its closest ally, the US, both rejected Carney's statements. Canada and the US are working on negotiating a trade deal by Aug 1, the date Trump is threatening to impose a 35% tariff on all Canadian goods not covered by the US-Mexico-Canada trade agreement. Carney said yesterday that tariff negotiations with the US President Donald Trump's administration have been constructive, but the talks may not conclude by the deadline.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store