
Margot Friedlaender, Germany's voice of Holocaust remembrance
NEW YORK - German Holocaust survivor Margot Friedlaender, who has died at the age of 103, won plaudits at home and abroad for her tireless efforts to foster reconciliation and understanding.
Born and raised in Berlin, Friedlaender's family were among the hundreds of thousands of Jews killed by the Nazis at Auschwitz over the course of World War II.
Friedlander herself was interned at the camp in Theresienstadt in the modern-day Czech Republic, but survived the end of the war and emigrated to the United States.
The death of her husband, Adolf Friedlaender, and a memoir writing course at a community centre in New York propelled her back to her hometown.
Friedlander's prodigal return to Germany, where she dedicated herself to sharing her story with young people, made her one of the most prominent witnesses to the horrors of Adolf Hitler's regime.
For her work promoting historical memory, she was given awards and showered by praise from political leaders from both sides of the Atlantic.
"Perhaps the generation now that hears me in schools will say something to their children. I have no idea how far that will go," Friedlaender told German broadcaster ARD in 2021.
Friedlaender preached for mutual empathy as an antidote to the world's evils.
"Don't look at what separates you. Look at what unites you. Be human. Be reasonable," she said in 2024.
- 'Try to make your life' -
Born Margot Bendheim in 1921 to a family of button makers, young Margot had trained as a fashion illustrator.
The family had lived through Hitler's rise to power and witnessed the Kristallnacht pogroms against Jewish businesses in 1938 but remained in Berlin.
Friedlaender was 21 in 1943 when the Nazi secret police, the Gestapo, came for her 17-year-old brother Ralph.
Arriving home, Friedlaender spotted a stranger by the entrance to their building. The young girl covered her Jewish Star of David, passed the man and knocked on a neighbour's door.
Soon after, she learnt that her brother had been taken and her mother, Auguste Bendheim, had turned herself in to the police to be by her son. She left Friedlaender a note: "Try to make your life."
The invocation would stay with Friedlaender, as would the amber necklace left to her by her mother.
Auguste Bendheim and brother Ralph were deported to Auschwitz and killed. Friedlaender's father, she would learn much later, was also murdered in the gas chambers at the camp.
Friedlaender lived for more than a year in the underground, dying her hair red, submitting to nasal surgery to appear less Jewish.
The people who protected her "risked everything to share a bed or their food with me", she told the Hamburger Abendblatt in 2010.
Eventually, she was stopped and asked for her papers. Friedlaender confessed to her Jewish identity and was deported to Theresienstadt.
- 'Stay careful' -
At the concentration camp, she found Adolf Friedlaender, who she had known through the Jewish community in Berlin. After the Red Army liberated the camp in 1945, he asked her to marry him.
A year later, the couple emigrated to the United States and settled in the New York borough of Queens. Adolf worked for Jewish organisations in the city, while Margot worked as a seamstress and a travel agent.
AFP | JOHN MACDOUGALL
In 1997, Adolf passed away and Friedlaender began taking classes at the 92nd Street Y, where he had worked, including a memoir writing course.
At the centre, she met the German producer Thomas Halaczinsky, who, on hearing her recollections, wanted to return with Friedlaender to Berlin to film a documentary.
Friedlaender returned to Germany in 2003 for the first time since she left, a step her husband had never been willing to contemplate. The resulting documentary was released in 2004 and her autobiography, whose title reused her mother's words, was published in 2008.
In 2010 at the age of 88, Friedlaender decided to move permanently to Berlin and recovered her German citizenship.
"I only got back what belonged to me," she said at the time.
After her improbable return home, Friedlaender became a voice of moral authority in a country still trying to make amends for the atrocities of the Nazis.
AFP | John MACDOUGALL
Friedlaender was garlanded with awards, including Germany's federal order of merit, and graced the cover of the German edition of fashion magazine Vogue in 2024.
On a visit to Berlin, then US President Joe Biden emotionally told the survivor of the Holocaust he was "actually honoured to be in your presence".
In Germany, she dedicated herself to speaking to young people, touring schools and answering questions on her life.
"I don't want to know what people's parents or grandparents did," Friedlaender told German weekly Die Zeit around her centenary.
"I concentrate on telling them: stay careful, watch that something like that never happens again. Not for me, but for yourselves."
Her last public engagement was just a few days before her death, at Berlin city hall, to mark the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II.
"Be human! That is what I ask you to do: be human!," she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Maverick
4 days ago
- Daily Maverick
Chief Rabbi Goldstein abuses legal and religious concepts in attack on Ramaphosa
On 21 May 2025, President Donald Trump's Oval Office was yet again turned into the set of a reality television show livestreamed into the homes of many millions of viewers all over the world. The meeting between the US president and South Africa's President Cyril Ramaphosa quickly shifted gear from the initial pleasantries to spectacular political theatre as Trump played video material purporting to be evidence of a 'white genocide' in South Africa. This included footage of Julius Malema in a packed football stadium chanting 'Kill the Boer, kill the farmer' and a 'cemetery with 1,000 white crosses' that turned out to be a memorial commemorating the murder of two farmers. As this political theatre was taking place in the White House, a real-time genocide was unfolding in Gaza with Israel's relentless bombardment, its humanitarian blockade of food, water and medical aid and its refusal to comply with international court rulings. In the face of these developments, and an intensification of international pressure and criticism of Israel, South Africa's chief rabbi, Warren Goldstein, decided it was time to respond. In his Facebook video message Goldstein accused Ramaphosa of many things, including allowing a 'South African genocide' to take place. Although the chief rabbi refrained from using the term 'white genocide', and acknowledged that all South Africans are victims of violent crime, he appeared to endorse the key talking points of Trump's Maga movement and South African right-wing, white nationalist agendas. This played right into the accusations of 'white genocide' plied by right-wing Afrikaner organisations to discredit the South African government's transformation policies, especially its land reform and employment equity programmes. But the chief rabbi went much further than these white nationalists. In his relentless attack on the South African President, he insisted that the 'shame' and 'humiliation' that Ramaphosa had experienced in the Oval Office on 21 May 2025 was 'divine retribution' for South Africa's genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice (ICJ). This is how the chief rabbi described how God choreographed what happened in the White House meeting: 'As I watched the White House spectacle unfold, as I watched President Ramaphosa literally squirm in his seat, visibly uncomfortable, humiliated, as President Trump accused him of genocide in his own country, I couldn't help but think, I'm not a prophet and I do not presume to know the will of God, and yet the thought kept crossing my mind – this moment, this humiliation, felt biblical. It felt like divine retribution. It felt like justice for a different earlier sin. 'Because Ramaphosa and the ANC stood on a different international stage and falsely accused the Jewish state, the State of Israel, of genocide, a lie, a libel, a defamation of an entire nation. And now, in front of the whole world, they themselves are being accused of genocide. This time a true genocide demonstrated by the cold, brutal facts of a murder rate spiralling out of control. The blood of countless victims on their hands and their total inability to protect South Africans of any race or background.' In this wide-ranging video message Goldstein held Ramaphosa personally accountable for Malema's chants of 'Kill the Boer, kill the farmer', claiming that he 'has never publicly condemned the chant as hate speech, not even in the Oval Office when he had every opportunity and motive to do so'. This was followed by an assault on the South African Constitutional Court for not ruling that Malema's chants are hate speech: 'This judgment casts a shadow on the integrity and legacy of the Constitutional Court and makes a mockery of their role as the guardians of human rights in South Africa.' Although the violent crime statistics in South Africa are truly shocking, Goldstein's claims of a 'South African genocide' radically dilutes and relativises the legal definition and meaning of the term. This constitutes a dangerous trivialisation of genocidal catastrophes, including the Holocaust. It thereby threatens to undermine the very precise meaning of genocide, a concept which was introduced into international law after the Holocaust by Raphael Lemkin, a Jewish Polish lawyer. Lemkin's concept helped establish the 1948 Genocide Convention, which legally defines the act of genocide. As the son of a German Jewish refugee whose entire family was murdered in Auschwitz and Riga, I appreciate the importance of Lemkin's precise definition of genocide. Using the notion of a 'South African genocide' to refer to a violent crime crisis undermines this precision. Most international law experts would agree that Hamas perpetrated horrific war crimes against civilians in Israel on 7 October 2023. At the same time, there is currently a growing consensus among Holocaust and genocide scholars that the Israeli military is indeed perpetrating genocide in Gaza. This assessment draws on the very specific criteria that Lemkin used to define the crime of genocide which, according to the Genocide Convention, consists of any of five 'acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group'. These acts include killing members of the group, causing them serious bodily or mental harm, imposing living conditions intended to destroy the group, preventing births and forcibly transferring children out of the group. In terms of this very precise definition, genocide is a crime of special intent (dolus specialis) that deliberately targets a protected group. How can the unacceptably high violent crime levels that impact on all South Africans possibly constitute genocide in terms of this definition? Just as legal concepts need to be used with precision, one would also expect that the use of religious concepts needs to meet stringent definitions. It is therefore surprising to discover the flagrant abuse of religious concepts by the chief rabbi when he claimed that the shame and humiliation experienced by Ramaphosa in the White House was 'divine retribution' for an earlier sin – taking Israel to the ICJ. I will quote a lengthy passage from the video that conveys the lengths to which the chief rabbi was prepared to go to stretch the meanings of both 'genocide' and biblical notions of divine justice: '… It felt like what our sages called Midah Keneged Midah, measure for measure, a precise justice, a reckoning. And as that thought took hold, another verse came to mind. I kept hearing the words of Genesis in 12:3: 'Those who bless you will be blessed, and those who curse you will be cursed.' 'President Ramaphosa and the ANC cursed Israel, and now it feels as though they are being cursed. You can feel it in the air, in the sense of decay and despair, you can feel the weight of a divine curse settling on this Presidency… In the heavenly court, you will stand accused of presiding over the human suffering of all those who were murdered on your watch. The King of All Kings will ask you what you did to stop the carnage, the genocide… and you will be held eternally accountable for every moment of human suffering you caused through your callous neglect, through your omissions and commissions…' What is happening here? Why is the chief rabbi, the spiritual leader of South African Jews, so brazenly abusing the specific definitions and meanings of legal and religious concepts to denounce the President and the Constitutional Court? Is it simply to score political points? How will such divisive speech, which is uttered on behalf of the whole Jewish community, make Jews any more secure in South Africa? It is quite conceivable that the chief rabbi – like so many other defenders of Israel's actions in Gaza – is becoming increasingly defensive and desperate as international public opinion and Western governments become more critical of Israel's actions in Gaza. The chief rabbi's false and unconsidered accusations and condemnations appear to be a radical displacement and distraction from the horrific realities of a genocide unfolding daily in Gaza. DM

IOL News
4 days ago
- IOL News
The world needs peace, stability and security
Mohamed Sabry Soliman allegedly used incendiary devices to torch protesters rallying in support of Israeli hostages, injuring at least eight people in the US state of Colorado Image: AFP A few weeks ago, when the world focused on South Africa's Cyril Ramaphosa's visit to his counterpart, Donald Trump, in the Oval Office, two staffers from the Israeli embassy in the US lost their lives most brutally. Some happy-trigger Elias Rodriguez shot dead Sarah Milgrim and Yaron Lischinsky as they were leaving the event at the Capital Jewish Museum in downtown Washington, DC. It is reported that the couple were to be engaged, tragic ending for the lovely young couple. This past Sunday, another tragic shooting targeting Jews took place in America. This time in Colorado, where a suspect made it clear that he was shooting as a sign of solidarity with the people of Gaza, the Palestinian Territories. Mohamed Sabry Soliman was charged this week with one hate crime charge by the federal prosecutors. Rodriguez was not showing any remorse from the beginning as he was being arrested by the FBI, as he kept on shouting ''Free, Free Palestine'', and he made it clear that he killed the duo as a means of advancing the struggle for the Palestinians by killing two innocent staffers. The offence constitutes a hate crime against the Jewish community and acts of terrorism. He told the authorities, 'I did it for Palestine, I did it for Gaza'. What is clear is that Rodriguez did not know whether his victims were Jews or not, but what he fully understood was that they were from a Jewish event, and that was his target. This horrific incident, which took place some 6000 miles away from the actual war zone in Gaza, sent shockwaves throughout the world, especially to the Jewish communities whose safety and security are of priority to them at the moment. The South African Jewish Board of Deputies (SAJBD) National Director, Wendy Kahn, stated that this attack underscored the ongoing vulnerability of Jewish communities around the world. 'Antisemitism across the world has increased, including in South Africa, where we are seeing more attacks on our community members, including physical assault. It is for this reason that the SAJBD takes seriously all acts of incitement, and we call out every politician and thought-leader that has used the tragic war between Israel and Hamas as an opportunity to demonise the Jewish community,' Kahn said. Political and thought leaders must avoid any verbal provocation or instigation of violence against the Jewish community or any other community, for that matter. We have seen some incidents where prominent politicians would instigate violence against the Jewish community for example, more recently on May 14, 2025, the Economic Freedom FIghter (EFF) member of parliament, Nazier Paulsen, posten on X (formerly Twitter), 'Shoot the Zionists!'. Again on the same day, May 14, 2025, the City of Joburg MMC for community development, a councillor from the Pan Africanist Congress, Tebogo Nkokou, threatened during the heated council meeting to wear a Hitler T-shirt in protest against the pro-Israel DA councillor. For those who understand the world history, Adolf Hitler became the German chancellor in 1933 and started to enact laws targeting Jews (stripping them off their properties) and eliminating them in what would be known today as Holocaust where a total of more than 6 million people were killed, mostly Jews and other minority groups. All countries should be careful of these kind of incidents as they may spread due to intention of others to 'globalize intifada', that is to millitarise people across the world on the notion that by hating or carrying out violence against the Jewish people it will be a symbol of support to the Palestinians and attack against Israel. The world needs peace, stability and security to address socio-economic challenges such as hunger, energy poverty, unemployment, environmental crisis, crime and corruption, HIV/AIDS and many others. It is impossible to address all these challenges when a country is in the middle of a war or conflict. Governments throughout the world should call for peace and help to restore it, and not become part of the conflict which has affected the livelihoods of the people. Kenneth Moeng Mokgatlhe Joburg


Mail & Guardian
5 days ago
- Mail & Guardian
Apartheid, crimes against humanity: How the law remembers the past
Members of the Black Sash and Movement for Colonial Freedom and the Black march to South Africa House in London to deliver a memorandum to South African prime minister JG Strijdom. Photo: ulton-Deutsch Collection/Corbis/Getty Images In May 1945, the world marked the end of World War II. This was a pivotal historical moment that reshaped the world order and profoundly influenced the development of international human rights frameworks. This was a period that acutely exposed the catastrophic consequences of unchecked state power, genocide and war crimes. The 80th anniversary offers a moment to reflect on how societies remember the past and how those memories shape the present and future. For South Africa, a country with its own complex history of injustice, this anniversary provides an opportunity to examine the role of law in shaping collective memory and advancing justice. Law is not just a mechanism for resolving disputes or enforcing rules; it is also a tool for remembering. Legal frameworks, court rulings and public policies often reflect how a society chooses to acknowledge its past. In South Africa, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) stands as a prime example of how the law can be used to confront historical injustices. The TRC sought to document the atrocities of apartheid, offering victims a platform to share their stories while promoting national healing. This year's anniversary is especially monumental as it marks both the end of World War II and the Nuremberg Trials, which were the first military tribunals set up a few months after the end of war. For the first time in history, military and political leaders were prosecuted. Prominent leaders of Nazi Germany were prosecuted for war crimes, crimes against humanity and crimes against peace. These trials set a long-lasting precedent globally that regardless of rank, political influence or even state authority, individuals can be held personally responsible and account for their role in gross human rights violations. Nuremberg's retributive approach to the violation of human rights laid the foundation for international criminal law as we know it today. It has embedded the concept of justice as a fundamental component of post-conflict recovery. The defining shift in historical legal frameworks — such as the formation of the United Nations, Geneva Conventions and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights — were symbolic of the global reckoning that followed WWII. This shift in the role of law was also a demonstration of law as not just a mechanism to exert control but an instrument of memory. Beyond its adjudicative function, the law serves as a repository of collective moral judgment. The function of the law is not limited to passing judgments, it sets precedents, holding a determining power on what we as post-trauma nations choose to remember and what we are not only willing to forget but allow to happen. But the work of memory is ongoing. In South Africa, the TRC laid a foundation, but many argue that its promises of justice and reparations remain unfulfilled. The law must continue to evolve to address these gaps, ensuring that the past is not forgotten but serves as a guide for building a more equitable future. In 2021, the high court in Johannesburg made a ruling of paramount importance on the history of injustice. The ruling was about the From this perspective, the recent ruling marks a potentially groundbreaking shift in global justice. Not only does it re-open doors to truth-telling and accountability within contexts once thought closed, it also makes possible the idea of extending prosecutions to economic crimes that were direct beneficiaries of systematic racial oppression. Similar to post-war reparations in Germany, where victims of Nazi prosecutions were compensated and acknowledged, South Africa may reckon with the country's renewed calls of redress. Law is similar to history in that it is a narrative and repository of events that happened in the past. The inability or failure of the courts to uphold justice in the face of violations — whether because of procedural injustice, institutional inertia or politicised fear — then risks inaction and legal silence turning into national amnesia. The 80th anniversary of WWII reminds us that the past is never truly behind us. For South Africa, the law must serve as both a mirror and a map — reflecting the injustices of history while charting a path toward a more just and inclusive society. By learning from global and local experiences, South Africa can continue to use the law as a powerful tool for memory, accountability and transformation. Letlhogonolo Mokgoroane is a legal practitioner at the Johannesburg Society of Advocates and part-time in-house counsel at the Centre for Applied Legal Studies, University of the Witwatersrand. Tebelelo Lentsoane is a research and policy consultant and civic education practitioner.